Ixazomib for Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Ixazomib for Desensitization (IXADES) in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Key Points

Ixazomib treatment resulted in decreases in B-cell subsets and bone marrow lymphocytes. Ixazomib treatment resulted in modest decreases in certain anti-HLA antibody specificities. Ixazomib treatment was tolerated, with modest adverse events.

Background

Ixazomib is a second-generation oral proteasome inhibitor approved for treatment of refractory multiple myeloma. We conducted an open-label phase II trial, IXAzomib for DESensitization (IXADES), testing the safety of ixazomib treatment as an approach to decreasing the level and diversity of specificities of anti-HLA antibodies in subjects awaiting kidney transplantation. The trial (NCT03213158 ) enrolled highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates, defined as subjects with calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) >80%, awaiting kidney transplantation >24 months. The subjects were treated with 12 monthly cycles of ixazomib 3 mg+dexamethasone 20 mg. Efficacy was defined as a decrease of cPRA >20% or kidney transplantation. The safety end point was tolerability.

Methods

In ten enrolled subjects, no grade IV, five grade III, 11 grade II, and 43 grade I adverse events were noted. The adverse events included infection, transient paresthesia, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The IXADES regimen was not associated with significant change in levels or diversity of anti-HLA antibodies (cPRA).

Results

Although the IXADES regimen did not exhibit a clear impact on levels and diversity of anti-HLA antibodies in this small cohort, the prolonged half-life of IgG could necessitate a longer duration of treatment for accurate evaluation of efficacy.

Conclusions

In conclusion, treatment with ixazomib/dexamethasone engendered mild-to-moderate toxicity. The impact on anti-HLA was modest and paradoxical in the case of anti-HLA-DR. Clinical trials combining ixazomib with other immunosuppressive agents may be more effective in addressing antibody-mediated processes in kidney transplantation.

A Multicenter Phase II, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Maintenance Ixazomib After Allogeneic Transplantation for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1302 Trial

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) followed by maintenance therapy in high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of ixazomib maintenance therapy after reduced-intensity conditioning allo-HCT from HLA-matched donors in patients with high-risk MM. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) postrandomization, treated as a time to event. Secondary endpoints were grade II-IV and grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, best response, disease progression, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), toxicity, infection, and health-related quality of life. In this phase 2, double-blinded, prospective multicenter trial, we randomized patients with high-risk MM (ie, those with poor-risk cytogenetics, plasma cell leukemia, or relapsing within 24 months after autologous HCT) to ixazomib (3 mg on days 1, 8, and 15) or placebo after allo-HCT. The conditioning regimen included fludarabine/melphalan/bortezomib with tacrolimus plus methotrexate for GVHD. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, of whom 52 (91.2%) underwent allo-HCT and 43 (82.7%) were randomized to ixazomib versus placebo. At 21 months postrandomization, the ixazomib and placebo groups had similar PFS (55.3% versus 59.1%; P = 1.00) and OS (94.7% versus 86.4%; P = .17). The cumulative incidences of grade III-IV acute GVHD at 100 days (9.5% versus 0%) and chronic GVHD at 12 months (68.6% versus 63.6%) also were similar in the 2 groups. The secondary analysis showed that at 24 months post-allo-HCT, PFS and OS were 52% and 82%, respectively, with a corresponding NRM of 11.7%. These results demonstrate the safety and durable disease control with allo-HCT in high-risk MM patients. We could not adequately assess the efficacy of ixazomib maintenance because the trial terminated early owing to enrollment delays, but there was no indication of any impact on outcomes.

Maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

In the last two decades, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies have greatly improved the overall survival of patients with multiple myeloma. However, multiple myeloma remains incurable, and high-risk patients have poor long-term survival. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is not considered standard therapy because of relatively high transplant-related mortality and relapse rates, the graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect makes it a potentially curative therapy. Therefore, allo-HCT remains a treatment option for younger patients and those with high-risk myeloma. Maintenance therapy with novel agents has recently been attempted to reduce relapse in patients undergoing allo-HCT, but its effectiveness remains unclear. This review focuses on the role of maintenance therapy after allo-HCT in patients with myeloma. Maintenance therapy using IMiDs and/or PIs after allo-HCT may be effective in reducing relapse or improving response because it may prevent early progression before achievement of the GVM effect or enhance the GVM effect. However, care must be taken to avoid complications, such as graft-versus-host disease. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal maintenance drugs, drug combinations, dosing, start timing, and number of cycles.

GVHD Pathogenesis, Prevention and Treatment: Lessons From Humanized Mouse Transplant Models

Graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) is the most common cause of non-relapse mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) despite advances in conditioning regimens, HLA genotyping and immune suppression. While murine studies have yielded important insights into the cellular responses of GVHD, differences between murine and human biology has hindered the translation of novel therapies into the clinic. Recently, the field has expanded the ability to investigate primary human T cell responses through the transplantation of human T cells into immunodeficient mice. These xenogeneic HSCT models benefit from the human T cell receptors, CD4 and CD8 proteins having cross-reactivity to murine MHC in addition to several cytokines and co-stimulatory proteins. This has allowed for the direct assessment of key factors in GVHD pathogenesis to be investigated prior to entering clinical trials. In this review, we will summarize the current state of clinical GVHD research and discuss how xenogeneic HSCT models will aid in advancing the current pipeline of novel GVHD prophylaxis therapies into the clinic.