Decrease of mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm after centralization and in-hospital quality improvement of vascular service

Modern management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) remain one of the most clinically challenging and technically complex emergencies in contemporary vascular surgery practice. Over the past 30 years, a variety of changes surrounding the treatment of rAAA have evolved including improvements in diagnosis, development of coordinated referral networks to transfer patients more efficiently to higher volume centers, deliberate de-escalation of pre-hospital resuscitation, modification of patient and procedure selection, implementation of clinical pathways, as well as enhanced awareness of certain high-impact postoperative complications. Despite these advances, current postoperative outcomes remain sobering since morbidity and mortality rates ranging from 25%-50% persist among modern published series. Some of the most impactful variation in rAAA management has been fostered by the rapid proliferation of endovascular repair (EVAR) along with service alignment at selected centers to improve timely revascularization. Indeed, clinical care pathways and emergency response networks are now increasingly utilized which has led to improved outcomes contemporaneously. Moreover, evolution in pre- and post-operative physiologic resuscitation has also contributed to observed improvements in rAAA outcomes. Due to different developments in care provision over time, the purpose of this review is to describe the modern management of rAAA, while providing historical perspectives on patient, procedure and systems-based practice elements that have evolved care delivery paradigms in this complex group of patients.

The Management of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: An Ongoing Challenge

BACKGROUND

despite improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of elective AAAs, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) continue to cause a substantial number of deaths. The choice between an open or endovascular approach remains a challenge, as does postoperative complications in survivors. The aim of this manuscript is to offer an overview of the contemporary management of RAAA patients, with a focus on preoperative and intraoperative factors that could help surgeons provide more appropriate treatment.

METHODS

we performed a search on MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus from 1 January 1985 to 1 May 2023 and reviewed SVS and ESVS guidelines. A total of 278 articles were screened, but only those with data available on ruptured aneurysms' incidence and prevalence, preoperative scores, and mortality rates after emergency endovascular or open repair for ruptured AAA were included in the narrative synthesis. Articles were not restricted due to the designs of the studies.

RESULTS

the centralization of RAAAs has improved outcomes after both surgical and endovascular repair. Preoperative mortality risk scores and knowledge of intraoperative factors influencing mortality could help surgeons with decision-making, although there is still no consensus about the best treatment. Complications continue to be an issue in patients surviving intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

RAAA still represents a life-threatening condition, with high mortality rates. Effective screening and centralization matched with adequate preoperative risk-benefit assessment may improve outcomes.

Characteristics of Nontrauma Patients Receiving Prehospital Blood Transfusion with the Same Triggers as Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Objective: While prehospital blood transfusion (PHBT) for trauma patients has been established in many services, the literature on PHBT use for nontrauma patients is limited. We aimed to describe and compare nontrauma and trauma patients receiving PHBT who had similar hemodynamic triggers. Methods: We analyzed 3.5 years of registry data from a single prehospital critical care unit. The PHBT protocol included two packed red blood cell units and was later completed with two freeze-dried plasma units. The transfusion triggers were a strong clinical suspicion of massive hemorrhage and systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg or absent radial pulse. Results: Thirty-six nontrauma patients and 96 trauma patients received PHBT. The nontrauma group had elderly patients (median 65 [interquartile range, IQR, 56-73] vs 37 [IQR 25-57] years, p < 0.0001) and included patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 15; 42%), vascular catastrophes (n = 9; 25%), postoperative bleeding (n = 6; 17%), obstetrical bleeding (n = 4; 11%) and other (n = 2; 6%). Cardiac arrest occurred in nine (25%) nontrauma and in 15 (16%) trauma patients. Of these, 5 (56%) and 10 (67%) survived to hospital admission and 3 (33%) and 2 (13%) to hospital discharge. On admission, the nontrauma patients had lower hemoglobin (median 95 [84-119] vs 124 [108-133], p < 0.0001), higher pH (median 7.40 [7.27-7.44] vs 7.30 [7.19-7.36], p = 0.0015) and lower plasma thromboplastin time (median 55 [45-81] vs 72 [58-86], p = 0.0261) than the trauma patients. Conclusions: We identified four nontrauma patient groups in need of PHBT, and the patients appeared to be seriously ill. Efficacy of prehospital transfusion in nontrauma patients should be evaluated futher in becoming studies.

Epidemiology of fatal ruptured aortic aneurysms in the United States (1999-2016)

OBJECTIVE

Ruptured aortic aneurysms (rAAs) are associated with high mortality. The purpose of this study was to describe the trends of deaths due to rAA in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the national death certificate data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics System was done to identify deaths due to rAAs in the United States between 1999 and 2016. Patients aged 15 years or older with rAA as the underlying cause of death as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes I71.1 (ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm [rTAA]), I71.3 (ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm [rAAA]), I71.5 (ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm), and I71.8 (rAA of unspecified site) were included and standardized to U.S. Census data.

RESULTS

A total of 104,458 deaths due to rAAs occurred during the study period. The overall age-adjusted incidence of fatal rAA was 23.3 per 1 million (rAAA, 15.1; rTAA, 3.1; thoracoabdominal, 0.4; and unspecified site, 4.8). The annual incidence of rAA decreased by 68% from 40.0 (1999) to 12.8 (2016) per 1 million (rTAA by -67% from 5.5 to 1.8 and rAAA by -70% from 26.3 to 7.89 per 1 million; P < .001 for all comparisons). These trends were consistent across age groups, sexes, and races. There was a significant seasonal variation in rAA mortality, with higher deaths in winter months compared with summer months. The incidence of rAA is highest in Midwest states (27.1 per 1 million), followed by Northeast (23.8 per 1 million) and West (14 per 1 million) states, and lowest in Southern states (13.6 per 1 million). Only 57% of rAAA deaths occurred in men ≥65 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of fatal rAA, rTAA, and rAAA drastically decreased in the United States between 1999 and 2016, a trend that was consistent across age groups, sexes, and races. A significant percentage of fatal rAAAs occurred in patients who are not eligible for the current screening program.

Population-based study of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Background

The incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) and their rupture has been reported to be decreasing. The aim was to evaluate trends in ruptured AAA (rAAA) incidence in the hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa (HUS) in southern Finland. This was a population-based retrospective review of all patients with rAAA in this well defined geographical area during 2003–2013.

Methods

Data for all patients treated for rAAA at Helsinki University Hospital, the only vascular surgery centre in an area of 1·5 million inhabitants, were collected from local vascular registry. All deaths attributed to rAAA were obtained from the cause of death registry of Statistics Finland.

Results

The mean(s.d.) age of the 712 patients with rAAA was 76·5(9·6) years; 76·7 per cent of them were men. Only 330 patients (46·3 per cent of those with rAAA) arrived alive at Helsinki University Hospital. The turn-down rate for surgical treatment was 10·3 per cent. Of the 296 patients operated on, 199 (67·2 per cent) were alive at 30 days. Only 27·9 per cent of all patients were alive 30 days after rupture of the AAA. The incidence of rAAA was 4·3 per 100 000 inhabitants and the mortality rate was 3·2 per 100 000 inhabitants. A decreasing trend was seen in incidence and mortality during the 11-year study interval.

Conclusion

The incidence of rAAA is decreasing in the HUS district. Mortality from rAAA remains very high, because half of the patients die before reaching the hospital.

Current treatment strategies for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) represents one of the most challenging emergencies in surgery. Open repair (OR) is associated with relevant morbidity and mortality and has not been reduced significantly over the last decade. The introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and its meanwhile common use in the treatment of rAAA has raised the demand for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in order to resolve a potential superiority of either OR or EVAR.

PURPOSE

This review discusses the current treatment strategies in rAAA repair including diagnostics, peri-operative management and results of OR and EVAR, focussing on RCTs comparing both modalities.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality after OR and EVAR shows no significant difference in published RCTs. In particular with respect to OR, 30-day mortality was much lower than anticipated throughout all RCTs ranging from 18 to 37 %. EVAR for rAAA resulted in reduced in-hospital stay. Limitations of all except one RCT are low patient recruitment and exclusion of haemodynamically unstable patients.

CONCLUSIONS

OR and EVAR need to be provided for rAAA. Despite lacking evidence, EVAR is the first choice treatment in experienced high-volume vascular centres. Low mortality rates in all RCTs raise the question if aortic surgery should be centralised.

Analysis of in hospital mortality and long-term survival excluding in hospital mortality after open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

Purpose

The aim of this study was to confirm the factors that affect the mortality associated with the open surgical repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) and to analyze the long-term survival rates.

Methods

A retrospective review was performed on a prospectively collected database that included 455 consecutive patients who underwent open surgical repair for AAA between January 2001 and December 2012. We divided our analysis into in-hospital and postdischarge periods and analyzed the risk factors that affected the long-term survival of rAAA patients.

Results

Of the 455 patients who were initially screened, 103 were rAAA patients, and 352 were non-rAAA (nAAA) patients. In the rAAA group, 25 patients (24.2%) died in the hospital and 78 were discharged. Long-term survival was significantly better in the nAAA group (P = 0.001). The 2-, 5-, and 10-year survival rates of the rAAA patients were 87%, 73.4%, and 54.1%, respectively. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–.08; P < 0.001) and aneurysm rupture (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.12–.44; P = 0.01) significantly affected long-term survival.

Conclusion

Preoperative circulatory failure is the most common cause of death for in-hospital mortality of rAAA patients. After excluding patients who have died during the perioperative period, age is the only factor that affects the survival of rAAA patients.

Epidemiology of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in a well-defined Norwegian population with trends in incidence, intervention rate, and mortality

OBJECTIVE

Ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs) represent both a life-threatening emergency for the affected patient and a considerable health burden globally. The aim of this study was to investigate the contemporary epidemiology of rAAA in a defined Norwegian population for which both hospital and autopsy data were available.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, single-center population-based study of rAAA. The study includes all consecutively diagnosed prehospital and in-hospital cases of rAAA in the catchment area of Stavanger University Hospital between January 2000 and December 2012. Incidence and mortality rates (crude and adjusted) were calculated using national demographic data.

RESULTS

A total of 216 patients with primary rAAA were identified. The adjusted incidence rate for the study period was 11.0 per 100,000 per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.6-12.5). Twenty patients died out of the hospital, and 144 of the 196 patients (73%) admitted to the hospital underwent surgery. The intervention rate varied from 48% to 81% during the study period. The adjusted mortality rate was 7.5 per 100,000 per year (95% CI, 6.3-8.8). No differences in the incidence and mortality rates were found in comparing early and late periods. The 90-day standardized mortality ratio for the study period was 37.2 (95% CI, 31.6-43.7). The overall 90-day mortality was 68% (146 of 216 persons) and 51% (74 of 144 persons) for the patients treated for rAAA.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a stable incidence and mortality rate during a decade. The prehospital death rate was lower (9%), the intervention rate (73%) higher, and the total mortality (68%) lower than in most other studies. Geographic and regional differences may influence the epidemiologic description of rAAA and hence should be taken into consideration in comparing outcomes for in-hospital mortality and intervention rates.

The natural course of abdominal aortic aneurysms that meet the treatment criteria but not the operative requirements

INTRODUCTION

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) of 55 mm diameter or growth >5 mm in 6 months are commonly accepted treatment criteria. The aim of this study was to establish the outcome of aneurysms that met the treatment criteria but not the operative requirements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients (n = 154) who were declined from operative care of AAA in Helsinki University Central Hospital (HUCH) during 2000-2010 were retrospectively analysed. Reasons for exclusion were identified. The follow-up period extended until the end of April 2012. The rupture rate and mortality were determined. The patients were analysed according to the aneurysm diameter: 55-60, 61-70 and >70 mm.

RESULTS

The reasons for exclusion from operative treatment were cardiorespiratory co-morbidities in 33%, cancer in 8%, overall condition in 33% and patient's choice in 21% of the patients. Regardless of the size of the aneurysm, the cause of death was aneurysm rupture in 43%, which was confirmed either in hospital or in autopsy for 76% of the patients. Of the ruptured aneurysms, 12 were operated of which five survived.

CONCLUSIONS

A ruptured aneurysm is the most common cause of death among patients unfit for surgery; this should be considered in the preoperative evaluation process, especially since 5 of the 12 patients survived the ruptured AAA (RAAA) operation.

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: the state of play

BACKGROUND

Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) remains a challenging problem: 2,410 cases were treated in Germany in 2010. Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm should be suspected in patients over age 50 who complain of pain in the abdomen or back and in whom examination reveals a pulsatile abdominal mass. The incidence of hospitalization for rAAA is 12 per 100,000 persons over age 65 per year (statistics for Germany, 2010), and rAAA carries an overall mortality of 80%.

METHODS

The current state of knowledge of rAAA was surveyed in a selective review of pertinent literature retrieved by an electronic search in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases with the keywords "abdominal aortic aneurysm," "ruptured," "open repair," and "endovascular." Publications in English or German up to and including March 2012 were considered, among them the Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (1).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Recent reports show that the treatment of rAAA is still fraught with high mortality and high perioperative morbidity. Improvement is needed. It would be advisable for the care of rAAA to be centralized in specialized vascular centers implementing defined treatment pathways. Systematic screening, too, would be beneficial. An increasing number of reports suggest that endovascular treatment with stent prostheses improves outcomes; more definitive evidence on this matter will come from prospective, randomized trials that are now in progress.

Intraoperative blood product resuscitation and mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVES

The resuscitation of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs) has not been well studied, and the potential benefit of autotransfusion (AT) is unknown. The increased use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) has been associated with decreased mortality rates in trauma patients and may also improve RAAA survival. We explored the influence of intraoperative AT and FFP resuscitation on mortality rates in massively transfused RAAA patients.

METHODS

A single-center review of RAAA patient records from April 1989 to October 2009 was undertaken. Clinical data and outcomes were studied. Operative and anesthesia records were queried for intraoperative transfusion totals. Massive transfusion was defined as ≥10 units of red blood cells (RBCs) inclusive of AT units.

RESULTS

We identified 151 RAAA patients, of which 89 (60%) received a massive transfusion and comprised the study population. These 89 patients had an in-hospital mortality rate of 44%. Univariate predictors of mortality included increased age, preoperative hypotension, operative blood loss, and crystalloid, RBCs, and FFP volume. AT was used in 85 patients, with an increased ratio of AT:RBC units associated with survival. Mortality was 34% with AT:packed RBCs (PRBC) ≥1 (high AT) and 55% with AT:PRBC of <1 (low AT; P = .04). On multivariate analysis, age > 74 years (P = .03), lowest preoperative systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 mm Hg (P = .06), blood loss >6 liters (P = .06), and low AT (P = .02) independently predicted mortality. The mean RBC:FFP ratio was similar in those that died (2.7) and in those that lived (2.9; P = .66). RBC:FFP ≤2 (high FFP) was present in 38 (43%) patients, with mortality of 49%. RBC:FFP >2 (low FFP) had 40% mortality (P = .39). RBC:FFP ratios decreased over time from 3.6 (years 1989 to 1999) to 2.2 (years 2000 to 2009; P < .001), but more liberal use of FFP was not associated with decreased mortality (47% vs 41%; P = .56). AT:PRBC ratios were stable over time (range, 1.4-1.2; P = .18).

CONCLUSIONS

Greater use of AT but not of FFP was associated with survival in massively transfused RAAA patients. No mortality benefit was seen with increased FFP, but few patients had high FFP transfusion ratios. Further study to identify RAAA patients at risk for massive transfusion should be undertaken and a potentially greater role for AT in RAAA resuscitation investigated.

Outcome after open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients>80 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The role of open repair in the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in patients>80 years old is questioned by the perceived high operative risk of these patients. This issue has been investigated in the present meta-analysis of observational studies.

METHODS

Studies on open repair of RAAA in patients>80 years old were identified in July 2010. The immediate and intermediate results were expressed as pooled proportions with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Linear regression and meta-regression were performed to evaluate the impact of variables on the immediate postoperative mortality.

RESULTS

Pooled analysis of 29 studies showed that the risk of immediate postoperative mortality in patients>80 years old was significantly higher than in younger patients (risk ratio 1.440, 95%CI 1.365-1.519, I2 36.8%, P=0.002; risk difference 19.4%, 95% CI 16.4-22.4%, I2 38.8%, P=0.019). Pooled analysis of 36 studies showed an immediate postoperative mortality rate of 59.2% (95% CI 55.7-62.5, I2 35.62). Immediate postoperative mortality in patients<80 years old positively correlated with that of patients>80 years old (rho: 0.686, P<0.0001). Intermediate survival data of 111 operative survivors were available from six studies, and their pooled survival rates at 1-, 2-, and 3-year were 82.4, 75.6, and 68.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate and intermediate survival rates of patients>80 years old after open repair of RAAA are acceptable. These findings suggest a more confident approach toward emergency repair of RAAA in the very elderly.

Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients aged 80 years and older

Background

Open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA) in patients aged 80 years and older may be questioned owing to the patients' high operative risk and short life expectancy.

Methods

Data on patients aged at least 80 years, admitted for RAAA at four Finnish university hospitals, were collected and analysed retrospectively.

Results

Three hundred and ten consecutive patients aged 80 years and older with RAAA reached hospital alive; 200 (64·5 per cent) underwent open repair. The number of open repairs increased during the last 5 years (49·0 per cent of the whole series), with no significant increase in the number of patients treated conservatively. The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 72·9 per cent. The operative mortality rate was 59·0 per cent and decreased from 66 to 52 per cent during the last 5 years (P = 0·050). On multivariable analysis, shock was the only independent predictor of immediate postoperative death (odds ratio 4·97, 95 per cent confidence interval 2·09 to 7·94; P &lt; 0·001). Classification and regression tree analysis showed that preoperative haemoglobin level and presence of shock were predictive of immediate postoperative death; 19 (95 per cent) of 20 patients with shock and a haemoglobin level below 68 g/l died immediately after surgery. Among the 82 survivors of surgery, survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 90, 68 and 45 per cent respectively. These values were not significantly different from those of the age-, sex- and year-matched general population (P = 0·885).

Conclusion

Survival after open repair of RAAA among patients aged 80 years and older is sufficient to justify the procedure, particularly in patients in a stable haemodynamic condition.

Open surgery in endovascular aneurysm repair era: simplified classification in two risk groups owing to factors affecting mortality in 137 ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (RAAAs)

Our objective is to identify in 137 true RAAAs operated consecutively in open surgery: (1) diagnostic therapeutic aspects capable of influencing results, (2) risk classes with different prognosis, (3) any situations where the prognosis is so negative that surgery is not recommended. The relationship of 16 anamnestic, clinical and technical parameters prospectively collected with 30-day mortality was retrospectively evaluated by uni- and multivariate analyses. Thirty-day mortality was 37%. The univariate analysis identified as mortality predictors Hb ≤ 8 g/dl and circulatory shock at hospitalisation, but following the multivariate analysis only circulatory shock was a certainly significant risk-factor. The cumulative effect on mortality of the two parameters identified at univariate analysis translates into a statistically significant difference in mortality between two groups of patients: A (no or just one risk-factor) and B (two risk-factors). To reinstate euvolemia, rather than adequate haemoglobin values, improves the chances of success. A simple prognostic index into two risk classes is feasible, but abstention from surgery is not justified in any type of patient.

Assessing the quality of surgical care in vascular surgery; moving from outcome towards structural and process measures

OBJECTIVES

This study presents a review of studies reporting on quality of care in vascular surgery. The aim of this study was to provide insight in quality improvement initiatives in vascular surgery.

DESIGN

Original data were collected from MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. Inclusion criteria were: description of one of the three factors of quality of care, e.g. process, outcome or structure and prospectively described. All articles identified were ascribed to a domain of quality of care.

RESULTS

57 prospective articles were included, drawn from 859 eligible reports. Structure as an indicator of quality of care was described in 19 reports, process in 7 reports and outcome in 31 reports. Most studies based on structural measures considered the introduction of a clinical pathway or a registration system. Reports based on process measures showed promising results. Outcome as clinical indicator mainly focussed on identifying risk factors for morbidity, mortality or failure of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Structure and process indicators are evaluated scarcely in vascular surgery. Many studies in vascular surgery have been focussed on outcomes as indicator of quality of care, but a shift towards process measures should be considered as focus of attention in the future.

Prevention of Rupture of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Background and Aims:

Two thirds of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have relevant coronary artery disease (CAD). AAAs are prevalent in up to 16% of smokers with CAD. General screening of AAA is controversial. Aim was to assess the potential of finding AAA prior to rupture among patients with known CAD. Main endpoint was whether AAA could have been found during follow-up by sonography or at other time of cardiovascular evaluation.

Material and Methods:

Retrospective study. 213 consecutive, formerly unknown emergently operated AAAs, treated emergently for symptoms (n = 91) or rupture (n = 122) (rAAA) between January 1998 and June 2005. Patient charts were analysed and primary care physicians contacted.

Results:

At presentation, mean age was 71 (+/–9) years, twenty (9%) were female. AAA had a mean diameter of 7.6 cm. Two thirds (143) were clinically obese (BMI 27 +/–5). 137 (64%) were active smokers, 32 (15%) had diabetes, 151 (71%) were hypertensive, and 80 (38%) received statin treatment. CAD had been diagnosed in 95 (45%) 9 years earlier and followed up. Thirty-five (16%) had had myocardial infarction. Echocardiography had been performed in 52 (24%). Thirty day mortality after open surgery was 25 (21%).

Conclusion:

All patients with rAAA had been seen by a GP or cardiologist within a year prior to presentation. The cost effectiveness of selective AAA screening should be evaluated in a larger study.

Improved Long-Term Survival After Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Background— Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has changed significantly over the past 2 decades. In this perspective, time trends in long-term survival were studied.

Methods and Results— We identified 8663 primary intact and 4171 ruptured AAA repairs in the Swedish Vascular Registry from 1987 to 2005. Mortality was obtained from the national population registry. Crude survival was analyzed, including all mortality. To analyze the long-term outcome among those surviving the AAA repair, relative survival, which denotes the survival rate of patients compared with that of the general population adjusted for age, sex, and calendar year, was calculated, excluding 90-day mortality. In a comparison of AAA repairs from 1987 to 1999 and 2000 to 2005, age (71.4 versus 72.5 years; P <0.001), patients with comorbidities (65.0% versus 68.5%; P <0.001), and endovascular repair (1.6% versus 17.0%; P <0.001) increased. After intact AAA repair, crude 5-year survival was 69.0% (99% confidence interval [CI], 67.7 to 70.4), and relative 5-year survival excluding 90-day mortality was 90.3% (99% CI, 88.6 to 92.0). Relative 5-year survival was better for those operated on from 2000 to 2005 compared with 1987 to 1999 (difference, 4.7%; 99% CI, 1.3 to 8.1), for men versus women (4.6%; 99% CI, 0.4 to 8.8), and for octogenarians versus patients <80 years of age (10.2%; 99% CI, 1.5 to 18.8); no difference was observed between open and endovascular repair (6.0%; 99% CI, −1.5 to 13.4). After ruptured AAA repair, crude 5-year survival was 41.7% (99% CI, 39.6 to 43.7) and relative 5-year survival was 87.1% (99% CI, 83.9 to 90.3). No significant differences in relative 5-year survival were observed between time periods, sex, or age groups.

Conclusions— Long-term survival improved over time after intact AAA repair despite a change in case mix toward older patients with more comorbidities. Long-term survival was stable after ruptured AAA repair.

Model for the reconfiguration of specialized vascular services

Background

This article built on previous work to develop an algorithm for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), with the aim of improving patient survival by regionalization of services. Vascular procedures were used as an example of specialized surgical services.

Methods

A model was generated based on a national data set that incorporated the statistical demonstration of procedural safety, hospital annual surgical case volume, and travel distance and time. Elective AAA repair was used to construct a hub-and-spoke model that was tested against CEA. The impact of the model was quantified in terms of mortality rates, and travel distance and time.

Results

Only 48 vascular hubs were required to provide adequate coverage in England, with the majority of patients travelling for less than 1 h to access inpatient vascular surgery. The model predicted a reduction in the number of deaths from elective surgery for AAA (P &lt; 0·001) and CEA (P = 0·016).

Conclusion

Adoption of this strategic model may lead to improved outcome after AAA and CEA. It could be used as a model for the regionalization of specialized surgery. The model does not take into account the complexity of providing a comprehensive vascular service in every locality.

The Role of Vascular Registries in Improving the Management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is one of the vascular surgical index procedures and an important part of the total workload. Whichever way treated, it typically has high mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, endovascular repair is still a relatively new treatment method and under evolution. Therefore continuous quality control with subsequent outcome analysis, benchmarking, intervention and reassessment are mandatory to achieve high level aneurysm care. Vascular registries are tools for this audit. The aim of this review is to focus on the problems and solutions related to attempts to improve the management of abdominal aortic aneurysm with emphasis on the experience gathered in Finland. This includes great variations in dynamics over time in southern Finland. To control the influence of patient selection and case-mix, total hospital mortality is emphasized as the most appropriate outcome measure of the level of treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (RAAA). Total aneurysm mortality (including total hospital mortality of RAAA and other AAA surgery) is introduced as an outcome measure of vascular service.

The Value of a Nationwide Vascular Registry in Understanding Contemporary Time Trends of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Nationwide vascular registries offer rapid feed-back in an environment of fast new technical development, as is the case with the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Furthermore, they offer an opportunity to study non-selected, population-based data. The aim of this review was to analyze time-trends in published papers from nationwide registries on AAA-repair. In contrast to several US reports, an increased rate of intact AAA repair, associated with the introduction of endovascular repair, was reported in a recent publication based on the Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc). The rate of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair is stable in most reports, while some report a decreasing incidence. Most nationwide studies report a reducing mortality over time after intact AAA repair, while time trends on the mortality after ruptured AAA repair are more heterogenic.

Outcome after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in Sweden 1994–2005

Background

The aim was to study the epidemiology of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in Sweden.

Methods

Primary AAA repairs registered in the Swedish Vascular Registry between 1994 and 2005 were studied. Mortality data were obtained from the national population registry, and age- and sex-specific populations for each calendar year from Statistics Sweden.

Results

Some 10 691 primary AAA repairs were identified. In the population aged 60 years or over the incidence of intact AAA repair increased from 27·0 per 100 000 in 1994–1999 to 28·8 per 100 000 in 2000–2005 (P = 0·006), while the incidence of surgery for ruptured AAA (rAAA) remained stable (13·8 versus 14·1 per 100 000; P = 0·595). Open repair with a bifurcated graft decreased, whereas endovascular repair (EVAR) increased to 35·0 per cent of intact AAA and 10·3 per cent of rAAA procedures in 2005. Patients who had EVAR were older than those undergoing open repair (74·1 versus 71·9 years; P &lt; 0·001). The 30-day mortality rate decreased over time for intact and ruptured aneurysm operations (P = 0·001). Age, female sex and open repair (compared with EVAR) were independently associated with a higher 30-day mortality rate in a logistic regression model.

Conclusion

The introduction of EVAR was associated with an increasing incidence of intact AAA repair, whereas the rate of rAAA was stable. Perioperative mortality rates decreased over time.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm in women: Prevalence, risk factors, and implications for screening

OBJECTIVE

Accurate data regarding the prevalence and associated risk factors for aneurysmal disease is essential when determining the appropriateness of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Although women are poorly represented in most large studies of AAA prevalence, the US Preventative Services Task Force recently recommended against primary screening for AAA in women. The purpose of this analysis was to define the prevalence and risk factors associated with the development of AAA in women.

METHODS

A free duplex ultrasound screening was offered to men and women with cardiovascular risk factors or a family history of AAA. Patients were recruited through advertising at local screening centers and screenings were performed between 2004 and 2006. Demographic information and cardiovascular and aneurysmal disease risk factors were obtained for each patient through a questionnaire. A total of 17,540 subjects were screened for AAA, including 10,012 women (mean age 69.6 years) and 7528 men (mean age 70.0 years). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on the subset of women that were screened to determine risk factors for and prevalence of AAA.

RESULTS

Seventy-four aneurysms were detected in women (including four aneurysms >5 cm diameter and 70 aneurysms 3 to 5 cm diameter) while 291 were detected in men, resulting in prevalence rates of 0.7% and 3.9%, respectively. Increasing age (odds ratio [OR]= 4.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.98 to 10.54, P < .0001), history of tobacco use (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 1.86 to 5.80, P < .0001), and cardiovascular disease (OR= 3.57, 95% CI 2.19 to 5.84, P < .0001) were independently associated with AAA in women on univariate and multivariable analysis. Women with multiple atherosclerotic risk factors were more commonly found to have AAAs and had a prevalence rate of AAA as high as 6.4%.

CONCLUSION

Although the medical literature suggests a low prevalence rate of AAA in women in the general population, specific risk factors are associated with the development of AAA, and subgroups of women can be identified that are at a substantially increased risk of aneurysmal disease. In particular, elevated rates of AAA were found among women of advanced age (> or =65 years) with a history of smoking or heart disease. These data support the notion that women with such risk factors should be considered for AAA screening.