Effect of glucocorticoid on the biosynthesis of growth hormone-containing secretory granules in pituitary cells

Dynamics of somatostatin 4 receptor expression during chronic-stress loading and its potential as a chronic-stress marker

Chronic stress has been implicated in mental illnesses and depressive behaviors. Somatostatin 4 receptor (SSTR4) has been shown to mediate anxiolytic and depression-like effects. Here, we aimed to explore the potential of SSTR4 as a diagnostic marker for chronic stress in mice. The mice were divided into single stress, chronic restraint stress, and control groups, and Sstr4 mRNA expression in the pituitary, lungs, and thymus, its protein expression in the thymus, were analyzed. Compared to controls, Sstr4 mRNA expression decreased significantly in the pituitary gland of the chronic and single-stress groups (P = 0.0181 and 0.0022, respectively) and lungs of the single-stress group (P = 0.0124), whereas it significantly increased in the thymus of the chronic-stress group (P = 0.0313). Thymic SSTR4 expression did not decrease significantly in stress groups compared to that in the control group (P = 0.0963). These results suggest that SSTR4 expression fluctuates in response to stress. Furthermore, Sstr4 mRNA expression dynamics in each organ differed based on single or chronic restraint stress-loading periods. In conclusion, this study suggests that investigating SSTR4 expression in each organ could allow for its use as a stress marker to estimate the stress-loading period and aid in diagnosing chronic stress.

FOXO1 regulates expression of Neurod4 in the pituitary gland

Pituitary gland function is regulated by the activity of various transcription factors that control cell fate decisions leading to cellular differentiation and hormone production. FOXO1 is necessary for normal somatotrope differentiation and function. Recent in vivo data implicate FOXO1 in the regulation of genes important for somatotrope differentiation including Gh1, Neurod4, and Pou1f1. In the current study, the somatotrope-like cell line GH3 was treated with a FOXO1 inhibitor, resulting in significant reduction in Neurod4 and Gh1 expression. Consistent with these findings, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of Foxo1 in GH3 cells significantly reduced expression of Gh1 and Neurod4. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing identifies novel FOXO1 binding sites associated with the Neurod4, Gh1, and Pou1f1 genes. The FOXO1 binding site in the Neurod4 gene exhibits enhancer activity in somatotrope-like cells but not in gonadotrope-like cells. These data strongly suggest FOXO1 directly contributes to the transcriptional control of genes important for somatotrope differentiation.

The G protein-coupled receptor family C group 6 subtype A (GPRC6A) receptor is involved in amino acid-induced glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from GLUTag cells

Although amino acids are dietary nutrients that evoke the secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) from intestinal L cells, the precise molecular mechanism(s) by which amino acids regulate GLP-1 secretion from intestinal L cells remains unknown. Here, we show that the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), family C group 6 subtype A (GPRC6A), is involved in amino acid-induced GLP-1 secretion from the intestinal L cell line GLUTag. Application of l-ornithine caused an increase in intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) in GLUTag cells. Application of a GPRC6A receptor antagonist, a phospholipase C inhibitor, or an IP(3) receptor antagonist significantly suppressed the l-ornithine-induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase. We found that the increase in [Ca(2+)](i) stimulated by l-ornithine correlated with GLP-1 secretion and that l-ornithine stimulation increased exocytosis in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, depletion of endogenous GPRC6A by a specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) inhibited the l-ornithine-induced [Ca(2+)](i) increase and GLP-1 secretion. Taken together, these findings suggest that the GPRC6A receptor functions as an amino acid sensor in GLUTag cells that promotes GLP-1 secretion.

Cellular and molecular specificity of pituitary gland physiology

The anterior pituitary gland has the ability to respond to complex signals derived from central and peripheral systems. Perception of these signals and their integration are mediated by cell interactions and cross-talk of multiple signaling transduction pathways and transcriptional regulatory networks that cooperate for hormone secretion, cell plasticity, and ultimately specific pituitary responses that are essential for an appropriate physiological response. We discuss the physiopathological and molecular mechanisms related to this integrative regulatory system of the anterior pituitary gland and how it contributes to modulate the gland functions and impacts on body homeostasis.

Epidermal growth factor-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase suppresses growth hormone expression and stimulates proliferation in MtT/ E cells

The mechanism for the inhibition of growth hormone (GH) expression by the epidermal growth factor (EGF) was examined in two clonal cell lines, MtT/E and MtT/S. The former has a negligible basal level of GH, whereas the latter has a high basal GH. The treatment of MtT/E cells with retinoic acid resulted in a significant increase in GH mRNA and subsequently GH. This stimulatory response to retinoic acid was strongly suppressed by EGF. This suppression was associated with an increase in the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (Erk1/2). The MEK [mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) kinases that activate ERK1 and ERK2] inhibitor, PD98059, clearly inhibited the phosphorylation of Erk1/2 and restored the stimulatory effects of retinoic acid. These results suggest that the inhibitory effects of EGF on GH expression are mediated by MAPK activation in these cells. By contrast to the GH-producing clones examined previously, EGF showed a marked stimulation of proliferation of the MtT/E cells through a mechanism dependent on MAPK activation. On the other hand, the inhibitory effect of EGF on GH expression was less pronounced and the stimulation of cellular proliferation was not seen in MtT/S cells, even though it induced Erk-phosphorylation similar to that seen in MtT/E. The distinct difference in the response to EGF between these two GH cell lines appears to be attributed to differences in the function of MAPK cascade in each cell line. This may reflect the developmental stage of the cells from which MtT/E and MtT/S are derived.