Challenges in promoter methylation analysis in the new era of translational oncology: a focus on liquid biopsy

Liquid biopsy for promoter methylation in prostate cancer: a promising non-invasive diagnostic weapon

OBJECTIVE

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has served as a screening tool for prostate cancer (PCa) for over 30 years, but its low specificity remains a significant limitation. Liquid biopsy based on promoter methylation, an epigenetic modification, holds significant potential to complement PSA testing and enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PCa. Our objective was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of liquid biopsy for promoter methylation in PCa.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search to screen clinical studies on the application of liquid biopsy for promoter methylation in PCa diagnosis. Subgroup analyses were performed based on sample type, area, control type, method, timing of prostatectomy or prostate massage, and promoter type. The quality of the included articles was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

RESULTS

We included 31 studies with a total of 3,880 participants. The results indicated that the sensitivity of promoter methylation detected via liquid biopsy for PCa was 0.55 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.67) and the specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.89). In the serum sample group, specificity reached 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98), and both the positive likelihood ratio and AUC demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance.

CONCLUSIONS

Liquid biopsy for promoter methylation shows excellent specificity for PCa diagnosis, particularly in serum samples. However, further large-scale studies are required before its superiority over PSA testing can be fully established.

Longitudinal detection of somatic mutations in the saliva of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma-affected patients: a pilot study

Introduction

Liquid biopsy is gaining momentum for diagnosis and surveillance of cancer patients. Indeed, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is burdened with poor prognosis and high recurrence rates after treatment. It is therefore crucial to be able to detect minimal residual disease early after radical treatment or relapse, so surgery can be performed when the disease is still resectable. In this scenario, aim of this study is to create a liquid biopsy-based pipeline able to detect somatic tumor mutations in a cohort of HNSCC-affected patients undergoing follow-up after surgical intervention.

Methods

Our cohort included 17 patients diagnosed with HNSCC over 4 years. The first saliva sample was collected before surgery while the rest were collected during the subsequent visits, according to the follow-up schedule. Salivary DNA (sDNA) was extracted, and a 52-gene next generation sequencing (NGS)-based panel was used for somatic variants detection.

Results

41.2% of samples collected before surgery bore a deleterious variant (n=7/17). Overall, 29.2% of samples harbored at least a pathogenic variant (n=21/72). The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (80%), FBXW7 (8%), PDGFRA (4%) and PTEN (4%). Finally, three patients experienced a loco-regional relapse by clinical evaluations, anticipated in 67% of cases by the molecular one (n=2/3).

Discussion

Our data indicate that sDNA could aid in the monitoring of patients' follow-up as low-frequency somatic mutations could be assessed from the saliva of HNSCC patients. Prospectively, these results suggest that salivary-based liquid biopsy might pave the way for personalized molecular therapies based on mutational data.

Is ctDNA ready to outpace imaging in monitoring early and advanced breast cancer?

INTRODUCTION

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and radiological imaging are increasingly recognized as crucial elements in breast cancer management. While radiology remains the cornerstone for screening and monitoring, ctDNA holds distinctive advantages in anticipating diagnosis, recurrence, or progression, providing concurrent biological insights complementary to imaging results.

AREAS COVERED

This review delves into the current evidence on the synergistic relationship between ctDNA and imaging in breast cancer. It presents data on the clinical validity and utility of ctDNA in both early and advanced settings, providing insights into emerging liquid biopsy techniques like epigenetics and fragmentomics. Simultaneously, it explores the present and future landscape of imaging methodologies, particularly focusing on radiomics.

EXPERT OPINION

Numerous are the current technical, strategic, and economic challenges preventing the clinical integration of ctDNA analysis in the breast cancer monitoring. Understanding these complexities and devising targeted strategies is pivotal to effectively embedding this methodology into personalized patient care.

Cancer signature ensemble integrating cfDNA methylation, copy number, and fragmentation facilitates multi-cancer early detection

Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing has demonstrated great potential for early cancer detection. However, most large-scale studies have focused only on either targeted methylation sites or whole-genome sequencing, limiting comprehensive analysis that integrates both epigenetic and genetic signatures. In this study, we present a platform that enables simultaneous analysis of whole-genome methylation, copy number, and fragmentomic patterns of cfDNA in a single assay. Using a total of 950 plasma (361 healthy and 589 cancer) and 240 tissue samples, we demonstrate that a multifeature cancer signature ensemble (CSE) classifier integrating all features outperforms single-feature classifiers. At 95.2% specificity, the cancer detection sensitivity with methylation, copy number, and fragmentomic models was 77.2%, 61.4%, and 60.5%, respectively, but sensitivity was significantly increased to 88.9% with the CSE classifier (p value < 0.0001). For tissue of origin, the CSE classifier enhanced the accuracy beyond the methylation classifier, from 74.3% to 76.4%. Overall, this work proves the utility of a signature ensemble integrating epigenetic and genetic information for accurate cancer detection.

Cell-free DNA approaches for cancer early detection and interception

Rapid advancements in the area of early cancer detection have brought us closer to achieving the goals of finding cancer early enough to treat or cure it, while avoiding harms of overdiagnosis. We evaluate progress in the development of early cancer detection tests in the context of the current principles for cancer screening. We review cell-free DNA (cfDNA)-based approaches using mutations, methylation, or fragmentomes for early cancer detection. Lastly, we discuss the challenges in demonstrating clinical utility of these tests before integration into routine clinical care.

Early Detection of Cancers in the Era of Precision Oncology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The increasing global incidence of cancer demands innovative cancer detection modalities. The current population-based early cancer detection approaches focus on several major types of cancers (breast, prostate, cervical, lung and colon) at their early stages, however, they generally do not target high-risk individuals at precancerous stages.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some cancers, such as pancreatic cancer, are challenging to detect in their early stages. Therefore, there is a pressing need for improved, accessible, noninvasive, and cost-effective early detection methods. Harnessing cell-free-based biomarker-driven strategies paves a new era of precision diagnosis for multicancer early detection. The majority of these tests are in the early stages and expensive, but these approaches are expected to become cost sensitive in the near future.

SUMMARY

This review provides an overview of early cancer detection strategies, highlighting the methods, challenges, and issues to be addressed to revolutionize and improve global early cancer detection.

Molecular Biomarkers in Cancer

Molecular cancer biomarkers are any measurable molecular indicator of risk of cancer, occurrence of cancer, or patient outcome. They may include germline or somatic genetic variants, epigenetic signatures, transcriptional changes, and proteomic signatures. These indicators are based on biomolecules, such as nucleic acids and proteins, that can be detected in samples obtained from tissues through tumor biopsy or, more easily and non-invasively, from blood (or serum or plasma), saliva, buccal swabs, stool, urine, etc. Detection technologies have advanced tremendously over the last decades, including techniques such as next-generation sequencing, nanotechnology, or methods to study circulating tumor DNA/RNA or exosomes. Clinical applications of biomarkers are extensive. They can be used as tools for cancer risk assessment, screening and early detection of cancer, accurate diagnosis, patient prognosis, prediction of response to therapy, and cancer surveillance and monitoring response. Therefore, they can help to optimize making decisions in clinical practice. Moreover, precision oncology is needed for newly developed targeted therapies, as they are functional only in patients with specific cancer genetic mutations, and biomarkers are the tools used for the identification of these subsets of patients. Improvement in the field of cancer biomarkers is, however, needed to overcome the scientific challenge of developing new biomarkers with greater sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value.