Timing of radiotherapy in head and neck free flap reconstruction--a study of postoperative complications

Oculofacial plastic surgery in the cancer patient: A narrative review

With the advances in systemic therapy and radiotherapy, the life expectancy of patients battling cancer has increased. The oculofacial plastic surgeon should be aware of the potential impacts a patient in remission or one being actively treated may pose. The goal of this review is to discuss the considerations a surgeon should have in this patient population.MethodsThe authors performed a computerized search using PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The search terms used were "chemotherapy AND surgery", "immunotherapy AND surgery", "radiotherapy AND surgery", "nutrition AND surgery", "(oculoplastic OR orbit OR eyelid OR lacrimal OR puncta) AND (chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy)", "(facial OR facial plastic OR oculoplastic) AND (chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy)", "(cancer OR malignancy) AND surgery", "(cancer OR malignancy) AND (surgery OR surgical) complications", "wound healing AND (cancer OR malignancy)", "infection AND (cancer OR malignancy)", "(bleeding OR blood loss) AND (cancer OR malignancy) AND surgery", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND wound healing", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND (bleeding OR blood loss)", "(chemotherapy OR immunotherapy OR radiotherapy) AND infection".ResultsA total of 89 articles, published from 1993 to 2023 in the English language or with English translations were included. Articles published earlier than 2000 were cited for foundational knowledge. References cited in the identified articles were also used to gather further data for the review.Conclusions and RelevancePatients who are being treated for cancer or are undergoing current treatment for cancer require special considerations. Systemic therapies and radiotherapy impact the physiology of patients and the integrity of tissue in ways that significantly impact surgical interventions. It is imperative for the oculofacial plastic surgeon to have a complete understanding on how a previous or current diagnosis of cancer can influence surgical outcomes.

Microvascular Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: The Utility of the Modified Frailty Five-Item Index

BACKGROUND

 Microvascular free tissue transfer is a common tool for the reconstruction of oncologic head and neck defects. Adequate preoperative assessment can aid in appropriate risk stratification and peri-operative optimization. The modified five-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a validated risk-assessment scale; however, its utility in head and neck free-flap reconstruction is unknown when compared with other common risk factors.

METHODS

 A retrospective, single-institution chart review (2017-2020) was performed. Patient demographics, defect and repair characteristics, pre- and peri-operative factors, and flap outcomes were recorded. A high mFI-5 score was defined as greater than 2. The total score, as well as other patient factors, was correlated to postoperative flap complications.

RESULTS

 A total of 214 patients were deemed appropriate for conclusion. The mean age was 63.9 ± 12.8 years. There were an even number of males (52.8%) and females (47.2%). A fifth of subjects (20.8%) underwent preoperative radiotherapy. There were 21 cases (9.8%) of complete flap loss. A total of 34 patients (29.4%) experienced any postoperative complication related to flap outcomes. An elevated mFI-5 was significantly associated with a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (39.7 vs. 29.4%, p < 0.019) and total flap loss (16.7% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.033). Preoperative radiation was found to be associated with an increased complication rate (p < 0.003).

CONCLUSION

 The mFI-5 score may be a potentially significant tool in the risk stratification of patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstruction as opposed to commonly utilized risk factors. Preoperative radiotherapy is significantly associated with postoperative complications. Appropriate preoperative assessment may help tailor patient care preoperatively.

Impact of Drain Removal Timing and Prophylactic Antibiotic Agents on Surgical Site Infections in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Background: Regarding drain removal timing in head and neck reconstruction, each institution applies its criteria, and a clear consensus has not been established. This pre-post study aims to identify risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) after reconstructive surgical procedure for head and neck cancer, specifically examining the influence of drain removal timing. Patients and Methods: A cohort of 220 patients undergoing reconstructive surgical procedure was analyzed. Patients had closed suction drains removed on post-operative day (POD) 2 or POD3. The primary endpoint was SSI incidence within 30 days after operation. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of hematoma and lymphorrhea within 30 days after operation and drain tip culture results. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher exact test and logistic regression models. Results: SSIs occurred in 14.5% of patients, with no significant difference between the POD2 (14.6%) and POD3 (14.5%) groups. No substantial differences were found for hematoma and lymphorrhea. The positive rate of drain tip cultures was significantly greater in the POD3 group (38.2%) compared with the POD2 group (18.0%). Multi-variable analysis showed no correlation between SSI and POD3 drain removal (odds ratio [OR], 0.728; p = 0.471). However, significant SSI risk factors included oral cavity lesions (OR, 3.510; p = 0.003) and ampicillin prophylaxis (OR, 5.266; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Oral cavity lesions and ampicillin prophylaxis were substantial SSI risk factors in reconstructive surgical procedure for head and neck cancer. However, drain removal timing did not significantly affect SSI incidence or other complications. Considering benefits such as shorter hospital stays and less chance of retrograde bacterial invasion, removing drains on POD2 is preferable compared with removal on POD3. Further research is needed to refine prophylactic protocols and enhance patient outcomes.

The pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled flap-Its past and current practice in a dedicated microsurgery service. Review of the literature, and debunking controversies

BACKGROUND

The pectoralis major myocutaneous pedicled (PMMP) flap is still considered by many a workhorse flap in head and neck (H&N) reconstruction, despite free flap surgery advancing. The authors aimed to examine this claim and associated myths and controversies by analyzing literature trends and revealing the role of the PMMP flap in a well-established microsurgery center.

METHODS

The senior author's reconstructive H&N practice between 1995 and 2022 was reviewed to describe and critically judge primary and secondary PMMP flap decisions to provide invaluable lessons learned and debunk common controversies related to complex H&N reconstruction. A literature review from 1978 to 2022 evaluated PMMP flap articles from plastic surgery and allied H&N specialties, with a deeper analysis on publications from 2010 onward.

RESULTS

In 27 years of practice, the senior author performed 2871 major H&N reconstructions, including 27 PMMP flaps. Both primary (13/27) and secondary (14/27) PMMP flaps decreased over time. Indications shifted from external skin compromise (fistulae/metastases) to complex medical morbidity and high-risk neck status. Neck status was increasingly evaluated based on any previous violation, surgical or irradiative, rather than simply number of remaining vessels. A literature review revealed an ongoingly abundant and primary PMMP flap use, largely by non-plastic surgeons.

CONCLUSION

The PMMP flap can and should be reserved for complex, high-risk or free flap-exhausted cases. Thus, current indications deserve redefinition. Multidisciplinary collaboration in specialized centers with plastic surgeons is imperative to ensure appropriate reconstructive rational and protect patient outcomes, as changing reconstructive hands and starting anew risks reconstructive regression.

Microvascular reconstruction of midface osteoradionecrosis

BACKGROUND

Head and neck osteoradionecrosis (ORN) of the midface requiring free flap (FF) reconstruction is uncommon. This multi-institutional study was designed to review outcomes for this rare patient population.

METHODS

Retrospective multi-institutional review of FF reconstruction for midface ORN (2005-2022; n = 54).

RESULTS

The FF survival rate was 87% (n = 54). Patients were less likely to be tolerating a regular diet at 3 months postoperative if they had a preoperative history of prior head and surgery (80% vs. 95%; p = 0.02), a pathologic fracture (50% vs. 90%; p = 0.04), exposed bone intraorally (43% vs. 94%; p = 0.002), or a fistula (67% vs. 96%; p = 0.03). Mean albumin was higher in patients whose FF survived (3.6 ± 0.5 vs. 2.7 ± 1.4; p = 0.03). Patients with low prealbumin were more likely to undergo a hematoma evacuation (27% vs. 0%; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In this series of midface ORN requiring FF reconstruction preoperative nutritional status impacted postoperative complications. Preoperative occurrence of a fistula, pathologic fracture, and intraoral bone exposure correlated with decreased tolerance of a regular diet following reconstruction.

The use of artificial intelligence in reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancer: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

The popularity of artificial intelligence (AI) in head and neck cancer (HNC) management is increasing, but postoperative complications remain prevalent and are the main factor that impact prognosis after surgery. Hence, recent studies aim to assess new AI models to evaluate their ability to predict free flap complications more effectively than traditional algorithms. This systematic review aims to summarize current evidence on the utilization of AI models to predict complications following reconstructive surgery for HNC.

METHODS

A combination of MeSH terms and keywords was used to cover the following three subjects: "HNC," "artificial intelligence," and "free flap or reconstructive surgery." The electronic literature search was performed in three relevant databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane. Quality appraisal of the included study was conducted using the TRIPOD Statement.

RESULTS

The review included a total of 5 manuscripts (n = 5) for a total of 7524 patients. Across studies, the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) value achieved was 0.824 by the Auto-WEKA model. However, only 20% of reported AUROCs exceeded 0.70. One study concluded that most AI models were comparable or inferior in performance to conventional logistic regression. The highest predictors of complications were flap type, smoking status, tumour location, and age.

DISCUSSION

Some models showed promising results. Predictors identified across studies were different than those found in existing literature, showing the added value of AI models. However, the algorithms showed inconsistent results, underlying the need for better-powered studies with larger databases before clinical implementation.

Modern Oncologic Maxillary Reconstruction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Have a broad understanding of the oncological principles relating to cancers involving the maxilla. (2) Define anatomically the various types of maxillectomy defects and their associated morbidity. (3) Understand the goals and principles of maxillary reconstruction. (4) Demonstrate an understanding of the strengths, limitations, and alternative reconstructive options for the various types of maxillectomy defects.

SUMMARY

Reconstruction of the maxilla following cancer resection has evolved over the past decade. Underpinned by advances in virtual surgery technology and an increased focus on dental rehabilitation, more sophisticated workflows using free bone flaps have become more commonplace. There are few reconstructions anywhere in the body that require the restoration of similarly intricate bone and soft-tissue relations with implications for both form and function, like the maxilla. Success demands careful anatomical definition of the defect, an understanding of the goals and principles of reconstruction, and the understanding of relative strengths and limitations of the various reconstructive options. Equally, as no one technique is without shortcomings and maxillary surgery can be associated with a significant complication profile, it is just as important to match the patient and oncologic context to the reconstruction. This article is intended to provide the reader with a broad overview of these core factors.

The Impact of Timing of Delayed Autologous Breast Reconstruction following Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Postoperative Morbidity

BACKGROUND

 The ideal time to perform reconstruction after the completion of postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer is currently unknown. We evaluate the association between the timing of delayed autologous breast reconstruction following PMRT and postoperative complications.

METHODS

 Patients who underwent mastectomy, PMRT, and then delayed autologous breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2016 were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases. Timing of reconstruction following PMRT was grouped 0-3, 3-6, 6-12, 12-24, and after 24 months. Multivariable models were used to assess associations between timing of reconstruction following PMRT and key measures of morbidity.

RESULTS

 A total of 1,039 patients met inclusion criteria. The rate of any complications for the analytic cohort was 39.4%, including 13.3% of patients who experienced wound complications and 11.3% of patients requiring additional flaps. Unadjusted rates of complications increased from 23.4% between 0 and 3 months to 49.4% between 3 and 6 months and decreased thereafter. Need for additional flaps was highest within 3 to 6 months (14.0%). Multivariate analysis revealed higher rates of any complications when reconstruction was performed between 3 and 6 months (odds ratio [OR]: 3.04, p < 0.001), 6 and 12 months (OR: 2.66, p < 0.001), or 12 and 24 months (OR: 2.13, p = 0.001) after PMRT. No difference in complications were noted in reconstructions performed after 24 months compared with those performed before 3 months (p > 0.05). However, rates of wound complications were least likely in reconstructions after 24 months (OR: 0.34, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

 These findings suggest plastic surgeons may consider performing autologous breast reconstruction early for select patients, before 3 months following PMRT without increasing postoperative morbidity.

A Review of Radiation-Induced Vascular Injury and Clinical Impact

ABSTRACT

The number of cancer survivors continues to increase because of advances in therapeutic modalities. Along with surgery and chemotherapy, radiotherapy is a commonly used treatment modality in roughly half of all cancer patients. It is particularly helpful in the oncologic treatment of patients with breast, head and neck, and prostate malignancies. Unfortunately, among patients receiving radiation therapy, long-term sequalae are often unavoidable, and there is accumulating clinical evidence suggesting significant radiation-related damage to the vascular endothelium. Ionizing radiation has been known to cause obliterative fibrosis and increased wall thickness in irradiated blood vessels. Clinically, these vascular changes induced by ionizing radiation can pose unique surgical challenges when operating in radiated fields. Here, we review the relevant literature on radiation-induced vascular damage focusing on mechanisms and signaling pathways involved and highlight microsurgical anastomotic outcomes after radiotherapy. In addition, we briefly comment on potential therapeutic strategies, which may have the ability to mitigate radiation injury to the vascular endothelium.

Analysis of vein grafting versus arteriovenous loop in microvascular head and neck reconstruction: Multicenter series of 36 patients

BACKGROUND

The utilization of an arteriovenous loop is an underreported technique that affords the creation of reliable vascular options. Understanding the efficacy and impacting variables of microvascular reconstruction with an arteriovenous loop can be critical to its use.

METHODS

Multi-institutional study of 36 patients who underwent vein grafting or AV loop with free tissue transfer.

RESULTS

58.3% of patients received prior radiation and 38.9% prior flap reconstruction. Flap success for vein grafting was 76% and AV loop was 100% (p = 0.16). Success for the radiated cohort was 90.5% and non-radiated 80% (p = 0.63). Flap success for the radiated, vein grafted patient was 83.3% and 100% flap success rate for radiated, AV loop patient (p = 0.49). Overall flap survival was 83.3% versus 97% overall success rate in the United States.

CONCLUSION

The AV loop is a viable modality for vessel-depleted free tissue reconstruction. Radiation and previous surgery do not significantly impact flap success rates.

Secondary Reconstruction of Head and Neck Cancer Defects-Principles in its Practice

Objective

Secondary reconstruction is requested by patients who have completed their head and neck cancer treatment. The reason for the request for reconstruction may be to improve the functional deficits, achieve aesthetic refinements or most commonly both. The article looks at various issues related to reconstruction in the secondary setting and suggesting the ways to approaching patients requesting secondary reconstruction.

Discussion

While considering secondary reconstruction, various factors need to be considered. These include issues related to the disease, the treatment received as well as the patient's comorbid conditions. Aggressive disease and multiple recurrences should deter from undertaking complex reconstructions. Lack of tissue pliability resulting in a woody neck due to radiation makes dissection difficult and wound healing poor. The reconstructive requirements include release of contractures inside the mouth, reconstruction of the missing jaws, replacement of the missing volume of the tongue and correction of the incompetent angle of mouth. Goals of reconstruction should be prioritized by the surgical team. Free soft tissue or bone containing flaps would be provided ideal tissue to meet the reconstructive requirements in secondary reconstruction. However, several impediments could exist for their safe use. Release of contractures and provision of adequate soft tissue should be given priority and must be addressed before bony reconstruction is contemplated.

Conclusion

Bony reconstruction of both mandible and maxilla is possible, with the former being more difficult to deliver good results due to the associated soft tissue fibrosis. Virtual surgical planning with the aid of Stereo lithographic models and planning software will improve the quality of bony reconstruction. Detailed counseling sessions involving patient and the family are essential before embarking on secondary reconstruction as the patient expectations and the surgical outcome may not be easy to match. However excellent improvement in function and appearance will be possible in many patients with appropriate reconstructive procedure.

II-Y-Shaped Vascular Anastomosis for Free Flap Transfer in Head and Neck Reconstruction in Vessel-Depleted Neck

In vessel-depleted neck, salvage free flap transfer for head and neck reconstruction is challenging because the difficulty of selecting the recipient vessel and the discrepancy of vessel diameters. Here, the authors describe a novel technique for vascular anastomosis, which allows 2 thin donor veins end-to-end anastomosed with the larger recipient vein. This II-Y-shaped vascular anastomosis for free flap reconstruction were performed at Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology, West China Stomatology Hospital, Sichuan University. The patient received anterolateral thigh flap transfer after tumor excision. The ligated stump of external jugular vein was anastomosed to the enlarged accompanying veins of the anterolateral thigh flap. The flap survived completely without complications. The II-Y-shaped vascular anastomosis procedures were easy to perform and no complications were observed. Result suggests this novel technique could be useful in free flap transfer in vessel-depleted neck as an efficient way of adjusting the limited diameters.

A Paradigm Shift: Outcomes of Early Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND

 Radiation creates significant challenges for breast reconstruction. There is no consensus regarding optimal timing for autologous reconstruction following radiation. This study explores clearly defined, shorter time intervals between completion of radiation and reconstruction than previously reported.

METHODS

 A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent autologous reconstruction by five microsurgeons at an academic institution from 2009 to 2020. Cohorts were selected by time elapsed between radiation and autologous reconstruction including <3 months, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 9 months, 9 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, and >24 months. Analysis compared baseline characteristics, operative details, complications, revision rates, and BREAST-Q scores. Analysis of variance was used for continuous variables and chi-square for discrete variables.

RESULTS

 In total, 462 radiated patients underwent 717 flaps. There were 69 patients at <3 months (14.9%), 97 at 3 to 6 months (21%), 64 at 6 to 9 months (13.9%), 36 at 9 to 12 months (7.8%), 73 at 12 to 24 months (15.8%), and 123 at >24 months (26.6%). Age, time from mastectomy, and failure of primary reconstruction were higher at >24 months (p < 0.001). There was no difference between cohorts in intraoperative complications in radiated or nonradiated breasts. There was no difference in acute and late postoperative complications between cohorts. Wound-healing complications in radiated sides were lowest at <3 months and 3 to 6 months (5/69 [7.3%] and 11/97 [11.3%], respectively) compared with other groups (18.8-22.2%) but did not reach significance (p = 0.11). More fat graft revisions occurred at <3 months (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

 Reconstruction can be safely performed within 3 months after radiation without increases in intraoperative, acute, or late reconstructive complications.

Influence of Radiotherapy on Ossification of Vascularized Osseous Reconstruction of the Jaw: A Radiological Retrospective Cohort Study Based on Panoramic Radiographs

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of irradiation and time of irradiation on the ossification of jaws reconstructed with free bone grafts. Methods: In total, 100 reconstructions of the jaw were retrospectively evaluated for ossification between bone segments by two raters based on postoperative panoramic radiographs (immediate postOP, approximately 6, 12 and 24 months follow-up). Three subgroups were divided according to the time of irradiation: preoperative radiation therapy (n = 41), postoperative radiation therapy (n = 26) and patients without any radiation therapy (n = 33) as the control group. Ossification time and influencing factors were documented. Results: The fastest ossification with a median of 304 ± 37 days was observed (p < 0.001) in the nonirradiated control group. No significant difference (p = 0.087) in ossification was found between the pre- (447 ± 136 days) and postoperative (510 ± 112 days) radiation groups. Ossification between two graft segments (336 ± 38 days) showed significantly (p < 0.001) faster ossification than between the original and grafted bone (448 ± 85 days). Moreover, closer initial contact between the segments resulted in faster ossification (p < 0.001). When analyzing cofactors, tobacco consumption was the only negative factor aggravating ossification (p = 0.006). Conclusion: Head and neck radiation corresponded with the impaired and prolonged ossification of jaw reconstructions with free bone grafts. There was no difference in ossification if radiotherapy was performed before or after reconstructive surgery. A close bony contact was particularly important for ossification between the original and grafted bone.

Free Flap Outcome in Irradiated Recipient Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The impact of previous radiotherapy on free flap outcome is still a subject of debate. Clinical investigations have come to divergent conclusions and the true effect of radiotherapy (XRT) on flap survival is not definitely known. Most studies investigating the factor often have their methodological limitations such as lack of statistical power as a consequence of the overall low failure rates together with few irradiated cases. This study will attempt to address the question whether previous radiotherapy is associated with a significantly higher incidence of flap failure or not.

Use of Biologic Agents for Lip and Cheek Reconstruction

The unique requirements of reconstructing cheek defects, often with its proximity to the mobile elements of the face including the lip and the eyelid, have been met very handily with the directed and thoughtful use of biologic wound healing agents. One of the key advantages of these agents is their ability to provide coverage for the mobile elements of the cheek and the lip in patients with multiple co-morbidities. These agents are successfully used where the standard cheek closure techniques including cervicofacial advancement flap are contraindicated due to its anesthetic requirement. Additionally, lip reconstruction involves examining the lip's three anatomic layers: mucosa, muscle, and skin. The defects must be planned for reconstruction based on the involvement of these layers. This paper serves to introduce the use of biologic wound healing agents depending on the involvement of these layers. The authors provide specific illustrations of these agents based on defect location, tissue involvement, and severity of the defect to help with procedural planning to reconstruct a very aesthetically involved part of the face.

Use of Biologic Agents for Lip and Cheek Reconstruction

The unique requirements of reconstructing cheek defects, often with its proximity to the mobile elements of the face including the lip and the eyelid, have been met very handily with the directed and thoughtful use of biologic wound healing agents. One of the key advantages of these agents is their ability to provide coverage for the mobile elements of the cheek and the lip in patients with multiple co-morbidities. These agents are successfully used where the standard cheek closure techniques including cervicofacial advancement flap are contraindicated due to its anesthetic requirement. Additionally, lip reconstruction involves examining the lip's three anatomic layers: mucosa, muscle, and skin. The defects must be planned for reconstruction based on the involvement of these layers. This paper serves to introduce the use of biologic wound healing agents depending on the involvement of these layers. The authors provide specific illustrations of these agents based on defect location, tissue involvement, and severity of the defect to help with procedural planning to reconstruct a very aesthetically involved part of the face.

Current Surgical Therapy of Locally Advanced cSCC: From Patient Selection to Microsurgical Tissue Transplant. Review

Among the non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) the squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is one of the most challenging for the surgeon. Local aggressiveness and a tendency to metastasize to regional lymph nodes characterize the biologic behavior. The variants locally advanced and metastatic require wide excision and node dissection. Such procedures can be extremely detrimental for patients. The limit of the surgery can be safely pushed forward with a multidisciplinary approach. The concept of skin oncoplastic surgery, the ablative procedures and the reconstructive options (skin graft, pedicled flap, microsurgical free flap) are discussed together with a literature review.

Impact of preoperative and intraoperative management on outcomes in osteoradionecrosis requiring free flap reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Perioperative management of advanced osteoradionecrosis of the head and neck requiring free flap (FF) reconstruction varies. Our objectives included assessment of practice patterns and outcomes.

METHODS

Multi-institutional, retrospective review of FF reconstruction for head and neck osteoradionecrosis (n = 260).

RESULTS

Administration of preoperative antibiotics did not correlate with reduction in postoperative complications. Preoperative alcohol use correlated with higher rates of hardware exposure (p = 0.03) and 30-day readmission (p = 0.04). Patients with FF compromise had higher TSH (p = 0.04) and lower albumin levels (p = 0.005). Prealbumin levels were lower in patients who required neck washouts (p = 0.02) or a second FF (p = 0.03). TSH levels were higher in patients undergoing postoperative debridement (p = 0.03) or local flap procedures (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Malnutrition, hypothyroidism, and substance abuse correlated with a higher incidence of postoperative wound complications in patients undergoing FF reconstruction for advanced osteoradionecrosis. Preoperative antibiotics use did not correlate with a reduction in postoperative wound complications.

Effect of preoperative radiation on free flap outcomes for head and neck reconstruction: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate about whether neoadjuvant radiation therapy is associated with higher rates of postoperative complications after head and neck reconstruction. Herle et al. conducted a systematic review in 2014 of 24 studies, finding higher complication rates in irradiated fields. We sought to perform an exhaustive updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We conducted an updated systematic review of the literature, as outlined in our protocol, which was registered on PROSPERO. Databases included Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science. There were no limits placed on the date range, place of publication, or origin. Exclusion criteria included patients less than 18 years of age, studies with less than 20 participants (n < 20), case studies, skull base reconstructions, and local tissue rearrangements. The combined results of the studies and relative risks (RR) were calculated.

RESULTS

53 studies were included for analysis, including 5,086 free flaps in an irradiated field, and 9,110 free flaps in a non-irradiated field. Of the 53 studies, 21 studies overlapped with those discussed in Herle et al.'s study, with a total of 32 additional studies. Neoadjuvant radiation was found to be a statistically significant risk factor for postoperative complications (RR 1.579, P < 0.001), total flap failure (RR, 1.565; P < 0.001), and fistula (RR, 1.810; P < 0.001). Our work reaffirmed the findings of the Herle et al.

STUDY

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiation was associated with a statistically significant increase in the risk of total flap failure, fistula, and total complications but not partial flap failure. These high-morbidity complications must be taken into consideration when determining which patients should receive neoadjuvant radiation therapy.

The geriatric-8 screening tool for predicting complications in older adults after surgery for locally advanced head and neck cancer with free flap reconstruction

PURPOSE

Radical surgery with free flap reconstruction for locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) is quite challenging for older adults. This retrospective study aimed to elucidate the usefulness of the geriatric-8 (G8) screening tool for predicting postoperative complications in older adults with HNC.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 37 older adults with HNC who underwent radical surgery with free flap reconstruction and were assessed by the G8 screening tool was performed. Postoperative complications during hospitalization were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and possible contributing factors, including the G8 score, for major and minor complications were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The appropriate G8 cut-off value for both major and minor complications was 12 (area under the curve 0.56 and 0.55, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that both smoking and lower G8 score (≤ 12) were independently associated with the severity of complications (p = 0.043, p = 0.034, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The G8 was a possible predictor of major and minor complications in older adults with HNC who underwent radical surgery with free flap reconstruction.

Radiation Oncology Applications in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Nonsystematic Review of Concepts and Principles

SUMMARY

Careful consideration of radiotherapy can determine the success of reconstructive therapy. There is a broad spectrum of radiotherapy modalities, both benign and malignant. Delivery mechanisms differ in the physical design, setup, radiation source, administrable dosage, and mode of delivery. This range of options allows radiation oncologists to tailor individualized treatment; however, radiotherapy concepts can be challenging for nonspecialists. The purpose of this article is to review general radiation oncology concepts, including essential equipment and radiobiology, and provide plastic surgeons with a basic conceptual understanding to facilitate effective multidisciplinary collaboration with radiation oncologists.

Recipient vessel selection for multiple free flap transfers in head and neck reconstruction at different periods

BACKGROUND

Treatment decisions can be challenging in patients undergoing multiple oropharyngeal microsurgical reconstructions at different periods by various causes. We, retrospectively, reviewed patients with at least three consecutive free flap reconstructions to determine the optimal strategy for selecting recipient vessels.

METHODS

Then, 36 patients (33 men and 3 women) who underwent at least 3 microsurgical reconstructions with a total of 51 free flap transfers for head and neck defects were included in this report. The most common reason for multiple microsurgical reconstructions was recurrent disease. For reconstructions, recipient vessel candidates on the same side of the head and neck were prioritized; if ipsilateral vessels were unavailable, contralateral recipient vessels, which might necessitate vein grafts, were used.

RESULTS

The most common reconstructions were anterolateral thigh flaps (19 cases). The most commonly used contralateral recipient vessels were the superior thyroid artery, facial artery, and external jugular vein. All vessel anastomoses were performed using the end-to-end method. Postoperative complications occurred at the sites of 26 free flap reconstructions. The overall flap reconstruction success rate in patients with at least three surgeries was 90.2%. The median follow-up duration was 25.8 months. During follow-up, 26 patients survived until the end of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing multiple free flap reconstructions, recipient vessels on the ipsilateral side that have not been subjected to radiation should be selected first. Recipient vessels contralateral to the reconstruction side can then be selected; however, they may require vein grafts. Finally, distant healthy recipient vessels can be selected through vein grafting.

The use of negative pressure wound therapy in the primary setting for high-risk head and neck surgery

BACKGROUND

In head and neck surgery, dead space is typically managed by transferring a secondary pedicled flap or harvesting a larger composite flap with a muscular component. We demonstrate the novel use of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) to obliterate dead space and reduce possible communication between the upper aerodigestive tract and the contents of the neck.

METHODS

We present a single-institutional case series of five patients with high-risk head and neck cancer treated with NPWT after ablative and reconstructive surgery to eliminate dead space following surgical resection.

RESULTS

All patients achieved successful wound closure following NPWT, which was applied in the secondary setting to combat infection in one patient and the primary setting to prophylactically eliminate dead space in four patients.

CONCLUSION

NPWT can be used to treat unfilled dead space in the primary setting of head and neck ablative and reconstructive surgery and help to avoid wound healing problems as well as the need for secondary flap transfers.

Determining the optimal osteotomy distance with the fibula free flap in mandibular reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Fibula free tissue transfer is a common and reliable method for mandibular reconstruction. Functional outcomes from this procedure are dependent on the successful union of the osseous segments postoperatively. This study was conducted to define the maximum gap-size criteria for osseous union to occur at osteotomy sites in fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care academic center.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review of computed tomography and medical records was conducted on patients who underwent fibula free flap surgery and had imaging of the mandible at <3 months and >6 months after surgery. Distances between osteotomies were measured and evaluated for interval healing. Secondary data included subject age, sex, smoking status, diabetes, number of osteotomies, complications, and adjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight osteotomy sites were analyzed from thirteen subjects and a total of 190 measurements were made. The mean gap size at the first scan that demonstrated union by the second scan interval was 1.31 mm and mean gap size demonstrating non-union was 2.55 mm (p < 0.01). Complication rate, number of osetotomies, adjuvant therapy, or medical co-morbidities did not significantly affect rates of union.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, osseous union was achieved with a mean osteotomy gap size of 1.31 mm. The data suggests that distances between ossesous segments >2 .55mm have a higher risk of non-union. We believe the information from this study will help augment current and future techniques in the field of mandible reconstruction.

Influence of preoperative radiotherapy on head and neck free-flap reconstruction: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The effect of preoperative external radiotherapy (XRT) on head and neck free-flap reconstruction is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of preoperative XRT on the outcomes of head and neck microvascular free-flap reconstruction. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in concordance with the Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol. We searched several databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to find published papers on the topic. The R program was used for data synthesis and statistical heterogeneity evaluation; then, fixed effect or random effect models were used. A total of 37 studies, involving 12 408 patients with 12 668 flaps, were included in this meta-analysis. The overall flap success rate for all studies was 94.4%. Pooled analysis showed that patients with preoperative XRT were significantly associated with an increased risk of total flap failure (odds ratio [OR] = 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.45-2.23, P < .001), partial flap failure (OR = 1.90, 95% CI = 1.07-3.38, P = .029), and postoperative complication rates (OR = 2.22, 95% CI = 1.64-2.72, P < .001). Our study suggests that preoperative XRT is associated with an increased risk of developing free-flap failure and an increased postoperative complication rate.

Is sequential free flap safe in oral cancer reconstruction in the same patient? An outcome and complication analysis

BACKGROUND

Sequential free flap reconstruction in patient with head and neck cancer can provide reliable and effective wound coverage. Only a few studies have reported on the outcome and complications analysis but without consensus on the recipient vessels and flap chosen. Herein, we presented the outcome and analysed the risk factors for complications in sequential free flap reconstruction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who had sequential free tissue transfers due to cancer recurrence, second primary cancer, or secondary correction of the soft tissue contractures and volume deficits were all included. Variables extracted included demographics, comorbidities, free flap characteristics, infection, dehiscence and flap necrosis rates.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients with 92 free flaps were analyzed; 42 initial and 50 sequential free flaps. The most common recipient vessels for sequential flap were contralateral superficial thyroid vessels (68%). The most common flap for both initial and sequential free flap was anterolateral thigh flap (64.3 and 62%). The success rate of sequential free flap was 92.0 compared to 92.9% for initial free flap, which showed no significant difference. Female was independently associated with delayed wound healing with an odds ratio of 90.91 (95% confidence interval 0.001-0.17, P = 0.001), as well as diabetes with an odds ratio of 31.14 (95% confidence interval 2.60-373.19, P = 0.007). Sequential free flap was not a risk factor for any complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Sequential free flap is a reliable method for head and neck surgery without more complication rate comparing to initial free flap reconstruction. More attentions should be paid on patients with preferential risk for certain complications.

Management of orbital complications in palatomaxillary reconstruction: A review of preemptive and corrective measures

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of orbit-sparing palatomaxillary defects requires consideration of globe dystopia, orbital volume, eyelid position and function, and the nasolacrimal system to preserve and optimize vision, globe protection, and appearance. We describe the fundamentals of orbital and eyelid anatomy, common orbital complications related to palatomaxillary reconstruction, and preemptive and corrective surgical techniques to be utilized during and after globe-sparing palatomaxillary reconstruction.

METHODS

We present a review of the literature supplemented by clinical case examples.

RESULTS

We advocate for the use of preemptive and corrective techniques to ensure optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients with orbital defects.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognition and anticipation of problems in patients undergoing midface ablative and reconstructive procedures are vital to the implementation of corrective measures. Incision choice, orbital volume restoration, appropriate orbital floor reconstruction, and permanent or temporary lower eyelid suspension during the primary surgery can all significantly impact the development of long-term orbital complications.

Osteoradionecrosis, an increasing indication for microvascular head and neck reconstruction

Better cancer treatment has led to a steadily growing population of cancer survivors suffering from late adverse effects after cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there has been an increase in free flap reconstruction due to osteoradionecrosis (ORN). A retrospective review was conducted to identify all consecutive head and neck free flap reconstructions performed over an 18-year period (1995-2012) at Karolinska University Hospital. A total of 235 free flaps were identified. Cases were divided into two groups: head and neck cancer reconstructions and ORN reconstructions. A comparison between the two groups showed longer survival (P<0.001) and higher rates of late complications (P<0.001) among ORN cases. ORN as an indication for reconstruction increased over time, from 7.0% of the total number of free flaps performed in 1995-2000, to 15.2% during the period 2001-2006, and to 27.3% in 2007-2012 (P<0.001). This, in accordance with the results of other studies, highlights the importance of the appropriate allocation of resources within the healthcare system to treat this patient group within the steadily increasing population of cancer survivors.

Head and neck cancer management and cancer stem cells implication

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) arise in the mucosal linings of the upper aerodigestive tract and are heterogeneous in nature. Risk factors for HNSCCs are smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, and the human papilloma virus. Conventional treatments are surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combined modality; however, no international standard mode of therapy exists. In contrast to the conventional model of clonal evolution in tumor development, there is a newly proposed theory based on the activity of cancer stem cells (CSCs) as the model for carcinogenesis. This “CSC hypothesis” may explain the high mortality rate, low response to treatments, and tendency to develop multiple tumors for HNSCC patients. We review current knowledge on HNSCC etiology and treatment, with a focus on CSCs, including their origins, identifications, and effects on therapeutic options.

miR-29b Mediates the Chronic Inflammatory Response in Radiotherapy-Induced Vascular Disease

•

Radiotherapy is a powerful treatment strategy in patients with oncological diseases.

•

Radiation-induced vasculopathy can dose dependently increase the risk of ischemic cardiovascular diseases (e.g., myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke).

•

The microRNA miR-29b is repressed in radiation-induced vasculopathy (human irradiated vs. nonirradiated tissue specimen, as well as in murine and cell culture models of irradiation).

•

Pentraxin-3 and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 are the main downstream effectors of miR-29b in radiation-induced vasculopathy.

•

miR-29b mimics were able to limit pentraxin-3 and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 levels in the irradiated vasculature (murine model) and to constrain the burden of vascular inflammation.

As a consequence of the success of present-day cancer treatment, radiotherapy-induced vascular disease is emerging. This disease is caused by chronic inflammatory activation and is likely orchestrated in part by microRNAs. In irradiated versus nonirradiated conduit arteries from patients receiving microvascular free tissue transfer reconstructions, irradiation resulted in down-regulation of miR-29b and up-regulation of miR-146b. miR-29b affected inflammation and adverse wound healing through its targets pentraxin-3 and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4. In vitro and in vivo, we showed that miR-29b overexpression therapy, through inhibition of pentraxin-3 and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4, could dampen the vascular inflammatory response.

Complication rates and clinical outcomes of osseous free flaps: a retrospective comparison of CAD/CAM versus conventional fixation in 128 patients

Studies evaluating plate-related complications in patient-specific versus conventional fixation systems in free flap surgery are lacking. This was a retrospective study of 128 osseous free flaps with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Wound healing disorders, plate exposure, fixation failure, and subtotal osseous union were recorded and evaluated statistically by univariate and regression analysis. Complication rates were as follows: wound healing disorders 33.6% (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) vs. conventional: 35.1% vs. 33.0%); plate exposure 21.9% (29.7% vs. 18.7%); fixation failure 7.0% (8.1% vs. 6.6%); subtotal osseous union 36.7% (45.9% vs. 33.0%). Radiotherapy (P<0.001) and more than two segments (P=0.026) were independent variables for the overall complication rate and were negatively correlated with the dental implantation rate. The time between diagnosis and ablative surgery was increased by 11.0days in the CAD/CAM group (34.2±16.2days vs. 23.2±12.0 days; P=0.002). Rates of dental rehabilitation were not significantly different (35.1% vs. 44.0%, P=0.358). On average, 3.2±1.7 dental implants were placed into flap segments. Plate-related complications were increased with radiotherapy and multisegment flaps. There was a non-significant trend towards increased complications with patient-specific plates in comparison to conventional reconstruction plates.

Microsurgery in musculoskeletal oncology

Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal bone and soft tissue tumors of the musculoskeletal system. In the past, the primary treatment modality was amputation of the involved limb and the 5-year survival was very low for high-grade tumors. During the last three decades, limb salvage has become the rule rather than the exception and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies (radiation and chemotherapy) has dramatically increased disease-free survival. Reconstruction of large bone and soft tissue defects, though, still remains a significant challenge in sarcoma patients. In particular, vascularized tissue transfer has proved extremely helpful in dealing with complex bone and soft tissue or functional defects that are frequently encountered as a result of the tumor or as a complication of surgery and adjuvant therapies. The principles, indications and results of microsurgical reconstruction differ from trauma patients and are directly related not only to the underlying disease process, but also to the local and systemic therapeutic modalities applied to the individual patient. Although plastic reconstruction in the oncological patients is not free of complications, usually these complications are manageable and do not jeopardize oncological outcome. The overall treatment strategy should be tailored to the patient's and sarcoma profile.

Determinants of Free Fasciocutaneous Flap Outcomes in Partial Hypopharyngeal Defects

BACKGROUND

Most of the patients with hypopharyngeal cancer are still diagnosed with advanced stage, and total or partial pharyngectomy with free flap reconstruction is the mainstay of treatment. The aim of this study was to find out the possible risk factors related to surgical complications after free fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction for partial pharyngeal defect and its sequelae in the follow-up.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with advanced hypopharyngeal cancer who received free fasciocutaneous flaps for partial pharyngeal defects reconstruction. From 2005 to 2015, 79 free fasciocutaneous flaps (59 free fasciocutaneous flaps and 20 anterolateral thigh flaps) were performed in our department. The risk factors for free flap outcome and complications were evaluated with multivariant linear regression model.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 60.8 years with male predominance. The mean follow-up duration was 39.6 months. Most of the cases (97.5%) were in stage III or IV. Patients with comorbidities showed significant correlation to flap failure (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.038 to 0.264, P = 0.10). Anastomosis style (end-to-side vs end-to-end) was the only operation-related factors significantly related to flap failure rate (18.8% vs 3.2%, 95% CI = 0.031 to 0.32, P = 0.18). Flap size was significantly associated with fistula formation (95% CI = -0.005 to 0.000, P = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, patients with comorbidities and end-to-side anastomosis illustrate significantly higher flap failure rate in free fasciocutaneous flap reconstruction of partial hypopharyngeal defect. Reconstruction with smaller flap size had higher possibility of fistula formation.

Obturators versus flaps after maxillary oncological ablation: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis

Maxillary defects can be resolved by prosthetic obturation, autologous tissue reconstruction, or a combination of both. However, there is still controversy in the selection of the optimal approach. Therefore, the aim of this study was to systematically review evidences comparing the performance of obturators and flaps in patients after maxillary oncological ablation. Both electronic and manual searching approaches were conducted to identify eligible evidence. Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias. In addition, the same reviewers independently extracted the data. Meta-analyses were performed using Revman 5.3, and best evidence synthesis was performed. Sixteen studies were included and a total of 528 participants were analyzed. All studies were assessed at low quality. Results of this meta-analysis showed weak evidence in the difference between obturators and flaps on the outcome regarding word intelligibility (P = 0.004) and masticatory efficiency (P = 0.002). However, no differences were detected regarding speech intelligibility and nasalance. All studies were compiled into the best evidence synthesis. The sum of 31 evidences was considered. Twelve evidences were evaluated at a moderate level, such as speech, mastication, pain, salivation, taste sensations, and mouth opening. Except the outcomes of word intelligibility, masticatory efficiency, and mouth pain, other moderate evidences showed no difference between obturators and flaps. In conclusion, both obturators and flaps might be effective in patients' rehabilitation functions after maxillary ablation. However, some advantages were observed when using surgical reconstruction over prosthetic rehabilitation. Additional high-quality studies are needed to provide more solid evidence before applying these results into clinical practice.

Methods to reduce postoperative surgical site infections after head and neck oncology surgery

Head and neck cancer surgery is often a complex multi-step procedure that includes major resections, vascularised tissue reconstruction, and extensive neck dissection. The upper aerodigestive tract mucosal lining is often disrupted during surgery, which requires the management of a clean-contaminated field and the need to reconstruct the mucosal lining. With bacterial contamination, surgical site infections (SSI) are a serious complication that can result in delayed wound healing, wound breakdown, fistula formation, and compromised tissue reconstruction. Methods to reduce SSI in patients with head and neck cancer have been intensely researched, yielding evolving and varied practice patterns. In this Review, we outline the data supporting perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis for clean-contaminated surgeries, which suggest that clindamycin is an inadequate prophylactic antibiotic therapy in the reduction of SSI, and that prolonged antibiotic courses have no established benefit. For salvage laryngectomy after radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, reconstruction with vascularised tissue reduces the frequency and severity of pharyngocutaneous fistula formation. These evidence-based recommendations have been shown to reduce the chance of SSI after head and neck surgery.

Improved Head and Neck Free Flap Outcome-Effects of a Treatment Protocol Adjustment from Pre- to Postoperative Radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The impact of preoperative radiotherapy on microvascular reconstructive surgery outcome has been a subject of debate. However, data are conflicting and often dependent on local treatment protocols. We have studied the effects of radiotherapy in a unique, single-center setting where a treatment protocol change was undertaken from pre- to postoperative radiotherapy administration for microsurgical head and neck reconstructions.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted for 200 consecutive head and neck free flap cases, where 100 were operated on before and 100 after the treatment protocol adjustment in 2006. Only direct cancer reconstructions were included. Complication rates of anastomosis-related (flap necrosis) and flap bed-related (infection, fistula, and wound dehiscence) complications were compared between irradiated and nonirradiated patients. A multivariate analysis was performed to correct for treatment period.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-six patients had received radiotherapy before reconstruction due to cases of cancer recurrence. There were no significant differences in demographic data or risk factors between irradiated and nonirradiated cases. Irradiated cases had a higher rate of both flap loss (9.5% versus 1.4%; P = 0.034) and flap bed-related complications (29% versus 13%; P = 0.014). However, after multivariate analysis, there was only a significant relationship between preoperative irradiation and infection (odds ratio = 2.51; P = 0.033) and fistula formation (odds ratio = 3.13; P = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

The current single-center study clearly indicates that preoperative radiotherapy is a risk factor for both infection and fistula formation, most likely related to an impaired flap bed. We suggest postoperative radiotherapy administration whenever possible for oncological reasons, otherwise proper antibiotic cover and meticulous flap insetting to prevent radiation-related infection and fistula formation.

Multivariate analysis as an advantageous approach for prediction of the adverse outcome in head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgery

BACKGROUND

The use of a free flap has become a mainstay of reconstruction following the ablative surgery in head and neck. The success rates are about 90%, however, several factors have been described to have an adverse effect on free flap survival.

METHODS

We have performed a retrospective analysis of the treatment outcome of 93 microvascular flaps and evaluated the factors influencing the risk of flap loss including patients' age, body mass index, smoking, general medical history and previous oncological treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 93 flaps the total necrosis have been observed in 15 flaps with gradual improvement in the consecutive years. In individual analysis the patients age, BMI, and comorbidities did not reveal any significant relation. The history of any previous oncological treatment represented a significant adverse factor of success rate (p=0.035), and was even more significant when patients experienced all treatment modalities prior to the reconstructive procedure (p=0.009). Multivariate logistic regression model indicated that only surgery (p=0.0008), chemotherapy (p=0.02), cardiovascular diseases (p=0.05) and patient's age (p=0.02) represented significant factors impairing the success rate.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating multivariate analysis represents important statistical approach for better prediction of free flaps survival in head and neck reconstructive surgery. Incorporation of additional collective information could provide more precise approach in the risk of the flap loss assessment.