1
|
Hayashi M, Yamamoto N, Kuroda N, Kano K, Miura T, Kamimura Y, Shiroshita A. Peripheral Nerve Blocks in the Preoperative Management of Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Ann Emerg Med 2024; 83:522-538. [PMID: 38385910 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the comparative efficacy of peripheral nerve block types for preoperative pain management of hip fractures. METHODS We searched Cochrane, Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar for randomized clinical trials. We included participants aged more than 16 years with hip fractures who received peripheral nerve blocks or analgesics for preoperative pain management. The primary outcomes were defined as absolute pain score 2 hours after block placement, preoperative consumption of morphine equivalents, and length of hospital stay. We used a random-effects network meta-analysis conceptualized in the Bayesian framework. Confidence of evidence was assessed using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA). RESULTS We included 63 randomized controlled studies (4,778 participants), of which only a few had a low risk of bias. The femoral nerve block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and pericapsular nerve group block yielded significantly lowered pain scores at 2 hours after block placement compared with those with no block (standardized mean differences [SMD]: -1.1; 95% credible interval [CrI]: -1.7 to -0.48, [confidence of evidence: low]; SMD: -1.8; 95% CrI: -3.0 to -0.55, [low]; SMD: -1.4; 95% CrI: -2.0 to -0.72, [low]; SMD: -2.3; 95% CrI: -3.2 to -1.4, [moderate], respectively). The pericapsular nerve group block, 3-in-1 block, fascia iliaca compartment block, and femoral nerve block resulted in lower pain scores than the no-block group. Additionally, the pericapsular nerve group block yielded a lower pain score than femoral nerve block or fascia iliaca compartment block (SMD: -1.21; 95% CrI: -2.18 to -0.23, [very low]: SMD: -0.92; 95% CrI: -1.70 to -0.16, [low]). However, both the fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block did not show a reduction in morphine consumption compared with no block. To our knowledge, no studies have compared the pericapsular nerve group block with other methods regarding morphine consumption. Furthermore, no significant difference was observed between peripheral nerve blocks and no block in terms of the length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS Compared with no block, preoperative peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures appear to reduce pain 2 hours after block placement. Comparing different blocks, pericapsular nerve group block might be superior to fascia iliaca compartment block and femoral nerve block for pain relief, though the confidence evidence was low in most comparisons because of the moderate to high risk of bias in many of the included studies and the high heterogeneity of treatment strategies across studies. Therefore, further high-quality research is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minoru Hayashi
- Department of Emergency Medicine Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Yotsui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Norio Yamamoto
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan; Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.
| | - Naoto Kuroda
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; Department of Epileptology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kenichi Kano
- Department of Emergency Medicine Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Yotsui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Takanori Miura
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Akita Rosai Hospital, Odate, Japan
| | - Yuji Kamimura
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicin, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Akihiro Shiroshita
- Scientific Research WorkS Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gerlier C, Mijahed R, Fels A, Bekka S, Courseau R, Singh AL, Ganansia O, Chatellier G. Effect of early ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block on preoperative opioid consumption in emergency patients with hip fracture: a randomized trial. Eur J Emerg Med 2024; 31:18-28. [PMID: 37650732 DOI: 10.1097/mej.0000000000001075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE Ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block (FNB) could be used as part of a multimodal preoperative pain management for patients with hip fracture. Evidence of the effects of its early implementation in the emergency room as an immediate alternative to intravenous morphine titration is sparse. OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of an early ultrasound-guided FNB performed by emergency physicians on preoperative opioid consumption, compared to standard pain management. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This open randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Emergency Department of a French hospital with patients with neck or trochanteric femoral fracture who had a pain score ≥7 out of 10 points at triage. INTERVENTION Patients were randomized to receive an initial analgesia with an early ultrasound-guided FNB or with standard pain management. The continuation of pain treatment followed standardized pain control guidelines until hospital discharge in both groups. OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS The primary outcome was preoperative opioid consumption truncated 48h after triage time, and converted in morphine milligram intravenous equivalents (MME). Secondary outcomes were time to pain relief, time for regaining walk, opioid consumption and occurrence of opioid and FNB adverse effects during the hospital stay. Exploratory outcomes included ease and duration of the procedure. MAIN RESULTS We randomized 35 patients: 17 to standard pain management and 18 to ultrasound-guided FNB, among whom 30 patients completed the protocol. The median of preoperative opioid consumption was reduced by 60% in the ultrasound-guided FNB group compared to standard group [6 MME (3-9) vs. 15 MME (11-18)], with a consumption difference of 9 MME (95% CI: 3-14, P < 0.001). Throughout hospital stay, opioid consumption was reduced by 56% in the ultrasound-guided FNB group compared to standard group, with a consumption difference of 11.5 MME (95% CI: 0.5-22).Times to pain relief and for regaining walk did not differ between groups. Opioid adverse events occurrence were reduced by 40% (95% CI: 5.1-74.9) in the ultrasound-guided FNB group compared to standard group. No adverse effects of FNB have been detected. CONCLUSION Early ultrasound-guided FNB resulted in reducing preoperative opioid consumption, without delaying time to pain relief.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rami Mijahed
- Emergency Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group
| | - Audrey Fels
- Clinical Research Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group
| | - Samir Bekka
- Anesthesiology Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group
| | - Romain Courseau
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group
| | | | | | - Gilles Chatellier
- Clinical Research Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group, University Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Exsteen OW, Svendsen CN, Rothe C, Lange KHW, Lundstrøm LH. Ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks for preoperative pain management in hip fractures: a systematic review. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:192. [PMID: 35729489 PMCID: PMC9210678 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01720-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Systematic reviews associate peripheral nerve blocks based on anatomic landmarks or nerve stimulation with reduced pain and need for systemic analgesia in hip fracture patients. We aimed to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided nerve blocks compared to conventional analgesia for preoperative pain management in hip fractures. Five databases were searched until June 2021 to identify randomised controlled trials. Two independent authors extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Data was pooled for meta-analysis and quality of evidence was evaluated using Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). We included 12 trials (976 participants) comparing ultrasound-guided nerve blocks to conventional systemic analgesia. In favour of ultrasound, pain measured closest to two hours after block placement decreased with a mean difference of -2.26 (VAS 0 to 10); (p < 0.001) 95% CI [–2.97 to –1.55]. In favour of ultrasound, preoperative analgesic usage of iv. morphine equivalents in milligram decreased with a mean difference of –5.34 (p=0.003) 95% CI [–8.11 to –2.58]. Time from admission until surgery ranged from six hours to more than three days. Further, ultrasound-guided nerve blocks may be associated with a lower frequency of delirium: risk ratio 0.6 (p = 0.03) 95% CI [0.38 to 0.94], fewer serious adverse events: risk ratio 0.33 (p = 0.006) 95% CI [0.15 to 0.73] and higher patient satisfaction: mean difference 25.9 (VAS 0 to 100) (p < 0.001) 95% CI [19.74 to 32.07]. However, the quality of evidence was judged low or very low. In conclusion, despite low quality of evidence, ultrasound-guided blocks were associated with benefits compared to conventional systemic analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Wilborg Exsteen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
| | - Christine Nygaard Svendsen
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Christian Rothe
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark
| | - Kai Henrik Wiborg Lange
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Hyldborg Lundstrøm
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Nordsjællands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Inoue GN, Pimenta R, Camargo JA, Viana NI, Guimarães VR, Srougi M, Nahas WC, Leite KR, Reis ST. Combined spinal and general anesthesia attenuate tumor promoting effects of surgery. An experimental animal study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 75:103398. [PMID: 35386811 PMCID: PMC8977895 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radical prostatectomy, a standard management approach for localized Prostate Cancer (PC), may cause a stress response associated with immune modulating effects. Regional anesthesia was hypothesized to reduce the immune effects of surgery by minimizing the neuroendocrine surgical stress response, thus mitigating tumor cells dissemination. Our primary objective was to investigate whether the use of spinal blocks attenuates PC tumor cells dissemination on an animal model. We also assessed the number of circulating NK cells and the amount of inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Materials and methods A subcutaneous tumor model, with PC-3M cell line transfected with a luciferase-producing gene (PC-3M-luc-C6) was used. After proper tumor establishment and before tumors became metastatic, animals were submitted to tumor excision surgeries under general or combined (general and spinal) anesthesia. A control group was only anesthetized with general anesthesia. Results The subcutaneous tumor model with PC-3M-luc-C6 cells was effective in causing distant metastasis after 35 days. The number of circulating tumor cells increased in animals that underwent surgery under general anesthesia alone compared to the group submitted to combined anesthesia. Interleukin 6 levels were different in all groups, with increase in the general anesthesia group. Conclusion Our results suggest that combination of spinal and general anesthesia may attenuate the suppression of innate tumor immunity and it might be related to a reduction in the neuroendocrine response to surgery. Institutional protocol number Animal Ethics Committee 1332/2019. Regional anesthesia is related to a reduction in the neuroendocrine response to surgery. Spinal anesthesia combined with general anesthesia modulates Circulating Tumor Cells and cytokines after tissue damage. General anesthesia combined to spinal block could reduce cancer cells dissemination in the postoperative period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo N.C. Inoue
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
- Corresponding author. Medical Investigation Laboratory (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), Sao Paulo, Brazil, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 455, 2nd floor, room 2145, Cerqueira Cesar, São Paulo, SP, 01246-903, Brazil.
| | - Ruan Pimenta
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Juliana A. Camargo
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Nayara I. Viana
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Vanessa R. Guimarães
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Miguel Srougi
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
| | - William C. Nahas
- Uro-Oncology Group, Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Sao Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
| | - Katia R.M. Leite
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Sabrina T. Reis
- Laboratory of Medical Investigation (LIM55), Urology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, 01246-903, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND This review was published originally in 1999 and was updated in 2001, 2002, 2009, 2017, and 2020. Updating was deemed necessary due to the high incidence of hip fractures, the large number of official societies providing recommendations on this condition, the possibility that perioperative peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) may improve patient outcomes, and the major role that PNBs may play in reducing preoperative and postoperative opioid use for analgesia. OBJECTIVES To compare PNBs used as preoperative analgesia, as postoperative analgesia, or as a supplement to general anaesthesia versus no nerve block (or sham block) for adults with hip fracture. Outcomes were pain on movement at 30 minutes after block placement, acute confusional state, myocardial infarction, chest infection, death, time to first mobilization, and costs of an analgesic regimen for single-injection blocks. We undertook the update to look for new studies and to update the methods to reflect Cochrane standards. SEARCH METHODS For the updated review, we searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 11), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (Ovid SP, 1966 to November 2019); Embase (Ovid SP, 1974 to November 2019); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (EBSCO, 1982 to November 2019), as well as trial registers and reference lists of relevant articles. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing use of PNBs compared with no nerve block (or sham block) as part of the care provided for adults 16 years of age and older with hip fracture. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened new trials for inclusion, assessed trial quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 tool, and extracted data. When appropriate, we pooled results of outcome measures. We rated the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS We included 49 trials (3061 participants; 1553 randomized to PNBs and 1508 to no nerve block (or sham block)). For this update, we added 18 new trials. Trials were published from 1981 to 2020. Trialists followed participants for periods ranging from 5 minutes to 12 months. The average age of participants ranged from 59 to 89 years. People with dementia were often excluded from the included trials. Additional analgesia was available for all participants. Results of 11 trials with 503 participants show that PNBs reduced pain on movement within 30 minutes of block placement (standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.25 to -0.86; equivalent to -2.5 on a scale from 0 to 10; high-certainty evidence). Effect size was proportionate to the concentration of local anaesthetic used (P = 0.0003). Based on 13 trials with 1072 participants, PNBs reduce the risk of acute confusional state (risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.90; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 12, 95% CI 7 to 47; high-certainty evidence). For myocardial infarction, there were no events in one trial with 31 participants (RR not estimable; low-certainty evidence). From three trials with 131 participants, PNBs probably reduce the risk for chest infection (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.89; NNTB 7, 95% CI 5 to 72; moderate-certainty evidence). Based on 11 trials with 617 participants, the effects of PNBs on mortality within six months are uncertain due to very serious imprecision (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.60; low-certainty evidence). From three trials with 208 participants, PNBs likely reduce time to first mobilization (mean difference (MD) -10.80 hours, 95% CI -12.83 to -8.77 hours; moderate-certainty evidence). One trial with 75 participants indicated there may be a small reduction in the cost of analgesic drugs with a single-injection PNB (MD -4.40 euros, 95% CI -4.84 to -3.96 euros; low-certainty evidence). We identified 29 ongoing trials, of which 15 were first posted or at least were last updated after 1 January 2018. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: PNBs reduce pain on movement within 30 minutes after block placement, risk of acute confusional state, and probably also reduce the risk of chest infection and time to first mobilization. There may be a small reduction in the cost of analgesic drugs for single-injection PNB. We did not find a difference for myocardial infarction and mortality, but the numbers of participants included for these two outcomes were insufficient. Although randomized clinical trials may not be the best way to establish risks associated with an intervention, our review confirms low risks of permanent injury associated with PNBs, as found by others. Some trials are ongoing, but it is unclear whether any further RCTs should be registered, given the benefits found. Good-quality non-randomized trials with appropriate sample size may help to clarify the potential effects of PNBs on myocardial infarction and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Guay
- Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
- Teaching and Research Unit, Health Sciences, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Faculty of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Sandra Kopp
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lu IC, Huang SH, Lu DV, Hsu CD, Wu SH. Combination Preemptive Peripheral Nerve Block in Limb Surgery. A Prospective Study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56080388. [PMID: 32756520 PMCID: PMC7466242 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56080388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background and objectives: Patients often suffer from moderate to severe pain during the early recovery period in orthopedic surgery. We investigated the impact of a single-shot preoperative peripheral nerve block (PNB) on post-anesthesia recovery parameters and interleukin (IL)-6 level during limb surgery. Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted, and patients scheduled for limb surgery were recruited. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to either the PNB group or control group, who received morphine as a primary analgesic. The peak verbal numeric rating scale (NRS) score in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was evaluated as a primary outcome. We also recorded rescue analgesics requirement and wake-up time from anesthesia in the PACU. In addition, the change of plasma IL-6 level after incision was measured. Results: Fifty-two patients completed the study, 27 and 25 cases in the PNB and control group, respectively. Preemptive PNB significantly reduced peak NRS score in the PACU compared to control group. Lower rescue analgesics requirement and rapid wake-up from anesthesia were also noted in PNB group. The IL-6 concentration increased less in the PNB group at 2 h after incision. Conclusions: Preemptive PNB attenuates IL-6 expression 2 h after incision and improves pain management in the PACU. PNB was considered as an essential part of pain management in limb surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Cheng Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan;
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan; (D.V.L.); (C.D.H.)
| | - Shu-Hung Huang
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan;
- Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
| | - David Vi Lu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan; (D.V.L.); (C.D.H.)
| | - Chun Dan Hsu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Kaohsiung 812, Taiwan; (D.V.L.); (C.D.H.)
| | - Sheng Hua Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan;
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung 801, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-7-312-1101-7033
| |
Collapse
|