Accuracy and reliability of voxel-based dentoalveolar registration (VDAR) in orthognathic surgical patients: a pilot study with two years' follow-up

Computed tomography imaging superimposition protocols to assess outcomes in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review with comprehensive recommendations

OBJECTIVES

A systematic review was performed to analyze the current evidence on three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) superimposition protocols used to assess dentomaxillofacial changes after orthognathic and orthofacial surgery. Accuracy, reproducibility, and efficiency were evaluated.

METHODS

The search was divided into Main Search (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and SciELO), Grey Literature search (Google Scholar and Open Grey), and Manual search. Thirteen studies were included. Of these, 10 reported data on accuracy, 10 on reproducibility and five on efficiency. Seven proposed or evaluated methods of voxel-based superimposition, three focused on the surface-based technique, one compared surface- and voxel-based superimposition protocols, one used the maximum mutual information algorithm, and one described a landmark-based superimposition method. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was the most common imaging technique, being used in 10 studies.

RESULTS

The accuracy of most methods was high, showing mean differences smaller than voxels' dimensions, ranging between 0.05 and 1.76 mm for translational accuracy, and 0.10-1.09° for rotational accuracy. The overall reproducibility was considered good as demonstrated by the small mean error (range: 0.01-0.26 mm) and high correlation coefficients (range: 0.53-1.00). Timing to complete virtual superimposition techniques ranged between a few seconds up to 40 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Voxel-based superimposition protocols presented the highest accuracy and reproducibility. Moreover, superimposition protocols that used automated processes and involved only one software were the most efficient.

Three-dimensional evaluation of long-term skeletal relapse following Le Fort I maxillary advancement surgery: a 2-year follow-up study

The aim of this study was to assess relapse following Le Fort I (LFI) maxillary advancement with superior or inferior repositioning at 2 years of follow-up. A total of 50 patients (26 female, 24 male; age range 15-56 years) with skeletal class II or III, who underwent bimaxillary surgery with LFI maxillary advancement in combination with either superior or inferior repositioning and also mandibular advancement/setback, were recruited. Preoperative (T0), immediate postoperative (T1), and 2-year postoperative (T2) cone beam computed tomography scans were acquired. Data were imported into a validated module to assess the skeletal movement (T0-T1) and relapse (T1-T2). Overall, the majority of the translational and rotational movements showed a relapse of <1 mm and <1°. Patients undergoing maxillary advancement with inferior repositioning in combination with mandibular advancement showed the highest amount of translational relapse in a superior (0.86 ± 0.85 mm, P < 0.0001) and posterior direction (-0.65 ± 1.11 mm, P < 0.0001). In relation to patients who received a bone graft, inferior repositioning with mandibular setback showed the highest maxillary relapse in a superior direction (1.20 ± 1.56 mm, P = 0.0719) with counterclockwise pitch rotation (2.15 ± 0.64°, P = 0.3759). Amongst the non-grafted procedures, superior repositioning with mandibular setback exhibited the highest relapse in a medial direction (1.38 ± 2.78 mm, P = 0.3981). Maxillary advancement was found to be a highly stable procedure with a lack of superoinferior stability in patients undergoing inferior repositioning.

Three-dimensional evaluation of distal and proximal segment skeletal relapse following isolated mandibular advancement surgery in 100 consecutive patients: A one-year follow-up study

The aim of this study was to perform a three-dimensional evaluation of the skeletal relapse of the proximal and distal mandibular segments following isolated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement surgery. One hundred consecutive patients (mean age 25.8±11.7 years), comprising 65 female patients (mean age 26.4±12.1 years) and 35 male patients (mean age 24.6±11.0 years) requiring mandibular advancement without genioplasty, were enrolled prospectively in the study. Cone beam computed tomography scans were acquired for each patient at three time-points: preoperatively, immediately (1-6 weeks) after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. A validated tool was utilized to assess the surgical movement and relapse. Based on percentage, the majority of the distal and proximal translational and rotational movements relapsed within the range of ≤2mm and ≤2°. The distal segment revealed a significant relapse in a posterior, inferior, and clockwise pitch direction. Both left and right proximal segments showed a significant translational relapse in the medial, posterior, and superior direction. Amongst the rotational parameters, proximal segments relapsed significantly in clockwise pitch, clockwise roll, and counterclockwise yaw direction. Overall, both distal and proximal bone segments showed a clinically acceptable translational and rotational stability. The proximal segments torqued towards their original position with a reduction of flaring.