Validated questionnaires on intimacy in patients who have had cancer

Head and neck cancer survivorship consensus statement from the American Head and Neck Society

OBJECTIVES

To provide a consensus statement describing best practices and evidence regarding head and neck cancer survivorship.

METHODS

Key topics regarding head and neck cancer survivorship were identified by the multidisciplinary membership of the American Head and Neck Society Survivorship, Supportive Care & Rehabilitation Service. Guidelines were generated by combining expert opinion and a review of the literature and categorized by level of evidence.

RESULTS

Several areas regarding survivorship including dysphonia, dysphagia, fatigue, chronic pain, intimacy, the ability to return to work, financial toxicity, lymphedema, psycho-oncology, physical activity, and substance abuse were identified and discussed. Additionally, the group identified and described the role of key clinicians in survivorship including surgical, medical and radiation oncologists; dentists; primary care physicians; psychotherapists; as well as physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapists.

CONCLUSION

Head and neck cancer survivorship is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach centered around patients and their caregivers. As survival related to head and neck cancer treatment improves, addressing post-treatment concerns appropriately is critically important to our patient's quality of life. There continues to be a need to define effective and efficient programs that can coordinate this multidisciplinary effort toward survivorship.

Sexuality and Intimacy Needs Within a Hospitalized Palliative Care Population: Results From a Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Palliative care (PC) clinicians are well trained to address physical, psychosocial and spiritual needs of patients who have a serious illness. However, one area that is often overlooked is intimacy and sexuality.

OBJECTIVE

To explore patient concerns regarding intimacy as it relates to illness, family reactions, physician conversations, and coping strategies and challenges.

METHODS

Eligible subjects (at least 18 years old, capacitated, receiving PC consultation at the lead author's institution) participated in semi-structured interviews between November and December 2017. Transcripts were open-coded and analyzed using Dedoose 3.5.35 software. A constant comparative method was used to identify patterns in the data.

RESULTS

21 interviews were analyzed and several themes emerged. Participants described the effect of physical and mental/emotional changes on their relationships. Family relationships, romantic relationships, and sexuality were prominent in patients' experiences of intimacy and how it changed as the illness progressed. Relationships were often noted to strengthen during the course of illness, while sexual activity was frequently reported to be negatively impacted. Patients consistently reported little provider communication on the impact of illness on intimacy beyond instructions about what sexual activities they could or could not engage in.

CONCLUSION

This study underlines the significant impact of serious, progressive illness on relationships, sexuality, and physical and emotional intimacy. It highlights that these topics continue to be priorities for patients with serious illness, and that medical teams frequently fail to address them at all. Future research should further explore these issues across diverse patient populations.

Psychometric validation of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire Sexual Health (EORTC QLQ-SH22)

BACKGROUND

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Group developed a questionnaire to assess sexual health in patients with cancer and cancer survivors. This study evaluates the psychometric properties of the questionnaire.

METHODS

The 22-item EORTC sexual health questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-SH22) was administered with the EORTC QLQ-C30 to 444 patients with cancer. The hypothesised scale structure, reliability and validity were evaluated through standardised psychometric procedures.

RESULTS

The cross-cultural field study showed that the majority of patients (94.7%) were able to complete the QLQ-SH22 in less than 20 min; 89% of the study participants did not need any help to fill in the questionnaire. Multi-item multi-trait scaling analysis confirmed the hypothesised scale structure with two multi-item scales (sexual satisfaction, sexual pain) and 11 single items (including five conditional items and four gender-specific items). The internal consistency yielded acceptable Cronbach's alpha coefficients (.90 for the sexual satisfaction scale, .80 for the sexual pain scale). The test-retest correlations (Pearson's r) ranged from .70 to .93 except for the scale communication with professionals (.67) and male body image (.69). The QLQ-SH22 discriminates well between subgroups of patients differing in terms of their performance and treatment status.

CONCLUSION

The study supports the reliability, the content and construct validity of the QLQ-SH22. The newly developed questionnaire is clinically applicable to assess sexual health of patients with cancer at different treatment stages and during survivorship for clinical trials and for clinical practice.

Sexual satisfaction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma survivors: Rates and determinants

OBJECTIVES

Sexual health problems have been identified as an unmet need in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. In particular, little is known about such outcomes in survivors of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study of NPC survivors with ≥4y follow-up was undertaken. Sexual satisfaction was assessed using the optional "I am satisfied with my sex life" item of the FACT-H&N. Other patient-reported outcomes measures were also captured including fatigue (FACIT-F), HNC symptom burden (MDASI-HN), emotional distress (HADS) and frontal function (FrSBE). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors influencing sexual satisfaction.

RESULTS

The sexual satisfaction item was answered by 85/103 (83%) enrollees. Female (p < 0.001) and non-partnered (p = 0.0045) patients were more likely to abstain from answering. The distribution of responses were: "very much" (26%), "quite a bit" (21%), "somewhat" (20%), "a little bit" (13%) and "not at all" (20%). Sexual satisfaction was associated with multiple patient-reported measures on univariate analysis, including quality of life, fatigue, a priori selected HNC symptoms (pain, taste), emotional distress, frontal lobe function, body image and relationship strength. On multivariate analysis, only relationship strength and emotional distress remained significant. Sociodemographic factors (age, sex, marital status) and other selected orofacial toxicities were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half (47%) of our sample reported being in the higher satisfaction range. While reassuring in the context of comparative population level data, a number of factors including toxicity, psychological and social factors were associated with sexual satisfaction responses. Prospective evaluation of this unmet need is required.

Mitchell-Hoole-Kanatas (MHK) questionnaire: the first to measure patient-reported outcomes relating to problems with intimacy after diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer

Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used by clinical teams as indicators of quality when assessing treatment after a diagnosis of head and neck cancer. About a third of patients report reduced sexual interest or enjoyment after such treatment but, despite that, there is no questionnaire about intimacy that has been developed specifically for them. The aim of this study was to develop such a questionnaire, to gain an indication of the relative incidence of individual items, and to compare characteristics such as age, stage, treatment, time since treatment for an established head and neck cancer, and a health-related quality of life (QoL) measure (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 with the Head and Neck 35 module). The development of the new instrument was based on an exploratory observational study that included quantitative and qualitative methods. The qualitative element was achieved by the generation of items - from published studies, the comments of patients and carers, and a cross-sectional survey of patients with head and neck cancer who were alive and free of disease. The quantitative element comprised analysis of exploratory and confirmatory factors, internal reliability assessment (Cronbach's alpha), and a correlation analysis. Forty-two patients were included in the focus groups, and 101 patients participated in the cross-sectional survey (both male and female, in a relationship and single, age range 30-70 years for the focus group, and 62-117 in the cross-sectional survey). All treatments were included. We found that the ability to enjoy a sex life had been adversely affected in about half the sample and that this had significantly changed from before their cancer in a third. The qualitative part of the study resulted in 22 items that covered a range of domains from dry mouth and thick saliva to loss of sensation (lips, fingertips), restricted head/neck movement, fatigue, and pain. The exploratory analysis covered four domains (physical, sensation, movement, and communication) from 12 of 22 items. Cronbach's alphas ranged from 0.62 to 0.84, and the correlation analysis indicated "good fit" statistics for these domains. In terms of the EORTC QoL Questionnnaire - Head and Neck 35, the four MHK domains showed good levels of association with anticipated domains. Head and neck cancer and its associated treatments significantly adversely affect intimacy and sexuality in half the population sampled. The MHK tool may be used to identify specific issues related to intimacy in patients with a history of diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer. Further work is essential to identify its precise role and to help develop specific interventions.

[Systematic retrospective study of oral cancer-related quality of life scale]

OBJECTIVE

The quality of life (QOL) related to oral cancer has recently become a focus of clinical studies. This study aims to systematically review the current research situation of QOL of local and foreign oral cancer patients and explore the existing related problems and future research directions to provide references and solutions.

METHODS

Through relevant key words, PubMed, Wiley InterScience, Science Direct, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were first searched. The related target literature from 2000 to 2017 were screened. Finally, the frequency of oral cancer related to QOL scale used in literature was calculated, and the related scales were briefly introduced.

RESULTS

From the target literature, 218 English target literature, 55 Chinese target literature, 24 English scales, and 12 Chinese scales were selected. The most widely used scales for assessing the QOL of patients with oral cancer were as follows: University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL), European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30/Head and Neck 35 (EORTC QLQ-C30/H&N35), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N), and Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP).

CONCLUSIONS

The QOL related to oral cancer was well underway, and the study of geographical distribution was widespread. However, the work on self-developed scale remains inadequate. UW-QOL, EORTC QLQ-C30/H&N35, and FACT-H&N can be utilized as the preferred scales for evaluating the QOL of oral cancer patients. A specific disease-related function scale can also be selected according to specific research objectives.

Phase 1-3 of the cross-cultural development of an EORTC questionnaire for the assessment of sexual health in cancer patients: the EORTC SHQ-22

To develop and pretest an European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Sexual Health Questionnaire (EORTC SHQ-22) for the assessment of physical, psychological, and social aspects of sexual health (SH) in male and female cancer patients and survivors. Questionnaire construction started with creating a list of relevant SH issues based on a comprehensive literature review. Issues were subsequently evaluated for relevance and prioritization by 78 healthcare professionals (HCP) and 107 patients from 12 countries during in-depth interviews (phase 1). Extracted issues were operationalized into items (phase 2). Phase 3 focused on pretesting the preliminary questionnaire in a cross-cultural patient sample (n = 171) using debriefing interviews. Psychometric properties were preliminary determined using a principal component analysis and Cronbach's alpha. We derived 53 relevant SH issues from the literature. Based on HCP and patient interviews, 22 of these 53 issues were selected and operationalized into items. Testing the preliminary 22-item short questionnaire resulted in a change of wording in five items and two communication-related items; no items were removed. Preliminary psychometric analysis revealed a two-factor solution and 11 single items; both scales showed good reliability indicated by a Cronbach's alpha of 0.87 (sexual satisfaction) and 0.82 (sexual pain). Cross-cultural pretesting of the preliminary EORTC SH questionnaire has indicated excellent applicability, patient acceptance, and comprehensiveness as well as good psychometric properties. The final development phase, that is psychometric validation (phase four) including large-scale, cross-cultural field testing of the EORTC SHQ-22, has commenced.