PARP1 facilitates EP300 recruitment to the promoters of the subset of RBL2-dependent genes

The PARP Enzyme Family and the Hallmarks of Cancer Part 1. Cell Intrinsic Hallmarks

The 17-member poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme family, also known as the ADP-ribosyl transferase diphtheria toxin-like (ARTD) enzyme family, contains DNA damage-responsive and nonresponsive members. Only PARP1, 2, 5a, and 5b are capable of modifying their targets with poly ADP-ribose (PAR) polymers; the other PARP family members function as mono-ADP-ribosyl transferases. In the last decade, PARP1 has taken center stage in oncology treatments. New PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been introduced for the targeted treatment of breast cancer 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2)-deficient ovarian and breast cancers, and this novel therapy represents the prototype of the synthetic lethality paradigm. Much less attention has been paid to other PARPs and their potential roles in cancer biology. In this review, we summarize the roles played by all PARP enzyme family members in six intrinsic hallmarks of cancer: uncontrolled proliferation, evasion of growth suppressors, cell death resistance, genome instability, reprogrammed energy metabolism, and escape from replicative senescence. In a companion paper, we will discuss the roles of PARP enzymes in cancer hallmarks related to cancer-host interactions, including angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis, evasion of the anticancer immune response, and tumor-promoting inflammation. While PARP1 is clearly involved in all ten cancer hallmarks, an increasing body of evidence supports the role of other PARPs in modifying these cancer hallmarks (e.g., PARP5a and 5b in replicative immortality and PARP2 in cancer metabolism). We also highlight controversies, open questions, and discuss prospects of recent developments related to the wide range of roles played by PARPs in cancer biology. Some of the summarized findings may explain resistance to PARPi therapy or highlight novel biological roles of PARPs that can be therapeutically exploited in novel anticancer treatment paradigms.

The Role of PARP1 in Monocyte and Macrophage Commitment and Specification: Future Perspectives and Limitations for the Treatment of Monocyte and Macrophage Relevant Diseases with PARP Inhibitors

Modulation of PARP1 expression, changes in its enzymatic activity, post-translational modifications, and inflammasome-dependent cleavage play an important role in the development of monocytes and numerous subtypes of highly specialized macrophages. Transcription of PARP1 is governed by the proliferation status of cells at each step of their development. Higher abundance of PARP1 in embryonic stem cells and in hematopoietic precursors supports their self-renewal and pluri-/multipotency, whereas a low level of the enzyme in monocytes determines the pattern of surface receptors and signal transducers that are functionally linked to the NFκB pathway. In macrophages, the involvement of PARP1 in regulation of transcription, signaling, inflammasome activity, metabolism, and redox balance supports macrophage polarization towards the pro-inflammatory phenotype (M1), which drives host defense against pathogens. On the other hand, it seems to limit the development of a variety of subsets of anti-inflammatory myeloid effectors (M2), which help to remove tissue debris and achieve healing. PARP inhibitors, which prevent protein ADP-ribosylation, and PARP1‒DNA traps, which capture the enzyme on chromatin, may allow us to modulate immune responses and the development of particular cell types. They can be also effective in the treatment of monocytic leukemia and other cancers by reverting the anti- to the proinflammatory phenotype in tumor-associated macrophages.

PARP1 Co-Regulates EP300-BRG1-Dependent Transcription of Genes Involved in Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and DNA Repair

BRG1, an active subunit of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex, enables the EP300-dependent transcription of proliferation and DNA repair genes from their E2F/CpG-driven promoters in breast cancer cells. In the current study, we show that BRG1-EP300 complexes are accompanied by poly-ADP-ribose polymerase 1 (PARP1), which emerges as the functional component of the promoter-bound multiprotein units that are capable of controlling gene expression. This enzyme is co-distributed with BRG1 at highly acetylated promoters of genes such as CDK4, LIG1, or NEIL3, which are responsible for cancer cell growth and the removal of DNA damage. ADP-ribosylation is necessary to maintain active transcription, since it ensures an open chromatin structure that allows high acetylation and low histone density. PARP1-mediated modification of BRG1 and EP300 does not affect the association of enzymes with gene promoters; however, it does activate EP300, which acetylates nucleosomes, leading to their eviction by BRG1, thus allowing mRNA synthesis. Although PARP1 was found at BRG1 positive/H3K27ac negative promoters of highly expressed genes in a transformed breast cancer cell line, its transcriptional activity was limited to genes simultaneously controlled by BRG1 and EP300, indicating that the ADP-ribosylation of EP300 plays a dominant role in the regulation of BRG1-EP300-driven transcription. In conclusion, PARP1 directs the transcription of some proliferation and DNA repair genes in breast cancer cells by the ADP-ribosylation of EP300, thereby causing its activation and marking nucleosomes for displacement by BRG1. PARP1 in rapidly dividing cells facilitates the expression of genes that confer a cancer cell phenotype. Our study shows a new mechanism that links PARP1 with the removal of DNA damage in breast cancer cells via the regulation of BRG1-EP300-dependent transcription of genes involved in DNA repair pathways.

Long non-coding RNA GAS5 inhibits DDP-resistance and tumor progression of epithelial ovarian cancer via GAS5-E2F4-PARP1-MAPK axis

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the malignant tumor of the female reproductive system with the highest fatality rate. Tolerance of chemotherapeutic drugs like cisplatin (DDP) occurring in very early stage is one of the important factors of the poor prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer. Here we aim to study the dysregulation of a particular long noncoding RNA, lncRNA GAS5, and its role in EOC progression.

Methods

The low expression of lncRNA GAS5 in EOC tissues and OC cell lines was determined by microarray analyses and Real-Time qPCR. Flow cytometer assays were used to detect cell cycle and apoptosis of OC cells. CCK8 assay were performed to investigate the DDP sensitivity of OC cells. Western blot was carried out to detect cell growth markers, apoptotic markers, PARP1, E2F4, MAPK pathway protein expression and other protein expression in OC cell lines. The binding of GAS5 and E2F4 were proved by RNA pull-down and RIP assay. The effect of E2F4 on PARP1 were determined by CHIP-qPCR assay and luciferase reporter assay. The effect of lncRNA GAS5 on OC cells was assessed in vitro and in vivo.

Results

By microarray (3 EOC tissues νs. 3 normal ovary tissues) and RT- qPCR (53 EOC tissues νs. 10 normal ovary tissues) we identified lncRNA GAS5 to be dramatically low expressed in EOC samples and correlated with prognosis. Compared with sensitive cell lines, GAS5 was also low expressed in DDP resistant OC cell lines, and over-expression of GAS5 significantly enhanced the sensitivity of OC cells to DDP in vivo and in vitro. Meanwhile the over-expression of GAS5 also caused OC cells G0/G1 arrest and apoptosis increase. Mechanistically, GAS5 might regulate PARP1 expression by recruiting the transcription factor E2F4 to its promoter, and then affect the MAPK pathway activity. Due to the 5’TOP structure, GAS5 could be regulated by transcription inhibitor rapamycin in OC cells.

Conclusion

Here we explored the specific mechanisms of EOC cisplatin resistance and tumor progress due to lncRNA-GAS5, presented the GAS5-E2F4-PARP1-MAPK axis and its role in OC drug-sensitivity and progression for the first time, and the results may provide experimental basis for clinical application.

Combined Targeted Resequencing of Cytosine DNA Methylation and Mutations of DNA Repair Genes with Potential Use for Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 Inhibitor Sensitivity Testing

Current molecular tumor diagnostics encompass panel sequencing to detect mutations, copy number alterations, and rearrangements. However, tumor suppressor genes can also be inactivated by methylation within their promoter region. These epigenetic alterations are so far rarely assessed in the clinical setting. Therefore, we established the AllCap protocol facilitating the combined detection of mutations and DNA methylation at the coding and promoter regions of 342 DNA repair genes in one experiment. We demonstrate the use of the protocol by applying it to ovarian cancer cell lines with different responsiveness to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. BRCA1, ATM, ATR, and EP300 mutations and methylation of the BRCA1 promoter were detected as potential predictors for therapy response. The required amount of input DNA was optimized, and the application to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples was verified to improve the clinical applicability. Thus, by adding DNA methylation values to panel resequencings, the AllCap assay will add another important level of information to clinical tests and will improve stratification of patients for systemic therapies.

EP300-HDAC1-SWI/SNF functional unit defines transcription of some DNA repair enzymes during differentiation of human macrophages

Differentiation of human macrophages predisposes these cells to numerous tasks, i.e. killing invading pathogens, and this entails the need for enhanced intracellular defences against stress, including conditions that may increase DNA damage. Our study shows that expression of DNA repair enzymes, such as PARP1, BRCA1 and XRCC1, are activated during macrophage development by the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, which serves as a histone acetylation sensor. It recognises and displaces epigenetically marked nucleosomes, thereby enabling transcription. Acetylation is controlled both in monocytes and macrophages by the co-operation of EP300 and HDAC1 activities. Differentiation modulates the activities of individual components of EP300-HDAC1-SWI/SNF functional unit and entails recruitment of PBAF to gene promoters. In monocytes, histone-deacetylated promoters of repressed PARP1, BRCA1 and XRCC1 respond only to HDAC inhibition, with an opening of the chromatin structure by BRM, whereas in macrophages both EP300 and HDAC1 contribute to the fine-tuning of nucleosomal acetylation, with HDAC1 remaining active and the balance of EP300 and HDAC1 activities controlling nucleosome eviction by BRG1-containing SWI/SNF. Since EP300-HDAC1-SWI/SNF operates at the level of gene promoters characterized simultaneously by the presence of E2F binding site(s) and CpG island(s), this allows cells to adjust PARP1, BRCA1 and XRCC1 transcription to the differentiation mode and to restart cell cycle progression. Thus, mutual interdependence between acetylase and deacetylase activities defines the acetylation-dependent code for regulation of histone density and gene transcription by SWI/SNF, notably on gene promoters of DNA repair enzymes.

PARP1 promoter links cell cycle progression with adaptation to oxidative environment

Although electrophiles are considered as detrimental to cells, accumulating recent evidence indicates that proliferating non-cancerous and particularly cancerous cells utilize these agents for pro-survival and cell cycle promoting signaling. Hence, the redox shift to mild oxidant release must be balanced by multiple defense mechanisms. Our latest findings demonstrate that cell cycle progression, which dictates oxidant level in stress-free conditions, determines PARP1 transcription. Growth modulating factors regulate CDK4/6-RBs-E2Fs axis. In cells arrested in G1 and G0, RB1-E2F1 and RBL2-E2F4 dimers recruit chromatin remodelers such as HDAC1, SWI/SNF and PRC2 to condense chromatin and turn off transcription. Release of retinoblastoma-based repressive complexes from E2F-dependent gene promoters in response to cell transition to S phase enables transcription of PARP1. This enzyme contributes to repair of oxidative DNA damage by supporting several strand break repair pathways and nucleotide or base excision repair pathways, as well as acting as a co-activator of transcription factors such as NRF2 and HIF1a, which control expression of antioxidant enzymes involved in removal of electrophiles and secondary metabolites. Furthermore, PARP1 is indispensible for transcription of the pro-survival kinases MAP2K6, ERK1/2 and AKT1, and for maintaining MAPK activity by suppressing transcription of the MAPK inhibitor, MPK1. In summary, cell cycle controlled PARP1 transcription helps cells to adapt to a pro-oxidant redox shift.

Downregulation of PARP1 transcription by CDK4/6 inhibitors sensitizes human lung cancer cells to anticancer drug-induced death by impairing OGG1-dependent base excision repair

Hallmarks of cancer cells include uncontrolled growth and rapid proliferation; thus, cyclin-dependent kinases are a therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Treating non-small lung cancer cells with sublethal concentrations of the CDK4/6 inhibitors, ribociclib (LEE011) and palbociclib (PD0332991), which are approved by the FDA for anticancer therapies, caused cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase and suppression of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) transcription by inducing recruitment of the RB1-E2F1-HDAC1-EZH2 repressive complex to the PARP1 promoter. Downregulation of PARP1 made cancer cells vulnerable to death triggered by the anticancer drugs (WP631 and etoposide) and H₂O₂. All agents brought about redox imbalance and DNA strand breaks. The lack of PARP1 and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation impaired the 8-oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1)-dependent base excision DNA repair pathway, which is critical for maintaining the viability of cells treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors during oxidative stress. Upon G1 arrest of PARP1 overexpressing cells, OGG1 formed an immunoprecipitable complex with PARP1. Similar to cells with downregulated PARP1 expression, inhibition of PARP1 or OGG1 in PARP1 overexpressing cells resulted in DNA damage and decreased viability. Thus, PARP1 and OGG1 act in the same regulatory pathway, and PARP1 activity is required for OGG1-mediated repair of oxidative DNA damage in G1-arrested cells. In conclusion, the action of CDK4/6 inhibitors is not limited to the inhibition of cell growth. CDK4/6 inhibitors also lead to accumulation of DNA damage by repressing PARP1 in oxidatively stressed cells. Thus, CDK4/6 inhibitors sensitize G1-arrested cells to anticancer drugs, since these cells require PARP1-OGG1 functional interaction for cell survival.

•

CDK4/6 inhibitors arrest cell proliferation in G1 phase.

•

iCDK4/6 sensitize cells to DNA damage-induced cell death by repressing PARP1.

•

PARP1 is required for OGG1 activity upon growth inhibition.

•

OGG1 repairs DNA damaged by WP631, etoposide, or H₂O₂ in G1-arrested cells.