Delivery of a brief motivational intervention to patients with alcohol-related facial injuries: role for a specialist nurse

Effectiveness of Brief Alcohol Intervention in Reducing Alcohol Consumption Among Patients With Alcohol-Related Facial Trauma in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Facial trauma is a frequent presentation to the emergency department following alcohol-related injuries. Brief alcohol intervention (BAI) is a form of a motivational interview which is implemented in the postinjury phase to educate patients on the detrimental effects of their alcohol drinking behavior and reduce their future consumption. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the impact of BAI on alcohol drinking behavior in the emergency department setting.

METHODS

An extensive systematic literature review was implemented from 21 October 2020 to 23 November 2020. All clinical studies that reported the outcomes of brief alcohol intervention on alcohol consumption in patients who attended the emergency department with facial injuries were included in the systematic review. The data sources utilized include Google Scholar, PubMed, ISI, Scopus, EMBASE, SIGLE, Virtual Health Library, NYAM, ClinicalTruaks.Gov, Controlled Trials (mRCT), and ICTRP.

RESULTS

The current systematic review included 8 articles encompassing 941 patients. Of the included patients, 304 (32.3%) patients were subjected to BAI, while the remaining 637 (67.7%) were not subjected to BAI. BAI significantly decreased the amount of alcohol consumption 3 months after intervention (SMD -0.596; 95% CI -1.067, -0.126; P = .013). Patients who received BAI were 1.89 times more likely to reduce their alcohol consumption (OR 1.89; 95% CI 0.59, 6.11; P = .29).

CONCLUSIONS

BAI is an efficacious motivational tool for patients with facial trauma in the emergency setting. It can effectively reduce the amount and rate of alcohol consumption after facial trauma in the short-term. However, a higher level of evidence is required to reach long-term conclusions.

Alcohol Screening and Brief Advice in NHS General Dental Practices: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial

AIM

To assess the feasibility and acceptability of screening for alcohol misuse and delivering brief advice to eligible patients attending NHS dental practices in London.

METHODS

A two-arm cluster randomized controlled feasibility trial was conducted. Twelve dental practices were recruited and randomized to intervention and control arms. Participants attending for a dental check were recruited into the study and were eligible if they consumed alcohol above recommended levels assessed by the AUDIT-C screening tool. All eligible participants were asked to complete a baseline socio-demographic questionnaire. Six months after the completion of baseline measures, participants were contacted via telephone by a researcher masked to their allocation status. The full AUDIT tool was then administered. Alcohol consumption in the last 90 days was also assessed using the Form 90. A process evaluation assessed the acceptability of the intervention.

RESULTS

Over a 7-month period, 229 participants were recruited (95.4% recruitment rate) and at the 6 months follow-up, 176 participants were assessed (76.9% retention rate). At the follow-up, participants in the intervention arm were significantly more likely to report a longer abstinence period (3.2 vs. 2.3 weeks respectively, P = 0.04) and non-significant differences in AUDIT (44.9% vs. 59.8% AUDIT positive respectively, P = 0.053) and AUDIT C difference between baseline and follow-up (-0.67 units vs. -0.29 units respectively, P = 0.058). Results from the process evaluation indicated that the intervention and study procedures were acceptable to dentists and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of dentists screening for alcohol misuse and providing brief advice.

Assessing the impact of computerised and written advice in changing the habit and behaviour of alcohol use in patients who have suffered alcohol-related facial injuries-a pilot study

PURPOSE

Alcohol screening and a brief intervention (SBI) can be effective in changing harmful drinking behaviour and reducing the chance of future alcohol-related traumas. However, there is no standardised method in its application. This study aims to deliver a novel method of SBI to patients with alcohol-related facial fractures and to assess changes in their alcohol intake and attitudes to drinking following this intervention.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients at two Victorian Hospitals were consented to undergo a novel SBI program. This study analysed the results of the initial survey and the follow-up survey completed at least 3 months later.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients recruited for the initial survey, 18 returned for the follow-up (90% response rate). All patients were males, 50% were aged between 18 and 29 years, 61% involved in interpersonal violence, 56% sustained mandibular fractures and 89% underwent surgery. The alcohol risk score increased in the follow-up survey; however, the relationship is not statistically significant. A high proportion of the patients were still unaware of their risk. Patients showed greater awareness of their drinking and willingness to accept help and more readiness to accept written advice rather than computerised materials.

CONCLUSION

This study found a high rate of acceptance among trauma patients to the intervention program. Although there was no significant change in the risk scores between the initial and follow-up surveys, certain subgroup was more amenable to the intervention given. There is generally an improvement in the attitudes towards and knowledge of harmful drinking.

Current practice in provision of alcohol assessment and support for patients following alcohol related facial fractures

OBJECTIVES

The algorithm for maxillofacial trauma management is well defined; however, provision of alcohol assessment for patients after trauma is not widely practiced. This study aims to investigate the rate of alcohol assessment achieved within the demographic characteristics of patients with facial trauma and the circumstances where this intervention was implemented.

STUDY DESIGN

This study retrospectively examined the Victorian Admitted Episodes Data Set (VAED) from 2004 to 2013.

RESULTS

Of a total of 54,730 presentations with facial fractures to all Victorian hospitals, 0.9% in the non-alcohol-involved group and 4.3% in the alcohol-involved group received alcohol assessment during their inpatient stay (P < .001). Among patients with alcohol involvement, the likelihood of assessment was significantly different with regard to length of stay, age, trauma mechanism, and gender. Positive blood alcohol test did not relate to probability of assessment. Those with acute alcohol intoxication were less likely to be assessed (P < .001), whereas those with harmful alcohol use, alcohol dependence, or alcohol withdrawal state were much more likely to be assessed (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no consistent practice of alcohol support to patients following alcohol-related facial fractures. Post-trauma alcohol support may optimize perioperative management of patients and education regarding alcohol harm and may reduce future trauma risk. Development and refinement of such practice is an area for further research.

Should alcohol screening be a routine practice in alcohol-related facial trauma care? A narrative review

The link between alcohol intoxication and Emergency Department (ED) attendance for management of alcohol-related injuries has been well documented. The acute settings such as ED and surgical wards may not be the most appropriate environment for treatment of chronic conditions, but traumatic episode presentation to ED may offer the most opportunistic time to focus on screening against harmful alcohol use in order to provide timely feedback and support. Although ED provides an opportunity to identify patients with alcohol problems, the initial challenge is finding suitable ways to identify and screen affected patients. This paper is a narrative review on methods of alcohol screening and its effectiveness and efficacy in trauma care setting. It is second part in a series on implementation of screening and brief intervention in managing trauma patients.

Assessing the feasibility of screening and providing brief advice for alcohol misuse in general dental practice: a clustered randomised control trial protocol for the DART study

INTRODUCTION

Alcohol misuse is a significant public health problem with major health, social and economic consequences. Systematic reviews have reported that brief advice interventions delivered in various health service settings can reduce harmful drinking. Although the links between alcohol and oral health are well established and dentists come into contact with large numbers of otherwise healthy patients regularly, no studies have been conducted in the UK to test the feasibility of delivering brief advice about alcohol in general dental settings.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Dental Alcohol Reduction Trial (DART) aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of screening for alcohol misuse and delivering brief advice in patients attending National Health Service (NHS) general dental practices in North London. DART is a cluster randomised control feasibility trial and uses a mixed methods approach throughout the development, design, delivery and evaluation of the intervention. It will be conducted in 12 NHS general dental practices across North London and will include dental patients who drink above the recommended guidance, as measured by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT-C) screening tool. The intervention involves 5 min of tailored brief advice delivered by dental practitioners during the patient's appointment. Feasibility and acceptability measures as well as suitability of proposed primary outcomes of alcohol consumption will be assessed. Initial economic evaluation will be undertaken. Recruitment and retention rates as well as acceptability of the study procedures from screening to follow-up will be measured.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was obtained from the Camden and Islington Research Ethics Committee. Study outputs will be disseminated via scientific publications, newsletters, reports and conference presentations to a range of professional and patient groups and stakeholders. Based on the results of the trial, recommendations will be made on the conduct of a definitive randomised controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN81193263.

Overview of the fast alcohol screening test and some patient characteristics from a regional maxillofacial trauma clinic based in Glasgow, United Kingdom

A huge body of evidence exists as to the efficacy of alcohol screening and alcohol brief interventions in a range of settings including maxillofacial trauma clinics. An overview of the Fast Alcohol Screening Test (FAST) and some patient characteristics were gathered from those attending a regional maxillofacial trauma clinic in Glasgow, United Kingdom. A 3-month study was undertaken from March 2011 using the FAST as a means of detecting hazardous or harmful alcohol use. Gender, age, and deprivation were examined from patient records. Descriptive statistics were obtained, and gender, deprivation, and alcohol consumption were analyzed using Spearman's rho to ascertain potential correlations between these variables. Two hundred and eighteen patients (157 men and 61 women) participated in the study. A total of 120 participants were deemed to be FAST positive, with a score of 3 or more. The mean age of all patients was 34 years. Forty-six participants (21.3%) fell into the most deprived category. There was no significant correlation between deprivation and age, and deprivation and alcohol intake, but a significant negative correlation between age and alcohol intake was underscored (r = -.183, n = 218, p = .007, two-tailed). Alcohol screening and alcohol brief interventions appear to be a worthwhile contribution to the service studied. Screening could be utilized more effectively through targeting the young male population. Moreover, additional research needs to be carried out to further ascertain if relationships are present between deprivation and age, deprivation and alcohol intake, and age and alcohol intake.

The role of alcohol in maxillofacial trauma: a comparative retrospective audit between the two centers

Alcohol abuse and maxillofacial trauma, particularly that due to interpersonal violence, have a well-established relationship in the literature. We present a retrospective audit comparing the role of alcohol in maxillofacial trauma between Selly Oak Hospital in Birmingham, United Kingdom and Westmead Hospital in Sydney, Australia, and the association between alcohol involvement and patient demographics, including age, sex, marital status, and employment status. Also presented are the differences between the two centers in terms of mechanisms and types of injuries and the locations where these injuries were sustained. Alcohol was involved in 34.78 and 30.77% of patients at Westmead and Birmingham, respectively. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed a reduced likelihood of alcohol involvement in episodes of maxillofacial trauma where patients were unemployed (P=.04), and where injuries were sustained secondary to mechanisms other than assault (P<.001) and in locations other than pubs and nightclubs (P=.024). There appeared to be no statistically significant contribution to the likelihood of alcohol involvement by treating center, marital status, patient sex, or age. Alcohol continues to be a strong driving factor in cases of maxillofacial trauma, particularly those due to alleged assault, with a typical patient demographic of the gainfully employed frequenting drinking establishments being most at risk for alcohol-related trauma, most commonly sustaining their injuries secondary to assault. Identifying patient groups most at risk is a key step in developing public health strategies aimed at prevention, and our findings would appear to suggest this group of patients as being the most worthwhile to target with measures aimed at reducing alcohol-fueled maxillofacial trauma.

Randomized controlled trial of personalized motivational interventions in substance using patients with facial injuries

PURPOSE

The proximate use of illicit drugs or alcohol (substance use) is the most common precipitator of facial injuries among socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Reducing these risky behaviors could minimize adverse health sequelae and potential reinjury. The objective of our study was to test whether a culturally competent, personalized motivational intervention incorporated into surgical care could significantly reduce existing substance use behaviors in facial injury patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Substance-using subjects (n = 218) presenting with facial injuries to a level 1 trauma center were randomly assigned to either a personalized motivational intervention (PMI) condition or a health-information (HI) control condition. After a brief assessment of the individual's substance use severity and willingness to change these behaviors, both groups attended 2 counseling sessions with a trained interventionist. The PMI subjects (n = 118) received individualized, motivational interventions, whereas the HI subjects (n = 100) received only general health information. Both groups were reassessed at 6 and 12 months postinjury, and changes in substance-use patterns were measured to assess the effects of intervention.

RESULTS

The PMI and HI groups were closely matched on their sociodemographic and substance use characteristics. Subjects in the PMI group showed statistically significant declines in drug use at both the 6- and 12-month assessments. The intervention's effect on lowering illicit drug use was greatest at the 6-month assessment but had weakened by the 1-year follow-up. The efficacy of the PMI was moderated by an individual's initial drug use severity; individuals with greater drug use dependency at baseline were seen to have larger intervention effects, as did individuals who were most aware of their drug problem and willing to change their substance use behaviors. Unlike illicit drug use, changes in alcohol use did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups, irrespective of an individuals' recognition of the alcohol problem or willingness to take steps to address it.

CONCLUSION

A culturally competent, motivational intervention integrated into the care of vulnerable patients with facial injury can reduce illicit drug use behaviors. Subgroups of injured patients appear to benefit most from such personalized motivational interventions. A better articulation of target populations, intervention content, and delivery would allow for directed interventions and an appropriate focusing of limited time and health care resources.

A summary of trauma and trauma-related papers published in BJOMS during 2008-2009

This paper provides a summary of the 49 trauma and related papers published in British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery during the period January 2008 to December 2009. 16/49 (32%) of these publications were full length articles, which covered areas such as epidemiology, service provision, materials and operative surgery. In addition there were other articles including short communications, technical notes, letters to the editor and interesting cases. Whilst fewer full length articles were published compared to the other sub-specialties, it was reassuring to see that the studies represent all aspects of trauma. More basic science and randomized control studies relating to trauma need to be encouraged.