Treating Peripheral Artery Disease in the Wake of Rising Costs and Protracted Length of Stay

Daly/Cost comparison in the management of peripheral arterial disease at 17 Belgian hospitals

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a manifestation of atherosclerosis that affects the lower extremities and afflicts more than 200 million people worldwide. Because of limited resources, the need to provide quality care associated with cost control is essential for health policies. Our study concerns an interhospital comparison among seventeen Belgian hospitals that integrates the weighting of quality indicators and the costs of care, from the hospital perspective, for a patient with this pathology in 2018.

METHODS

The disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) were calculated by adding the number of years of life lost due to premature death and the number of years of life lost due to disability for each in-hospital stay. The DALY impact was interpreted according to patient safety indicators. We compared the hospitals using the adjusted values ​​of costs and DALYs for their case mix index, obtained by relating the observed value to the predicted value obtained by linear regression.

RESULTS

We studied 2,437 patients and recorded a total of 560.1 DALYs in hospitals. The in-hospital cost average [standard deviation (SD)] was €8,673 (€10,893). Our model identified the hospitals whose observed values were higher than predicted; six needed to reduce the costs and impacts of DALYs, six needed to improve one of the two factors, and four seemed to have good results. The average cost (SD) for the worst performing hospitals amounted to €27,803 (€28,358).

CONCLUSIONS

Studying the costs of treatment according to patient safety indicators permits us to evaluate the entire chain of care using a comparable unit of measurement.

The Association of the Day of the Week with Outcomes of Infrainguinal Lower Extremity Bypass

BACKGROUND

The day of the week (DOW) for performing procedures and operations has been shown to affect clinical and resource utilization outcomes. Limited published data are available on vascular surgery operations. Our primary objective was to assess outcomes by DOW for infrainguinal lower extremity bypass (LEB) performed for claudication or rest pain. The secondary objective was to assess outcomes by DOW for LEBs performed for tissue loss.

METHODS

The Vascular Quality Initiative was queried from 2003 to 2018 for all elective index infrainguinal LEBs performed for claudication or rest pain. Cases performed for acute limb ischemia as well as concomitant peripheral vascular intervention, nonelective LEBs, sequential grafts, and weekend cases were excluded. LEBs were grouped by DOW: Monday-Tuesday (early weekdays) versus Wednesday-Friday (later weekdays). Baseline data, operative details, and outcomes were collected. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed. LEBs performed for claudication/rest pain were analyzed together while tissue loss was assessed separately.

RESULTS

There were 12,084 LEBs identified-44.5% performed on Monday-Tuesday and 55.5% on Wednesday-Friday. Overall, the mean age was 65.6 years, 68.6% were male, and 82.8% were Caucasian. LEBs were performed for claudication in 57.4% of cases. An autogenous great saphenous vein was used in 58.8% of cases, whereas a prosthetic graft was used in 35.1% of cases. The most common bypass origin was the femoral artery (94.1%), and target was the popliteal artery (70.1%). Significant differences between Monday-Tuesday versus Wednesday-Friday, respectively, were mean body mass index (27.8 kg/m² vs. 28 kg/m²), preoperative aspirin use (74.2% vs. 72.5%), continuous vein harvest technique (41.9% vs. 44%), and mean operative time (mins) (216.2 vs. 222.6) (all P < 0.05). Univariate postoperative outcomes were significantly different between Monday-Tuesday versus Wednesday-Friday, respectively, for mean length of stay (LOS) (days) (3.9 vs. 4.3), cardiac complications (myocardial infarction/dysrhythmia/congestive heart failure) (3.5% vs. 4.9%), stroke (0.3% vs. 0.6%), and respiratory complications (0.8% vs. 1.3%) (all P < 0.05). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LEBs performed on Wednesday-Friday versus Monday-Tuesday for claudication/rest pain were independently associated with cardiac complications and prolonged LOS. There were also 8,491 LEBs performed for tissue loss which overall had similar findings to LEBs performed for claudication/rest pain such as increased LOS for LEBs performed for tissue loss on Wednesday-Friday (P < 0.001) and similar likeliness for respiratory complication, wound complication, return to the operating room, and mortality (all P > 0.05). However, LEBs performed for tissue loss on Wednesday-Friday versus Monday-Tuesday had similar cardiac complications (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Elective LEBs performed on later weekdays for claudication/rest pain were associated with cardiac complications and prolonged LOS, whereas tissue loss confirmed association with prolonged LOS. Further investigations are needed to identify whether increased resources or allocation of resources should be focused on later weekdays to optimize patient outcomes.

The Frequency of, and Factors Associated with Prolonged Hospitalization: A Multicentre Study in Victoria, Australia

Background: Limited available evidence suggests that a small proportion of inpatients undergo prolonged hospitalization and use a disproportionate number of bed days. Understanding the factors contributing to prolonged hospitalization may improve patient care and reduce the length of stay in such patients. Methods: We undertook a retrospective cohort study of adult (≥20 years) patients admitted for at least 24 h between 14 November 2016 and 14 November 2018 to hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Data including baseline demographics, admitting specialty, survival status and discharge disposition were obtained from the Victorian Admission Episode Dataset. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with prolonged hospitalization (≥14 days). Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to examine the association between various factors and in-hospital mortality. Results: There were almost 5 million hospital admissions over two years. After exclusions, 1,696,112 admissions lasting at least 24 h were included. Admissions with prolonged hospitalization comprised only 9.7% of admissions but utilized 44.2% of all hospital bed days. Factors independently associated with prolonged hospitalization included age, female gender, not being in a relationship, being a current smoker, level of co-morbidity, admission from another hospital, admission on the weekend, and the number of admissions in the prior 12 months. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.0% for those with prolonged hospitalization compared with 1.8% in those without (p < 0.001). Prolonged hospitalization was also independently associated with a decreased likelihood of being discharged to home (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.52–0.54). Conclusions: Patients experiencing prolonged hospitalization utilize a disproportionate proportion of bed days and are at higher risk of in-hospital death and discharge to destinations other than home. Further studies are required to identify modifiable factors contributing to prolonged hospitalization as well as the quality of end-of-life care in such admissions.

Present-day analysis of early failure after forefoot amputation

BACKGROUND

Forefoot transmetatarsal amputation is performed commonly to achieve limb salvage, but transmetatarsal amputations have a high rate of failure, requiring more proximal amputations. Few contemporary studies have examined the incidence of major amputation (transtibial or transfemoral) after transmetatarsal amputation. The goal of this study is to determine risk factors and outcomes for a more proximal amputation after forefoot amputation.

METHODS

We queried the 2012 to 2016 database of the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program for patients undergoing a complete transmetatarsal amputation with wound closure by Current Procedural Terminology code. Patients requiring early (within 30 days) more proximal amputation after transmetatarsal amputation were compared with those who did not need further amputation. Characteristics of patients requiring more proximal amputation were examined, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created to identity risk factors for early more proximal amputation.

RESULTS

In the study, 1,582 transmetatarsal amputation were identified. Most patients were male (70%), white (59%), and diabetic (74%), with a median age of 63 years. More proximal amputation occurred in 4.2% of patients within the first 30 days postoperatively. This early failure was associated with greater hospital stays postoperatively (10 days vs 7 days), more wound complications (29% vs 11%), pneumonia (8% vs 2%), stroke (3% vs 0.1%), and overall complications (50% vs 28%; P ≤ .025 each). Although there was no difference in 30-day mortality (P = .27), there was a marked increase in unplanned readmission (59% vs 14%; P < .0001) for those undergoing reamputation. On multivariable analysis, preoperative systemic inflammatory response, sepsis, or septic shock (odds ratio 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.6) were independent predictors of more proximal amputation.

CONCLUSION

Early below-knee or above-knee amputation early after transmetatarsal amputation leads to increased morbidity. Because patients with preoperative sepsis may be at increased risk of failure after transmetatarsal amputation, the level of amputation should be considered carefully in these patients.

Treatment of bypass failure in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia – open surgery vs. percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy

Summary: Background: Lower limb bypass occlusion in patients with chronic limb threating ischemia remains a challenge. We can choose between different treatment options: open surgery, local thrombolysis, thrombectomy/atherectomy devices. In this pilot study, we compare clinical outcomes and treatment costs between open surgery (OS) and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (pMTH). Patients and methods: This pilot study represents a retrospective analysis of hospital data of 48 occluded bypasses admitted from 2013 to 2018. Only patients presenting with severe ischemia and recrudescence of symptoms (Rutherford 4–6) were included in the current analysis. Two cohorts of patients were analysed: patients who underwent OS and patients that underwent pMTH. Primary clinical outcomes were one-year cumulative patency and limb salvage rates. Total cost was calculated as a sum of intra- and post-operative costs. To weigh clinical benefits against the economic consequences of OS versus pMTH a cost-effectiveness framework was adopted. Results: We analysed a series of 48 occluded bypasses 17 treated with open surgery and 31 with pMTH. Procedural success was 100% in both groups. When comparing one-year death rates ( p-value = .22) and re-occlusion rates ( p-value = .43), no statistically significant differences were observed between the two cohorts. Mean patency duration in the surgery cohort was significantly shorter ( p-value < .05). Primary patency (OS 41.2% vs. pMTH 48.4%) and limb salvage rate (OS 88.2% vs. pMTH 90.3%) at one year are similar in both groups. The total cost of surgery was substantially higher (OS 10,159€ vs. pMTH 8,401€) Conclusions: This pilot study, although limited to 48 occluded bypasses, demonstrates that endovascular treatment with pMTH is less invasive, less time consuming and less expensive, and produces greater health benefits than traditional OS.

Bleeding and thrombotic outcomes associated with postoperative use of direct oral anticoagulants after open peripheral artery bypass procedures

OBJECTIVE

Widespread adoption of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism treatment has resulted in peripheral bypass patients receiving therapeutic anticoagulation with DOACs postoperatively. This study was undertaken to evaluate patient outcomes after open peripheral bypass based on anticoagulation treatment.

METHODS

Postoperative treatment and outcomes of patients undergoing peripheral bypass operations between January 2012 and December 2017 from a statewide multicenter quality improvement registry were examined. Surgeons participating in the registry were surveyed on practice patterns regarding DOACs in bypass patients. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for 30-day transfusion outcomes, and multiple linear regression was performed for length of stay.

RESULTS

Among 9682 patients, 7685 patients received no anticoagulation, whereas 1379 received a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and 618 received a DOAC postoperatively. Patients receiving anticoagulation compared with no anticoagulation had a higher body mass index and were more likely to have preoperative anemia, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (all P < .001). Compared with patients receiving VKAs, patients receiving DOACs were less likely to have chronic kidney disease (P = .002) and more likely to have atrial fibrillation (P < .001). The shortest length of stay was among patients receiving no anticoagulation (median, 5 days; interquartile range, 3-9 days; P < .001), followed by DOACs (median, 6 days; interquartile range 3-11 days; P < .001) and VKAs (median, 8 days; interquartile range, 5-13 days; P < .001). Compared with patients receiving VKAs postoperatively, there was no difference in readmission for anticoagulation complications, bypass thrombectomy or thrombolysis, major amputation, or graft patency at 1 year among patients receiving DOACs. On multivariate logistic regression, patients receiving a DOAC (odds ratio, 0.743; confidence interval, 0.59-0.94; P = .011) or no anticoagulation (odds ratio, 0.792; confidence interval, 0.69-0.91; P = .001) were less likely to require transfusion within 30 days than patients taking VKAs. Approximately 70% of the surveyed surgeons reported that they "sometimes" or "always" use DOACs instead of VKAs for protection of a high-risk bypass.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing lower extremity surgical bypass, those receiving a DOAC postoperatively had a shorter length of stay and were less likely to receive a transfusion in 30 days without compromising graft patency and readmission for anticoagulation complications, thrombectomy, or thrombolysis or affecting amputation rate compared with those receiving a VKA. A majority of surgeons within the quality collaborative have adopted the use of DOACs after peripheral bypass, suggesting the need for a prospective trial evaluating DOAC safety and efficacy in patients requiring anticoagulation for high-risk bypass grafts.