1
|
Sharma S, Dasgupta M, Vadaga BS, Kodgire P. Unfolding the symbiosis of AID, chromatin remodelers, and epigenetics-The ACE phenomenon of antibody diversity. Immunol Lett 2024; 269:106909. [PMID: 39128629 DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2024.106909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2024] [Revised: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 08/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is responsible for the initiation of somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class-switch recombination (CSR), which result in antibody affinity maturation and isotype switching, thus producing pathogen-specific antibodies. Chromatin dynamics and accessibility play a significant role in determining AID expression and its targeting. Chromatin remodelers contribute to the accessibility of the chromatin structure, thereby influencing the targeting of AID to Ig genes. Epigenetic modifications, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and miRNA expression, profoundly impact the regulation of AID and chromatin remodelers targeting Ig genes. Additionally, epigenetic modifications lead to chromatin rearrangement and thereby can change AID expression levels and its preferential targeting to Ig genes. This interplay is symbolized as the ACE phenomenon encapsulates three interconnected aspects: AID, Chromatin remodelers, and Epigenetic modifications. This review emphasizes the importance of understanding the intricate relationship between these aspects to unlock the therapeutic potential of these molecular processes and molecules.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurav Sharma
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, Simrol, Khandwa Road, Indore, 453552, India
| | - Mallar Dasgupta
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, Simrol, Khandwa Road, Indore, 453552, India
| | - Bindu Sai Vadaga
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, Simrol, Khandwa Road, Indore, 453552, India
| | - Prashant Kodgire
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore, Simrol, Khandwa Road, Indore, 453552, India.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bello A, Hirth G, Voigt S, Tepper S, Jungnickel B. Mechanism and regulation of secondary immunoglobulin diversification. Cell Cycle 2023; 22:2070-2087. [PMID: 37909747 PMCID: PMC10761156 DOI: 10.1080/15384101.2023.2275397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Secondary immunoglobulin diversification by somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination in B cells is instrumental for an adequate adaptive humoral immune response. These genetic events may, however, also introduce aberrations into other cellular genes and thereby cause B cell malignancies. While the basic mechanism of somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination is now well understood, their regulation and in particular the mechanism of their specific targeting to immunoglobulin genes is still rather mysterious. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the mechanism and regulation of secondary immunoglobulin diversification and discuss known mechanisms of physiological targeting to immunoglobulin genes and mistargeting to other cellular genes. We summarize open questions in the field and provide an outlook on future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Bello
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Gianna Hirth
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Stefanie Voigt
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Sandra Tepper
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Berit Jungnickel
- Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kumar K, Sinha SK, Maity U, Kirti PB, Kumar KRR. Insights into established and emerging roles of SR protein family in plants and animals. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS. RNA 2023; 14:e1763. [PMID: 36131558 DOI: 10.1002/wrna.1763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Splicing of pre-mRNA is an essential part of eukaryotic gene expression. Serine-/arginine-rich (SR) proteins are highly conserved RNA-binding proteins present in all metazoans and plants. SR proteins are involved in constitutive and alternative splicing, thereby regulating the transcriptome and proteome diversity in the organism. In addition to their role in splicing, SR proteins are also involved in mRNA export, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, mRNA stability, and translation. Due to their pivotal roles in mRNA metabolism, SR proteins play essential roles in normal growth and development. Hence, any misregulation of this set of proteins causes developmental defects in both plants and animals. SR proteins from the animal kingdom are extensively studied for their canonical and noncanonical functions. Compared with the animal kingdom, plant genomes harbor more SR protein-encoding genes and greater diversity of SR proteins, which are probably evolved for plant-specific functions. Evidence from both plants and animals confirms the essential role of SR proteins as regulators of gene expression influencing cellular processes, developmental stages, and disease conditions. This article is categorized under: RNA Processing > Splicing Mechanisms RNA Processing > Splicing Regulation/Alternative Splicing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kundan Kumar
- Department of Biotechnology, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University (IGNTU), Amarkantak, India
| | - Shubham Kumar Sinha
- Department of Biotechnology, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University (IGNTU), Amarkantak, India
| | - Upasana Maity
- Department of Biotechnology, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University (IGNTU), Amarkantak, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Paz S, Ritchie A, Mauer C, Caputi M. The RNA binding protein SRSF1 is a master switch of gene expression and regulation in the immune system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2020; 57:19-26. [PMID: 33160830 DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2020.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Serine/Arginine splicing factor 1 (SRSF1) is an RNA binding protein abundantly expressed in most tissues. The pleiotropic functions of SRSF1 exert multiple roles in gene expression by regulating major steps in transcription, processing, export through the nuclear pores and translation of nascent RNA transcripts. The aim of this review is to highlight recent findings in the functions of this protein and to describe its role in immune system development, functions and regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Paz
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, United States
| | - Anastasia Ritchie
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, United States
| | - Christopher Mauer
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, United States
| | - Massimo Caputi
- Charles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, 777 Glades Rd, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jaiswal A, Singh AK, Tamrakar A, Kodgire P. Unfolding the Role of Splicing Factors and RNA Debranching in AID Mediated Antibody Diversification. Int Rev Immunol 2020; 40:289-306. [PMID: 32924658 DOI: 10.1080/08830185.2020.1815725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Activated B-cells diversify their antibody repertoire via somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). SHM is restricted to the variable region, whereas, CSR is confined to the constant region of immunoglobulin (Ig) genes. Activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) is a crucial player in the diversification of antibodies in the activated B-cell. AID catalyzes the deamination of cytidine (C) into uracil (U) at Ig genes. Subsequently, low fidelity repair of U:G mismatches may lead to mutations. Transcription is essential for the AID action, as it provides a transient single-strand DNA substrate. Since splicing is a co-transcriptional event, various splicing factors or regulators influence the transcription. Numerous splicing factors are known to regulate the AID targeting, function, Ig transcription, and AID splicing, which eventually influence antibody diversification processes. Splicing regulator SRSF1-3, a splicing isoform of serine arginine-rich splicing factor (SRSF1), and CTNNBL1, a spliceosome interacting factor, interact with AID and play a critical role in SHM. Likewise, a splicing regulator polypyrimidine tract binding protein-2 (PTBP2) and the debranching enzyme (DBR1) debranches primary switch transcripts which later forms G-quadruplex structures, and the S region guide RNAs direct AID to S region DNA. Moreover, AID shows several alternate splicing isoforms, like AID devoid of exon-4 (AIDΔE4) that is expressed in various pathological conditions. Interestingly, RBM5, a splicing regulator, is responsible for the skipping of AID exon 4. In this review, we discuss the role and significance of splicing factors in the AID mediated antibody diversification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankit Jaiswal
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Amit Kumar Singh
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Anubhav Tamrakar
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Prashant Kodgire
- Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Indore, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Singh AK, Tamrakar A, Jaiswal A, Kanayama N, Kodgire P. SRSF1-3, a splicing and somatic hypermutation regulator, controls transcription of IgV genes via chromatin regulators SATB2, UBN1 and histone variant H3.3. Mol Immunol 2020; 119:69-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2020.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Revised: 01/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
7
|
Splicing regulator SRSF1-3 that controls somatic hypermutation of IgV genes interacts with topoisomerase 1 and AID. Mol Immunol 2019; 116:63-72. [PMID: 31622795 DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2019] [Revised: 09/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Somatic hypermutation (SHM) of Ig genes is initiated by activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) and requires target gene transcription. A splice isoform of SRSF1, SRSF1-3, is necessary for AID-dependent SHM of IgV genes. Nevertheless, its exact molecular mechanism of action in SHM remains unknown. Our in silico studies show that, unlike SRSF1, SRSF1-3 lacks a strong nuclear localization domain. We show that the absence of RS domain in SRSF1-3 affects its nuclear localization, as compared to SRSF1. Consequently, SRSF1-3 is predominantly present in the cytoplasm. Remarkably, co-immunoprecipitation studies showed that SRSF1-3 interacts with Topoisomerase 1 (TOP1), a crucial regulator of SHM that assists in generating ssDNA for AID activity. Moreover, the immunofluorescence studies confirmed that SRSF1-3 and TOP1 are co-localized in the nucleus. Furthermore, Proximity Ligation Assay corroborated the direct interaction between SRSF1-3 and TOP1. An interaction between SRSF1-3 and TOP1 suggests that SRSF1-3 likely influences the TOP1 activity and consequently can aid in SHM. Accordingly, SRSF1-3 probably acts as a link between TOP1 and SHM, by spatially regulating TOP1 activity at the Ig locus. We also confirmed the interaction between SRSF1-3 and AID in chicken B-cells. Thus, SRSF1-3 shows dual-regulation of SHM, via interacting with AID as well as TOP1.
Collapse
|
8
|
RNA-binding proteins control gene expression and cell fate in the immune system. Nat Immunol 2018; 19:120-129. [PMID: 29348497 DOI: 10.1038/s41590-017-0028-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are essential for the development and function of the immune system. They interact dynamically with RNA to control its biogenesis and turnover by transcription-dependent and transcription-independent mechanisms. In this Review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms by which RBPs allow gene expression changes to occur at different speeds and to varying degrees, and which RBPs regulate the diversity of the transcriptome and proteome. These proteins are nodes for integration of transcriptional and signaling networks and are intimately linked to intermediary metabolism. They are essential components of regulatory feedback mechanisms that maintain immune tolerance and limit inflammation. The role of RBPs in malignancy and autoimmunity has led to their emergence as targets for the development of new therapeutic modalities.
Collapse
|