Different mechanisms of cisplatin resistance development in human lung cancer cells

From resistance to resilience: Uncovering chemotherapeutic resistance mechanisms; insights from established models

Despite the tremendous advances in cancer treatment, resistance to chemotherapeutic agents impedes higher success rates and accounts for major relapses in cancer therapy. Moreover, the resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapy is linked to low efficacy and high recurrence of cancer. To stand up against chemotherapy resistance, different models of chemotherapy resistance have been established to study various molecular mechanisms of chemotherapy resistance. Consequently, this review is going to discuss different models of induction of chemotherapy resistance, highlighting the most common mechanisms of cancer resistance against different chemotherapeutic agents, including overexpression of efflux pumps, drug inactivation, epigenetic modulation, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. This review aims to open a new avenue for researchers to lower the resistance to the existing chemotherapeutic agents, develop new therapeutic agents with low resistance potential, and establish possible prognostic markers for chemotherapy resistance.

siRNA-mediated silencing of Nanog reduces stemness properties and increases the sensitivity of HepG2 cells to cisplatin

Liver cancer is one of the most lethal cancers having worldwide prevalence. Despite significant progress in cancer therapy, liver cancer-induced mortality is very high. Nanog, as an essential transcription factor modulating cellular multipotency, causes tumor progression, drug resistance, and preserves stemness properties in various tumors such as liver cancer. Thus, this research was conducted to evaluate the impact of combination therapy of Nanog siRNA/cisplatin on the sensitivity of liver cancer cells to this drug. HepG2 cells were transfected with Nanog siRNA and treated with cisplatin, individually and in combination. Then, it was observed that in transfected HepG2 cells, Nanog expression was significantly reduced at mRNA level and also these cells were sensitized to cisplatin. In addition, to assess the impact of Nanog siRNA and cisplatin individually and in combination on cells' viability, migration capacity, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression, the MTT, wound healing, colony formation assay, Annexin V/PI staining, and flow cytometry assays were applied on HepG2 cells, respectively. Also, the quantitive Real-Time PCR was used to check the expression of stemness-associated genes (CD44, CD133, and Sox2), and apoptosis-related genes (caspase-3, 8, 9, BAX and Bcl2) after combination therapy. It is indicated that the combination of Nanog siRNA and cisplatin significantly reduced proliferation, migration, and colony formation ability, as well as increased apoptosis rate, and cell cycle arrest. Also, it is found that the combination of Nanog siRNA and cisplatin down-regulated the expression of stemness-associated genes and up-regulated apoptosis-related genes in HepG2 cells. Hence, it can be suggested that Nanog inhibition in combination with cisplatin is a potential therapeutic strategy for developing new therapeutic approaches for liver cancer.

SOX2 knockdown with siRNA reverses cisplatin resistance in NSCLC by regulating APE1 signaling

SOX2 is related to drug resistance in many types of cancer, including lung cancer. Herein, we investigated the role of SOX2 and its regulatory signaling in cisplatin-treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The effects of SOX2 on cell viability, proliferation, and apoptosis were evaluated in vitro. Western blotting, real-time quantitative PCR, immunohistochemistry, and luciferase reporter assays were used to investigate the underlying mechanism. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were used to assess the relationship between SOX2 expression and patient survival. A549/CDDP cells had marked resistance to cisplatin and stronger colony formation ability than A549 cells. The expression of SOX2 protein or mRNA in A549/CDDP was higher than that in A549. Knockdown of SOX2 in A549/CDDP-induced apoptosis by inhibiting colony formation and decreasing viability, but overexpression of SOX2 reversed these effects. Interestingly, Genomatix software predicted that the APE1 promoter has some SOX2 binding sites, while the SOX2 promoter has no APE1 binding sites. Furthermore, luciferase reporter assays proved that SOX2 could bind the promoter of APE1 in 293T cells. We further verified that SOX2 expression was not affected by shAPE1 in A549/CDDP. As expected, colony formation was obviously inhibited and apoptosis was strongly enhanced in A549/CDDP treated with SOX2 siSOX2 alone or combined with CDDP compared with control cells. Meaningfully, patients with low expression of SOX2, and even including its regulating APE1, survived longer than those with high expression of SOX2, and APE1. siSOX2 overcomes cisplatin resistance by regulating APE1 signaling, providing a new target for overcoming cisplatin resistance in NSCLC.

Research progress on SLC7A11 in the regulation of cystine/cysteine metabolism in tumors

Solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11) is a major transporter regulating cysteine metabolism and is widely expressed in a variety of tumor cells. SLC7A11 plays an important role in the occurrence, development, invasion and metastasis of tumors by regulating the transport of cysteine in the tumor microenvironment. SLC7A11 is expected to become a new therapeutic target and prognostic indicator for the individualized treatment of patients. According to relevant research reports, SLC7A11 can predict the stages and metastasis of liver, breast and lung cancer. Therefore, an in-depth exploration of the role of SLC7A11 in tumors may be important for the screening, early diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of patients with tumors. The current review summarizes the research progress on SLC7A11 in liver cancer, lung cancer and other tumors on the basis of previous primary studies. In addition, the present review systematically elaborates on the three main aspects of SLC7A11 pathways in some tumors, the cancer-promoting mechanisms, and the therapeutic relationship between SLC7A11 and tumors. Finally, the present review aims to provide a reference for assessing whether SLC7A11 can be used as a prognostic indicator and treatment target for tumor patients, and the future research direction with regard to SLC7A11 in tumors.

Membrane model as key tool in the study of glutathione-s-transferase mediated anticancer drug resistance

Glutathione-s-transferase is believed to be involved in the resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs, which depends on the interaction with the cell membranes. In this study, we employed Langmuir monolayers of a mixture of phospholipids and cholesterol (MIX) as models for tumor cell membranes and investigated their interaction with the anticancer drugs cisplatin (CDDP) and doxorubicin (DOX). We found that both DOX and CDDP expand and affect the elasticity of MIX monolayers, but these effects are hindered when glutathione-s-transferase (GST) and its cofactor glutathione (GSH) are incorporated. Changes are induced by DOX or CDDP on the polarization-modulated infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (PM-IRRAS) data for MIX/GST/GSH monolayers, thus denoting some degree of interaction that is not sufficient to alter the monolayer mechanical properties. Overall, the results presented here give support to the hypothesis of the inactivation of DOX and CDDP by GST and point to possible directions to detect and fight drug resistance.

MicroRNA-106a-5p alleviated the resistance of cisplatin in lung cancer cells by targeting Jumonji domain containing 6

BACKGROUND

Cisplatin (DDP) is used for lung cancer therapy. MicroRNAs, small non-coding RNAs, may contribute to tumorigenesis as well as to drug resistance. We examined regulatory functions of miR-106a-5p in DDP-resistant lung cancer cells.

METHODS

Differentially expressed miRNAs were provided by Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets and RT-qPCR examined RNA levels of miR-106a-5p and Jumonji domain-containing protein 6 (JMJD6), an enzyme causing lysine hydroxylation and arginine demethylation. Bindings were determined by luciferase reporter assay. Additionally, the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) of DDP was determined through Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) after treated by DDP (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 75 μM) and apoptosis rates were analyzed using flow cytometry. Besides that, migratory ability and invasiveness were examined by transwell. Western blot was for measuring protein levels of Bcl-2, Bax in apoptosis and E-cadherin, N-cadherin in epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).

RESULTS

The IC₅₀ value of DDP-resistant A549 (A549/DDP) cells was higher, so were migration, invasion and N-cadherin in EMT while the apoptosis and E-cadherin in EMT were lower versus the parental A549 cells (no DDP resistance). MiR-106a-5p was low expressed in A549/DDP cells while its overexpression caused decreased migration, invasiveness and EMT but promoted apoptosis. JMJD6 was directly targeted and negatively regulated by miR-106a-5p. Inhibited JMJD6 decreased migratory ability, invasion and EMT but improved apoptosis. Moreover, knockdown of miR-106a-5p induced high level of JMJD6, migration, invasiveness and EMT but low apoptosis rates, which were restrained by JMJD6 suppression.

CONCLUSION

MiR-106a-5p/JMJD6 axis accelerated cell apoptosis and suppressed invasiveness, migration and EMT in A549/DDP cells.

Diclofenac potentiates the antitumor effect of cisplatin in a xenograft mouse model transplanted with cisplatin-resistant cells without enhancing cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity

Cisplatin (CDDP) is a well-known anticancer agent, and CDDP-induced nephrotoxicity (CIN) is one of the most serious adverse effects. Previously, we revealed that while celecoxib reduces CIN, diclofenac does not appear to enhance it. Furthermore, we reported that diclofenac additively enhances the cytotoxic effect of CDDP on CDDP-resistant A549 cells (A549/DDP cells) and their spheroids. In addition, celecoxib reduces the cytotoxic effect of CDDP on A549/DDP cells while demonstrating an anticancer effect; however, it enhanced the effect of CDDP cytotoxicity on spheroids. Therefore, we evaluated the effects of diclofenac or celecoxib on CIN and the antitumor effect of CDDP in a xenograft mouse model transplanted with A549/DDP cells. Although CDDP did not decrease tumor size and tumor weight, these parameters were significantly reduced following co-administration with diclofenac when compared with the control group. Conversely, celecoxib marginally suppressed the antitumor effect of CDDP. Moreover, CDDP increased the mRNA levels of kidney injury molecule 1 (Kim-1), a renal disorder marker, in the kidneys of xenograft mice; treatment with celecoxib and diclofenac did not impact Kim-1 mRNA levels increased by CDDP. In conclusion, diclofenac potentiated the antitumor effect of CDDP without enhancing CIN.

SIRT1/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ Correlate With Hypoxia-Induced Chemoresistance in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Resistance is the major cause of treatment failure and disease progression in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is evidence that hypoxia is a key microenvironmental stress associated with resistance to cisplatin, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and immunotherapy in solid NSCLCs. Numerous studies have contributed to delineating the mechanisms underlying drug resistance in NSCLC; nevertheless, the mechanisms involved in the resistance associated with hypoxia-induced molecular metabolic adaptations in the microenvironment of NSCLC remain unclear. Studies have highlighted the importance of posttranslational regulation of molecular mediators in the control of mitochondrial function in response to hypoxia-induced metabolic adaptations. Hypoxia can upregulate the expression of sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) in a hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-dependent manner. SIRT1 is a stress-dependent metabolic sensor that can deacetylate some key transcriptional factors in both metabolism dependent and independent metabolic pathways such as HIF-1α, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), and PPAR-gamma coactivator 1-alpha (PGC-1α) to affect mitochondrial function and biogenesis, which has a role in hypoxia-induced chemoresistance in NSCLC. Moreover, SIRT1 and HIF-1α can regulate both innate and adaptive immune responses through metabolism-dependent and -independent ways. The objective of this review is to delineate a possible SIRT1/PGC-1α/PPAR-γ signaling-related molecular metabolic mechanism underlying hypoxia-induced chemotherapy resistance in the NSCLC microenvironment. Targeting hypoxia-related metabolic adaptation may be an attractive therapeutic strategy for overcoming chemoresistance in NSCLC.

Kinetic analysis of cystine uptake and inhibition pattern of sulfasalazine in A549 cells

Cystine/glutamate transporter (xCT) is an antiporter involved in cystine uptake and glutamate efflux. However, there are very few reports regarding the kinetic analysis of xCT for cystine uptake using cancer cell lines, as well as the inhibition pattern of sulfasalazine, an inhibitor of xCT, for cystine uptake. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the kinetics of xCT in A549 cells, human lung cancer cells, and to reveal the inhibition pattern of sulfasalazine. Cystine uptake occurred in a time-dependent manner, with linear cystine uptake observed for 5 min. Additionally, sulfasalazine inhibited cystine uptake in a concentration-dependent manner, presenting an IC₅₀ value of 24.7 ± 5.6 μM. Cystine uptake was saturated with increasing concentration, demonstrating K_m and V_max values of 179.4 ± 26.7 μM and 30.4 ± 2.3 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively. Moreover, during cystine uptake with sulfasalazine, K_m and V_max were >300 μM and 8.0 ± 1.5 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively, suggesting that sulfasalazine might demonstrate a mixed inhibition pattern. Furthermore, xCT siRNA decreased the xCT mRNA level and reduced cystine uptake. In conclusion, xCT was involved in the cystine uptake in A549 cells and sulfasalazine showed a mixed inhibition pattern to xCT.

Anticancer effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs against cancer cells and cancer stem cells

Certain non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known to have anticancer effects. However, it is unclear whether all NSAIDs have anticancer effects, and thus far, very few studies have compared the antitumor effects among multiple NSAIDs. Therefore, we aimed to identify NSAIDs that enhance the anticancer effect of cisplatin (CDDP); the effects of 17 NSAIDs in lung cancer cells and their spheroids as cancer stem cells (CSCs) were evaluated. Some of the NSAIDs showed cytotoxic effects against A549 and SBC-3 cells and their CDDP-resistant cell lines (A549/DDP and SBC-3/DDP cells, respectively). In addition, co-addition of CDDP and celecoxib, which showed cytotoxic effects, increased the resistance to CDDP by increasing SLC7A11, which is one of the CDDP resistance mechanisms, in A549/DDP and SBC-3/DDP cells. On the other hand, celecoxib also showed antitumor effects on the spheroids of A549/DDP and SBC-3/DDP cells, and enhanced the antitumor effect of CDDP while increasing the mRNA levels of SLC7A11. Moreover, diclofenac was also cytotoxic and enhanced the cytotoxic effect of CDDP in cancer cells and CSCs. In conclusion, some NSAIDs including celecoxib and diclofenac may enhance the therapeutic efficacy of CDDP.