Report on the international workshop on alternative methods for Leptospira vaccine potency testing: state of the science and the way forward

Evaluation of protective efficacy, serological responses, and cytokine modulation induced by polyvalent Leptospira vaccines in hamsters

Whole-cell inactivated vaccines (bacterins) are the only licensed vaccines available for leptospirosis prevention and control, especially in domestic and farm animals. However, despite their widespread use, inconsistencies in their efficacy have been reported. Because immunity induced by bacterins is mainly mediated by antibodies against leptospiral lipopolysaccharides, the involvement of cellular responses is not well-known. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and characterize the humoral and cellular immune responses induced by whole-cell inactivated leptospirosis bacterin formulations containing serovars Bratislava, Canicola, Copenhageni, Grippotyphosa, Hardjoprajitno, and Pomona. For the potency test, hamsters were immunized with one dose of polyvalent bacterins (either commercial or experimental) and then challenged with a virulent Pomona strain. Serological (MAT and IgM and IgG-ELISA) and cellular (cytokine transcription in blood evaluated by RT-qPCR) analyses were performed. The results revealed that vaccination with either bacterin formulation was able to protect 90-100% of the hamsters infected with the Pomona serovar, although most of the surviving animals remained as renal carriers. Specific agglutinating antibodies and significant levels of IgM, IgG, and IgG2 (P < 0.05) that were able to react with the six serovars present in the vaccine formulations were produced, indicating that the vaccines can potentially provide immunity against all strains. The protective immunity of these vaccines was mainly mediated by balanced a Th1/Th2 response, characterized by increased IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-α transcription. These data support the importance of characterizing immunological responses involved in bacterin efficacy and investing in the improvement of these vaccine formulations.

2022 AAHA Canine Vaccination Guidelines

These guidelines are an update and extension of previous AAHA peer-reviewed canine vaccination guidelines published in 2017. Vaccination is a cornerstone of canine preventive healthcare and one of the most cost-effective ways of maintaining a dog's health, longevity, and quality of life. Canine vaccination also serves a public health function by forming a barrier against several zoonotic diseases affecting dogs and humans. Canine vaccines are broadly categorized as containing core and noncore immunizing antigens, with administration recommendations based on assessment of individual patient risk factors. The guidelines include a comprehensive table listing canine core and noncore vaccines and a recommended vaccination and revaccination schedule for each vaccine. The guidelines explain the relevance of different vaccine formulations, including those containing modified-live virus, inactivated, and recombinant immunizing agents. Factors that potentially affect vaccine efficacy are addressed, including the patient's prevaccination immune status and vaccine duration of immunity. Because animal shelters are one of the most challenging environments for prevention and control of infectious diseases, the guidelines also provide recommendations for vaccination of dogs presented at or housed in animal shelters, including the appropriate response to an infectious disease outbreak in the shelter setting. The guidelines explain how practitioners can interpret a patient's serological status, including maternally derived antibody titers, as indicators of immune status and suitability for vaccination. Other topics covered include factors associated with postvaccination adverse events, vaccine storage and handling to preserve product efficacy, interpreting product labeling to ensure proper vaccine use, and using client education and healthcare team training to raise awareness of the importance of vaccinations.

Replacement of in vivo leptospirosis vaccine potency testing in the United States

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regulates the potency testing of leptospirosis vaccines, which are administered to animals to protect against infection by Leptospira bacteria. Despite the long-term availability of in vitro test methods for assessing batch potency, the use of hamsters in lethal in vivo batch potency testing persists to varying degrees across leptospirosis vaccine manufacturers. For all manufacturers of these products, data collected from public USDA records show an estimated 40% decline in the annual use of hamsters from 2014 to 2020, with an estimated 55% decrease in the number of hamsters expected to have been used in leptospirosis vaccine potency tests (i.e., those in USDA Category E). An estimated 49,000 hamsters were used in 2020, with about 15,000 hamsters in Category E specifically. Based on this assessment, additional efforts are needed to fully implement in vitro batch potency testing as a replacement for the in vivo batch potency test. We propose steps that can be taken collaboratively by the USDA Center for Veterinary Biologics (CVB), manufacturers of leptospirosis vaccines, government agencies, and non-governmental organizations to accelerate broader use of the in vitro approach.

Overcoming scientific barriers in the transition from in vivo to non-animal batch testing of human and veterinary vaccines

INTRODUCTION

Before release, vaccine batches are assessed for quality to evaluate whether they meet the product specifications. Vaccine batch tests, in particular of inactivated and toxoid vaccines, still largely rely on in vivo methods. Improved vaccine production processes, ethical concerns, and suboptimal performance of some in vivo tests have led to the development of in vitro alternatives.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the scientific constraints that need to be overcome for replacement of in vivo batch tests, as well as potential solutions. Topics include the critical quality attributes of vaccines that require testing, the use of cell-based assays to mimic aspects of in vivo vaccine-induced immune responses, how difficulties with testing adjuvanted vaccines in vitro can be overcome, the use of altered batches to validate new in vitro test methods, and how cooperation between different stakeholders is key to moving the transition forward.

EXPERT OPINION

For safety testing, many in vitro alternatives are already available or at an advanced level of development. For potency testing, in vitro alternatives largely comprise immunochemical methods that assess several, but not all critical vaccine properties. One-to-one replacement by in vitro alternatives is not always possible and a combination of methods may be required.

Protective efficacy of whole-cell inactivated Leptospira vaccines made using virulent or avirulent strains in a hamster model

Whole-cell inactivated vaccines remain the only licensed vaccines used to control human and animal leptospirosis worldwide. Although they are protective against lethal infections, the efficacy of these vaccines has been divergent. The manufacturing process often involves the use of standard bacterial strains subjected to serial in vitro passages, with a risk of loss of virulence, and may affect the immunogenicity and consequently decrease protection. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a comparative analysis of the efficacy of in-house bacterins produced with standard (avirulent) and virulent strains. Hamsters were immunized with killed bacteria produced using avirulent and virulent strains of L. interrogans serovars Copenhageni and Canicola. Vaccine efficacy was determined in terms of protection against lethal homologous or heterologous challenges. The results showed that immunization with both avirulent and virulent Canicola strains resulted in 100% protection against homologous challenge. Conversely, Copenhageni bacterins produced using an avirulent strain conferred only 25-37.5% protection against homologous challenge (P > 0.05), while virulent Copenhageni bacterin conferred 100% protection (P < 0.001). A single vaccine dose was sufficient to induce protection, and administration of a prime boost significantly reduced the bacterial load in the kidneys and improved the humoral immune response to the virulent Copenhageni strain. These findings suggest that the maintenance of virulent strains in bacterin formulations is essential for improving the immunogenicity and efficacy of leptospirosis vaccines.

Corrigendum to "Development and Evaluation of an Immuno-Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay to Quantify the Mycoplasma capricolum subsp. Capripneumoniae (Mccp) Protein in Contagious Caprine Pleuropneumonia (CCPP) Vaccine"

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2020/4236807.].

Re-evaluating the LD50 requirements in the codified potency testing of veterinary vaccines containing Leptospira (L.) serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae and L. serogroup Canicola in the United States

Approximately one-third of the reportable USDA Category D and E laboratory animals in the United States are expended on the potency testing of leptospiral vaccines by the codified hamster vaccination-challenge assay. Valid tests require ≥80% of challenge controls to succumb to disease and an LD50 between 10 and 10,000. This work evaluates the risk associated with the removal of LD50 limits; thereby, eliminating back-titration hamsters from in vivo potency assays for Leptospira (L.) serogroups Canicola and Icterohaemorrhagiae. The impact was assessed through 1) retrospective analysis of industry and CVB serial release data from July 2011-April 2015 and 2) evaluation through vaccination-challenge assays. For the initial vaccination-challenge assays (n = 3/serogroup), one group received potent bacterin (PB) and six groups received subpotent bacterins (SB1-SB6). PB and SB1 were challenged with a single dilution of Leptospira between 10 and 10,000 LD50. SB2-SB6 received serial dilutions of more concentrated challenge. Based on the retrospective analysis and in vivo assays, 80% of the challenge controls succumbing to disease reasonably ensured the minimal LD50 was administered. Subpotent vaccines were not at increased risk for being deemed potent when challenged with >10,000 LD50, but potent vaccines were at risk of being deemed subpotent when challenged with >10,000 LD50.

Efficacy of leptospiral commercial vaccines on the protection against an autochtonous strain recovered in Brazil

In swine and bovines, leptospirosis prevention and control is carried out via vaccination of susceptible animals using bacterins. However, the efficiency of leptospirosis vaccines has been questioned. This work aimed to investigate the potency of five leptospirosis vaccines sold commercially in Brazil, challenging the animals with one autochthonous strain of Leptospira, Canicola serovar, denoted LO4, isolated from swine. The standard protocol was followed, and renal carriers of Leptospira were identified among the surviving animals by culture and PCR. Of the five vaccines tested, only two proved effective. None of the surviving animals was positive by culture; however, one animal was positive by PCR. Three of the five vaccines sold commercially in Brazil for the immunization of swine or bovines failed the test of the efficacy to protect the vaccinated animals following challenge with an autochthonous Leptospira strain, Canicola serovar. The two vaccines provided protection against the renal carrier state in the surviving animals. The criteria used to produce leptospirosis bacterins sold commercially in Brazil must be reviewed. The industry should support researches on leptospiral vaccinology to improve the quality of the present vaccines and discover new immunogenic strains, because it is known that vaccination is one of the most important tools to increase the reproduction rates in livestock.