1
|
Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Peris K, Stratigos A, Hauschild A, Forsea AM, Lebbe C, Lallas A, Grob JJ, Harwood C, Gogas H, Rutkowski P, Olah J, Kelleners-Smeets NWJ, Paoli J, Dummer R, Moreno-Ramirez D, Bastholt L, Putnik K, Karls R, Hoeller C, Vandersleyen V, Vieira R, Arenberger P, Bylaite-Buckinskiene M, Ocvirk J, Situm M, Weinlich G, Banjin M, Todorovic V, Ymeri A, Zhukavets A, Garbe C. Which medical disciplines diagnose and treat melanoma in Europe in 2019? A survey of experts from melanoma centres in 27 European countries. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 35:1119-1132. [PMID: 33326646 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The incidence of melanoma is increasing. This places significant burden on societies to provide efficient cancer care. The European Cancer Organisation recently published the essential requirements for quality melanoma care. The present study is aimed for the first time to roughly estimate the extent to which these requirements have been met in Europe. MATERIALS AND METHODS A web-based survey of experts from melanoma centres in 27 European countries was conducted from 1 February to 1 August 2019. Data on diagnostic techniques, surgical and medical treatment, organization of cancer care and education were collected and correlated with national health and economic indicators and mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) as a surrogate for survival. Univariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the correlations. SPSS software was used. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS The MIR was lower in countries with a high health expenditure per capita and with a higher numbers of general practitioners (GPs) and surgeons (SURG) per million inhabitants. In these countries, GPs and dermatologists (DER) were involved in melanoma detection; high percentage of DER used dermatoscopy and were involved in the follow-up of all melanoma stages; both medical oncologists (ONC) and dermato-oncologists administered systemic treatments; and patients had better access to sentinel lymph node biopsy and were treated within multidisciplinary tumour boards. CONCLUSION Based on these first estimates, the greater involvement of GPs in melanoma detection; the greater involvement of highly trained DER in dermatoscopy, dermatosurgery, follow-up and the systemic treatment of melanoma; and the provision of ongoing dermato-oncology training for pathologists, SURG, DER and ONC are necessary to provide an optimal melanoma care pathway. A comprehensive analysis of the melanoma care pathway based on clinical melanoma registries will be needed to more accurately evaluate these first insights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Kandolf-Sekulovic
- Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, Military Medical Academy, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - K Peris
- Institute of Dermatology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - A Stratigos
- 1st Department of Dermatology-Venereology, Andreas Sygros Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Hauschild
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany
| | - A-M Forsea
- Elias University Hospital Bucharest, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucuresti, Romania
| | - C Lebbe
- APHP Dermatology Department, University Paris 7 Diderot, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| | - A Lallas
- First Department of Dermatology, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - J-J Grob
- Service de Dermatologie et Cancérologie Cutanée, Hopital de la Timone, Marseille, France
| | - C Harwood
- Centre for Cell Biology and Cutaneous Research, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - H Gogas
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Laiko Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - P Rutkowski
- Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Olah
- Department of Oncotherapy, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - N W J Kelleners-Smeets
- Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - J Paoli
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - R Dummer
- UniversitätsSpital Zürich-Skin Cancer Center, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - D Moreno-Ramirez
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | - L Bastholt
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - K Putnik
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - R Karls
- Derma Clinic Riga, Riga, Latvia
| | - C Hoeller
- Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Vandersleyen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - R Vieira
- Department of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - P Arenberger
- Department of Dermatovenereology, Charles University 3rd Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - J Ocvirk
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - M Situm
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - G Weinlich
- Department of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - M Banjin
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - V Todorovic
- Clinic for Oncology and radiotherapy, Podgorica, Montenegro
| | - A Ymeri
- University Hospital Mother Theresa, Tirana, Albania
| | - A Zhukavets
- Belarusian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education (BelMAPE), Minsk, Belarus
| | - C Garbe
- Centre for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beecher S, Wrafter PF, Joyce CW, Regan PJ, Kelly JL. High-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the ear - A potential role for sentinel node biopsy. Head Neck 2017. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne Beecher
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway; National University of Ireland; Galway
| | - Paula F. Wrafter
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway; National University of Ireland; Galway
| | - Cormac W. Joyce
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway; National University of Ireland; Galway
| | - Padraic J. Regan
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway; National University of Ireland; Galway
| | - Jack L. Kelly
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University College Hospital, Galway; National University of Ireland; Galway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pacifico MD, Pearl RA, Grover R. The UK Government two-week rule and its impact on melanoma prognosis: an evidence-based study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2007; 89:609-15. [PMID: 18201477 PMCID: PMC2121231 DOI: 10.1308/003588407x205459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In order to tackle increasing waiting lists the UK Government's 'two-week rule' was introduced for a number of cancers, including melanoma, in 2000. Whilst there is evidence that secondary prevention (i. e. early diagnosis) improves patient outcome, particularly in melanoma where early surgical excision is the only intervention to improve survival, there is as yet no evidence base for a 2-week limit. Any survival benefit from this Government target will not be demonstrable until long-term follow-up is available, realistically 10-year mortality figures in 2010. PATIENTS AND METHODS To investigate an evidence base for the two-week rule in melanoma, we performed a retrospective study on patients with suspected skin cancers referred to a rapid access Pigmented Lesion Clinic (PLC) over a 4-year period with long-term survival data, and compared them to a historical control group. RESULTS A total of 4399 patients attended the PLC from January 1993 to December 1996 and all were seen within 2 weeks. Ninety-six melanomas were diagnosed during this period with 96% treated within 2 weeks of GP referral, the majority (74%) excised on the day of PLC attendance. Melanoma patients (n = 78) diagnosed in the 2 years prior to the inception of the PLC waited 3-34 days for consultation and 4-74 days for treatment. Melanoma patients diagnosed in the PLC had significantly thinner tumours (Mann Whitney test, P < 0.001) and improved overall survival (chi(2) 18.1924; P < 0.001) compared with melanoma patients diagnosed before the inception of the clinic. CONCLUSIONS This is, to our knowledge, the first example that consultation within a 2-week time-frame of GP referral impacts patient survival and the first evidence base behind Government guidelines for this particular cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M D Pacifico
- RAFT Institute of Plastic Surgery, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giblin AV, Thomas JM. Incidence, mortality and survival in cutaneous melanoma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006; 60:32-40. [PMID: 17126264 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2006.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2006] [Revised: 04/25/2006] [Accepted: 05/02/2006] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Cutaneous melanoma remains a challenge despite increased levels of awareness, education and targeted health policies. Worldwide incidence rates for cutaneous melanoma have risen faster than those for any other malignancy in Caucasian populations over the last 30 years. Despite improving survival rates (defined as the ratio of those who survive the disease against incidence) over this period, mortality rates, generally, have continued to climb. Mortality from melanoma is greater than that caused by all other types of skin cancer, especially in men. In Britain the percentage of increase in the male age standardised mortality rate surpassed that of all other malignancies assessed (1993-2002) by Cancer Research UK. A literature-based study was conducted with review of publications identified through Medline and EMBase, 1980-December 2005, databases. We present a review of the current literature on incidence, mortality and survival rates of melanoma including a discussion on the aetiological factors, behaviour modification associated with public education campaigns and recent health policies and the effect these are having on melanoma figures. It is likely that any fall in mortality rates from melanoma in the near future will be secondary to early detection. Changes resulting from primary prevention are unlikely to be noticeable for several decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-V Giblin
- Melanoma and Sarcoma Surgical Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, 203 Fulham Road, London SW3 6JJ, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|