The linker histone Hho1 modulates the activity of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes

The Yeast HMGB Protein Hmo1 Is a Multifaceted Regulator of DNA Damage Tolerance

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomal architectural protein Hmo1 is categorized as an HMGB protein, as it contains two HMGB motifs that bind DNA in a structure-specific manner. However, Hmo1 has a basic C-terminal domain (CTD) that promotes DNA bending instead of an acidic one found in a canonical HMGB protein. Hmo1 has diverse functions in genome maintenance and gene regulation. It is implicated in DNA damage tolerance (DDT) that enables DNA replication to bypass lesions on the template. Hmo1 is believed to direct DNA lesions to the error-free template switching (TS) pathway of DDT and to aid in the formation of the key TS intermediate sister chromatid junction (SCJ), but the underlying mechanisms have yet to be resolved. In this work, we used genetic and molecular biology approaches to further investigate the role of Hmo1 in DDT. We found extensive functional interactions of Hmo1 with components of the genome integrity network in cellular response to the genotoxin methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), implicating Hmo1 in the execution or regulation of homology-directed DNA repair, replication-coupled chromatin assembly, and the DNA damage checkpoint. Notably, our data pointed to a role for Hmo1 in directing SCJ to the nuclease-mediated resolution pathway instead of the helicase/topoisomerase mediated dissolution pathway for processing/removal. They also suggested that Hmo1 modulates both the recycling of parental histones and the deposition of newly synthesized histones on nascent DNA at the replication fork to ensure proper chromatin formation. We found evidence that Hmo1 counteracts the function of histone H2A variant H2A.Z (Htz1 in yeast) in DDT possibly due to their opposing effects on DNA resection. We showed that Hmo1 promotes DNA negative supercoiling as a proxy of chromatin structure and MMS-induced DNA damage checkpoint signaling, which is independent of the CTD of Hmo1. Moreover, we obtained evidence indicating that whether the CTD of Hmo1 contributes to its function in DDT is dependent on the host's genetic background. Taken together, our findings demonstrated that Hmo1 can contribute to, or regulate, multiple processes of DDT via different mechanisms.

Complexes of HMO1 with DNA: Structure and Affinity

Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMO1 is an architectural nuclear DNA-binding protein that stimulates the activity of some remodelers and regulates the transcription of ribosomal protein genes, often binding to a DNA motif called IFHL. However, the molecular mechanism dictating this sequence specificity is unclear. Our circular dichroism spectroscopy studies show that the HMO1:DNA complex forms without noticeable changes in the structure of DNA and HMO1. Molecular modeling/molecular dynamics studies of the DNA complex with HMO1 Box B reveal two extended sites at the N-termini of helices I and II of Box B that are involved in the formation of the complex and stabilize the DNA bend induced by intercalation of the F114 side chain between base pairs. A comparison of the affinities of HMO1 for 24 bp DNA fragments containing either randomized or IFHL sequences reveals a twofold increase in the stability of the complex in the latter case, which may explain the selectivity in the recognition of the IFHL-containing promoter regions.

Hmo1: A versatile member of the high mobility group box family of chromosomal architecture proteins

Eukaryotic chromatin consisting of nucleosomes connected by linker DNA is organized into higher order structures, which is facilitated by linker histone H1. Formation of chromatin compacts and protects the genome, but also hinders DNA transactions. Cells have evolved mechanisms to modify/remodel chromatin resulting in chromatin states suitable for genome functions. The high mobility group box (HMGB) proteins are non-histone chromatin architectural factors characterized by one or more HMGB motifs that bind DNA in a sequence nonspecific fashion. They play a major role in chromatin dynamics. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast hereafter) HMGB protein Hmo1 contains two HMGB motifs. However, unlike a canonical HMGB protein that has an acidic C-terminus, Hmo1 ends with a lysine rich, basic, C-terminus, resembling linker histone H1. Hmo1 exhibits characteristics of both HMGB proteins and linker histones in its multiple functions. For instance, Hmo1 promotes transcription by RNA polymerases I and II like canonical HMGB proteins but makes chromatin more compact/stable like linker histones. Recent studies have demonstrated that Hmo1 destabilizes/disrupts nucleosome similarly as other HMGB proteins in vitro and acts to maintain a common topological architecture of genes in yeast genome. This minireview reviews the functions of Hmo1 and the underlying mechanisms, highlighting recent discoveries.

General regulatory factors exert differential effects on nucleosome sliding activity of the ISW1a complex

BACKGROUND

Chromatin dynamics is deeply involved in processes that require access to DNA, such as transcriptional regulation. Among the factors involved in chromatin dynamics at gene regulatory regions are general regulatory factors (GRFs). These factors contribute to establishment and maintenance of nucleosome-depleted regions (NDRs). These regions are populated by nucleosomes through histone deposition and nucleosome sliding, the latter catalyzed by a number of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, including ISW1a. It has been observed that GRFs can act as barriers against nucleosome sliding towards NDRs. However, the relative ability of the different GRFs to hinder sliding activity is currently unknown.

RESULTS

Considering this, we performed a comparative analysis for the main GRFs, with focus in their ability to modulate nucleosome sliding mediated by ISW1a. Among the GRFs tested in nucleosome remodeling assays, Rap1 was the only factor displaying the ability to hinder the activity of ISW1a. This effect requires location of the Rap1 cognate sequence on linker that becomes entry DNA in the nucleosome remodeling process. In addition, Rap1 was able to hinder nucleosome assembly in octamer transfer assays. Concurrently, Rap1 displayed the highest affinity for and longest dwell time from its target sequence, compared to the other GRFs tested. Consistently, through bioinformatics analyses of publicly available genome-wide data, we found that nucleosome occupancy and histone deposition in vivo are inversely correlated with the affinity of Rap1 for its target sequences in the genome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings point to DNA binding affinity, residence time and location at particular translational positions relative to the nucleosome core as the key features of GRFs underlying their roles played in nucleosome sliding and assembly.

Exploring the Molecular Underpinnings of Cancer-Causing Oncohistone Mutants Using Yeast as a Model

Understanding the molecular basis of cancer initiation and progression is critical in developing effective treatment strategies. Recently, mutations in genes encoding histone proteins that drive oncogenesis have been identified, converting these essential proteins into "oncohistones". Understanding how oncohistone mutants, which are commonly single missense mutations, subvert the normal function of histones to drive oncogenesis requires defining the functional consequences of such changes. Histones genes are present in multiple copies in the human genome with 15 genes encoding histone H3 isoforms, the histone for which the majority of oncohistone variants have been analyzed thus far. With so many wildtype histone proteins being expressed simultaneously within the oncohistone, it can be difficult to decipher the precise mechanistic consequences of the mutant protein. In contrast to humans, budding and fission yeast contain only two or three histone H3 genes, respectively. Furthermore, yeast histones share ~90% sequence identity with human H3 protein. Its genetic simplicity and evolutionary conservation make yeast an excellent model for characterizing oncohistones. The power of genetic approaches can also be exploited in yeast models to define cellular signaling pathways that could serve as actionable therapeutic targets. In this review, we focus on the value of yeast models to serve as a discovery tool that can provide mechanistic insights and inform subsequent translational studies in humans.

Poly(dA:dT) Tracts Differentially Modulate Nucleosome Remodeling Activity of RSC and ISW1a Complexes, Exerting Tract Orientation-Dependent and -Independent Effects

The establishment and maintenance of nucleosome-free regions (NFRs) are prominent processes within chromatin dynamics. Transcription factors, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes (CRCs) and DNA sequences are the main factors involved. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, CRCs such as RSC contribute to chromatin opening at NFRs, while other complexes, including ISW1a, contribute to NFR shrinking. Regarding DNA sequences, growing evidence points to poly(dA:dT) tracts as playing a direct role in active processes involved in nucleosome positioning dynamics. Intriguingly, poly(dA:dT)-tract-containing NFRs span asymmetrically relative to the location of the tract by a currently unknown mechanism. In order to obtain insight into the role of poly(dA:dT) tracts in nucleosome remodeling, we performed a systematic analysis of their influence on the activity of ISW1a and RSC complexes. Our results show that poly(dA:dT) tracts differentially affect the activity of these CRCs. Moreover, we found differences between the effects exerted by the two alternative tract orientations. Remarkably, tract-containing linker DNA is taken as exit DNA for nucleosome sliding catalyzed by RSC. Our findings show that defined DNA sequences, when present in linker DNA, can dictate in which direction a remodeling complex has to slide nucleosomes and shed light into the mechanisms underlying asymmetrical chromatin opening around poly(dA:dT) tracts.

Single-molecule study reveals Hmo1, not Hho1, promotes chromatin assembly in budding yeast

Linker histone H1 plays a crucial role in various biological processes, including nucleosome stabilization, high-order chromatin structure organization, gene expression, and epigenetic regulation in eukaryotic cells. Unlike higher eukaryotes, little about the linker histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is known. Hho1 and Hmo1 are two long-standing controversial histone H1 candidates in budding yeast. In this study, we directly observed at the single-molecule level that Hmo1, but not Hho1, is involved in chromatin assembly in the yeast nucleoplasmic extracts (YNPE), which can replicate the physiological condition of the yeast nucleus. The presence of Hmo1 facilitates the assembly of nucleosomes on DNA in YNPE, as revealed by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Further single-molecule analysis showed that the lysine-rich C-terminal domain (CTD) of Hmo1 is essential for the function of chromatin compaction, while the second globular domain at the C-terminus of Hho1 impairs its ability. In addition, Hmo1, but not Hho1, forms condensates with double-stranded DNA via reversible phase separation. The phosphorylation fluctuation of Hmo1 coincides with metazoan H1 during the cell cycle. Our data suggest that Hmo1, but not Hho1, possesses some functionality similar to that of linker histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, even though some properties of Hmo1 differ from those of a canonical linker histone H1. Our study provides clues for the linker histone H1 in budding yeast and provides insights into the evolution and diversity of histone H1 across eukaryotes. IMPORTANCE There has been a long-standing debate regarding the identity of linker histone H1 in budding yeast. To address this issue, we utilized YNPE, which accurately replicate the physiological conditions in yeast nuclei, in combination with total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy and magnetic tweezers. Our findings demonstrated that Hmo1, rather than Hho1, is responsible for chromatin assembly in budding yeast. Additionally, we found that Hmo1 shares certain characteristics with histone H1, including phase separation and phosphorylation fluctuations throughout the cell cycle. Furthermore, we discovered that the lysine-rich domain of Hho1 is buried by its second globular domain at the C-terminus, resulting in the loss of function that is similar to histone H1. Our study provides compelling evidence to suggest that Hmo1 shares linker histone H1 function in budding yeast and contributes to our understanding of the evolution of linker histone H1 across eukaryotes.

Hmo1 Protein Affects the Nucleosome Structure and Supports the Nucleosome Reorganization Activity of Yeast FACT

Yeast Hmo1 is a high mobility group B (HMGB) protein that participates in the transcription of ribosomal protein genes and rDNA, and also stimulates the activities of some ATP-dependent remodelers. Hmo1 binds both DNA and nucleosomes and has been proposed to be a functional yeast analog of mammalian linker histones. We used EMSA and single particle Förster resonance energy transfer (spFRET) microscopy to characterize the effects of Hmo1 on nucleosomes alone and with the histone chaperone FACT. Hmo1 induced a significant increase in the distance between the DNA gyres across the nucleosomal core, and also caused the separation of linker segments. This was opposite to the effect of the linker histone H1, which enhanced the proximity of linkers. Similar to Nhp6, another HMGB factor, Hmo1, was able to support large-scale, ATP-independent, reversible unfolding of nucleosomes by FACT in the spFRET assay and partially support FACT function in vivo. However, unlike Hmo1, Nhp6 alone does not affect nucleosome structure. These results suggest physiological roles for Hmo1 that are distinct from Nhp6 and possibly from other HMGB factors and linker histones, such as H1.