The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2022 Update on Outcomes and Research

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2023 Update on Outcomes and Research

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (GTSD) continues its trajectory of growth and enhancement, solidifying its stature as a premier global thoracic surgical database. The past year witnessed a notable expansion with the inclusion of 10 additional participating sites, now totaling 287, augmenting the database's repository to more than 800,000 procedures. A significant stride was made in refining the data audit process, thereby elevating the accuracy and completeness metrics, a testament to the relentless pursuit of data integrity. The GTSD further broadened its research apparatus, with 15 scholarly publications, a 50% uptick from the preceding year. These publications underscore the database's instrumental role in advancing thoracic surgical knowledge. In a concerted effort to alleviate data entry exigencies, the GTSD Task Force also instituted streamlined data submission protocols, a move lauded by participant sites. This report delineates the recent advancements, volume trajectories, and outcome metrics and encapsulates the prolific research output emanating from the GTSD, reflecting a year of substantial progress and academic fecundity.

Lobectomy, segmentectomy, or wedge resection for peripheral clinical T1aN0 non-small cell lung cancer: A post hoc analysis of CALGB 140503 (Alliance)

BACKGROUND

We have recently reported the primary results of CALGB 140503 (Alliance), a randomized trial in patients with peripheral cT1aN0 non-small cell lung cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer seventh) treated with either lobar resection (LR) or sublobar resection (SLR). Here we report differences in disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) between LR, segmental resection (SR), and wedge resection (WR). We also report differences between WR and SR in terms of surgical margins, rate of locoregional recurrence (LRR), and expiratory flow rate at 6 months postoperatively.

METHODS

Between June 2007 and March 2017, a total of 697 patients were randomized to LR (n = 357) or SLR (n = 340) stratified by clinical tumor size, histology, and smoking history. Ten patients were converted from SLR to LR, and 5 patients were converted from LR to SLR. Survival endpoints were estimated using the Kaplan-Maier estimator and tested by the stratified log-rank test. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare margins and changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) between groups, and the χ2 test was used to test the associations between recurrence and groups.

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients had LR, 131 had SR, and 204 had WR. Basic demographic and clinical and pathologic characteristics were similar in the 3 groups. Five-year DFS was 64.7% after LR (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.6%-70.1%), 63.8% after SR (95% CI, 55.6%-73.2%), and 62.5% after WR (95% CI, 55.8%-69.9%) (P = .888, log-rank test). Five-year OS was 78.7% after LR, 81.9% after SR, and 79.7% after WR (P = .873, log-rank test). Five-year LCSS was 86.8% after LR, 89.2% after SR, and 89.7% after WR (P = .903, log-rank test). LRR occurred in 12% after SR and in 14% after WR (P = .295). At 6 months postoperatively, the median reduction in % FEV1 was 5% after WR and 3% after SR (P = .930).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large randomized trial, LR, SR, and WR were associated with similar survival outcomes. Although LRR was numerically higher after WR compared to SR, the difference was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in the reduction of FEV1 between the SR and WR groups.

Outcomes and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients who underwent curable surgery: a protocol for a real-world, retrospective, population-based and nationwide Chinese National Lung Cancer Cohort (CNLCC) study

INTRODUCTION

Surgery is one of the main approaches for the comprehensive treatment of early and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study conducts a nationwide multicentre study to explore factors that could influence the outcomes of patients with I-IIIA NSCLC who underwent curable surgery in real-world scenarios.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

All patients diagnosed with NSCLC between January 2013 and December 2020 will be identified from 30 large public medical services centres in mainland China. The algorithm of natural language processing and artificial intelligence techniques were used to extract data from electronic health records of enrolled patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria. Six categories of parameters are collected and stored from the electronic records, then the parameters will be structured as a high-quality structured case report form. The code book will be compiled and each parameter will be classified and designated a code. In addition, the study retrieves the survival status and causes of death of patients from the Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. The primary endpoints are overall survival and the secondary endpoint is disease-free survival. Finally, an online platform is formed for data queries and the original records will be stored as secure electronic documents.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Study findings will be disseminated via presentations at conferences and publications in open-access journals. This study has been registered in the Chinese Trial Register (ChiCTR2100052773) on 11 May 2021, http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=136659.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100052773.

Is It Time to Cross the Pillars of Evidence in Favor of Segmentectomies in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

In the debate on lobectomy versus segmentectomy for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), currently, we have reached two pillars of knowledge, like Jachim and Boaz, which have encompassed the actual boundary of the literature published up until now [...]