Autoantibodies in connective tissue disease

Qualitative evaluation of connective tissue disease with cytomegalovirus infection: A meta-analysis of case reports

BACKGROUND

The primary therapies for connective tissue disease include glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. However, their prolonged usage can precipitate opportunistic infections, such as cytomegalovirus infection. When managing connective tissue disease complicated by cytomegalovirus infection, judicious selection of treatment modalities is crucial. This involves assessing the necessity for antiviral therapy and contemplating the reduction or cessation of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants.

OBJECTIVE

This investigation sought to methodically review existing literature regarding treating connective tissue disease patients with cytomegalovirus infection.

METHODS

On July 5, 2023, an exhaustive literature search was conducted. Data analysis utilized the Kruskal-Wallis test or one-way analysis of variance, supplemented by Bonferroni post hoc testing.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis incorporated 88 studies encompassing 146 connective tissue disease patients with CMV infections. The results indicated that patients with connective tissue disease and cytomegalovirus disease benefitted more from antiviral therapy than those not receiving such treatment (P = 0.003, P < 0.005). Furthermore, the strategic reduction of glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants was beneficial (P = 0.037, P < 0.05). Poor clinical outcomes with glucocorticoid-immunosuppressant combination therapy compared to other treatment modalities. The findings also suggested that CMV infection patients fare better without Cyclosporine A than using it (P = 0.041, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Antiviral therapy is a viable treatment option in cases of connective tissue disease co-occurring with cytomegalovirus disease. Additionally, when connective tissue disease is stable, there is potential merit in reducing glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants, especially avoiding the combination of these drugs. For all cytomegalovirus infection patients, Cyclosporine A may be avoided wherever possible for selecting immunosuppressive agents if its use is not deemed essential in the treatment regimen.

Connective tissue disease as a challenge in heart failure: Three case reports

RATIONALE

Connective tissue disease (CTD) is a heterogeneous group of chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorders derived from a systemically auto-immunological deregulation. CTD may affect cardiac structures through multiple pathophysiological mechanisms, and subclinical cardiac injury is common. Heart failure (HF) is one of the common complications in these patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Patients with CTD suffer an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and may have chest pain and shortness of breath.

DIAGNOSIS

HF is characterized by dyspnea or exertional limitation due to impaired ventricular filling and/or blood ejection. HF can be caused by other systemic diseases, not only by cardiovascular disorders but CTD. CTD may cause HF due to diffuse myocardial damage, heart valve damage, coronary ischemia, and so on.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome take prednisone and warfarin. The patient with anti-synthetase syndrome was treated with immunoglobulin, followed by long-term oral medicines of prednisone, methotrexate, and folic acid.

OUTCOMES

The symptoms of chest pain and shortness of breath for patients with CTD improved.

LESSONS

HF is one of the common complications in these patients with CTD, which has poor prognosis and severe aggravation. Once such patients experience chest pain, chest tightness, shortness of breath, etc, we should consider the possibility of HF. Early identification and correct treatment can delay the progression of HF, improve the prognosis, and enhance the quality of life for patients. Therefore, we should pay more attention to patients with CTD combined with HF.

The Role of Sclerostin in Rheumatic Diseases: A Review

Systemic connective tissue disorders constitute a heterogenous group of autoimmune diseases with the potential to affect a range of organs. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive, autoimmune inflammatory disease affecting the joints. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may manifest with multiple system involvement as a result of inflammatory response to autoantibodies. Spondyloarthropathies (SpAs) such as ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are diseases characterised by the inflammation of spinal joints, paraspinal tissues, peripheral joints and enthesitis as well as inflammatory changes in many other systems and organs. Physiologically, sclerostin helps to maintain balance in bone tissue metabolism through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, which represents a major intracellular signalling pathway. This review article aims to present the current knowledge on the role of sclerostin in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and its correlation with clinical data from RA, SLE, AS and PsA patients.

Autoantibody status according to multiparametric assay accurately estimates connective tissue disease classification and identifies clinically relevant disease clusters

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of circulating autoantibodies represents one of the earliest diagnostic procedures in patients with suspected connective tissue disease (CTD), providing important information for disease diagnosis, identification and prediction of potential clinical manifestations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of multiparametric assay to correctly classify patients with multiple CTDs and healthy controls (HC), independent of clinical features, and to evaluate whether serological status could identify clusters of patients with similar clinical features.

METHODS

Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis (SSc), Sjogren's syndrome (SjS), undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD), idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) and HC were enrolled. Serum was tested for 29 autoantibodies. An XGBoost model, exclusively based on autoantibody titres was built and classification accuracy was evaluated. A hierarchical clustering model was subsequently developed and clinical/laboratory features compared among clusters.

RESULTS

908 subjects were enrolled. The classification model showed a mean accuracy of 60.84±4.05% and a mean area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 88.99±2.50%, with significant discrepancies among groups. Cluster analysis identified four clusters (CL). CL1 included patients with typical features of SLE. CL2 included most patients with SjS, along with some SLE and UCTD patients with SjS-like features. CL4 included anti-Jo1 patients only. CL3 was the largest and most heterogeneous, including all the remaining subjects, overall characterised by low titre or lower-prevalence autoantibodies.

CONCLUSION

Extended multiparametric autoantibody assay allowed an accurate classification of CTD patients, independently of clinical features. Clustering according to autoantibody titres is able to identify clusters of CTD subjects with similar clinical features, independently of their final diagnosis.

Novel aspects of muscle involvement in immune-mediated inflammatory arthropathies and connective tissue diseases

Myalgia, myopathy and myositis are the most important types of muscle impairment in immune-mediated inflammatory arthropathies and connective tissue diseases. Multiple pathogenetic and histological changes occur in the striated muscles of these patients. Clinically, the most important muscle involvement is the one that causes complaints to the patients. In everyday practice, insidious symptoms present a serious problem for the clinician; in many cases, it is difficult to decide when and how to treat the muscle symptoms that are often present only subclinically. In this work, authors review the international literature on the types of muscle problems in autoimmune diseases. In scleroderma histopathological picture of muscle shows a very heterogeneous picture, necrosis and atrophy are common. In rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, myopathy is a much less defined concept, further studies are needed to describe it. According to our view, overlap myositis should be recognized as a separate entity, preferably with distinct histological and serological characteristics. More studies are needed to describe muscle impairment in autoimmune diseases which may help to explore this topic more in depth and be of clinical use.

Anti-nuclear autoantibodies in Graves' disease and Graves' orbitopathy

OBJECTIVE

A relationship between thyroid and non-organ-specific autoimmunity could be relevant for Graves' orbitopathy (GO), which affects connective tissue. We investigated the association between GO and anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs).

METHODS

Retrospective investigation was conducted in 265 patients with Graves' disease (GD), 158 with and 107 without GO. Primary outcome was: prevalence of ANAs in GO vs no-GO. Secondary outcomes were: (1) relationship between ANAs and GO features; (2) prevalence of ANAs in GD compared with non-autoimmune hyperthyroidism [(78 patients with toxic nodular goiter (TNG)]; (3) distribution of ANA patterns.

RESULTS

ANAs were detected in 212 (80%) GD patients, but prevalence did not differ between GO (79.7%) and no-GO (80.3%). Higher ANA titers (1:160) were more common in GO (51.5 vs 38.3%), but only nearly significantly (OR 0.5; 95% CI: 0.3-1; P = 0.059). Proptosis was lower in ANA-positive patients (mean difference: - 1.4 mm; 95% CI from - 2.5 to - 0.3; P = 0.011), in whom nearly significantly lower CAS (Mann-Whitney U: 1.5; P = 0.077) and eyelid aperture (mean difference: - 0.9 mm; 95% CI from - 2 to 0; P = 0.062) were observed. Prevalence of ANAs in GD was lower than in TNG (80 vs 91%; OR 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9; P = 0.028), but nuclear speckled pattern was more frequent (OR 22.9; 95% CI 1.3-381.3; P = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

Although ANAs are not more frequent in GO, they seem to exert a protective role on its severity and on development of GD. A switch of T cell population in ANA-positive patients, resulting in a different phenotype, may be responsible. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms.

Cell surface expression of human RP105 depends on N-glycosylation of MD-1

For its cell surface expression, radioprotective 105 (RP105) - an orphan Toll-like receptor - must form a complex with a soluble glycoprotein called myeloid differentiation 1 (MD-1). The number of RP105-negative cells is significantly increased in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); however, to elucidate the mechanism underlying this increase, how RP105 is expressed on the cell surface depending on MD-1 should be investigated. We demonstrated that RP105 exhibits two forms depending on MD-1 and its two N-glycosylation sites, N96 and N156. Cell surface expression of RP105 decreased in the presence of mutant MD-1 (N96Q/N156Q). Nonglycosylated MD-1 decreased the de novo cell surface expression of RP105 but not pre-expressed RP105. Thus, the N-glycans of MD-1 may represent targets for SLE therapy.

Comparative analysis of clinical and imaging data of first-attack neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders with and without connective tissue disease

Background

The coexistence of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and connective tissue disease (CTD) is well recognized. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the characteristics of first attack NMOSD with and without CTD.

Methods

A total of 113 Patients with NMOSD were included and were divided into two groups based on the presence of co-occurring CTD. Their demographic, clinical, laboratory, and image characteristics were obtained through inpatient medical records and follow-ups. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to analyze the effect of CTD in NMOSD patients at the time of first recurrence. The risk factors that could predict complications of NMOSD with CTD was analyzed by binary logistic regression. The ability of homocysteine (Hcy) to predict the coexistence of NMOSD and CTD was analyzed and evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

The demographic data, clinical features, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and MRI findings, except relapse events (including relapse rate, number of recurrences, and time of first recurrence), were similar between the two groups. The serum lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio and albumin levels were lower (P < 0.05), while serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate and Hcy levels were higher in patients with NMOSD with CTD than in those without CTD (P < 0.001). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed that the time of first recurrence in NMOSD patients complicated with CTD was earlier than that of without CTD (log rank test P = 0.035). Logistic regression revealed that serum Hcy levels (OR 1.296, 95% CI, 1.050–1.601, P = 0.016) were independently associated with the occurrence of NMOSD with CTD. The receiver operating characteristic curve area was 0.738 (95% CI, 0.616–0.859; P < 0.001) for Hcy levels. Considering the Hcy concentration of 14.07 μmol/L as the cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity of predicting the coexistence of first-attack NMOSD and CTD were 56 and 89.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

When the first-attack NMOSD patients are complicated with CTD, they have a higher recurrence rate, more recurrences, earlier first recurrence, higher serum Hcy levels, and enhanced systemic inflammatory reactions. Furthermore, Hcy levels may help to screen for CTD in patients with first-attack NMOSD.

Autoantibodies in Common Connective Tissue Diseases: A Primer for Laboratory Professionals

Background

Autoimmune connective tissue disorders are a significant health concern throughout the world with an estimated prevalence of 3% to 5%. They are associated with a variety of autoantibodies that play roles in their diagnosis, risk stratification, prognostication, and/or management. While some autoantibodies have been well-characterized for use in clinical laboratories, many more are in the research stage. Rapid transition from research to clinical practice, lack of clinical guidelines, and harmonization across a rapidly growing number of commercially available tests create numerous challenges to clinicians and laboratories.

Content

This article briefly discusses common connective tissue disorders and their association with well-known autoantibodies, describes current methods used in clinical laboratories, and outlines their advantages and limitations in the context of these diseases.

Summary

Understanding the role of specific autoantibodies and various methodologies for autoantibody testing are important for laboratory professionals who may be introducing/repatriating new tests, updating existing tests, or advising clinicians/patients about testing options/results. Collaboration between laboratory professional staff and clinicians, around the advantages and limitations of each methodology, is also important in their appropriate clinical utilization.

Advances in the Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis

Although systemic sclerosis (SSc) is currently incurable, there have been recent advances in treatment. This review article begins by providing a brief background to SSc in terms of disease subtyping and autoantibodies, because both predict disease trajectory and help clinicians to select appropriate monitoring and treatment protocols. Broad principles of management are then described: ‘disease-modifying’ therapies and therapies directed at reducing disease burden and/or progression of SSc-related digital vascular disease and of internal organ involvement. Next, advances in the management of digital vasculopathy, pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), interstitial lung disease (ILD) and early diffuse cutaneous SSc are discussed in turn, for example: (a) increased use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists for digital vasculopathy; (b) early recognition and treatment of PAH, including with combination therapies; (c) increased use of mycophenolate mofetil and of nintedanib in ILD; and (d) immunosuppression now as standard practice in early diffuse cutaneous SSc, and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for highly selected patients with progressive diffuse disease. Finally, future challenges are discussed, including ensuring that all patients with SSc are monitored and treated according to best practice guidelines, and whenever possible giving patients the opportunity to participate in clinical trials.

Anti - Dense Fıne Speckled (DFS) Antibody: its staınıng pattern in indirect immunofluorescence and its clinical relevance

BACKGROUND

Dense fine speckled (DFS) pattern defined by very intense, heterogeneous speckled staining of nucleoplasms of interphase HEp-2 cells and chromosomal areas of metaphase cells. The association of Anti-DFS70 and rheumatologic signs, symptoms, and diagnosis were evaluated.

METHODS

One-hundred-eight anti-DFS70 positives who consecutively admitted Rheumatology clinic between January-June 2020 were analyzed. The clinical and laboratory findings of positives for anti-DFS70 antibody were compared with those with DFS pattern ANA IFA staining rates. Also, anti-DFS70 positivity rates and their correlation with the DFS staining pattern were analyzed retrospectively in 1016 CTD patients.

RESULTS

The most common complaint was joint pain seen in 77(71.3%) and the most common laboratory abnormality was RF-positivity observed in 10/108(9.3%) who had anti-DFS70 positivity. The most common ANA staining pattern was DFS (72/108;66,7%); one-third had other than DFS. No statistical significance was found for the association of any of the rheumatological complaints and laboratory findings with the DFS70 staining pattern. ANA analysis was performed in a total of 964/1016(94.88%) CTD patients and 44 (4.56%) of these positive for anti-DFS70. The correlation coefficient showed good correlations between the DFS pattern staining and anti-DFS70 antibody positivity (r=+0.773, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-DFS70-positives have a low rate of CTD. A low anti-DFS70 positivity rate was observed in patients with CTD. As such, it can be considered that anti-DFS70 does not predict CTD or even excludes it.

Role of autoantibodies in the diagnosis and prognosis of interstitial lung disease in autoimmune rheumatic disorders

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been recognized as a frequent manifestation associated with a substantial morbidity and mortality burden in patients with autoimmune rheumatic disorders. Serum autoantibodies are considered good biomarkers for identifying several subsets or specific phenotypes of ILD involvement in these patients. This review features the role of several autoantibodies as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker linked to the presence ILD and specific ILD phenotypes in autoimmune rheumatic disorders. The case of the diverse antisynthetase antibodies in the antisynthease syndrome or the anti-melanoma differentiation-associated 5 protein (MDA5) antibodies as a marker of a severe condition such as rapidly progressive ILD in patients with clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis are some of the associations herein reported in the group of myositis spectrum disorders. Specific autoantibodies such as the well-known anti-topoisomerase I (anti-Scl70) or the anti-Th/To, anti-U11/U12 ribonucleoprotein, and anti-eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) antibodies seems to be specifically linked to ILD in patients with systemic sclerosis. Overlap syndromes between systemic sclerosis and myositis, also have good ILD biomarkers, which are the anti-PM/Scl and anti-Ku autoantibodies. Lastly, other not so often reported disorders as being associated with ILD but recently most recognized as is the case of rheumatoid arthritis associated ILD or entities herein included in the miscellaneous disorders section, which include anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated interstitial lung disease, Sjögren's syndrome or the mixed connective tissue disease, are also discussed.

In vitro diagnostics for the medical dermatologist. Part I: Autoimmune tests

Despite the expansion of available in vitro laboratory tests at a rate far exceeding that of dermatologic pharmaceuticals, the existing literature is dominated by discussion of the latter. With the advent of numerous new tests, it can be difficult for practicing dermatologists to stay up-to-date on the available options, methodologies, and recommendations for when to order one test over another. Understanding the inherent strengths and weaknesses of these options is necessary to inform appropriate ordering and proper interpretation of the results. The first article in this continuing medical education series summarizes information on methodology, test characteristics, and limitations of several in vitro laboratory tests used for the work up of undifferentiated patients suspected of having dermatologic autoimmune diseases and it provides a general guide to ordering these tests.