Renal Artery Coverage During Endovascular Aneurysm Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Concomitant large renal cancer and abdominal aortic aneurysm. An original multidisciplinar approach to solve both pathologies saving residual kidney

A 65-year-old male patient presented a large mass of the left kidney and a concomitant saccular abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) of the infrarenal aorta. Due to the particular vascularization of the right kidney in order to allow an endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR), a hybrid staged repair was planned. Through a median laparotomy, a left radical nephrectomy and an ilio-renal bypass were performed, thus creating the anatomical feasibility for subsequent EVAR. Two days later the AAA was excluded by positioning of an abdominal straight stent graft. This original surgical strategy showed to be effective and reduced invasiveness of traditional approach.

[Secondary ruptures of an abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with a physician-modified fenestrated endograft, endoanchors and finally with open repair]

Secondary rupture is a late complication of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Open surgery is a technically feasible treatment option in most cases, however, late conversion carries a significant risk of morbidity and mortality, as it usually requires at least partial explantation of the in situ device, which is of major concern especially if suprarenal fixation is present. Endovascular treatment of these cases is usually challenging, especially since the custom-made devices that are often needed are not readily available but having a production time of several weeks. To overcome this limitation, physician-modified stent grafts are getting accepted to treat such urgent cases. We present the case of a patient receiving EVAR who later experienced two ruptures, treated first with a physician-modified endograft and adjunctive endoanchoring, later with open ligation of the lumbar arteries. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(36): 1426-1431.

Intentional Bilateral Renal Artery Coverage During Ruptured Endovascular Paraanastomotic Pseudoaneurysm Repair

The development of a paraanastomotic pseudoaneurysm is a serious complication after open prosthetic reconstruction of the aorta for occlusive or aneurysmal disease. Open repair of these lesions has previously been associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Endovascular repair may provide suitable treatment for proximal paraanastomotic aortic bypass graft pseudoaneurysms in patients who are poor candidates for open surgery. Bilateral renal artery coverage may be necessary to achieve adequate fixation and seal during life-threatening emergency cases of pseudoaneurysm rupture. Due to the infrequency of reported cases, the consequences of bilateral renal artery occlusion during these complex procedures are poorly understood. We present a case of a proximal paraanastomotic aortobifemoral bypass pseudoaneurysm rupture that was managed using endovascular repair with intentional coverage of both renal arteries. We also review the contemporary literature on endovascular management of paraanastomotic aneurysms and discuss the role of bilateral renal artery coverage in treating select patients with complex ruptured aortic pathology.

The role of surgical and total endovascular techniques in the treatment of ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms

Background: Ruptured juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (RJAAA) represent a special challenge in clinical practice, but the evidence to guide therapeutic decision-making is scarce. The aim of this study was to present two different approaches, open surgical (OAR) and chimney endovascular repair (CHEVAR), for treating patients with RJAAA. Patients and methods: This retrospective two-center study included all patients per center undergoing OAR or CHEVAR for RJAAA between February 2008 and January 2020. Juxtarenal aortic aneurysms were defined as having an infrarenal neck of 2-5 mm, measured after three-dimensional reconstruction of the computed tomography angiography scan. Results: 12 OAR patients (10 male, median age 73 years [58-90 years]) and 6 CHEVAR patients (all male, median age 74 years [59-83 years]) were included. In the OAR group, the proximal aortic clamping was suprarenal in 7 and interrenal in 5 patients. Cold renal perfusion was used in 4 patients, in 2 with suprarenal aortic clamping and in 2 with interrenal aortic clamping. 3 CHEVAR patients received a single renal chimney, the other 3 received double renal chimneys. Technical success was 12/12 in the OAR group 5/6 in the CHEVAR group. In-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality were 3/12 after OAR and 0/6 after CHEVAR. 2 OAR patients required transient dialysis. Median in-hospital stay was 14 (10-63) and 8 (6-21) days and median follow-up (FU) was 20 (3-37) and 30 (7-101) months, respectively. No further deaths occurred during FU. One OAR patient and 4 CHEVAR patients required aortic reinterventions. Conclusions: RJAAAs are rare. Both OAR and CHEVAR can represent adequate treatments for RJAAAs. OAR is the traditional approach, but CHEVAR has - in a high-volume center - promising early results with nonetheless a need for continuous FU to prevent reinterventions. Defining the studied aortic pathology precisely is essential for future research in order to draw valid conclusions.