Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation after Salvage Therapy with Blinatumomab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Long-Term Remission in T315I+ Relapsed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia with Blinatumomab and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Two Case Studies

BACKGROUND Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL) in adults has a poor prognosis with conventional chemotherapy. Treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has improved clinical outcomes; however, the relapse rate is still high. Therapeutic options for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Ph+ ALL are scarce, with very few studies focusing on these patients. Blinatumomab is a novel bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct showing promising efficacy in R/R Ph+ ALL. CASE REPORT Here, we present 2 cases of relapsed Ph+ ALL with T315I mutation refractory to multiple TKIs and chemotherapy. Patient 1 was a 48-year-old woman who had increased leukocytes in her peripheral blood cells, with 90% abnormal cells and decreased platelets. Bone marrow (BM) smear showed 95% blasts. Patient 2 was a 20-year-old man who had leukocytosis with thrombocytopenia, while all other parameters were normal. BM aspirate showed 98% immature granulocytes/blasts. The immunophenotypic observations of both the patients on BM were consistent with the presence of ALL. Both patients were effectively treated with a combination of blinatumomab and allo-HSCT and achieved complete remission in 1 month with minimal residual disease negativity and remained in remission for a long period. CONCLUSIONS The findings suggest, that for patients with R/R Ph+ ALL with T315I mutation who respond poorly to TKIs, salvage therapy with blinatumomab is a potentially effective treatment for improving clinical outcomes. The treatment with blinatumomab can further act as a bridge to HSCT in these patients, helping them to attain deeper remission.

Treatment of Relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in Adult Patients

OPINION STATEMENT

For adult patients diagnosed with relapsed B cell-ALL (B-ALL), there have been significant improvements in available treatment options following the FDA approval of novel cellular and immunotherapy approaches - blinatumomab, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T therapy, and inotuzumab. For the last several years, research has focused on gaining a better understanding of the effects of specific disease and patient characteristics on long-term outcomes with each of the FDA-approved agents. In combination with the better prevention and management of unique, treatment-specific toxicities, providers can now select the best available treatment option for each individual patient diagnosed with relapsed, adult B-ALL needing therapy. This has allowed more patients to proceed to consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), and long-term data has even brought into question the need for HSCT for long-term durable remission for all patients. However, with the adoption of blinatumomab, CAR T therapy, and inotuzumab in front-line treatment regimens, it remains unclear what effects this will have on patients with relapsed B-ALL following exposure to these novel cellular and immunotherapy therapies. Unlike B-ALL, similar advances have unfortunately not yet been realized in T cell-ALL (T-ALL). Currently, new therapeutic approaches are underway to utilize similar targeting strategies that have been successful in B-ALL - monoclonal antibodies, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTE), and CAR T therapy. Like B-ALL, the only existing approved therapy for relapsed T-ALL, nelarabine, is now used in the upfront treatment setting potentially limiting its utility in relapsed disease. Over the next several years, the hope is for patients diagnosed with T-ALL to experience the drastic improvement in outcomes as has been seen for patients diagnosed with B-ALL over the last decade.

Pretransplant Blinatumomab Improves Outcomes in B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Who Undergo Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Blinatumomab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody, effectively controls refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and promotes measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity. This study investigated the impact of pretransplant blinatumomab on allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes in B cell ALL patients.

METHODS

We analyzed the effect of pretransplant blinatumomab on transplant outcomes of 117 adults undergoing allogeneic HCT for B cell ALL at Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, between 2010 and 2021. Outcomes assessed included overall survival (OS), graft-versus-host disease and relapse-free survival (GRFS), cumulative incidences of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 36 months. Thirty-one participants (26.5%) received blinatumomab. Blinatumomab group had higher proportions of individuals with high disease risk index, primary induction failure and was more likely to receive dual T cell depletion with antithymocyte globulin and post-transplant cyclophosphamide. Two-year OS, GRFS, NRM, and CIR in the blinatumomab and nonblinatumomab groups were, respectively: 65.4% versus 45.6% (P = .05), 42.2% versus 17.3% (P = .01), 3.2% versus 43.0% (P = .007) and 34.4% versus 14.4% (P = .02). Blinatumomab was associated with a lower incidence of day-100 grade 2 to 4 and grade 3 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD): 27.5% versus 56.7% (P = .009), and 10.9% versus 34.7% (P = .04), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between pretransplant blinatumomab and improved OS and NRM.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretransplant blinatumomab is associated with improved OS and lower risk of NRM in B cell ALL patients undergoing allogeneic HCT, likely reflecting lower burden of treatment-related toxicity in this population. Larger prospective trials are warranted to validate our findings.

Blinatumomab Therapy Is Associated with Favorable Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Pediatric Patients with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Blinatumomab, a bispecific T cell engager that binds CD19 in leukemic cells and CD3 in cytotoxic T cells and leads to leukemic blast lysis, is often used in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Concerns about the potential risk of blinatumomab-related immune-mediated toxicities after allo-HCT have not been adequately addressed. These include graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), delayed engraftment, and graft failure or rejection. Pediatric-specific data reporting post-HCT outcomes of patients treated with blinatumomab are scarce and limited to small cohorts. We sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of pediatric patients with R/R B-ALL who received blinatumomab therapy pre-HCT, focusing on overall survival (OS), leukemia-free survival (LFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM), as well as the incidence of immune-mediated post-HCT complications including GVHD, delayed neutrophil or platelet engraftment, graft failure, and graft rejection. We also investigated blinatumomab's effects on B cell reconstitution based on achievement of i.v. immunoglobulin (IVIG) independence post-HCT. This single-center, retrospective study included patients with B-ALL receiving blinatumomab therapy before undergoing allo-HCT, with transplantation performed between 2016 and 2021 at our institution. Patients receiving blinatumomab for relapse after allo-HCT were excluded. Patients receiving chemotherapy alone before allo-HCT during the same period composed the control group. Seventy-two patients were included, 31 of whom received blinatumomab before allo-HCT. Survival estimates were obtained using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to analyze differences between groups. Categorical variables were compared between groups using the chi-square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Cumulative incidences were estimated using the competing risks method, and Gray's test was used to analyze differences between groups. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used for univariate and multivariable analyses for OS. Landmark analysis was performed at the set time points of 30 days and 100 days post-allo-HCT. Most patients in the study cohort had high-risk relapsed B-ALL. Blinatumomab therapy induced minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative remissions in all patients, whereas 5 patients (12.2%) receiving chemotherapy alone had persistent MRD pre-allo-HCT. Time from the start of therapy to the date of allo-HCT was shorter for patients who received blinatumomab compared with those who received chemotherapy (P < .0001). Blinatumomab therapy was associated with greater LFS compared to chemotherapy alone (P = .049), but when limited to 1 year, LFS was not significantly different from control (P = .066). There appeared to be higher OS, lower CIR, and lower NRM in patients receiving blinatumomab compared to the control group; however, the differences were not significant. None of the variables assessed in multivariable analysis was associated with differences in OS. When compared to the controls, blinatumomab therapy did not result in a higher incidence of acute or chronic GVHD, delayed neutrophil or platelet engraftment, or graft failure or rejection. The time to IVIG infusion independence post-allo-HCT was similar in the 2 groups. This study supports the use of blinatumomab salvage therapy for R/R B-ALL before allo-HCT given its efficacy in inducing MRD-negative remissions and optimizing LFS, as well as its lack of association with an increased incidence of post-allo-HCT adverse immune-mediated toxicities. Larger, prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate blinatumomab's effects in long-term post-allo-HCT events.

Comparison of blinatumomab and CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the benefits and risks of patients with refractory or relapsed acute lymphocytic leukemia (R/R ALL) treated with anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and blinatumomab.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies.

RESULTS

The pooled complete remission (CR) rate and minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate were 48%, 31% for blinatumomab, and 86% and 80% for CAR T-cell therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAR T-cell therapy group exhibited a higher likelihood of CR rate than the blinatumomab group in every analysis regardless of adjustment subgroups. CAR T-cell therapy was associated with a significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) compared with blinatumomab (2-year OS 55% vs 25%; 2-year RFS 40% vs 22%). CAR T-cell therapy was more effective for achieving CR and bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) than blinatumomab (2-year OS 75% vs. 57%). An emerging role for blinatumomab is as a bridging agent pre-SCT, and for patients who achieve an MRD-negative state pre-SCT, post-SCT outcomes are expected to be the same as CAR-T. For adverse effects (AEs), blinatumomab was associated with a lower rate of grade ≥3 hematological toxicity, CRS, and neurological events.

Incidence of CD19-negative relapse after CD19-targeted immunotherapy in R/R BCP acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review

There are inconsistencies in the reporting of CD19 antigen status following treatment with CD19-targeted therapies. A majority of evidence comes from studies reporting small sample sizes. In this review, we systematically summarize published studies that have reported rates of CD19-negative relapse after treatment with either blinatumomab or CD19-directed CAR T-cell therapy and report the rates of CD19-negative relapse when evaluated in a standardized way across trials. CD19-negative relapse appears to occur more commonly in relapses following CAR T-cell therapy compared with blinatumomab, whether proportions are calculated among all treated patients (8.7% vs 4.5%) or among patients who relapse (30% vs 22.5%). The median (range) duration of follow-up was 29.3 (17.4-50.8) and 20.4 (6.9-49.0) months for publications on blinatumomab (n = 10) and CAR T-cell therapies (n = 23), respectively. There is a need for standardized reporting of CD19 antigen status in the setting of relapse following novel immunotherapies to inform clinical practice.

Sequencing antigen-targeting antibodies and cellular therapies in adults with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

The recent approvals of four CD19-or CD22-targeted therapies for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) have transformed the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) disease. Adults with r/r B-ALL are usually eligible for all options, but there are no studies directly comparing these agents, and the treating physician must decide which to select. Each therapy has notable activity as a single agent but has limitations in particular settings, and the optimal choice varies. These therapies can be complementary and used either sequentially or concomitantly. Here, we review the current landscape of antigen-targeted therapies for r/r B-ALL and discuss considerations for their use.

High response rates and transition to transplant after novel targeted and cellular therapies in adults with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia with Philadelphia-like fusions

Philadelphia (Ph)-like acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor response to standard chemotherapy. However, outcomes with novel antibody and cellular therapies in relapsed/refractory (r/r) Ph-like ALL are largely unknown. We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of adult patients (n = 96) with r/r B-ALL and fusions associated with Ph-like who received novel salvage therapies. Patients were treated with 149 individual novel regimens (blinatumomab = 83, inotuzumab ozogamicin [InO] = 36, and CD19CAR T cells = 30). The median age at first novel salvage therapy was 36 years (range; 18-71). Ph-like fusions were IGH::CRLF2 (n = 48), P2RY8::CRLF2 (n = 26), JAK2 (n = 9), ABL-class (n = 8), EPOR::IGH (n = 4) and ETV6::NTRK2 (n = 1). CD19CAR T cells were administered later in the course of therapy compared to blinatumomab and InO (p < .001) and more frequently in recipients who relapsed after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) (p = .002). Blinatumomab was administered at an older age compared to InO and CAR T-cells (p = .004). The complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) rates were 63%, 72%, and 90% following blinatumomab, InO and CD19CAR, respectively, among which 50%, 50%, and 44% of responders underwent consolidation with alloHCT, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the type of novel therapy (p = .044) and pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .006) predicted the CR/CRi rate, while the Ph-like fusion subtype (p = .016), pretreatment marrow blasts (p = .022) and post-response consolidation with alloHCT (p < .001) influenced event-free survival. In conclusion, novel therapies are effective in inducing high remission rates in patients with r/r Ph-like ALL and successfully transitioning the responders to alloHCT.

Optimal Use of Novel Immunotherapeutics in B-Cell Precursor ALL

Novel immune therapies are currently being used for patients with R/R ALL based on their ability to induce not only hematologic but also molecular remission. Despite promising results, specific clinical conditions, such as high tumor burden or extra medullary relapse, are still associated with a remarkably poor clinical outcome. Therefore, how to optimize the choice and the timing of such new treatments within different clinical settings remains a matter of debate. In addition, with the aim of increasing the rate and depth of molecular remission, clinical studies are currently evaluating the combination of these immunotherapies with chemotherapy in the contest of frontline treatment. The preliminary data suggest that this approach may increase the cure rate and perhaps reduce the use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in first remission. In Ph-positive ALL, reproducible results are showing that frontline treatment programs, based on the combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, can achieve unprecedented rates of hematologic and molecular remission as well as a long-term cure, even in the absence of chemotherapy and alloHSCT. The results from these studies have led to the development of potentially curative treatment modalities, even for older ALL patients who cannot be treated with conventional intensive chemotherapy. The present review examined the evidence for an appropriate use of the new immunotherapies in ALL patients and provided some appraisal of the current and future possible uses of these drugs for achieving further therapeutic improvement in the treatment of this disease.

Comparing the efficacy of salvage regimens for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

The complete remission (CR) rate and overall survival (OS) of relapsed/refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) are not satisfactory. The available salvage regimens include standard chemotherapy, inotuzumab ozogamicin, blinatumomab and cluster of differentiation (CD)19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T), and the NCCN guidelines recommend all of these therapies with no preference. Dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells have emerged as new treatments and have shown some efficacy, with high CR rates and preventing CD19-negative relapse. However, direct comparisons of the CR rate and long-term survival among the different salvage therapies are lacking. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane were searched from inception to January 31, 2022, for relevant studies. The outcomes of interest were complete remission/complete remission with incomplete haematologic recovery (CR/CRi) rates and 1-year overall survival (OS) rates. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for binary outcomes, and the mean difference (MD) was generated for consecutive outcomes by network meta-analysis. CD19 CAR T-cells demonstrated a significantly better effect in improving the CR/CRi rate than blinatumomab (OR = 8.32, 95% CI: 1.18 to 58.44) and chemotherapy (OR = 16.4, 95% CI: 2.76 to 97.45). In terms of OS, CD19 CAR T-cells and dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells both had a higher 1-year OS rate than blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin and chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between CD19 CAR T-cells and dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells in terms of 1-year OS and CR/CRi rates. CD19 CAR T-cells are effective in inducing CR, and CD19 CAR T-cells and dual CD19/CD22 CAR T-cells show benefits for overall survival. More high-quality randomized controlled trials and longer follow-ups are needed to confirm and update the results of this analysis in the future.

Outcomes of Relapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia After Sequential Treatment with Blinatumomab and Inotuzumab

Inotuzumab was an effective treatment of B-ALL relapse post-blinatumomab regardless of CD19 expression status.

Outcomes of R/R B-ALL patients relapsing after treatment with both blinatumomab and inotuzumab were poor, with high relapse and mortality.

Novel monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapies targeting CD19 and CD22 (blinatumomab and inotuzumab) have shown high rates of complete remission (CR) and been used as a bridging treatment to potentially curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) in adults with relapsed or refractory (R/R) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL). However, limited data exist on the outcome of patients resistant to both mAbs as well as responses to each agent when progressed after the alternate antigen-targeted mAb. Herein, we report outcomes of 29 patients with R/R B-ALL previously treated with both blinatumomab and inotuzumab. Twenty-five patients (86.2%) received blinatumomab as first mAb (mAb1), and CD19-negative/dim relapses were observed in 44% of the patients. Inotuzumab induced CR in 68% of the patients for post-blinatumomab relapse regardless of CD19 expression status. The median time between mAb1 and mAb2 was 99 days. Twelve (63.2%) of 19 patients who achieved remission after mAb2 underwent alloHSCT. The median time from mAb2 to alloHSCT was 37.5 days. Acute graft-versus-host disease and nonrelapse mortality were observed in 58.3% (grade 3 or higher, 25%) and 41.7%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 16.8 months after mAb2, 19 patients (65.5%) relapsed, and 21 patients (72.4%) have died. Overall survival was not different between alloHSCT and non-alloHSCT patients. In conclusion, patients with B-ALL who relapsed after blinatumomab could be successfully rescued by inotuzumab as a bridge to alloHSCT but represent an ultra-high-risk group with poor overall survival. Further studies, including novel consolidation and treatment sequence, may improve outcomes of these patients.

Impact of pre-transplantation minimal residual disease (MRD) on the outcome of Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute leukemia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of minimal residual disease (MRD) before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on the outcome of acute leukemia.

METHODS

Data from 114 patients who were diagnosed with acute leukemia (AL) and underwent allo-HSCT between Jan 2013 and Dec 2019 were collected and analyzed. The patients were attributed into MRD positive (MRD+) group and MRD negative (MRD-) group.

RESULTS

Among the 114 acute leukemia patients, there were 32 MRD+ patients before transplantation, and 82 MRD- patients. No significant difference was found between the MRD+ group and the MRD- group in the incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) (p = 0.09). Compared with the MRD+ group, the MRD- group had a higher incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) (p = 0.008). There is no significance in relapse between the two groups (p = 0.084), while the incidence of relapse was seemingly higher in the MRD+ group: 36.9% Vs 19.7% . We attributed to the lack of sample size and NRM in MRD+ group was remarkably higher. The MRD+ group had significantly worse one-year overall survival (OS) ( , p = 0.003) and one-year progression-free survival (PFS) (, p = 0.009). In the multivariate analysis, MRD+ was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 1.898; 95%CI 1.042-3.457; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Pre-transplantation MRD positive status is a risk factor for survival and prognosis after HSCT. Upon this, emphasis should be put on (1) screening more efficient chemo regimen with targeted agents, to help patients reach and keep MRD- status before transplantation; (2) designing better management with different GvHD prophylaxis treatment, timely disease monitoring and preemptive intervention on relapse.

Multi-institutional study evaluating clinical outcome with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after blinatumomab in patients with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: real-world data

Safety and efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) consolidation after blinatumomab is largely undetermined. To address this issue, we assembled multi-center data of relapsed refractory (RR) acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) patients who received alloHCT after blinatumomab. From December 2014 to May 2019, 223 patients who received blinatumomab for RR ALL outside clinical trials were identified. Among them, 106 (47%) patients transplanted post blinatumomab were evaluated for response and toxicity. Ninety-two (87%) patients received alloHCT after achieving CR, while remaining received subsequent salvage prior to undergoing alloHCT. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years post alloHCT was 48% (95% CI: 36-59%) and 58% (95% CI: 45-69%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of GIII-IV aGVHD at 3 months was 9.9% (95% CI: 5.0-16.6%). Similarly, cumulative incidence of moderate to severe cGVHD at 2 years was 34.4% (95% CI: 23.7-45.3%). The overall survival at 2 years was not significantly different in patient who achieved CR with MRD negative (68.4% [95% CI: 28.5-89.1%]) compared to CR with MRD positive (63.4% [95% CI: 47.8-75.4%]) prior to alloHCT (p = 0.8). Our real-world analysis suggests that alloHCT is feasible and effective post blinatumomab in patients with RR ALL.

Sequencing of novel agents in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin may have comparable efficacy as first or second novel agent therapy in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

BACKGROUND

The availability of novel agents (NAs), including blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO), has improved the outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory (RR) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Because of the relative effectiveness, it is often a challenge for clinicians to determine how to best sequence these NAs with respect to efficacy and toxicity.

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective study of patients with RR ALL treated with blinatumomab, InO, or both, their efficacy as a first or second NA was compared.

RESULTS

Among 276 patients, 221 and 55 received blinatumomab and InO, respectively, as a first NA therapy. The complete remission (CR)/complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi) rate was 65% and 67% for the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively (P = .73). The rate of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 4% and 7% in the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively. Ninety-two patients (43%) in the blinatumomab group and 13 patients (29%) in the InO group proceeded with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The median overall survival (OS) was 15 and 11.6 months in the blinatumomab and InO groups, respectively. A subset analysis was performed for 61 patients who received both NAs (blinatumomab and then InO [n = 40] or InO and then blinatumomab [n = 21]). The CR/CRi rate was 58% for patients who received InO as the second NA and 52% for patients who received blinatumomab as the second NA. The median OS was 10.5 for patients who received InO as the second NA and 5.9 months for patients who received blinatumomab as the second NA (P = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the limited power of this study to detect a significant difference between subgroups is acknowledged, the data suggest that blinatumomab and InO may have comparable efficacy as a first or second NA therapy in RR ALL.

Prognostic factors for survival after allogeneic transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) offers a curative option in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Prognostic factors for survival after allo-SCT have not been sufficiently defined: pheno-/genotype, patients´ age, conditioning regimens and remission at allo-SCT are under discussion. We analyzed the outcome of 180 consecutive adult ALL-patients undergoing allo-SCT at our center between 1995 and 2018 to identify specific prognostic factors. In our cohort 19% were older than 55 years, 28% had Philadelphia-positive B-ALL, 24% T-ALL. 54% were transplanted in first complete remission (CR1), 13% in CR2 after salvage therapy, 31% reached no remission (8% within first-line, 23% within salvage therapy). In 66% conditioning contained total body irradiation (TBI). With a median follow-up of 10 years, we observed an overall survival of 33% at 10 years, and a progression free survival of 31%. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 41% at 10 years, the cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality 28%. Acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) II°-IV° occurred in 31%, moderate/severe chronic GvHD in 27%. Survival was better in patients reaching CR before allo-SCT and in those receiving TBI. No difference between patients younger/older than 55 years and between different phenotypes was observed. Survival after allo-SCT improved considerably over the last decades.