Rituximab administration within 6 months of T cell-depleted allogeneic SCT is associated with prolonged life-threatening cytopenias

Treatment of Epstein-Barr Virus infection in immunocompromised patients

Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), is a ubiquitous γ-Herpesvirus that infects over 95% of the human population and can establish a life-long infection without causing any clinical symptoms in healthy individuals by residing in memory B-cells. Primary infection occurs in childhood and is mostly asymptomatic, however in some young adults it can result in infectious mononucleosis (IM). In immunocompromised individuals however, EBV infection has been associated with many different malignancies. Since EBV can infect both epithelial and B-cells and very rarely NK cells and T-cells, it is associated with both epithelial cancers like nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and gastric carcinoma (GC), with lymphomas including Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) or Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) and rarely with NK/T-cell lymphomas. Currently there are no approved antivirals active in PTLD nor in any other malignancy. Moreover, lytic phase disease almost never requires antiviral treatment. Although many novel therapies against EBV have been described, the management and/or prevention of EBV primary infections or reactivations remains difficult. In this review, we discuss EBV infection, therapies targeting EBV in both lytic and latent state with novel therapeutics developed that show anti-EBV activity as well as EBV-associated malignancies both, epithelial and lymphoproliferative malignancies and emerging therapies targeting the EBV-infected cells.

Rituximab for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder - therapeutic, preemptive, or prophylactic?

To minimize mortality due to posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), the following strategies have been used: (1) Therapy without EBV Monitoring, i.e., administration of rituximab after PTLD diagnosis, usually by biopsy, in the absence of routine Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNAemia monitoring, (2) Prompt Therapy, i.e., monitoring EBV DNAemia, searching for PTLD by imaging when the DNAemia has exceeded a pre-specified threshold, and administration of rituximab if the imaging is consistent with PTLD, (3) Preemptive Therapy, i.e., monitoring EBV DNAemia and administration of rituximab when the DNAemia has exceeded a pre-specified threshold, and (4) Prophylaxis, i.e., administration of rituximab to all transplant recipients. The superiority of one of these strategies over the other strategies has not been established. Here we review the pros and cons of each strategy. Preemptive therapy or prophylaxis may currently be preferred for patients who are at a high risk of dying due to PTLD. However, Therapy without EBV Monitoring may be used for both high- and low-risk patients in the future, if effective and relatively non-toxic therapies for rituximab-refractory PTLD (e.g., EBV-specific T cells) have become easily available.

Low-dose rituximab in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a major complication that puts patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) at risk of death or infection. Currently, there is no gold standard for the first-line treatment of patients who do not respond to steroids, and there are several therapeutic options being evaluated in clinical trials for this disease to be used even in the first-line treatment for GvHD. There is evidence of the benefit of rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, at a standard dose of 375 mg/m2 weekly in the treatment of steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus disease (SR-cGvHD).

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the safety and efficacy of low-dose rituximab in a middle-income center in northeastern Mexico STUDY DESIGN: We report the experience of 26 patients with chronic graft-versus-graft disease who received low-dose rituximab (100 mg weekly for 4 weeks). We utilized the advances in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria for diagnosis, scoring, trial design, and assessment of treatment response.

RESULTS

We obtained a 5-year overall survival of 23.6%, including four patients with complete response. The 1-year event-free survival was 70% for patients with rituximab. During the treatment, there were 3 hospitalizations, and the causes were: immune thrombocytopenia, a parapneumonic effusion, and a cerebral vascular event. The median length of hospital stay was twelve days.

CONCLUSION

A low dose of rituximab is an available and cost-effective option for patients with steroid-refractory cGvHD.

Immunotherapy of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and EBV-associated hematological diseases with gp350/CD89-targeted bispecific antibody

Acute and persistent infection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is associated with several life-threatening hematological disorders, including lymphoproliferative disorders (LPD), hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), and chronic active Epstein-Barr virus infection (CAEBV). Currently, there are no efficacious virus-targeted therapies for EBV-driven hematological diseases. To explore the potential of phagocytosis-based immunotherapy, we created a bispecific antibody by targeting the viral envelope protein gp350 with a novel EBV-neutralizing antibody (named R1) that was paired with a monoclonal antibody against CD89 for redirecting macrophages and neutrophils. In vitro study showed that the bispecific antibody enabled efficient phagocytosis of EBV and killing of gp350 + lymphoma cells in the presence of PBMC. In vivo studies in NSG mice inoculated with EBV showed that bispecific antibody dramatically reduced the viral load in blood, solid organs and tissues. Treatment of mice implanted with EBV-harboring Raji lymphoma cells efficiently prevented tumor formation and massive metastasis to solid organs. Treatment of mice implanted with whole blood from EBV-HLH patients was effective in reducing viral levels in blood and solid organ. The gp350/CD89 bispecific antibody was highly effective in clearing EBV and immunotherapy of EBV-driven hematological diseases such as LPD and EBV-HLH.

Rituximab Toxicity after Preemptive or Therapeutic Administration for Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder

Rituximab is commonly used as prevention, preemption, or therapeutically for post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Although it is generally assumed that rituximab toxicity (ie, infections resulting from hypogammaglobulinemia and neutropenia) is negligible in relation to mortality due to PTLD, limited evidence supports the validity of this assumption. We sought to determine the impact of rituximab on immunoglobulin levels, neutrophil count, infection density, and mortality outcomes. This study retrospectively analyzed 349 HCT recipients, 289 of whom did not receive rituximab and 60 of whom received rituximab preemptively or therapeutically at a median of 55 days post-transplantation. IgM, IgG, and IgA levels at 6 months and 12 months post-transplantation were lower in patients who received rituximab compared with those who did not (significant at P < .05 for IgM and IgA at 6 months and for IgM and IgG at 12 months). Rituximab recipients also had a higher incidence of severe neutropenia (<.5/nl) between 3 and 24 months (subhazard ratio [SHR], 2.3; P = .020). Regarding non-Epstein-Barr viral infections/PTLD, the rituximab group had a higher infection density between 3 and 24 months compared with the no-rituximab group (3.8 versus 1.6 infections per 365 days at risk; incidence rate ratio, 2.2; P < .001). The rituximab group also had a higher incidence of fatal infections (SHR, 3.1; P = .026), higher nonrelapse mortality (SHR, 2.4; P = .006), and higher overall mortality (hazard ratio, 1.7; P = .033). There were no significant between-group differences in the incidence of clinically significant graft-versus-host disease, graft failure, or relapse. Based on this study, rituximab given for PTLD is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Whether the benefit of preemptive rituximab outweighs the risk remains to be determined. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disease (PTLD) after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Biology and Treatment Options

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) is a serious complication occurring as a consequence of immunosuppression in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT). The majority of PTLD arises from B-cells, and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection is present in 60-80% of the cases, revealing the central role played by the latent infection in the pathogenesis of the disease. Therefore, EBV serological status is considered the most important risk factor associated with PTLDs, together with the depth of T-cell immunosuppression pre- and post-transplant. However, despite the advances in pathogenesis understanding and the introduction of novel treatment options, PTLD arising after alloHSCT remains a particularly challenging disease, and there is a need for consensus on how to treat rituximab-refractory cases. This review aims to explore the pathogenesis, risk factors, and treatment options of PTLD in the alloHSCT setting, finally focusing on adoptive immunotherapy options, namely EBV-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (EBV-CTL) and chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR T).

An update on the incidence, risk factors and mechanisms of rituximab-associated neutropenia

With the increasing application of rituximab (RTB) in hematological diseases and autoimmune diseases (AIDs), we have gradually increased our awareness of the adverse reaction of rituximab-associated neutropenia (RAN), but little is known about its true incidence rate, susceptibility risk factors and exact pathogenesis. At present, research groups have conducted a large number of studies on different populations. The team found that age (> 60), advanced disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and combined cyclophosphamide therapy were independent risk factors for RAN. However, its exact mechanism is not completely clear. Several hypotheses have been put forward to solve this question, including the production of anti-neutrophil antibodies after RTB, the generation disorder and neutrophil maturation stagnation caused by abnormal B-cell reconstruction, and the amplification of T-large granular lymphocyte population that may induce neutrophil apoptosis. However, there are still many unsolved problems in all aspects of RAN. This article is an update of the incidence rate, risk factors and mechanisms of RAN.

The impact of Rituximab administered before transplantation in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world study

Rituximab is used to eliminate B cells as a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, a B-cell antigen expressed on B cells. To explore the impact of rituximab administered before transplantation, we implemented a retrospective, monocentric study and utilized real-world data collected at our center between January 2018 and December 2020, and then followed until December 2021. Based on whether a dose of 375mg/m2 rituximab was used at least once within two weeks before transplantation, patients undergoing allo-HSCT were classified into two groups: rituximab (N=176) and non-rituximab (N=344) group. Amongst all the patients, the application of rituximab decreased EBV reactivation (P&lt;0.01) and rituximab was an independent factor in the prevention of EBV reactivation by both univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.33-0.97, P=0.04). In AML patients, there were significant differences in the cumulative incidence of aGVHD between the two groups (P=0.04). Our data showed that rituximab was association with a decreased incidence of aGVHD in AML patients according to both univariate and multivariate analyses. There was no difference between the two groups in other sets of populations. Thus, our study indicated that rituximab administered before transplantation may help prevent EBV reactivation in all allo-HSCT patients, as well as prevent aGVHD in AML patients after allo-HSCT.

Validation of a Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Risk Prediction Score and Derivation of a New Prediction Score Using a National Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Database

BACKGROUND

We externally validated Fujimoto's post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) scoring system for risk prediction by using the Taiwan Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry Database (TBMTRD) and aimed to create a superior scoring system using machine learning methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients registered in the TBMTRD from 2009 to 2018 were included in this study. The Fujimoto PTLD score was calculated for each patient. The machine learning algorithm, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), was used to construct a new score system, which was validated using the fivefold cross-validation method.

RESULTS

We identified 2,148 allogeneic HCT recipients, of which 57 (2.65%) developed PTLD in the TBMTRD. In this population, the probabilities for PTLD development by Fujimoto score at 5 years for patients in the low-, intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk groups were 1.15%, 3.06%, 4.09%, and 8.97%, respectively. The score model had acceptable discrimination with a C-statistic of 0.65 and a near-perfect moderate calibration curve (HL test p = .81). Using LASSO regression analysis, a four-risk group model was constructed, and the new model showed better discrimination in the validation cohort when compared with The Fujimoto PTLD score (C-statistic: 0.75 vs. 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated a more comprehensive model when compared with Fujimoto's PTLD scoring system, which included additional predictors identified through machine learning that may have enhanced discrimination. The widespread use of this promising tool for risk stratification of patients receiving HCT allows identification of high-risk patients that may benefit from preemptive treatment for PTLD.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This study validated the Fujimoto score for the prediction of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) development following hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) in an external, independent, and nationally representative population. This study also developed a more comprehensive model with enhanced discrimination for better risk stratification of patients receiving HCT, potentially changing clinical managements in certain risk groups. Previously unreported risk factors associated with the development of PTLD after HCT were identified using the machine learning algorithm, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, including pre-HCT medical history of mechanical ventilation and the chemotherapy agents used in conditioning regimen.

Late onset neutropenia after rituximab and obinutuzumab treatment - characteristics of a class-effect toxicity

Late onset neutropenia (LON) after rituximab is a previously described complication. We aimed to assess and characterize LON after obinutuzumab, a novel anti-CD20 antibody, in the real-world setting and compare it to LON after rituximab therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 330 consecutive patients with lymphoproliferative neoplasms (rituximab-treated n = 283; obinutuzumab-treated n = 47). LON occurred in 23% patients with similar incidence in rituximab (n = 66, 23%) or obinutuzumab (n = 10, 21%) groups (p = 0.853). Patients treated for CLL and post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) were at higher risk to develop LON (multivariate analysis: HR for CLL - 6.62 CI 95% 1.33-32.92; HR for PTLD 15.82 CI 95% 2.04-122.4). Febrile neutropenia was uncommon during LON and occurred in 15 patients (4.5%; rituximab (n = 14) and obinutuzumab (n = 1).These data suggest that LON after obinutuzumab treatment is as common as with rituximab. The similarities in LON after rituximab and obinutuzumab argue for a possible class effect for anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies.

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a severe complication of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), occurring in a setting of immune suppression and dysregulation. The disease is in most cases driven by the reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), which induces B cell proliferation through different pathomechanisms. Beyond EBV, many factors, variably dependent on HSCT-related immunosuppression, contribute to the disease development. PTLDs share several features with primary lymphomas, though clinical manifestations may be different, frequently depending on extranodal involvement. According to the WHO classification, histologic examination is required for diagnosis, allowing also to distinguish among PTLD subtypes. However, in cases of severe and abrupt presentation, a diagnosis based on a combination of imaging studies and EBV-load determination is accepted. Therapies include prophylactic and pre-emptive interventions, aimed at eradicating EBV proliferation before symptoms onset, and targeted treatments. Among them, rituximab has emerged as first-line option, possibly combined with a reduction of immunosuppression, while EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes are effective and safe alternatives. Though prognosis remains poor, survival has markedly improved following the adoption of the aforementioned treatments. The validation of innovative, combined approaches is the future challenge.

Management of PTLD After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Immunological Perspectives

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are life-threatening complications of iatrogenic immune impairment after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In the pediatric setting, the majority of PTLDs are related to the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, and present as B-cell lymphoproliferations. Although considered rare events, PTLDs have been increasingly observed with the widening application of HSCT from alternative sources, including cord blood and HLA-haploidentical stem cell grafts, and the use of novel agents for the prevention and treatment of rejection and graft-vs.-host disease. The higher frequency initially paralleled a poor outcome, due to limited therapeutic options, and scarcity of controlled trials in a rare disease context. In the last 2 decades, insight into the relationship between EBV and the immune system, and advances in early diagnosis, monitoring and treatment have changed the approach to the management of PTLDs after HSCT, and significantly ameliorated the prognosis. In this review, we summarize literature on the impact of combined viro-immunologic assessment on PTLD management, describe the various strategies for PTLD prevention and preemptive/curative treatment, and discuss the potential of novel immune-based therapies in the containment of this malignant complication.

Persistent hypogammaglobulinemia due to immunoglobulin class switch impairment by peri-transplant rituximab therapy

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is one of the most serious complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Rituximab is effective for PTLD; however, rituximab can produce adverse effects, including hypogammaglobulinemia. Here, we present the case of an 18-year-old female with refractory cytopenia of childhood who developed persistent selective hypogammaglobulinemia with low immunoglobulin G (IgG) 2 and IgG4 levels and monoclonal protein after rituximab therapy against probable PTLD. Despite B-cell recovery, the serum IgG levels gradually declined, reaching < 300 mg/dL at 33 months after rituximab treatment. In addition, class-switched memory (CD27⁺IgD^-) B cells were limited in phenotypic analysis. These findings suggest that peri-HSCT rituximab may contribute to an abnormal B-cell repertoire induced by impaired immunoglobulin class switch.

Low incidence of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma treated with rituximab

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a serious complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Several studies of risk factors for PTLD have been reported; however, the probability of, and risk factors for, PTLD in patients with lymphoma is unknown. Japanese nationwide transplant registry data from 5270 patients with lymphoma after allogeneic HSCT were analyzed. Mature B-cell, T/NK-cell, and T-cell lymphoblastic subtypes accounted for 49%, 26%, and 9.6% of lymphoma cases, respectively. Rituximab was used in 1678 lymphoma patients, most of whom (89%) received HSCT for mature B-cell lymphoma. Thirty-one patients with lymphoma developed PTLD, representing a probability of 0.77% at 2 years post-HSCT, which did not differ significantly from that in patients with other diseases (P = .98). Year of HSCT after 2010 (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.6, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.48-21.3), antithymocyte globulin (ATG) use in the conditioning regimen (HR = 4.5, 95% CI, 1.61-12.5), and no rituximab use before HSCT (HR = 3.2, 95% CI, 1.26-7.90) were identified as risk factors for PTLD. Probabilities of PTLD at 1 year post-HSCT according to rituximab and ATG use were 0.23% (rituximab+, ATG-), 0.75% (rituximab-, ATG-), 1.25% (rituximab+, ATG+), and 3.53% (rituximab-, ATG+). Regarding lymphoma subtypes, patients with mature B-cell lymphoma had the lowest incidence of PTLD (0.35% at 2 years). Among high-risk patients receiving ATG, the mortality rate due to infection was elevated in those previously treated with rituximab (22%) relative to those without (14%); however, the difference was not significant (P = .10). Rituximab use before HSCT significantly reduces the risk of PTLD. Adding rituximab to the conditioning regimen is potentially a good strategy to prevent the development of PTLD in high-risk patients.

Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Pathogenesis, Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous virus belonging to the human γ-herpes virus subfamily. After primary infection, EBV maintains a life-long latent infection. A major concern is that EBV can cause a diverse range of neoplasms and autoimmune diseases. In addition, patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or solid organ transplantation can experience post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) due to dysfunction or suppression of host’s immune system, or uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected cells. In recent years, the number of EBV-associated PTLD cases has increased. This review focuses on the current understandings of EBV-associated PTLD pathogenesis, as well as the risk factors and clinical outcomes for patients after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Epstein-barr virus DNAemia monitoring for the management of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder

BACKGROUND

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a potentially fatal complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation (detectable DNAemia) predisposes to the development of PTLD.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 306 patients monitored for EBV DNAemia after Thymoglobulin-conditioned HCT to determine the utility of the monitoring in the management of PTLD. DNAemia was monitored weekly for ≥12 weeks post-transplantation.

RESULTS

Reactivation was detected in 82% of patients. PTLD occurred in 14% of the total patients (17% of patients with reactivation). PTLD was treated with rituximab only when and if the diagnosis was established. This allowed us to evaluate potential DNAemia thresholds for pre-emptive therapy. We suggest 100,000-500,000 IU per mL whole blood as this would result in unnecessary rituximab administration to only 4-20% of patients and near zero mortality due to PTLD. After starting rituximab (for diagnosed PTLD), sustained regression of PTLD occurred in 25/25 (100%) patients in whom DNAemia became undetectable. PTLD progressed or relapsed in 12/17 (71%) patients in whom DNAemia was persistently detectable.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, for pre-emptive therapy of PTLD, we suggest threshold DNAemia of 100,000-500,000 IU/mL. Persistently detectable DNAemia after PTLD treatment with rituximab appears to have 71% positive predictive value and 100% negative predictive value for PTLD progression/relapse.

Management of Epstein-Barr Virus infections and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Sixth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia (ECIL-6) guidelines

Epstein-Barr virus-related post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders are recognized as a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. To better define current understanding of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders in stem cell transplant patients, and to improve its diagnosis and management, a working group of the Sixth European Conference on Infections in Leukemia 2015 reviewed the literature, graded the available quality of evidence, and developed evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis, prevention, prophylaxis and therapy of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders exclusively in the stem cell transplant setting. The key elements in diagnosis include non-invasive and invasive methods. The former are based on quantitative viral load measurement and imaging with positron emission tomography; the latter with tissue biopsy for histopathology and detection of Epstein-Barr virus. The diagnosis of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder can be established on a proven or probable level. Therapeutic strategies include prophylaxis, preemptive therapy and targeted therapy. Rituximab, reduction of immunosuppression and Epstein-Barr virus-specific cytotoxic T-cell therapy are recommended as first-line therapy, whilst unselected donor lymphocyte infusions or chemotherapy are options as second-line therapy; other methods including antiviral drugs are discouraged.

Rituximab-containing reduced-intensity conditioning improves progression-free survival following allogeneic transplantation in B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Background

In B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL), rituximab-containing reduced-intensity conditioning regimens (R-RIC) have been shown to provide favorable outcomes in single-arm studies; however, large multicenter studies comparing R-RIC and non-rituximab-containing reduced-intensity conditioning regimens (nonR-RIC) have not been performed. Using the CIBMTR database, we report the outcomes of R-RIC versus nonR-RIC regimens in B-NHL.

Methods

We evaluated 1401 adult B-NHL patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) who received nonR-RIC (n = 1022) or R-RIC (n = 379) regimens. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was limited to calcineurin inhibitor-based approaches.

Results

Median follow-up of survivors in the R-RIC and nonR-RIC groups was 47 and 37 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, no difference was seen between the R-RIC and nonR-RIC cohorts in terms of acute GVHD grade II–IV (RR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.83–1.56, p = 0.43) or grade III–IV (RR = 1.16, 95%CI = 0.72–1.89, p = 0.54), chronic GVHD (RR = 1.15, 95%CI = 0.92–1.46, p = 0.22), non-relapse mortality (RR = 0.90; 95%CI = 0.67–1.22; p = 0.51), relapse/progression (RR = 0.79; 95%CI = 0.63–1.01; p = 0.055), and mortality (RR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.69–1.02, p = 0.08) risk. However, R-RIC was associated with a significantly improved progression-free survival (RR = 0.76; 95%CI 0.62–0.92; p = 0.006). On subgroup analysis, mortality benefit was noted in the R-RIC group patients not receiving busulfan-based RIC (RR = 0.76; 95%CI = 0.60–0.96; p = 0.02) and with the use of a higher cumulative rituximab dose (RR = 0.43; 95%CI = 0.21–0.90; p = 0.02).

Conclusion

Our analysis shows that inclusion of rituximab in RIC regimens improves progression-free survival in patients with B cell NHL. These data supports the use of R-RIC in B-NHL patients undergoing allo-HCT.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-017-0487-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Greatly reduced risk of EBV reactivation in rituximab-experienced recipients of alemtuzumab-conditioned allogeneic HSCT

EBV-associated post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) remains an important complication of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We retrospectively analysed the incidence and risk factors for EBV reactivation in 186 adult patients undergoing consecutive allo-HSCT with alemtuzumab T-cell depletion at a single centre. The cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation was 48% (confidence interval (CI) 41-55%) by 1 year, with an incidence of high-level EBV reactivation of 18% (CI 13-24%); 8 patients were concurrently diagnosed with PTLD. Amongst patients with high-level reactivation 31/38 (82%) developed this within only 2 weeks of first EBV qPCR positivity. In univariate analysis age⩾50 years was associated with significantly increased risk of EBV reactivation (hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, CI 1.02-2.31; P=0.039). Furthermore, a diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) was associated with greatly reduced risk of reactivation (HR 0.10, CI 0.03-0.33; P=0.0001) and this was confirmed in multivariate testing. Importantly, rituximab therapy within 6 months prior to allo-HSCT was also highly predictive for lack of EBV reactivation (HR 0.18, CI 0.07-0.48; P=0.001) although confounding with NHL was apparent. Our data emphasise the risk of PTLD associated with alemtuzumab. Furthermore, we report the clinically important observation that rituximab, administered in the peri-transplant period, may provide effective prophylaxis for PTLD.

Predictors of outcome in reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: summarizing the evidence and highlighting the limitations

Several studies have reported the prognostic significance of various clinical, genetic, biologic and molecular markers on postallogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation outcomes such as nonrelapse mortality, relapse and survival. Notwithstanding limitations, existence of refractory/progressive disease at allografting yields worse nonrelapse mortality, more relapse and inferior overall survival. Advanced age results in higher nonrelapse mortality and increased relapse risk. Presence of poor-risk cytogenetics increases post-transplant relapse risk, but its impact on overall survival appears controversial. Developing prognostic models using large multicenter data could help better understand the effect of these and other variables on post-transplant outcomes. Newly discovered mutations as well as response (or not) to new potent therapies, such as ibrutinib or others, would likely be incorporated in such models.

Immunologic recovery in children after alternative donor allogeneic transplantation for hematologic malignancies: comparison of recipients of partially T cell-depleted peripheral blood stem cells and umbilical cord blood

Impaired immunologic recovery (IR) after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with increased risk for infections and relapse. Stem cell source and graft manipulation influence the kinetics of IR. Partial T cell depletion of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) grafts is a novel alternative method of graft manipulation for children. We compared IR in children undergoing HSCT for hematologic malignancies receiving either T cell-depleted (TCD)-PBSCs (n = 55) or umbilical cord blood (UCB) (n = 21) over a 7-year period at a single institution. PBSC grafts underwent ex vivo negative selection for CD3(+) cells using the CliniMACS system with partial T cell add-back. Recovery of CD4(+) T cells was significantly delayed in TCD-PBSC recipients compared with UCB recipients, owing to impaired CD4(+)/CD45RA(+) (naïve) T cell lymphopoiesis. Recovery of total CD3(+) cells and CD3(+)/CD8(+) cells was similar in the 2 groups. The TCD-PBSC recipients had a marked deficit in CD19(+) and, to a lesser extent, IgA/IgM, owing to the need for B cell depletion of these grafts to attenuate the risk of lymphoproliferative disease after TCD HSCT. There were no significant between-group differences in response to mitogen stimulation, time to independence from intravenous immunoglobulin supplementation, or incidence of viral reactivation. Transplantation outcomes of relapse, transplantation-related mortality, event-free survival, and overall survival were similar in the 2 groups. Efforts to enhance IR after partial TCD-PBSC transplantation, such as selective αβ T cell depletion, hold promise for further improvement of this transplantation approach.

Rituximab prophylaxis prevents corticosteroid-requiring chronic GVHD after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: results of a phase 2 trial

B cells are implicated in the pathophysiology of chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), and phase 2 trials suggest that B cell depletion can treat established chronic GVHD. We hypothesized that posttransplantation B cell depletion could prevent the occurrence of chronic GVHD. We performed a 65-patient phase 2 trial of rituximab (375 mg/m(2) IV), administered at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplantation. Rituximab administration was safe without severe infusional adverse events. The cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD and systemic corticosteroid-requiring chronic GVHD at 2 years from transplantation were 48% and 31%, respectively, both lower than the corresponding rates in a concurrent control cohort (60%, P = .1, and 48.5%, P = .015). There was no difference in relapse incidence, but treatment-related mortality at 4 years from transplantation was significantly lower in treated subjects when compared with controls (5% vs 19%, P = .02), and overall survival was superior at 4 years (71% vs 56%, P = .05). At 2 years from transplantation, the B-cell activating factor/B-cell ratio was significantly higher in subjects who developed chronic GVHD in comparison with those without chronic GVHD (P = .039). Rituximab can prevent systemic corticosteroid-requiring chronic GVHD after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and should be tested in a prospective randomized trial.

EBV-induced post transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: a persisting challenge in allogeneic hematopoetic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49:163-167. [PMID: 23832092 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2013.96]

EBV-induced post transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (EBV-PTLD) is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Profound T-cell depletion of the allograft represents a major risk factor for EBV-PTLD. With regard to the increasing use of alternative stem cell sources such as cord blood or purified haploidentical stem cell grafts both associated with impaired immune reconstitution, the frequent occurrence of EBV-PTLD demands particular vigilance on laboratory changes and early symptoms. Here we have summarized today's knowledge about EBV-PTLD in a comprehensive review explaining the underlying mechanisms of EBV-based transformation, EBV-PTLD development, clinical presentation, incidence, diagnosis, screening, therapy and prognosis. In this context, we emphasize on the necessity of regularly applied screening tools and pre-emptive treatment strategies including anti-CD20 Abs particularly in high-risk patients to avoid disease progression to malignant lymphoma. Although EBV-PTLD has always been associated with a high mortality rate, novel immunotherapeutic approaches such as the transfer of EBV-specific T cells nowadays offer improved chances of disease control even at late stages.

Recent progress in managing graft-versus-host disease and viral infections following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Despite recent reductions in transplant-related mortality, post-transplant complications such as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) remain major obstacles to the successful application of allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation. Steroid-refractory GvHD has a poor outcome. Although there are a variety of new approaches to the treatment of refractory GvHD, many have limited evidence of efficacy. Other approaches appear to be unacceptably toxic. It would be preferable to improve GvHD prophylaxis. There is good evidence that rates of GvHD can be reduced without unacceptable reduction of the graft-versus-leukemia effect or compromising overall survival. However, prophylactic measures aimed at reducing T-cell numbers or functions are associated with high rates of reactivation of latent viruses. New technologies that allow rapid generation of virus-specific T-cells show promise to reduce the frequency and severity of such reactivations and have the potential to revolutionize the approach to post-transplant infectious complications.

Monoclonal antibodies in conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation

Monoclonal antibodies are increasingly being incorporated in conditioning regimens for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The benefit of adding rituximab to autologous HCT regimens is purportedly related to in vivo purging of clonal B cells. Randomized trials comparing the addition (or not) of rituximab to high-dose therapy regimens are lacking. No benefit of standard-dose radioimmunotherapy-based regimens for autografting in aggressive lymphomas was seen in a randomized controlled study. The incorporation of rituximab into allogeneic HCT regimens aims to improve responses while reducing nonrelapse mortality resulting from acute graft-versus-host disease. The optimal dose and administration schedule of rituximab in this setting are unknown, and potentially serious complications from increased infections owing to prolonged (and profound) cytopenias or persistent hypogammaglobulinemia are of concern. Radioimmunotherapy-based conditioning for allografting holds promise as a modality to optimize tumor control and synergize adoptive immunotherapy effects, but it remains experimental at this time. The addition of alemtuzumab to allogeneic HCT regimens is associated with prolonged lymphopenia and impaired immune reconstitution, high relapse rates, and serious infections. The optimal dose and schedule of alemtuzumab to avoid prolonged immune paresis remain elusive. It is anticipated that additional monoclonal antibodies will soon become available that can be incorporated into HCT regimens after safety and clinical efficacy are demonstrated.

Prophylactic rituximab after allogeneic transplantation decreases B-cell alloimmunity with low chronic GVHD incidence. Blood. 2012;119:6145-6154. [PMID: 22563089 DOI: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-395970]

B cells are involved in the pathogenesis of chronic GVHD (cGVHD). We hypothesized that prophylactic anti-B-cell therapy delivered 2 months after transplantation would decrease allogeneic donor B-cell immunity and possibly the incidence of cGVHD. Therefore, in the present study, patients with high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 22) and mantle-cell lymphoma (n = 13) received a total lymphoid irradiation of 80 cGy for 10 days and antithymocyte globulin 1.5 mg/kg/d for 5 days. Rituximab (375 mg/m(2)) was infused weekly on days 56, 63, 70, and 77 after transplantation. The incidence of acute GVHD was 6%. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was 20%. Nonrelapse mortality was 3%. Rituximab treatment after allogeneic transplantation significantly reduced B-cell allogeneic immunity, with complete prevention of alloreactive H-Y Ab development in male patients with female donors (P = .01). Overall survival and freedom from progression at 4 years for chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients were 73% and 47%, respectively; for mantle-cell lymphoma patients, they were 69% and 53%, respectively.

Current status of allogeneic transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide a succinct update on the role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in the management of patients with aggressive lymphomas. To clarify the indications for allogeneic transplantation vis-à-vis autologous transplant and to discuss the rationale and potential benefits of reduced intensity conditioning (RIC), nonmyeloablative (NMA) transplant, T-cell depletion and variations in graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Considerable effort has been spent in developing transplant regimens with reduced toxicity and reduced GVHD. The role of allogeneic transplantation has also been redefined in light of advances in lymphoma classification, diagnostic methods, particularly PET scan and advances in transplant technology. Haplo and umbilical cord blood SCT allow identification of a donor for nearly all patients.

SUMMARY

In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, the outcome of allo-SCT depends on patient characteristics and chemosensitivity. It is useful after failure of auto-SCT and in partial responses to salvage therapy. Allo-SCT may be the treatment of choice for advanced T-cell and natural killer cell lymphoma and for adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma. Prophylactic or preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion may be useful, but requires controlled studies. RIC and NMA conditioning have reduced early toxicity but are associated with increased risk for disease recurrence. Promising data have been reported from a novel conditioning regimen combining NMA with ibritumomab tiuxetan. T-cell depletion reduces chronic GVHD but has some increase in rate of recurrence. Rapamycin may be associated with reduction in risk for disease recurrence.

[Bronchiolitis obliterans postallogeneic stem cell transplantation: what is new?]

Bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) is a severe complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). It is considered as a respiratory manifestation of chronic graft-versus-host disease. It is quite similar to the bronchiolitis obliterans after lung transplantation. Classical therapy associates steroids and immunosuppressive drugs, however theses procedure showed a modest efficacy and have an important morbidity. Recent progresses in the physiopathology of BO post-HSCT allow to use new treatments: mTOR inhibitors, immunotherapy, extra-corporeal photochemotherapy, and bronchial anti-inflammatory effects of azithromycin, statins or antileucotriens. This review will focus on the use of these new therapies in BO post-HSCT.

Rituximab for prevention and treatment of graft-versus-host disease

Growing understanding of the important role of B lymphocytes in alloreactivity has paved the way for evaluating anti-B cell therapy with rituximab in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Data suggesting a beneficial reduction in incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are limited to non-randomized studies from single institutions using higher than conventional doses of rituximab. Additionally, rituximab is used as an effective treatment of corticosteroid-refractory chronic GVHD with good responses, particularly in cases of dermatologic and mucosal involvement. Post-transplant administration of rituximab appears to reduce the rate of chronic GVHD in preliminary studies.