Low-Dose vs Standard Warfarin After Mechanical Mitral Valve Replacement: A Randomized Trial

Classification of kinesiophobia in patients after cardiac surgery under extracorporeal circulation in China: latent profile and influencing factors analysis from a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential classification of kinesiophobia in patients after cardiac surgery under extracorporeal circulation from a psychosocial perspective, and analyse the characteristic differences among different latent levels of patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a cross-sectional study of Chinese adults after cardiac surgery under extracorporeal circulation, aged 18 years and older, recruited from a tertiary hospital in North China.

METHODS

This study uses latent profile analysis to identify potential classifications of kinesiophobia in questionnaires from 348 patients undergoing cardiac surgery under extracorporeal circulation. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the influencing factors at different latent classifications.

RESULTS

The average performance of each indicator in Model 3 is best suited for analysis, Entropy=0.873 and bootstrap likelihood ratio test (p)＜0.0001. The result of regression equation shows postoperative time (p<0.001), age, self-efficacy, pain and social support level (p<0.05) were the factors influencing the potential profile classification of patients after cardiac surgery under extracorporeal circulation.

CONCLUSION

The study identified three distinct classifications of patients: the low kinesiophobia group, the moderate kinesiophobia-high-risk perceived symptoms group and the high kinesiophobia-high exercise avoidance group (HK-HEAG). Addressing kinesiophobia, especially in older male patients during the early postoperative period, is crucial. Enhancing self-efficacy seems effective in reducing kinesiophobia, while increasing social support may not be as beneficial for the HK-HEAG. These findings provide a basis for implementing preventive interventions in cardiac rehabilitation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The research is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200057895).

Research on rheumatic heart disease from 2013 to early 2024: a bibliometric analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this bibliometric analysis was to highlight potential future areas for the practical application of research on rheumatic heart disease (RHD), considering past and current research efforts.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in the WoSCC to find articles and reviews focused on RHD published between 2013 and 2024. Microsoft Excel 2019 was used to chart the annual productivity of research relevant to RHD, while ArcGIS (version 10.8) was employed to visualize the global distribution of publications. Analysis tools such as CiteSpace (version 6.1.R6) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.18) were utilized to identify the most prolific countries or regions, authors, journals, and resource-, intellectual-, and knowledge-sharing in RHD research, and to perform co-citation analysis of references and keywords. Additionally, the Bibliometrix R Package was used to analyze topic dynamics.

RESULTS

From the search, a total of 2,428 publications were retrieved. In terms of countries or regions, the United States was the most productive country (566, 23.31%). As for institutions, most publications have been contributed by the University of Cape Town (149, 6.14%). Regarding authors, Jonathan R. Carapetis produced the most published works, and he received the most co-citations. The most prolific journal was identified as the International Journal of Cardiology (70, 2.88%). The study published in Circulation received the most co-citations. Keywords with ongoing strong citation bursts included "surgical treatment" and "valvular heart disease".

CONCLUSION

Despite the rapid advancements in the field of RHD research, future efforts should prioritize strengthening collaboration among national institutions to facilitate information dissemination. Current research on RHD mainly focuses on prognosis of patients. While, the emerging research trends in RHD encompass treatment strategies for complications, including atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF), and infective endocarditis, as well as screening strategies for RHD and surgical interventions for patients with rheumatic mitral valve disease.

Midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of a novel mechanical mitral valve prosthesis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the midterm survival, clinical, and hemodynamic outcomes of the On-X mechanical mitral valve, based on the 5-year results of the Prospective Randomized On-X Anticoagulation Clinical Trial (PROACT).

METHOD

PROACT Mitral was a multicenter study evaluating 401 patients who underwent mitral valve replacement (MVR) with either Standard or Conform-X On-X mitral valves, comparing low-dose and standard-dose warfarin. Here we report prespecified secondary outcomes of survival, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification, and valve hemodynamics as assessed by core lab-adjudicated echocardiography at 1, 3, and 5 years in the pooled population.

RESULTS

Actuarial survival was 99.7% at 1 year, 95.1% at 3 years, and 92.4% at 5 years, with no significant difference between the Standard and Conform-X cuffs. Hemodynamic analysis revealed a mean transvalvular pressure gradient (MG) of 4.6 ± 2.0 mm Hg at 1 year, with no interaction between valve size and patient body surface area. MG values were consistent over time. Quality of life improved with 96.6% of patients in NYHA class I or II at the latest available follow-up of 3 or 5 years. There were no significant differences in survival, clinical, or hemodynamic outcomes between valve sizes.

CONCLUSIONS

The On-X mechanical mitral valve demonstrated favorable survival, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced quality of life up to 5 years postimplantation. Derived from high-quality, rigorous randomized trial data, these findings can guide decision making in young patients requiring MVR.

Should mitral valve replacement age guidelines be lowered due to better bioprosthetic mitral valve durability?

OBJECTIVE

Guideline recommendations for mechanical or bioprosthetic valve for mitral valve replacement by age remains controversial. We sought to determine bovine pericardial valve durability by age and risk of reintervention.

METHODS

This retrospective study between 2 large university-based cardiac surgery programs examined patients who underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement from 2004 to 2020. Follow-up was obtained through June 2022. Durability outcomes involving structural valve deterioration were compared by age decile.

RESULTS

Of 1544 available patients, mean age was 66 ± 13 years and 652 (42%) were aged less than 65 years. Indications for mitral valve replacement were as follows: mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ in 53% (n = 813), mitral stenosis in 44% (n = 650), endocarditis in 18% (n = 277), and reoperation in 39% (n = 602). Concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement in 28% (n = 426), tricuspid valve in 36% (n = 550), and coronary artery bypass in 19% (n = 290). Thirty-day mortality was 5.4%. In follow-up (clinical: median [interquartile range] 75 [25-129] months), reoperation for endocarditis and new stroke were low (0.30 and 1.06 per 100 patient/years, respectively). The cumulative incidence of mitral valve reintervention for structural valve deterioration among all patients was 6.2% at 10 years and 9.0% at 12 years with no statistical difference in structural valve deterioration in patients aged 40 to 70 years (P = .1). In 90 patients with mitral valve reintervention, 30-day mortality after reintervention was 4.7% (n = 2) for 43 with mitral valve-in-valve and 6.4% (n = 3) for 47 with reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bovine pericardial mitral valve replacement is a durable option for younger patients. The opportunity to avoid anticoagulation and the associated risks with mechanical mitral valve replacement may be of benefit to patients. These insights may provide data needed to revise the current guidelines.

Optimizing Anticoagulation in Valvular Heart Disease: Navigating NOACs and VKAs

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have demonstrated similar effectiveness and safety profiles to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Given their favorable pharmacological profile, including the rapid onset and offset of action, fixed dosing, and predictable pharmacokinetics with a consistent dose-response relationship, reducing the need for frequent blood tests, researchers have investigated the potential of NOACs in patients with AF and valvular heart disease (VHD).

METHODS

Clinical trials, excluding patients with mechanical prosthetic valves or moderate/severe mitral stenosis, have shown the benefits of NOACs over VKAs in this population. However, there is a need for further research to determine if these findings apply to mechanical valve prostheses and NOACs.

RESULTS

Several ongoing randomized controlled trials are underway to provide more definitive evidence regarding NOAC treatment in moderate to severe rheumatic mitral stenosis. Importantly, recent trials that included patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves (also transcatheter heart valves) have provided evidence supporting the safety of NOACs in this specific patient population. Ongoing research aims to clearly define the specific scenarios where NOACs can be safely and effectively prescribed for various types of VHD, including moderate/severe mitral stenosis and mechanical valves.

CONCLUSIONS

The aim of this review is to accurately identify the specific situations in which NOACs can be prescribed in patients with VHD, with a focus centered on each type of valvulopathy.

Effect of Vascular Senescence on the Efficacy and Safety of Warfarin: Insights from Rat Models and a Prospective Cohort Study

Warfarin, with its narrow therapeutic range, requires the understanding of various influencing factors for personalized medication. Vascular senescence, marked by vascular stiffening and endothelial dysfunction, has an unclear effect on the efficacy and safety of warfarin. Based on previous studies, we hypothesized that vascular senescence increases the risk of bleeding during warfarin therapy. This study aimed to explore these effects using animal models and clinical cohorts. We established rat models of vascular senescence and calcification using d-galactose, vitamin D, and nicotine. After validating the models, we examined changes in the international normalized ratio (INR) at fixed warfarin doses (0.20 and 0.35 mg/kg). We found that vascular senescence caused significantly elevated INR values and increased bleeding risk. In the prospective clinical cohort study (NCT06428110), hospitalized warfarin patients with standard dose adjustments were divided into vascular senescence and control groups based on ultrasound and computed tomography diagnosis. Using propensity score matching to exclude the influence of confounding factors, we found that the vascular senescence group had lower steady-state warfarin doses and larger dose adjustments, with a higher probability of INR exceeding the therapeutic range. The vascular senescence group tended to experience more bleeding or thromboembolic/ischemic events during 1 year of follow-up, while there was no statistical difference. In conclusion, vascular senescence leads to unstable INR values and increases higher bleeding risk during warfarin therapy, highlighting the importance of considering vascular senescence in future precision warfarin therapies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Many factors influence warfarin efficacy; however, the effect of vascular senescence remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the effects of vascular senescence on the efficacy and safety of warfarin. Through both rat models and clinical cohort studies, our findings indicated that vascular senescence may compromise the stability of warfarin, presenting challenges in maintaining its efficacy and safety.

Tissue versus mechanical mitral valve replacement in patients aged 50-70: a propensity-matched analysis

OBJECTIVES

There remains debate over the optimal mitral valve replacement (MVR) option for patients aged 50-70 years. The objective of this study was to retrospectively compare the long-term outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic MVR in this patient population.

METHODS

Data from patients undergoing MVR between 2004 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included perioperative and late morbidity.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eight-six propensity-matched patients (n = 143 mechanical; n = 143 bioprosthetic) aged 50-70 years were included in the final analysis. Maximum follow-up was 15.8 years. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the groups at 30 days, 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, and at the longest follow-up. Patients who underwent mechanical MVR experienced significantly lower rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of sepsis, acute kidney injury, superficial and deep sternal wound infection, mediastinal bleeding, and permanent pacemaker implantation. At the longest follow-up, there were no differences in myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or overall rehospitalization. At the same time point, there was an increased rate of MVR in patients receiving a bioprosthetic valve (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival following mechanical and bioprosthetic MVR in patients 50-70 years of age is similar to up to 15 years of follow-up. Bioprosthetic MVR is associated with an increased risk of repeat MVR. Mechanical MVR is not associated with an increased risk of stroke. Valve selection in this patient population requires diligent consideration of structural valve deterioration and subsequent reoperation risk as well as bleeding and thromboembolic risk.

Mitral valve replacement in young patients: review and current challenges

Mitral valve repair is the ideal intervention for mitral valve disease with excellent long-term survival comparable to the age-matched general population. When the mitral valve is not repairable, mechanical prostheses may be associated with improved survival as compared with biological prostheses. Newer mechanical and biological valve prostheses have the potential to improve outcomes following mitral valve replacement in young patients. Patients presenting for mitral valve surgery after failed transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve have high rates of postoperative mortality and morbidity, exceeding those seen with reoperative mitral valve surgery, which poses issues in young patients who have a higher cumulative incidence of reintervention.

Mechanical Valves: Past, Present, and Future-A Review

The mechanical valve was first invented in the 1950s, and since then, a wide variety of prostheses have been developed. Although mechanical valves have outstanding durability, their use necessitates life-long treatment with anticoagulants, which increases the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. The current guidelines recommend a mechanical prosthetic valve in patients under 50-60 years; however, for patients aged 50-70 years, the data are conflicting and there is not a clear-cut recommendation. In recent decades, progress has been made in several areas. First, the On-X mechanical valve was introduced; this valve has a lower anticoagulant requirement in the aortic position. Second, a potential alternative to vitamin K-antagonist treatment, rivaroxaban, has shown encouraging results in small-scale trials and is currently being tested in a large randomized clinical trial. Lastly, an innovative mechanical valve that eliminates the need for anticoagulant therapy is under development. We attempted to review the current literature on the subject with special emphasis on the role of mechanical valves in the current era and discuss alternatives and future innovations.

Mid-term outcomes of the COMMENCE trial investigating mitral valve replacement using a bioprosthesis with a novel tissue

Objective

Novel tissue leaflets (RESILIA tissue) may improve durability of bioprosthetic heart valves. The COMMENCE trial is an ongoing prospective study to evaluate valve replacement using RESILIA tissue. This report describes mid-term outcomes in the mitral cohort of COMMENCE.

Methods

Adult patients requiring mitral valve replacement were enrolled in a prospective, single-arm trial at 17 sites in the United States and Canada. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated safety events using definitions from established guidelines, and hemodynamic performance was evaluated by an independent echocardiographic core laboratory.

Results

Eighty-two patients (median age 70 years) successfully underwent mitral valve replacement with the study valve. Five-year event-free probabilities for all-cause mortality, structural valve deterioration, and reoperation were 79.9%, 98.7%, and 97.1%, respectively. Hemodynamic valve function measurements were stable through the 5-year follow-up period; valvular leaks were infrequently observed and primarily clinically insignificant/mild.

Conclusions

Mitral valve replacement patients implanted with a RESILIA tissue bioprosthesis had a good safety profile and clinically stable hemodynamic performance.

Apixaban or Warfarin in Patients with an On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve

BACKGROUND: Vitamin K antagonists are the only oral anticoagulants approved to prevent valve thrombosis and valve-related thromboembolism in patients with mechanical heart valves. Whether patients with an On-X mechanical aortic valve can be safely anticoagulated with apixaban is unknown. METHODS: Patients with an On-X aortic valve implanted at least 3 months before enrollment were randomly assigned to receive apixaban 5 mg twice daily or warfarin (target international normalized ratio 2.0 to 3.0). The primary efficacy end point was the composite of valve thrombosis or valve-related thromboembolism with coprimary analyses comparing apixaban with warfarin for noninferiority and comparing the apixaban event rate with an objective performance criterion (OPC). RESULTS: The trial was stopped after 863 participants were enrolled owing to an excess of thromboembolic events in the apixaban group. Most (94%) participants took aspirin. A total of 26 primary end-point events occurred, 20 (in 16 participants) in the apixaban group (4.2%/patient-year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3 to 6.0) and 6 (in 6 participants) in the warfarin group (1.3%/patient-year; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.3). The difference in primary end-point rates between the apixaban and warfarin groups was 2.9 (95% CI, 0.8 to 5.0); noninferiority and OPC success criteria were not met. Major bleeding rates were 3.6%/patient-year with apixaban and 4.5%/patient-year with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Apixaban did not demonstrate noninferiority to warfarin and is less effective than warfarin for the prevention of valve thrombosis or thromboembolism in patients with an On-X mechanical aortic valve. (Funded by Artivion; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04142658.)

Management of Mechanical Prosthetic Heart Valve Thrombosis: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Mechanical prosthetic heart valves, though more durable than bioprostheses, are more thrombogenic and require lifelong anticoagulation. Mechanical valve dysfunction can be caused by 4 main phenomena: 1) thrombosis; 2) fibrotic pannus ingrowth; 3) degeneration; and 4) endocarditis. Mechanical valve thrombosis (MVT) is a known complication with clinical presentation ranging from incidental imaging finding to cardiogenic shock. Thus, a high index of suspicion and expedited evaluation are essential. Multimodality imaging, including echocardiography, cine-fluoroscopy, and computed tomography, is commonly used to diagnose MVT and follow treatment response. Although surgery is oftentimes required for obstructive MVT, other guideline-recommended therapies include parenteral anticoagulation and thrombolysis. Transcatheter manipulation of stuck mechanical valve leaflet is another treatment option for those with contraindications to thrombolytic therapy or prohibitive surgical risk or as a bridge to surgery. The optimal strategy depends on degree of valve obstruction and the patient's comorbidities and hemodynamic status on presentation.