Sublobar Resection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Octogenarians: A Prospective, Multicenter Study

Surgical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lung Resection in Nonagenarians: A Retrospective Analysis of Seven Patients at a Single Institution

Introduction With the global trend of aging populations, the number of nonagenarians diagnosed with malignancies, including lung cancer, is increasing. Despite advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques, lung resection for nonagenarians remains rare due to concerns regarding comorbidities and surgical risks. This study evaluates the surgical outcomes of lung resection in nonagenarians and introduces a holistic assessment approach to optimize patient care. Methods A retrospective review of surgical records from January 2011 to December 2022 identified seven nonagenarians who underwent lung resection under 3-port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Patient characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. To holistically evaluate each patient, multifaceted surgical tolerance and prognostic factors were summarized and visualized in a radar plot. Results The study cohort consisted of four males and three females aged 90 to 96 years. Wedge resection was performed in six patients, and one patient underwent lobectomy. Mediastinal lymph node dissection was not performed. The median duration of chest tube insertion was two days, and 86% of patients were discharged within one week. Postoperative complications were minimal, with one case of delirium and no occurrences of pneumonia. All patients were discharged in stable condition without deterioration of their activities of daily living. The median overall survival was 4.1 years. One patient succumbed to lung cancer progression, while the remaining patients exhibited favorable long-term survival without recurrence, including one patient whose lung tumor was a metastasis from colorectal cancer. As depicted in the radar plots, all patients had at least one risk factor other than their age. Conclusion Lung resection under a minimally invasive approach is feasible for carefully selected nonagenarians, yielding favorable short- and long-term outcomes. Because super-elderlies likely harbor multiple comorbidities, a holistic assessment of each patient is important for personalized patient care.

Segmentectomy versus lobectomy in younger patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Despite clinical trials supporting the efficacy of segmentectomy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a previous report indicated its limited efficacy in younger patients, raising concerns about its indication.

METHODS

Patients aged <70 years with radiologically solid-dominant clinical stage IA NSCLC ≤2 cm who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy at three institutions between 2010 and 2017 were enrolled. Propensity scores were estimated to adjust for confounding variables (age, sex, smoking history, tumour location, size, ground-glass opacity, maximum standardized uptake value and histological type). To elucidate the prognostic impact of surgical indications in the late postoperative phase, restricted mean survival time (RMST) from 0 to 5 and 8 years was also determined.

RESULTS

Overall, 388 patients with a median age of 63 years were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.447; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.152-1.316) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR, 0.638; 95% CI, 0.335-1.216) did not differ significantly between the segmentectomy (n = 114) and lobectomy groups (n = 274). In the propensity score matching of 100 pairs, OS (HR, 0.577; 95% CI, 0.162-2.056) and RFS (HR, 0.945; 95% CI, 0.408-2.191) were comparable between the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups. Regarding OS in the segmentectomy and lobectomy groups, the 5- and 8-year RMST were 4.95 years versus 4.92 years (difference: 0.02 years; 95% CI, -0.09-0.13; P = 0.699) and 7.82 years versus 7.69 years (difference: 0.12 years; 95% CI, -0.17-0.42; P = 0.420), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy is a viable option for younger patients with early-stage NSCLC, suggesting that indications for segmentectomy need not vary by age.

Performing High-Quality Sublobar Resections: Key Differences Between Wedge Resection and Segmentectomy

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The introduction of targeted treatments and immunotherapy in lung cancer has transformed patient care by offering "precision medicine" focused on the characteristics of the disease. The same concept has emerged in lung cancer surgery. This "precision surgery" aims to determine the best surgical approach based on the characteristics of the cancer, the patient's cardiorespiratory status, and technological advances in thoracic surgery. While lobectomy continues to be the gold standard for managing early-stage lung cancer, the implementation of screening programs has enabled the earlier detection of smaller tumors. In this context, sublobar resections, particularly segmentectomy, have emerged as valuable options in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. Recent studies suggest that sublobar resections, including segmentectomy and wedge resection, provide a viable alternative to lobectomy. This review explores the various resection strategies available, tailored to patient and tumor characteristics, and highlights modern preoperative techniques aimed at advancing precision surgery.

Sublobar Resection in Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant

BACKGROUND

Lobectomy is a standard surgical procedure for peripherally located early-stage non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) measuring 2 to 4 cm. However, it is unclear whether sublobar resections, such as wedge resection and segmentectomy, are effective in treating tumors with driver mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).

METHODS

We analyzed the clinicopathologic findings and surgical outcomes of 1395 patients with radiologically solid-dominant NSCLC measuring 2 to 4 cm, without clinical lymph node involvement, who underwent complete resection between 2010 and 2020. The patients, who underwent sublobar resections (n = 231) or lobectomy (n = 1164), were categorized by their EGFR mutation status and the surgical procedures performed. The follow-up was conducted for a median of 45.3 months.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates after sublobar resections (n = 39) were comparable to those after lobectomy (n = 359) in patients with EGFR mutation-positive tumors (80.5% [95% CI, 51.3%-93.2%] vs 88.8% [95% CI, 84.1%-92.1%], respectively; P = .16). Multivariable Cox regression analysis of OS revealed that the surgical procedure was an independent prognostic predictor in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-1.0; P = .028), but it was not an independent prognostic predictor in patients with EGFR-mutated tumors (hazard ratio, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.2-1.7; P = .32).

CONCLUSIONS

Sublobar resection with a secure surgical margin could be a viable option for appropriately selected patients with peripheral early-stage NSCLC tumors measuring 2 to 4 cm and harboring EGFR mutations, because it provides comparable OS to that of lobectomy.

Application of microwave surgical instrument to lung segmentectomy for small-sized lung cancer

Objectives

For lung segmentectomy of small lung cancers, we used a microwave surgical instrument for lung parenchymal dissection mainly at the pulmonary hilum, which is difficult to handle with surgical staplers. This technique facilitated the insertion of staples.

Methods

In total, 116 patients with cStage 0-1A3 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent lung segmentectomy were included in this study. We compared the perioperative factors of the group in which a microwave surgical instrument was used for dissection procedures, including lung parenchymal dissection at the pulmonary hilum, and peripheral intersegmental dissection was performed with surgical staplers (group M+S: N = 69), with those of the group in which parenchymal dissection was performed mainly with surgical staplers without using the microwave surgical instrument (group S: N = 47).

Results

Although more complex segmentectomies were performed in the M+S group (P = .001), the number of staple cartridges (7 staple cartridges vs 8 staple cartridges, P = .005), the surgical times (179 vs 221 minutes, P < .0001), and the blood loss (5 mL vs 30 mL, P = .012) were significantly lower in the M+S group. The duration of chest tube placement was significantly shorter in the M+S group (P = .019), and postoperative complications of grade 2 or greater were significantly lower in the M+S group (P = .049).

Conclusions

The effective use of the microwave surgical instrument combined with surgical staplers can simplify pulmonary hilar and intersegmental plane dissections not only for simple segmentectomy but also for complex segmentectomy, leading to favorable intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Robotic Versus Thoracoscopic Sub-lobar Resection for Octogenarians with Clinical Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive sub-lobectomy is sufficient in treating small early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, comparison of the feasibility and oncologic efficacy between robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in performing sub-lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC patients age 80 years or older is scarce.

METHODS

Octogenarians with clinical stage IA NSCLC (tumor size, ≤ 2 cm) undergoing minimally invasive wedge resection or segmentectomy at Shanghai Chest Hospital from 2011 to 2020 were retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Propensity score-matching (PSM) with a RATS versus VATS ratio of 1:4 was performed. Perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The study identified 594 patients (48 RATS and 546 VATS patients), and PSM resulted in 45 cases in the RATS group and 180 cases in the VATS group. The RATS patients experienced less intraoperative bleeding (60 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 50-100 mL] vs. 80 mL [IQR, 50-100 mL]; P = 0.027) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay (4 days [IQR, 3-5 days] vs. 5 days [IQR, 4-6 days]; P = 0.041) than the VATS patients. The two surgical approaches were comparable concerning other perioperative outcomes and postoperative complications (20.00% vs. 26.11%; P = 0.396). Additionally, during a median follow-up period of 66 months, RATS and VATS achieved comparable 5-year overall survival (90.48% vs. 87.93%; P = 0.891), recurrence-free survival (83.37% vs. 83.18%; P = 0.782), and cumulative incidence of death. Further subgroup comparison also demonstrated comparable long-term outcomes between the two approaches. Finally, multivariate Cox analysis indicated that the surgical approach was not independently correlated with long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The RATS approach shortened the postoperative hospital stay, reduced intraoperative bleeding by a statistically notable but clinically insignificant amount, and achieved long-term outcomes comparable with VATS in performing sub-lobectomy for octogenarians with early-stage small NSCLC.