Incidence, timing, presentation, treatment, and outcomes of second primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after oral cancer

Second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity - a retrospective cohort study of therapeutic procedures and oncological outcome

OBJECTIVES

In the presented study, the occurrence rates of second primary oral carcinomas and their prognostic relevance were analyzed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients with surgically treated oral squamous cell carcinomas within the years 2010 and 2022 in our department were included in this retrospective cohort study. Two groups were designed including patients with second primary carcinomas and patients with local tumor recurrences. Occurrence rates, tumor stages and applied therapies were assessed. Primary outcome was overall survival in dependence of the index tumor. Secondary outcomes were overall survival in dependence of local recurrences or second primary tumors.

RESULTS

An overall number of 908 patients was included in the analysis. 98 patients (10.8%) developed a second primary oral squamous cell carcinoma. Patients with second primary tumors presented significantly (p < 0.001) better overall survival in dependence of the index tumor compared to patients suffering from local recurrences. There was no significant difference in overall survival (p = 0.4) in dependence of the date of second primary tumor or local recurrence. Patients with second primary tumors were more likely to receive surgery-based therapy compared to patients with local recurrences who more frequently received definitive radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicates different clinical courses in terms of therapy and survival of patients suffering from second primary tumors compared to patients with local tumor recurrences. This may be due to a more aggressive biology of local recurrences and earlier detection of second primaries due to oncological follow-up of the index tumor.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The differentiation of local tumor recurrences and second primary tumors is of clinical relevance, as applicable therapies and resulting prognosis may differ significantly.

Age-specific characteristics of head and neck second primary malignancies in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study

This study was performed to analyse the age-specific characteristics of head and neck second primary malignancies (SPMs) in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The medical records of 56 NPC patients diagnosed with head and neck SPMs were reviewed retrospectively. Patients < 45 years old at NPC diagnosis were assigned to the younger group and those ≥ 45 years of age were assigned to the older group. The treatment of the index NPC, latency period, pathological TNM stage, survival status, and SPM subsite were analysed. Patients in the older group were found to have a shorter median latency period than those in the younger group: 8.5 years (range 3-20 years) versus 11 years (range 1-30 years) (P = 0.015). The proportion of SPMs in the jaw was significantly higher in the younger group (P = 0.002). Patients in the younger group receiving radiotherapy with chemotherapy had a shorter latency period (P = 0.003) and higher risk of developing SPMs in the jaw (P = 0.036) than those receiving radiotherapy alone. A long-term and age-dependent regular customised follow-up strategy for NPC is necessary for the prevention and early detection of head and neck second primary malignancies.

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a ten-year follow-up study

Traditional guidelines for determining the prognosis of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are used to make therapeutic decisions. However, only 50% of the patients had lived for more than five years. The present study aimed to analyze the correlation of traditional prognostic factors such as tumor size, histological grading, regional metastases, and treatment with the survival of patients with HNSCC. A total of 78 patients diagnosed with HNSCC were followed up for 10 years after diagnosis and treatment. The health status of the patients was tracked at four time points, and according to the evolution of the patients and their final clinical status, we performed a prognostic analysis based on the clinical outcomes observed during the follow-up period. The final study cohort comprised 50 patients. Most patients had tumors < 4 cm in size (64%) and no regional metastases (64%); no patients had distant metastases at the time of diagnosis. Most individuals had tumors with good (48%) and moderate (46%) degrees of malignancy. At the end of the follow-up period, only 14% of the patients were discharged, 42% died of the tumor, and 44% remained under observation owing to the presence of a potentially malignant disorder, relapse, or metastases. This analysis showed that traditional prognostic factors were not accurate in detecting subclinical changes or predicting the clinical evolution of patients.

Clinical and prognostic features of multiple primary cancers with oral squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the epidemiological, clinical, and prognostic features of multiple primary cancers (MPC) following oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

DESIGN

Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database were analyzed to determine the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of multiple subsequent sites, difference in clinical and prognostic features between MPC and single primary OSCC.

RESULTS

The sites with the highest SIRs were the oral cavity (SIR = 69.48), other oral cavity and pharynx (SIR=55.46), pharynx (SIR=39.21), tonsils (SIR=33.52), trachea (SIR=33.24), esophagus (SIR=18.00), and larynx (SIR=13.12). The 5- and 10-year survival rates for single primary OSCC were 57.9% (95% CI: 56.7-59.2%) and 47.1% (95% CI: 45.7-48.6%), respectively, while those for MPC were 66.9% (95% CI: 64.6-69.4%) and 42.2% (95% CI: 39.5-45.2%), respectively. The mean age of MPC patients was significantly higher than that of single primary OSCC patients. MPC are more common in the gums and other sites of the oral cavity, and more likely to be detected in early TNM stage and pathological grade. Age, site, T-stage, and N-stage were significantly associated with prognosis of MPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences in clinical and prognostic features were found between MPC and single primary OSCC. Considering MPC has a poor long-term prognosis, it is necessary to identify MPC and single primary OSCC early.

Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Concomitant Primary Tumors, What Do We Know? A Review of the Literature

Head and neck cancer is among the top ten cancers worldwide, with most lesions in the oral cavity. Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) accounts for more than 90% of all oral malignancies and is a significant public health concern. Patients with OSCC are at increased risk for developing concomitant tumors, especially in the oral cavity, due to widely genetically susceptible mucosa to carcinogenic factors. Based on fulfilling specific criteria, these concomitant tumors can be called second primary tumors (SPTs), which can be further categorized into metachronous and synchronous tumors. This research reviews the literature that investigated the concurrent OSCC with second or multiple primaries to improve understanding of the definition, classification guidelines, and its effect on cancer survival. It also highlights the current investigation methods, the variation of standard treatment approaches due to such a phenomenon, and preventive measures discussed in the literature.

Better survival and prognosis in SCLC survivors after combined second primary malignancies: A SEER database-based study

With recent advances in treatment modalities, the survival time for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) has increased, along with the likelihood of recurrence of a second primary tumor. However, patient treatment options and prognosis remain uncertain. This research evaluated the survival rates of patients with SCLC with a second malignancy, aiming to provide new insights and statistics on whether to proceed with more active therapy. SCLC patients were selected based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, updated on April 15, 2021. We defined those with SCLC followed by other cancers (1st of 2 or more primaries) in the sequence number as S-second primary malignant cancer (S-SPM). Those who had other cancers followed by SCLC (2nd of 2 or more primaries) were defined as OC-SCLC. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, life table analysis, univariate analysis, stratified analysis, and multiple regression analysis of patient data. We considered the difference statistically meaningful at P < .05. After selection, data for 88,448 participants from the SEER database was included in our analysis. The mean survival time for patients with S-SPM was 69.349 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.939, 72.759), and the medium duration of survival was 34 months (95% CI: 29.900, 38.100). Univariate analysis showed that for overall survival, the hazard ratio (HR) of S-SPM was 0.367 (95% CI: 0.351, 0.383), which was 0.633 lower than that of patients with solitary SCLC and 0.606 lower than that of patients with OC-SCLC. For cancer-specific survival (CSS), the HR of S-SPM was 0.285 (95% CI: 0.271, 0.301), which was 0.715 lower than for patients with solitary SCLC and 0.608 lower than that for patients with OC-SCLC. Multiple regression analysis showed that the HR values of S-SPM were lower than those of patients with single SCLC and those with OC-SCLC, before and after adjustment for variables. Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed that patients with S-SPM had significantly better survival times than the other groups. The survival time and prognosis of patients with S-SPM were clearly superior to those with single SCLC and OC-SCLC.

High-dose-rate remote brachytherapy for metachronous second primary carcinoma of soft palate by iridium 192 isotope in an afterload surface mold

Conservative management of metachronous second primary carcinoma of head and neck is preferred in order to preserve form and function. The purpose of the case report is to describe the treatment of metachronous second primary carcinoma of soft palate by high-dose-rate, remote, afterload brachytherapy. The brachytherapy was done in remote settings by afterloading Iridium 192 isotope carried through a custom fabricated surface mold. The mold enabled good adaptation, stability, and repeatable positioning of the radiation source at each treatment session of fractionated brachytherapy offering consistent dosimetric advantage through a single dosimetry calculation. Collaborative efforts of radiation oncologist and prosthodontist ensured conservative treatment in outpatient set up with minimal adverse effects.

A risk factor for newly diagnosed secondary cancer in patients with early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, or hypopharyngeal cancer: sub-analysis of a prospective observation study

BACKGROUND

We previously identified hypopharyngeal cancer as an independent risk factor for the incidence of newly diagnosed secondary cancers after the treatment of early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancers. We subsequently used a different patient cohort to validate the usefulness of this factor during the follow-up period in these patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent transoral surgery (TOS) as a definitive treatment between April 1, 2016, and September 30, 2020, were included. The incidence of secondary cancer was evaluated in hypopharyngeal and other cancers. Overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analyses based on the risk factors were also performed.

RESULTS

Incidence of new secondary cancer was 30% in hypopharyngeal cancer patients as compared to 11% in other cancer patients, and the risk was 3.60-fold (95% confidence interval 1.07-12.10) higher after definitive treatment for initial head and neck cancers. The 3-year OS, RFS, and DFS rates were 98%, 86%, and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with early-stage laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, who were initially treated with TOS, hypopharyngeal cancer patients had a higher risk of newly diagnosed secondary cancers as observed during the follow-up period.

The role of NBI with flexible video-endoscope in the follow-up of head and neck cancer patients: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Narrow band imaging (NBI) enhances mucosal vasculature and could help in the identification of recurrences. We assessed the effectiveness of NBI with flexible video-endoscope in the early detection of recurrence after treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, its diagnostic advantage over high-definition white-light (HD WL) endoscopy, also in relation to recurrence site, and the influence of previous radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy (CT). Moreover, we investigated the association between index tumor site and the risk of developing recurrence, and the relation between index tumor site and recurrence site.

METHODS

From January 2018 to November 2020, 160 patients previously treated with surgery and/or RT ± CT were evaluated using NBI with flexible video-endoscope. Sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated for NBI and HD WL, and compared using the McNemar test. The Fisher exact test was used to compare the other associations investigated.

RESULTS

The difference between NBI and HD WL sensitivity was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The NBI diagnostic advantage was 62.5%, highest in the hypopharynx (p = 0.05), and was not influenced by previous RT or CT (p = 0.49). Index tumor site statistically related with recurrence site (p < 0.001), but not with the risk of developing recurrence (p = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

NBI with flexible video-endoscope could represent a valid option to detect recurrence early during the follow-up, especially in a difficult-to-visualize site such as the hypopharynx.

Second primary tumors in head and neck cancer patients: The importance of a "tailored" surveillance

OBJECTIVE

Head and neck cancer survivors have increased risk of developing second primary tumors compared to overall population. Because second primary represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in this population, early detection is fundamental.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this 10-year single-institution study, we investigated the following: incidence, clinical-pathological risk factors, and survival of patients with second primary tumor. We included all patients with diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck seen at the Modena University Hospital from 2008 to 2018.

RESULTS

Among 1,177 patients included, 222 (18.9%) developed second primary tumor; its survival probability at 5 years was 40.6%. Alcohol consumption (p = .0055) and index cancer in oropharynx (p = .0029), supraglottic larynx (p = .0000), glottic larynx (p = .0222) were associated with higher risk of second primary. The most common second primary sites were head and neck district and lung (70, 31.5%, and 67, 30.2%, respectively). Head and neck district were more common in oral cavity (18, 43%) and oropharynx index cancer (20, 31%); lung second primary in hypopharynx (4, 40%), supraglottic larynx (17, 43%), and glottic larynx index cancer (23, 35%).

CONCLUSION

Head and neck cancer survivors developing a second primary tumor have dismal prognosis. Tailored surveillance is recommended.

The incidence of newly diagnosed secondary cancer; sub-analysis the prospective study of the second-look procedure for transoral surgery in patients with T1 and T2 head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Our prospective study of patients with early T-stage head and neck cancer indicated a high incidence of newly diagnosed secondary malignancies during the follow-up period. We aimed to determine the incidence rate and risk factors of secondary malignancies in early-stage head and neck cancer patients.

METHODS

We sub-analyzed the patient data of a previous study focusing on secondary cancer incidence. The endpoints were statistical analyses of risk factors and survival and incidence rates.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of secondary cancer was 37%, the crude incidence of second primary cancers was 10.6 per 100 person-years, and the 5 year secondary cancer-free survival rate was 63%. The hypopharynx as the primary site was an independent significant predictive factor (odds ratio 3.96, 95% confidence interval 1.07-14.6, p = 0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

Early stages of laryngeal, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer had a risk of secondary cancer, especially hypopharyngeal cancer. Attention to the secondary cancer has to be paid during the follow-up period after controlling the early-stage disease. These findings highlight the need for awareness of the incidence of secondary cancer in cases of early-stage primary head and neck cancer.