Troglitazone enhances tamoxifen-induced growth inhibitory activity of MCF-7 cells

PPARγ antagonism as a new tool for preventing or overcoming endocrine resistance in luminal A breast cancers

PURPOSE

This research investigates the role of PPARγ in the complex molecular events underlying the acquisition of resistance to tamoxifen (Tam) in luminal A breast cancer (BC) cells. Furthermore, it focuses on evaluating the possibility of repurposing Imatinib mesylate, an FDA-approved anticancer agent recently recognized also as a PPARγ antagonist, for the personalized therapy of endocrine-resistant BC with increased PPARγ expression.

METHODS

Differential gene expression between parental and Tam-resistant MCF7 cells was assessed by RNA-seq followed by bioinformatics analysis and validation by RT-qPCR. PPARγ was downregulated by esiRNAs or inhibited by the antagonist GW9662. Cell viability and proliferation were measured by MTT and colony formation assays. Spheroids were prepared from parental and Tam-resistant MCF7 cells. Other luminal A BC cell lines resistant to Tam were generated.

RESULTS

In MCF7-TamR cells, PPARγ and several of its target genes were significantly upregulated. Increased PPARγ expression was due to the modulation of its positive/negative transcriptional regulators. Downregulating PPARγ with esiRNAs or GW9662 effectively killed parental and Tam-resistant cells and spheroids. Imatinib revealed to be as effective as GW9662 in restoring Tam susceptibility of these cells. PPARγ overexpression was also observed in the newly-selected Tam-resistant luminal A BC cells, in which GW9662 and Imatinib restored their susceptibility to Tam.

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that the overexpression of PPARγ is a frequent occurrence during acquisition of Tam resistance in luminal A BC cells, and that PPARγ antagonism represents an alternative therapeutic approach for the personalized treatment of BC showing dysregulation of this nuclear receptor.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as therapeutic target for cancer

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are transcription factors belonging to the nuclear receptor family. There are three subtypes of PPARs, including PPAR-α, PPAR-β/δ and PPAR-γ. They are expressed in different tissues and act by regulating the expression of target genes in the form of binding to ligands. Various subtypes of PPAR have been shown to have significant roles in a wide range of biological processes including lipid metabolism, body energy homeostasis, cell proliferation and differentiation, bone formation, tissue repair and remodelling. Recent studies have found that PPARs are closely related to tumours. They are involved in cancer cell growth, angiogenesis and tumour immune response, and are essential components in tumour progression and metastasis. As such, they have become a target for cancer therapy research. In this review, we discussed the current state of knowledge on the involvement of PPARs in cancer, including their role in tumourigenesis, the impact of PPARs in tumour microenvironment and the potential of using PPARs combinational therapy to treat cancer by targeting essential signal pathways, or as adjuvants to boost the effects of current chemo and immunotherapies. Our review highlights the complexity of PPARs in cancer and the need for a better understanding of the mechanism in order to design effective cancer therapies.

The role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell metabolism, and anticancer therapy

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) have been extensively studied for over 3 decades and consist of three isotypes, including PPARα, γ, and β/δ, that were originally considered key metabolic regulators controlling energy homeostasis in the body. Cancer has become a leading cause of human mortality worldwide, and the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in cancer is increasingly being investigated, especially the deep molecular mechanisms and effective cancer therapies. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are an important class of lipid sensors and are involved in the regulation of multiple metabolic pathways and cell fate. They can regulate cancer progression in different tissues by activating endogenous or synthetic compounds. This review emphasizes the significance and knowledge of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in the tumor microenvironment, tumor cell metabolism, and anti-cancer treatment by summarizing recent research on peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. In general, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors either promote or suppress cancer in different types of tumor microenvironments. The emergence of this difference depends on various factors, including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor type, cancer type, and tumor stage. Simultaneously, the effect of anti-cancer therapy based on drug-targeted PPARs differs or even opposes among the three peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor homotypes and different cancer types. Therefore, the current status and challenges of the use of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors agonists and antagonists in cancer treatment are further explored in this review.

PPAR-γ Modulators as Current and Potential Cancer Treatments

Worldwide, cancer has become one of the leading causes of mortality. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (PPARs) is a family of critical sensors of lipids as well as regulators of diverse metabolic pathways. They are also equipped with the capability to promote eNOS activation, regulate immunity and inflammation response. Aside from the established properties, emerging discoveries are also made in PPAR's functions in the cancer field. All considerations are given, there exists great potential in PPAR modulators which may hold in the management of cancers. In particular, PPAR-γ, the most expressed subtype in adipose tissues with two isoforms of different tissue distribution, has been proven to be able to inhibit cell proliferation, induce cell cycle termination and apoptosis of multiple cancer cells, promote intercellular adhesion, and cripple the inflamed state of tumor microenvironment, both on transcriptional and protein level. However, despite the multi-functionalities, the safety of PPAR-γ modulators is still of clinical concern in terms of dosage, drug interactions, cancer types and stages, etc. This review aims to consolidate the functions of PPAR-γ, the current and potential applications of PPAR-γ modulators, and the challenges in applying PPAR-γ modulators to cancer treatment, in both laboratory and clinical settings. We sincerely hope to provide a comprehensive perspective on the prospect of PPAR-γ applicability in the field of cancer treatment.

PPARgamma: A Potential Intrinsic and Extrinsic Molecular Target for Breast Cancer Therapy

Over the last decades, the breast tumor microenvironment (TME) has been increasingly recognized as a key player in tumor development and progression and as a promising prognostic and therapeutic target for breast cancer patients. The breast TME, representing a complex network of cellular signaling—deriving from different stromal cell types as well as extracellular matrix components, extracellular vesicles, and soluble growth factors—establishes a crosstalk with cancer cells sustaining tumor progression. A significant emphasis derives from the tumor surrounding inflammation responsible for the failure of the immune system to effectively restrain breast cancer growth. Thus, effective therapeutic strategies require a deeper understanding of the interplay between tumor and stroma, aimed at targeting both the intrinsic neoplastic cells and the extrinsic surrounding stroma. In this scenario, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) γ, primarily known as a metabolic regulator, emerged as a potential target for breast cancer treatment since it functions in breast cancer cells and several components of the breast TME. In particular, the activation of PPARγ by natural and synthetic ligands inhibits breast cancer cell growth, motility, and invasiveness. Moreover, activated PPARγ may educate altered stromal cells, counteracting the pro-inflammatory milieu that drive breast cancer progression. Interestingly, using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, PPARγ also emerges as a prognostically favorable factor in breast cancer patients. In this perspective, we briefly discuss the mechanisms by which PPARγ is implicated in tumor biology as well as in the complex regulatory networks within the breast TME. This may help to profile approaches that provide a simultaneous inhibition of epithelial cells and TME components, offering a more efficient way to treat breast cancer.

The Role of PPARγ Ligands in Breast Cancer: From Basic Research to Clinical Studies

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily, is a ligand-dependent transcription factor involved in a variety of pathophysiological conditions such as inflammation, metabolic disorders, cardiovascular disease, and cancers. In this latter context, PPARγ is expressed in many tumors including breast cancer, and its function upon binding of ligands has been linked to the tumor development, progression, and metastasis. Over the last decade, much research has focused on the potential of natural agonists for PPARγ including fatty acids and prostanoids that act as weak ligands compared to the strong and synthetic PPARγ agonists such as thiazolidinedione drugs. Both natural and synthetic compounds have been implicated in the negative regulation of breast cancer growth and progression. The aim of the present review is to summarize the role of PPARγ activation in breast cancer focusing on the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the regulation of cell proliferation, cell cycle, and cell death, in the modulation of motility and invasion as well as in the cross-talk with other different signaling pathways. Besides, we also provide an overview of the in vivo breast cancer models and clinical studies. The therapeutic effects of natural and synthetic PPARγ ligands, as antineoplastic agents, represent a fascinating and clinically a potential translatable area of research with regards to the battle against cancer.

PPARγ Agonists in Combination Cancer Therapies

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor acting as a transcription factor involved in the regulation of energy metabolism, cell cycle, cell differentiation, and apoptosis. These unique properties constitute a strong therapeutic potential that place PPARγ agonists as one of the most interesting and widely studied anticancer molecules. Although PPARγ agonists exert significant, antiproliferative and tumoricidal activity in vitro, their anticancer efficacy in animal models is ambiguous, and their effectiveness in clinical trials in monotherapy is unsatisfactory. However, due to pleiotropic effects of PPARγ activation in normal and tumor cells, PPARγ ligands interact with many antitumor treatment modalities and synergistically potentiate their effectiveness. The most spectacular example is a combination of PPARγ ligands with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). In this setting, PPARγ activation sensitizes leukemic stem cells, resistant to any previous form of treatment, to targeted therapy. Thus, this combination is believed to be the first pharmacological therapy able to cure CML patients. Within the last decade, a significant body of data confirming the benefits of the addition of PPARγ ligands to various antitumor therapies, including chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, has been published. Although the majority of these studies have been carried out in vitro or animal tumor models, a few successful attempts to introduce PPARγ ligands into anticancer therapy in humans have been recently made. In this review, we aim to summarize shines and shadows of targeting PPARγ in antitumor therapies.

The phytoestrogenic Cyclopia extract, SM6Met, increases median tumor free survival and reduces tumor mass and volume in chemically induced rat mammary gland carcinogenesis

SM6Met, a phytoestrogenic extract of Cyclopia subternata indigenous to the Western Cape province of South Africa, displays estrogenic attributes with potential for breast cancer chemoprevention. In this study, we report that SM6Met, in the presence of estradiol, induces a significant cell cycle G0/G1 phase arrest similar to the selective estrogen receptor modulator, tamoxifen. Furthermore, as a proof of concept, in the N-Methyl-N-nitrosourea induced rat mammary gland carcinogenesis model, SM6Met increases tumor latency by 7days and median tumor free survival by 42 days, while decreasing palpable tumor frequency by 32%, tumor mass by 40%, and tumor volume by 53%. Therefore, the current study provides proof of concept that SM6Met has definite potential as a chemopreventative agent against the development and progression of breast cancer.

Chemotherapy and chemoprevention by thiazolidinediones

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are synthetic ligands of Peroxisome-Proliferator-Activated Receptor gamma (PPARγ). Troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone have been approved for treatment of diabetes mellitus type II. All three compounds, together with the first TZD ciglitazone, also showed an antitumor effect in preclinical studies and a beneficial effect in some clinical trials. This review summarizes hypotheses on the role of PPARγ in tumors, on cellular targets of TZDs, antitumor effects of monotherapy and of TZDs in combination with other compounds, with a focus on their role in the treatment of differentiated thyroid carcinoma. The results of chemopreventive effects of TZDs are also considered. Existing data suggest that the action of TZDs is highly complex and that actions do not correlate with cellular PPARγ expression status. Effects are cell-, species-, and compound-specific and concentration-dependent. Data from human trials suggest the efficacy of TZDs as monotherapy in prostate cancer and glioma and as chemopreventive agent in colon, lung, and breast cancer. TZDs in combination with other therapies might increase antitumor effects in thyroid cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, and melanoma.

Positive and negative effects of glitazones in carcinogenesis: experimental models vs. clinical practice

Diabetes increases cancer risk, which may be modulated by careful choice of treatment. Experimental reports showed efficacy of glitazones in various in vitro and in vivo models of carcinogenesis, but procarcinogenic effects in some models were reported too, and, similarly, data on cancer incidence in glitazone users are inconsistent. This review summarizes oncostatic effects of glitazones in preclinical and clinical studies and brings a brief summary of their impact on cancer risk in diabetic patients, with a focus on the association between pioglitazone use and bladder cancer.

Tualang honey promotes apoptotic cell death induced by tamoxifen in breast cancer cell lines

Tualang honey (TH) is rich in flavonoids and phenolic acids and has significant anticancer activity against breast cancer cells comparable to the effect of tamoxifen (TAM), in vitro. The current study evaluated the effects of TH when used in combination with TAM on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. We observed that TH promoted the anticancer activity of TAM in both the estrogen receptor-(ER-)responsive and ER-nonresponsive human breast cancer cell lines. Flow cytometric analyses indicated accelerated apoptosis especially in MDA-MB-231 cells and with the involvement of caspase-3/7, -8 and -9 activation as shown by fluorescence microscopy. Depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane was also increased in both cell lines when TH was used in combination with TAM compared to TAM treatment alone. TH may therefore be a potential adjuvant to be used with TAM for reducing the dose of TAM, hence, reducing TAM-induced adverse effects.

PPARγ antagonist GW9662 induces functional estrogen receptor in mouse mammary organ culture: potential translational significance

The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) plays a central role in regulating metabolism, including interaction with the estrogen receptor-α (ERα). Significantly, PPARγ activity can be modulated by small molecules to control cancer both in vitro and in vivo (Yin et al., Cancer Res 69:687-694, 2009). Here, we evaluated the effects of the PPARγ agonist GW7845 and the PPARγ antagonist GW9662 on DMBA-induced mammary alveolar lesions (MAL) in a mouse mammary organ culture. The results were as follows: (a) the incidence of MAL development was significantly inhibited by GW 7845 and GW 9662; (b) GW9662 but not GW7845, in the presence of estradiol, induced ER and PR expression in mammary glands and functional ERα in MAL; (c) while GW9662 inhibited expression of adipsin and ap2, GW 7845 enhanced expression of these PPARγ-response genes; and (d) Tamoxifen caused significant inhibition of GW9662 treated MAL, suggesting that GW9662 sensitizes MAL to antiestrogen treatment, presumably through rendering functional ERα and induction of PR. The induction of ERα by GW9662, including newer analogs, may permit use of anti-ER strategies to inhibit breast cancer in ER- patients.

Modern approach to metabolic rehabilitation of cancer patients: biguanides (phenformin and metformin) and beyond

Comparing the experience accumulated for more than 40 years in the Laboratory of Endocrinology of Petrov Institute of Oncology (St Petersburg, Russia) with similar approaches practiced elsewhere, evidence supports the reasonability of metabolic rehabilitation of patients suffering from breast cancer or other hormone-dependent malignancies. The primary objective of such approaches is to improve treatment results by ameliorating hormonal-metabolic disturbances, including excess body fat, glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and manifestations of endocrine-genotoxic switchings, and modify tissue and cellular targets or mechanisms related or nondirectly related to the aforementioned disturbances. The relevant measures may be categorized as pharmacological (antidiabetic biguanides exemplified with metformin being most popular but not exclusive) and nonpharmacological (rational nutrition, moderate physical activity and so forth) and used separately or in different combinations.

Pioglitazone in chemically induced mammary carcinogenesis in rats

Data available from in-vitro and in-vivo studies suggest oncostatic properties of peroral antidiabetics, thiazolidinediones, in many types of cancer. This study is the first report on the chemopreventive effect of pioglitazone in mammary carcinogenesis in rats. Mammary carcinogenesis was induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea administered in two intraperitoneal doses per 50 mg/kg bodyweight on the 43rd and 50th postnatal days. Pioglitazone was administered in the diet at concentrations of 10 and 100 ppm, respectively, 12 days before the first carcinogen dose until the termination of the experiment. During the experiment, the animals were weighed weekly and palpated for the presence of mammary tumors, and the incidence, latency, tumor frequency, and tumor volume were recorded. The experiment was terminated 17 weeks after the first carcinogen dose; basic tumor growth parameters and metabolic and hormonal variables were evaluated. Pioglitazone at higher concentration decreased incidence and frequency per group from the 11th week of experiment when compared with the control group and a group receiving a lower dose. Pioglitazone at a higher dose decreased the final incidence by 38%, frequency per group by 63%, and extended latency period by 32% when compared with the control group. Our data suggest that pioglitazone and other glitazones should be further investigated for oncopreventive effects.

Thiazolidinediones induce osteocyte apoptosis and increase sclerostin expression

AIMS

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are associated with a higher risk of bone fracture in women compared with men. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether TZDs could influence osteocyte behaviour and contribute to the skeletal phenotype observed in TZD-treated patients.

METHODS

The murine MLO-Y4 cell line was used as a source of osteocytes. These cells were cultured for 24 h with 0, 10(-8) m, 10(-7) m, 10(-6) m, 10(-5) m or 10(-4) m of pioglitazone, rosiglitazone or troglitazone in the presence or absence of 17beta-oestradiol. The extent of osteocyte apoptosis was assessed, as was the expression of the bone formation inhibitor sclerostin and receptor activator for nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) also.

RESULTS

In the absence of 17beta-oestradiol, pioglitazone, rosiglitazone and troglitazone induced osteocyte apoptosis dose-dependently even at the lowest concentration of 10(-8) m. Furthermore, the expression of sclerostin but not RANKL was significantly increased in TZD-treated cultures compared with untreated cultures. The presence of 17beta-oestradiol significantly reduced TZD-induced osteocyte apoptosis and also sclerostin up-regulation.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings therefore raise the potential concern of using TZDs in post-menopausal women where the lack of oestrogen would not prevent osteocyte apoptosis and sclerostin up-regulation and may aggravate the reduction in bone mass in these patients.

Troglitazone is an estrogen-related receptor alpha and gamma inverse agonist

As a ligand for peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma), troglitazone inhibits cell growth by mechanisms besides activating PPAR gamma. In this study, we found that troglitazone interfered with the interactions between estrogen-related receptor alpha and gamma (ERR alpha and ERR gamma) and their coactivator PPAR gamma coactivator-1 alpha (PGC-1 alpha) functioning as an inverse agonist. Additionally, troglitazone suppressed the expressions of PGC-1 alpha and its related member PGC-1 beta which are key regulators of mitochondrial function. Consequently, troglitazone reduced mitochondrial mass and suppressed the expressions of superoxide dismutases to elevate reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. The increase in ROS in turn induced the expression of cell cycle inhibitor p21(WAF1). We therefore propose that ERR alpha and ERR gamma are alternative targets of troglitazone important for mediating its growth suppressive effect.

KLF4-dependent, PPARgamma-induced expression of GPA33 in colon cancer cell lines

The glycoprotein A33 (GPA33) is a colon cancer antigen. Phase I trials with 131I and 125I monoclonal antibody A33 in colon carcinoma patients showed excellent localization to colorectal cancer and some evidence of tumor response. Using DNA microarrays, we have identified the GPA33 gene as a target of PPARgamma in HT29-Cl.16E colon cancer cells. Treatment of HT29-Cl.16E, Caco2, SW1116 and LS174T colon cancer cells with the PPARgamma agonist GW7845 induced a 2- to 6-fold increase in GPA33 mRNA as determined by real-time PCR. This induction was also found in HT29-Cl.16E cells treated with rosiglitazone and ciglitazone and was prevented by cotreatment with the PPARgamma antagonist GW9662, indicating that this regulation was PPARgamma dependent. No canonical PPAR responsive element was found in the GPA33 promoter. We therefore analyzed the expression of transcription factors involved in GPA33 expression. CDXl, CDX2 and KLF5 expression was not modified by PPARgamma activation. By contrast, a significant increase in KLF4 was seen, both at mRNA and protein levels. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation studies demonstrated that an increased amount of KLF4 protein was bound to the GPA33 promoter in cells treated with rosiglitazone. Finally, downregulation of KLF4 expression by siRNA reduced rosiglitazone-induced GPA33 expression. This indicates that PPARgamma activation induces KLF4 expression, which in turn increases GPA33 expression. We also demonstrate that PPARgamma activation leads to increased (p21WAF1/Cip1 and keratin 19) or decreased (cyclin D1) expression of known KLF4 targets, suggesting that KLF4 is a nodal player in a network of PPARgamma-regulated genes.