Reconstruction of sarcoma defects following pre-operative radiation: free tissue transfer is safe and reliable

Functional and donor-site morbidity outcomes of muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap in sarcoma defects reconstruction: A single-center cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap (LD) is widely used in trunk and limb reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma excision. The muscle-sparing technique (MSLD) appears to reduce donor site morbidity. The main objective of this study was to assess functional morbidity after reconstruction with LD and MSLD using the QuickDash score. Secondary objectives aimed to evaluate postoperative complications and hospital length of stay.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

This was a prospective single-center study including adult patients undergoing reconstruction with LD or MSLD flaps after resection of a soft tissue sarcoma, who completed a QuickDash questionnaire preoperatively and postoperatively between 2018 and 2024.

RESULTS

30 patients were included in the study: 17 in the MSLD group and 13 in the LD group. There was no significant difference between the ΔQuickDash in the MSLD group (13.1) and the LD group (9.7) (p = 0.729). The MSLD group had a shorter average hospitalization length (5.9 days) compared to the LD group (9.3 days) (p < 0.05). The seroma rate was higher in the LD group (46.2 %) than in the MSLD group (17.6 %) without statistically significant difference (p = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

This study does not show a reduction in functional morbidity of the donor site in MSLD compared to LD in oncoplastic surgery of sarcoma. MSLD presents the advantage of a shorter hospitalization duration, probably related to a lower complication rate. MSLD and LD seem to have different indications.

Twenty-five years of experience with patient-reported outcome measures in soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a systematic review

PURPOSE

As the importance of the patient's perspective on treatment outcome is becoming increasingly clear, the availability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has grown accordingly. There remains insufficient information regarding the quality of PROMs in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs). The objectives of this systematic review were (1) to identify all PROMs used in STS patients and (2) to critically appraise the methodological quality of these PROMs.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase on April 22, 2024. PROMs were identified by including all studies that evaluate (an aspect of) health-related quality of life in STS patients by using a PROM. Second, studies that assessed measurement properties of the PROMs utilized in STS patients were included. Quality of PROMs was evaluated by performing a COSMIN analysis.

RESULTS

In 59 studies, 39 PROMs were identified, with the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) being the most frequently utilized. Three studies evaluated methodological quality of PROMs in the STS population. Measurement properties of the TESS, Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) were reported. None of the PROMs utilized in the STS population can be recommended for use based on the current evidence and COSMIN analysis.

CONCLUSION

To ensure collection of reliable outcomes, PROMs require methodological evaluation prior to utilization in the STS population. Research should prioritize on determining relevant content and subsequently selecting the most suitable PROM for assessment.

Effects of Neoadjuvant Radiation and Recipient Vessel Characteristics on Microvascular Complication Rates in Reconstruction of Lower Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma Defects

BACKGROUND

 The treatment approach for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the lower extremity has shifted toward the use of neoadjuvant radiation combined with limb-sparing surgery (LSS). The resulting defects often require reconstruction with free tissue transfer for adequate outcomes. Data have demonstrated a potentially increased risk of microvascular complications for free flaps performed using irradiated recipient vessels. Similarly, certain anatomic areas of the lower extremity have a high proportion of unnamed perforators that are available as recipient vessels, increasing the technical difficulty. We aimed to determine if the characteristics of recipient vessels that were used for the reconstruction of STS defects influenced rates of microvascular complications in our patients.

METHODS

 A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent reconstruction of lower extremity STS defects with free tissue transfer from 2009 to 2020 was conducted. Data regarding recipient vessel type (axial vessel vs. unnamed perforator), radiation status of the recipient vessels (irradiated vs. non-irradiated), and microvascular complications were compared across groups.

RESULTS

 A total of 204 free flaps were included. The overall microvascular complication rate was 13.7% (28 cases). Most microvascular complications were detected postoperatively (82.1%) rather than intraoperatively, with the majority involving venous congestion/thrombosis (20 cases, 71.4%). While there was a trend toward increased microvascular complications with the use of irradiated recipient vessels (27 cases, 96.4%), this did not reach statistical significance (OR = 1.98, p = 0.52). The use of perforating branches as recipient vessels did not confer an increased risk of microvascular complications (OR = 0.87, p = 0.75).

CONCLUSION

 The reconstruction of irradiated lower-extremity STS defects represents a particularly challenging issue. This analysis demonstrates that free tissue transfer can be safely performed using irradiated vessels without a significantly increased risk of microvascular complications. Furthermore, unnamed perforating branches can be successfully used for reconstruction in anatomically challenging areas of the lower extremity.

When to ditch the ladder and take the elevator: The Anderson SArcoma Risk of Complications (A-SARC) score to guide reconstructive decision-making in extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients

BACKGROUND

The reconstructive ladder relies mostly on defect size and depth to determine reconstructive technique, however, in actuality, many more variables ultimately inform reconstructive decision making, especially regarding extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS) defects. The purpose of this study was to describe eSTS patients who will most optimally benefit from an advanced method of reconstruction (defined as a pedicled regional flap or free flap) and to create a simple risk assessment scale that can be employed in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-institution retrospective cohort study examined patients undergoing resection of soft tissue sarcoma affecting the upper or lower extremities between 2016 and 2021. We categorized patients who required a pedicled or free flap as having had advanced reconstruction, and all other techniques were considered simple reconstruction. A regression was used to create a risk scale to guide reconstructive decision-making.

RESULTS

The following variables were identified as independent predictors of complications and used to create our risk scale: lower extremity tumor location, preoperative radiotherapy, tumor bed excision, male sex, hypertension, and tumor volume. Intermediate and high-risk patients reconstructed using simple techniques had significantly greater overall complication rates compared to those reconstructed with advanced techniques. Major complications were significantly greater in low-risk patients reconstructed with advanced techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize postoperative wound complications, low-risk patients should receive simple methods of reconstruction, whereas high-risk patients should be reconstructed using advanced techniques.

Functional outcomes of reconstructive flap surgery for soft tissue sarcoma: Long-term outcomes of functional restoration using innervated muscle transplantation

Functional outcomes associated with prognostic factors and innervated muscle transplantation after wide soft tissue sarcoma resection remain unclear. We retrospectively examined the functional outcomes of reconstructive flap surgery for soft tissue sarcoma. Twenty patients underwent innervated muscle transplantation with pedicled or free flaps for functional reconstruction of resected muscles. Thirteen latissimus dorsi muscles and one vastus lateralis muscle combined with an anterolateral thigh flap were transferred as free flaps using the epi-perineural suture technique. Six latissimus dorsi muscles were transferred as pedicled flaps with neural continuity. Postoperative functional outcomes were assessed using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores for the upper and lower extremities of 22 and 24 patients, respectively. The mean MSTS score for all patients was 82.3 at 12 months postoperatively. The mean scores for patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled and free flaps were 89.2 and 77.1, respectively. The MSTS scores for the lower extremity, tumor size ≥5 cm, and free flap reconstruction were significantly lower than those for the upper extremity, tumor size <5 cm, and pedicled flap reconstruction (P = 0.02, 0.37, and 0.008, respectively). The postoperative MSTS score for innervated muscle transplantation was 76.7 at 12 months and was significantly higher (83.7) at 24 months (P = 0.003). Functional outcomes were significantly associated with tumor location, tumor size, and reconstructive flap type based on the MSTS scores. Innervated muscle transplantation improved functional outcomes at 24 months postoperatively via sufficient recovery of the innervated muscle, not the compensatory recovery of the remaining muscle.

Outcomes of plastic surgical reconstruction in extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma: Results from the US Sarcoma Collaborative

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to define how utilization of plastic surgical reconstruction (PSR) affects perioperative outcomes, locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), and overall survival (OS) after radical resection of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcoma (ETSTS). The secondary aim was to determine factors associated with PSR.

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection of ETSTS between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a multi-institutional database. PSR was defined as complex primary closure requiring a plastic surgeon, skin graft, or tissue-flap reconstruction. Outcomes included PSR utilization, postoperative complications, LRRFS, and OS.

RESULTS

Of 2750 distinct operations, 1060 (38.55%) involved PSR. Tissue-flaps (854, 80.57%) were most commonly utilized. PSR was associated with a higher proportion of R0 resections (83.38% vs. 74.42%, p < 0.001). Tissue-flap PSR was associated with local wound complications (odds ratio: 1.81, confidence interval: 1.21-2.72, p = 0.004). Neither PSR nor postoperative complications were independently associated with LRRFS or OS. High-grade tumors (1.60, 1.13-2.26, p = 0.008) and neoadjuvant radiation (1.66, 1.20-2.30, p = 0.002) were associated with the need for PSR.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ETSTS undergoing resection with PSR experienced acceptable rates of complications and a higher rate of negative margins, which were associated with improved LRRFS and OS. High tumor grade and neoadjuvant radiation were associated with requirement of PSR.

Clinical reliability of pedicled perforator flaps in the management of adult limb and trunk soft tissue sarcomas: Experience of two French expert centres

INTRODUCTION

Limb-sparing surgery combined with radiation has become the standard treatment for soft tissue sarcomas. Despite the many advantages of reconstruction procedures, such as muscle-sparing flap and local reconstruction, the use of pedicled perforator flaps remains non-consensual due to doubts about their reliability when associated with radiotherapy. This study evaluated their surgical reliability in reconstructive surgery for limb and trunk soft tissue sarcomas, in terms of healing time, wound disorders, and postoperative complications, regardless of radiation timing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We realized a retrospective, observational, bi-center study (Cancer University Institute of Toulouse Oncopole, France and Bergonié Institute Bordeaux, France) and describes pedicled perforator flaps performed between January 2015 and January 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 74 flaps were included. The median age of the population was 70-year-old. The group consisted of 68.8% (n = 51/74) propeller flaps. We found a partial necrosis rate of 28.4% (n = 21/74), scar disunion of 48.6% (n = 36/74), local infection of 10.8% (n = 8/74), and venous congestion of 13.5% (n = 10/74). Only 16.2% (n = 12/74) required secondary surgical repair to a local complication. The average length of stay was 7.3 days  [1.0-25.0]. The mean operating time of our flaps was 133.4 min [38.0-280.0].

CONCLUSIONS

Pedicled perforator flaps are a surgical technique that can be used in reconstructive surgery for limb and trunk soft tissue sarcomas in adults, regardless of radiation timing. However, these flaps carry a high rate of postoperative complications so they should be reserved for expert surgeons in referral centers.

Risk factors associated with 30-day complications following lower extremity sarcoma surgery: A national surgical quality improvement project analysis

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to identify risk factors associated with complications in lower extremity (LE) sarcoma surgery, as well as the prevalence and complications associated with concurrent plastic surgery procedures (CPSP).

METHODS

ACS-NSQIP database was accessed to identify patients treated for LE sarcoma (2010-2019). Patient demographics, preoperative lab, comorbidities, tumor type, location, principle procedure, and presence/characteristics of CPSPs were recorded. Thirty-day soft tissue complications were analyzed. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression was performed on IBM SPSS.™ RESULTS: Nine hundred eighteen patients were included (483 males and 435 females), average age and body mass index (BMI) of 57 and 27.4 kg/m,² respectively. Comorbidities included smoking (13.9%, 128), hypertension (37.3%, 342), and insulin-dependent diabetes (3.7%, 34). Preoperative lab values included albumin <3.5 (6.8%, 63), hematocrit <30% (8.2%, 75), and platelet count <150 000 (5.9%, 54). Thirty-day soft tissue complication rate was 5.7% (52 of 918). On multivariate logistic regression, increased age (p = 0.039), higher BMI (p = 0.017), and longer operative times (p = 0.002) were significant risk factors independently associated with soft tissue complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Soft tissue complications within 30 days occur in 6% of patients. Graft procedures carry a 20% risk of complications. Risk factors independently associated with complications include increased age, increased BMI, and longer operative times.

Free Flap Outcome in Irradiated Recipient Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

The impact of previous radiotherapy on free flap outcome is still a subject of debate. Clinical investigations have come to divergent conclusions and the true effect of radiotherapy (XRT) on flap survival is not definitely known. Most studies investigating the factor often have their methodological limitations such as lack of statistical power as a consequence of the overall low failure rates together with few irradiated cases. This study will attempt to address the question whether previous radiotherapy is associated with a significantly higher incidence of flap failure or not.

Free Functional Latissimus Dorsi Reconstruction of the Quadriceps and Hamstrings following Oncologic Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Thigh

Background

Limb-salvage surgery combined with radiotherapy has become the primary treatment for soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Free functional latissimus flaps (FFLF) are an option to restore function in the setting of volumetric muscle loss. The purpose of the current study was to examine the use of FFLF in patients undergoing resection of thigh sarcoma.

Methods

Twelve patients with a sarcoma involving the hamstring (n = 6), quadriceps (n = 5), or combined (n = 1) defects which included multiple muscle groups were reviewed. This included 9 males and 3 females with a mean age and body mass index of 56 ± 12 years and 31.3 ± 5.7 kg/m².

Results

The mean defect volume and operative time was 3,689 ± 2,314 cm³ and 587 ± 73 minutes. Following reconstruction, the mean knee range of motion (ROM), MSTS93 score, and muscle strength was 89 ± 24°, 90 ± 15%, and 4 ± 1; with 75% of patients ambulating without gait aids. Seven (58%) patients sustained a complication, namely, delayed wound healing (n = 2).

Conclusion

Although there was a high incidence of complications, FFLF can restore active knee ROM and function, with most patients ambulating without gait aids following reconstruction of large oncologic defects in the thigh.

Unravelling the heterogeneity of soft tissue and bone sarcoma patients' health-related quality of life: a systematic literature review with focus on tumour location

Patients with sarcoma experience many physical and psychological symptoms, adversely affecting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL assessment is challenging due to the diversity of the disease. This review aims to unravel the heterogeneity of HRQoL of patients with sarcoma with regard to tumour location and to summarise the used measures in research. English-language literature from four databases published between January 2000 and April 2019 was reviewed. Studies that described adult sarcoma HRQoL outcomes were included and classified according to primary sarcoma location. Eighty-seven articles met the inclusion criteria covering sarcoma of the extremities (n=35), pelvis and axial skeleton (n=9), pelvis and extremities (n=5), head and neck (n=4), retroperitoneum (n=2) and multiple sarcoma locations (n=33), respectively. Urogenital and thoracic sarcoma were lacking. Fifty-four different questionnaires were used, most often cancer-generic or generic HRQoL questionnaires. Patients with sarcoma reported lower HRQoL than the general population. Distinctive patterns of HRQoL outcomes according to tumour location regarding symptoms, physical functioning, disability and psychosocial well-being were identified. In metastatic sarcoma, mostly constitutional symptoms were present. To comprehensively assess HRQoL, a sarcoma-specific measurement strategy should be developed and used covering the heterogeneity of sarcoma including location-specific issues to improve personalised HRQoL assessment in future research and clinical practice.

Comparison of flap reconstruction for soft tissue sarcomas of the foot and ankle

BACKGROUND

Foot and ankle soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are challenging for reconstruction due to limited surrounding soft tissue and weight-bearing requirements. Currently, there is a paucity of data examining the outcome of flap reconstruction following resection of a foot and ankle sarcoma.

METHODS

We reviewed 44 (31 female, 13 male) patients with STS arising from the ankle or foot which required coverage in the form of a free (n = 21), pedicled (n = 13), or rotational perforator flap (n = 10). The mean tumor size was 6 ± 5 cm, with 39 (89%) patients receiving radiotherapy. The mean follow-up was 10 ± 7 years.

RESULTS

There were no cases of amputation due to flap failure, with a 10-year limb salvage rate of 84%. Complications occurred in 19 (43%) patients, most commonly wound infections. There was no difference in the incidence of complications between patients undergoing a free flap and pedicled or perforator flap (odds ratio = 0.97, p = 1.0); with no difference in the mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score between patients with a free flap versus a pedicled/perforator flap (84% vs. 76%, p = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Flap reconstruction is an essential part of limb salvage for foot and ankle STS. At final follow-up nearly all the patients are ambulatory with an acceptable MSTS score.

Preoperative versus Post-operative Radiotherapy for Extremity Soft tissue Sarcoma: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term Survival

BACKGROUND

The role of perioperative radiotherapy in the management of resectable extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) is widely recognised for local tumour control, wound complications (WC) and long-term function. However, debate continues regarding its implications on long-term survival. This study aimed to determine whether the timing of perioperative radiotherapy affects long-term survival outcomes in adults with ESTS.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane was performed. The primary outcome measure was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) at 95% confidence intervals. Secondary outcomes and subgroup analyses were presented as cumulative odds ratios (OR). A random-effects, generic inverse variance method and sensitivity analysis were performed to minimise heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Six studies (n = 4192 patients) were identified. Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a statistically significant advantage in post-operative radiotherapy for overall survival (HR 1.15 and p = 0.05). Combined HRs for disease-free (1.25 and p = 0.22) and disease-specific (1.06 and p = 0.43) survival also favoured post-operative radiotherapy but did not achieve statistical significance. Post-operative radiotherapy was shown to confer an overall (OR 1.19 and p = 0.01), disease-free (OR 1.19 and p = 0.01) and disease-specific (OR 1.19 and p = 0.01) survival advantage on subgroup analysis. This survival benefit was best observed at three years in the disease-free survival comparison (OR 1.55 and p = 0.003). Preoperative radiotherapy was associated with more WC (OR 2.74 and p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pooled analysis of published literature suggests that post-operative radiotherapy confers a significant long-term survival advantage with fewer WC. Further large multicentre randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up are required to determine the optimal perioperative radiotherapy regime in adult ESTS.

Immediate Versus Staged Soft Tissue Reconstruction After Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection Has Similar Wound and Oncologic Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the wound complication rate and oncologic outcome in patients undergoing immediate versus staged soft tissue reconstruction after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a single sarcoma referral center between 2006 and 2016 which identified a cohort that underwent resection of an extremity or trunk STS with reconstruction surgery (split thickness skin graft or flap coverage). Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction timing: immediate (same day) versus staged (later date). Demographic characteristics, wound complications, and oncologic outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 491 patients who underwent resection of an extremity or trunk STS, 81 (16%) received reconstructive surgery, with 26 patients undergoing immediate reconstruction and 55 patients undergoing staged reconstruction. Overall wound complication (58% vs 45%, P = 0.347) and infection rates (35% vs 25%, P = 0.602) were similar between immediate and staged groups, respectively. Likewise, local recurrence (8% vs 7%, P = 1.000), metastasis (19% vs 20%, P = 0.755), and all-cause mortality (27% vs 27%, P = 1.000) rates after reconstruction was similar. Patients in the staged group with positive margins after resection were re-excised before definitive reconstruction, whereas those in the immediate group were not. The staged group required fewer surgical intensive care unit stays after resection surgery (22% vs 58%, P = 0.006). The mean ± SD final follow-up was 38 ± 33 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound complication rates and oncologic outcomes remain similar, regardless of timing for reconstruction. Staged reconstructions were associated with fewer surgical intensive care unit stays, while also affording opportunity for reintervention after positive margins with little additional morbidity.

Soft Tissue Sarcoma of Lower Extremity: Functional Outcome and Quality of Life

Background

Few studies have focused on patient-related factors in analyzing long-term functional outcome and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with postoperative lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS).

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate factors associated with postoperative functional outcome and HRQoL in patients with lower extremity STS.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed in a tertiary referral center using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 and 15 Dimension (15D) measures. Functional outcome and HRQoL data were collected prospectively. All patients were treated by a multidisciplinary team according to a written treatment protocol.

Results

A total of 141 patients who had undergone limb-salvage surgery were included. Depending on the outcome measure used, 19–51% of patients were completely asymptomatic and 13–14% of patients had an unimpaired HRQoL. The mean score for TESS, 15D mobility score, and QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning scale were 86, 0.83, and 75, respectively, while the mean score for 15D was 0.88, and 73 for QLQ-C30 QoL. Lower functional outcome was statistically significantly associated with higher age, higher body mass index (BMI), and the need for reconstructive surgery and radiotherapy, while lower HRQoL was statistically significantly associated with higher age, higher BMI, and reconstructive surgery.

Conclusion

Functional outcome and HRQoL were generally high in this cross-sectional study of patients with STS in the lower extremity. Both tumor- and treatment-related factors had an impact but patient-related factors such as age and BMI were the major determinants of both functional outcome and HRQoL.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-021-09774-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Reconstruction of upper limb soft-tissue defects after sarcoma resection with free flaps: A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Upper limb preservation after soft tissue sarcoma (STS) surgical excision is now the accepted gold standard and it often requires reconstruction with free flaps. The purpose of this review is to summarize current literature on upper limb reconstruction with free flaps after STS resection.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in July 2019 in PubMed and MedLine Ovid databases according to the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies were included in the final analysis, with 132 patients. The most common diagnosis was Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma. The most frequent timing of flap coverage was immediate. The success rate was almost always 100%. The length of follow-up was reported in 11 studies with a range of 2-187 months. The most commonly reported patient-centered outcome was the MSTS Score. Based on the evidence of the literature collected, we divided the upper limb into four parts (shoulder, elbow and arm, forearm and wrist, and hand) and described the most common and functional free flaps used for reconstruction after STS resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Free flaps in the treatment of STS of the upper extremity have a good overall outcome, with a low postoperative complication rate. A wide array of free flaps is available for reconstruction, and the choice of flap is based on defect size, types of tissue required, postoperative functional goal, and surgeon preference. A greater degree of standardization is needed in the reporting of patient-centered outcomes to facilitate future comparative studies.

A novel skin-stretching device for closing large skin-soft tissue defects after soft tissue sarcoma resection

BACKGROUND

Closure of large skin-soft tissue defects following soft tissue sarcoma (STS) resection has been a great challenge. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel, simple, and cheap skin-stretching device (bidirectional regulation-hook skin closure system, BHS) for closing large skin-soft tissue defects resulting from the removal of STS and the complications associated with the use of the BHS.

METHODS

From January 2017 to September 2018, 25 patients with STS underwent BHS therapy after tumor resection. BHS was used for two main clinical applications: securing wound closure after high-tension suture closure and delayed wound closure. We described a detailed reconstruction procedure regarding this therapy. Wound closure and complications associated with BHS therapy were recorded. We also analyzed tumor recurrence and metastases.

RESULTS

All patients were observed for 16-36 months with an average follow-up of 25.6 months. During the follow-up period, no significant functional restriction was observed and the final scar was aesthetically acceptable. Superficial wound infection occurred in six patients, wound edge ischemia in two patients, and small skin tears in two patients. Two patients developed pulmonary metastasis, two patients had a local recurrence, and one patient died of pulmonary metastasis.

CONCLUSIONS

BHS therapy can effectively close large skin-soft tissue defects following STS resection and obtain acceptable functional results, without severe complications. However, larger studies are required to further evaluate the effectiveness, indications, and complications of BHS therapy.

Free flap reconstruction of sarcoma defects in the setting of radiation: a ten-year experience

Neoadjuvant treatment and surgical resection for sarcoma patients can often leave devastating wounds necessitating soft-tissue coverage in the form of free flaps. There is still debate as to the optimal flap for reconstruction of defects in irradiated fields. We aim to describe our experiences with free fasciocutaneous and free muscle flaps for sarcoma reconstruction in the setting of radiation therapy. A retrospective chart review was conducted encompassing all patients requiring soft-tissue reconstruction secondary to sarcoma resection from January 2010 to June 2019. Patient characteristics, flap viability and post-operative healing outcomes were all recorded and examined. In total, 49 patients who underwent 51 free-flaps were identified. Of these, 30 flaps were fasciocutaneous, while 21 were muscle-based. Most patients received pre-operative radiotherapy (76.5%), although these rates were not different between groups of flap type, and had no significant association with post-operative outcomes. Complication rates (31.3%) and re-operative rates (21.6%) were also comparable between flap types. Diabetes mellitus was significantly associated with delayed wound healing (p < .016), while the presence of peripheral vascular disease had a significant association with post-operative infection (p < .006). This study shows that free fasciocutaneous and free muscle-based flaps are both viable options for soft-tissue reconstruction demanded by sarcoma resection, even in the setting of radiation. Peripheral vascular disease and diabetes mellitus may confer increased wound complications.

Neoadjuvant radiation improves margin-negative resection rates in extremity sarcoma but not survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Radiation improves limb salvage in extremity sarcomas. Timing of radiation therapy remains under investigation. We sought to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant radiation (NAR) on surgery and survival of patients with extremity sarcomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-institutional database was used to identify patients with extremity sarcomas undergoing surgical resection from 2000-2016. Patients were categorized by treatment strategy: surgery alone, adjuvant radiation (AR), or NAR. Survival, recurrence, limb salvage, and surgical margin status was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1483 patients were identified. Most patients receiving radiotherapy had high-grade tumors (82% NAR vs 81% AR vs 60% surgery; P < .001). The radiotherapy groups had more limb-sparing operations (98% AR vs 94% NAR vs 87% surgery; P < .001). NAR resulted in negative margin resections (90% NAR vs 79% surgery vs 75% AR; P < .0001). There were fewer local recurrences in the radiation groups (14% NAR vs 17% AR vs 27% surgery; P = .001). There was no difference in overall or recurrence-free survival between the three groups (OS, P = .132; RFS, P = .227).

CONCLUSION

In this large study, radiotherapy improved limb salvage rates and decreased local recurrences. Receipt of NAR achieves more margin-negative resections however this did not improve local recurrence or survival rates over.

Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Role of Local Control

OPINION STATEMENT

For localized extremity soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS), treatment is individualized and each patient needs to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team at a referral sarcoma center specialized in the care of sarcoma. For a majority of patients, treatment for eSTS involves limb-salvage surgery, with or without the addition of radiation therapy. Surgery should only be performed by surgeons specifically fellowship trained in the resection of eSTS. Surgery alone may be considered for small, low-grade, and superficial tumors as long a wide (≥ 2 cm) margin can be achieved. In cases where a less than wide negative margin can be achieved, radiation therapy should be utilized to facilitate a planned close margin resection to preserve critical structures (such as nerves, blood vessels, and bone) without a significant impact on oncologic outcomes. Soft tissue sarcomas are rare, and as such patients often present following an inadvertent excision. In these situations, we recommend preoperative radiation and wide tumor bed re-excision, as rates of residual tumor can be high in this scenario. While there is large amount of evidence to support the use of radiotherapy to enhance local tumor control, the evidence to support the use of chemotherapy to enhance local tumor control is lacking, and as such cannot be recommended for all patients.

Functional Outcome Measurement in Patients with Lower-Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Systematic Literature Review

Background

The importance of functional outcome (FO) in the treatment of patients with extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) has been increasingly recognized in the last three decades. This systematic review aimed to investigate how FO is measured in surgically treated lower-extremity STS patients.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed based on the PRISMA guidelines. The methodologic quality of the publications was measured using the MINORS tool. The results from the included studies examining measurement types, measures, and time of FO measurement were compiled. The FO pooled mean and standard deviation were calculated as a weighted average for the groups. The validity of the applied measures is reported.

Results

The literature search found 3461 publications, 37 of which met the inclusion criteria. The measurement types used were clinician-reported outcomes (n = 27), patient-reported outcomes (n = 20), and observer-reported outcomes (n = 2). The most frequently used measures were the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) (n = 16) and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score 1993 (n = 12). The postoperative FO was relatively good. The pooled mean TESS and MSTS 1993 scores were respectively 83.3 and 86.2 (out of 100). Of the 10 previously reported measures, 3 provide validated FO scores. The methodologic quality of publications was generally low.

Conclusions

Based on this systematic review, several different methods exist for assessing FO in patients with lower-extremity sarcoma. The most frequently used measure is a validated TESS. The postoperative FO of patients with lower-extremity STS seems to increase to the preoperative baseline level during long-term follow-up evaluation.

[Principles of sarcoma surgery]

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare malignant tumors. Surgery remains the most important treatment modality. Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy may be administered to improve the local and systemic outcome. Advances in oncological and reconstructive surgery, combined with the use of multimodal therapies, have made mutilating surgery rare events in extremity sarcomas. In retroperitoneal sarcomas, local recurrences are life-threatening events and multivisceral resection has become the standard surgical procedure. The subjects of this review are diagnostics, multimodal therapy, and resection strategy from a surgical point of view.

[Systematic planning of surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities]

Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities are rarely malignant tumors. They are best treated by an experienced interdisciplinary sarcoma team. A preoperative biopsy and imaging are prerequisites for successful sarcoma treatment. Before surgery the multimodal treatment and the extent of resection and, if necessary, plastic reconstruction should be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. The aim is always a complete R0 resection with optimal preservation of function. The preservation of critical structures (e. g. sciatic nerve) by a planned focal marginal resection along the critical structure can be performed by an experienced team in a multidisciplinary treatment setting.

Microsurgery in musculoskeletal oncology

Sarcomas are rare mesenchymal bone and soft tissue tumors of the musculoskeletal system. In the past, the primary treatment modality was amputation of the involved limb and the 5-year survival was very low for high-grade tumors. During the last three decades, limb salvage has become the rule rather than the exception and the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies (radiation and chemotherapy) has dramatically increased disease-free survival. Reconstruction of large bone and soft tissue defects, though, still remains a significant challenge in sarcoma patients. In particular, vascularized tissue transfer has proved extremely helpful in dealing with complex bone and soft tissue or functional defects that are frequently encountered as a result of the tumor or as a complication of surgery and adjuvant therapies. The principles, indications and results of microsurgical reconstruction differ from trauma patients and are directly related not only to the underlying disease process, but also to the local and systemic therapeutic modalities applied to the individual patient. Although plastic reconstruction in the oncological patients is not free of complications, usually these complications are manageable and do not jeopardize oncological outcome. The overall treatment strategy should be tailored to the patient's and sarcoma profile.

Vascularized Tissue Reconstruction in Previously Irradiated Sarcoma Defects

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy (RT) is recommended for appropriately selected sarcoma patients to minimize the risk of local recurrence and to maximize outcomes of disease-free survival and function. The purpose of this study was to confirm the safety of vascularized tissue reconstruction in recently irradiated sarcoma defects.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients treated by the senior author for sarcoma reconstruction from January 2005 to July 2017 was performed. Two independent reviewers collected data from both electronic and paper medical records. Patients were included if they underwent flap reconstruction (pedicled or free) following sarcoma resection. The safety of neoadjuvant RT was compared with a control group with no previous irradiation using χ(2) analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in the study; 35 patients were included in the preoperative RT group, and 22 patients were included in the control group (no previous irradiation). There was no significant difference in wound complications between the 2 groups (infection, dehiscence, hematoma, and seroma). Microvascular complications (arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, partial/total flap loss) were also comparable in the free tissue transfer subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study demonstrates the safety of both pedicled and free flap reconstruction in previously irradiated sarcoma defects. Judicious selection of reconstructive technique and recipient vessels is crucial in obtaining optimal outcomes given the devastating effects of RT on native tissues.

Preoperative Radiotherapy and Wide Resection for Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Achieving a Low Rate of Major Wound Complications with the Use of Flaps. Results of a Single Surgical Team

Background

Surgery in combination with radiotherapy (RT) has become the standard of care for most soft tissue sarcomas. The choice between pre- and postoperative RT is controversial. Preoperative RT is associated with a 32–35% rate of major wound complications (MWC) and 16–25% rate of reoperation. The role of vascularized soft tissue “flaps” in reducing complications is unclear. We report the outcomes of patients treated with preoperative RT, resection, and flap reconstruction.

Patients and methods

122 treatment episodes involving 117 patients were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were treated with 50.4 Gy of external beam radiation. Surgery was performed at 4–8 weeks after completion of RT by the same combination of orthopedic oncology and plastic reconstructive surgeon. Defects were reconstructed with 64 free and 59 pedicled/local flaps.

Results

30 (25%) patients experienced a MWC and 17 (14%) required further surgery. 20% of complications were exclusively related to the donor site. There was complete or partial loss of three flaps. There was no difference in the rate of MWC or reoperation for complications with respect to age, sex, tumor site, previous unplanned excision, tumor grade, depth, and type of flap. Tumor size ≥8 cm was associated with a higher rate of reoperation (11/44 vs 6/78; P = 0.008) but the rate of MWC was not significant (16/44 vs 14/78; P = 0.066).

Conclusion

The use of soft tissue flaps is associated with a low rate of MWC and reoperation. Our results suggest that a high rate of flap usage may be required to observe a reduction in complication rates.

Therapeutic options and postoperative wound complications after extremity soft tissue sarcoma resection and postoperative external beam radiotherapy

Soft tissue sarcomas occur most commonly in the lower and upper extremities. The standard treatment is limb salvage surgery combined with radiotherapy. Postoperative radiotherapy is associated with wound complications. This systematic review aims to summarise the available evidence and review the literature of the last 10 years regarding postoperative wound complications in patients who had limb salvage surgical excision followed by direct closure vs flap coverage together with postoperative radiotherapy and to define the optimal timeframe for adjuvant radiotherapy after soft tissue sarcomas resection and flap reconstruction. A literature search was performed using PubMed. The following keywords were searched: limb salvage, limb-sparing, flaps, radiation therapy, radiation, irradiation, adjuvant radiotherapy, postoperative radiotherapy, radiation effects, wound healing, surgical wound infection, surgical wound dehiscence, wound healing, soft tissue sarcoma and neoplasms. In total, 1045 papers were retrieved. Thirty-seven articles were finally selected after screening of abstracts and applying dates and language filters and inclusion and exclusion criteria. Plastic surgery provides a vast number of reconstructive flap procedures that are directly linked to decreasing wound complications, especially with the expectant postoperative radiotherapy. This adjuvant radiotherapy is better administered in the first 3-6 weeks after reconstruction to allow timely wound healing and avoid local recurrence.

Flap reconstruction does not increase complication rates following surgical resection of extremity soft tissue sarcoma

BACKGROUND

Flap reconstruction plays an essential role in the surgical management of extremity soft tissue sarcoma (ESTS) for many patients. But flaps increase the duration and complexity of the surgery and their contribution to overall morbidity is unclear. This study directly compares the complication rates in patients with ESTS undergoing either flap reconstruction or primary wound closure and explores contributing factors.

METHODS

Eight hundred and ninety-seven patients who underwent ESTS resection followed by primary closure (631) or flap reconstruction (266) were included in this study. Data on patient, tumour and treatment variables and post-operative medical and surgical complications were collected. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of complications.

RESULTS

Post-operative complications occurred in 33% of patients. Flap patients were significantly older, had more advanced disease and were more likely to require neoadjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy. There was no significant difference in complication rates following flap reconstruction compared to primary closure on multivariate analysis (38 vs 30.9% OR 1.12, CI 0.77-1.64, p = 0.53). Pre-operative radiation and distal lower extremity tumour location were significant risk factors in patients who underwent primary wound closure but not in those who had flap reconstruction. Patients with comorbidities, increased BMI and systemic disease were at increased risk of complications following flap reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Flap reconstruction is not associated with increased post-operative complications following ESTS resection. Flaps may mitigate the effects of some risk factors in selected patients.

Superficial Soft-Tissue Sarcomas Rarely Require Advanced Soft-Tissue Reconstruction following Resection

Objective:

Soft-tissue sarcomas are most frequently located deep within myofascial compartments. Superficial soft-tissue sarcomas (S-STS) are relatively less common and may be managed differently than deep sarcomas because generous resection margins are often possible without sacrificing critical structures. We sought to investigate the frequency and types of soft-tissue reconstructive procedures that are required following excision of S-STS.

Methods:

We reviewed 457 consecutively treated patients with S-STS with a minimum 2-year follow-up from our prospectively maintained database between 1989 and 2009.

Results:

Mean follow-up was 10.5 years (range, 2–23). Four hundred twenty-one tumors (91%) were excised with negative margins, 38 (8.3%) had microscopically positive margins, and three (0.7%) had grossly positive margins. One patient required an amputation. In 271 (58%) patients, the wounds were closed primarily. In comparison, 93 patients (20%) required a rotation flap, 70 (15%) required a split-thickness skin graft, and 23 (5%) underwent a free tissue transfer (ie, advanced reconstructive procedure). The overall complication rate was 12%, although 43% of patients undergoing free tissue transfer developed complications (P = 0.04). An unplanned excision before referral to our center was a risk factor for local recurrence (P = 0.03) when residual tumor was recovered in the reexcision specimen pathologically.

Conclusions:

Although concern about the morbidity associated with a free tissue transfer (ie, advanced reconstructive procedure) may potentially limit the adequacy of resection in some patients with S-STS, the results of this study showed that the majority of patients had complete excisions with negative margins and primary closure. Obtaining a negative margin when excising a known or suspected S-STS rarely requires an advanced reconstructive procedure and almost never results in loss of limb.

Management of soft-tissue sarcomas; treatment strategies, staging, and outcomes

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are a rare group of malignant tumors which can affect any age group. For the majority of patients who present with a localized STS, treatment involves a multidisciplinary team decision-making approach ultimately relying on surgical resection with or without adjuvant radiation for successful limb salvage. The goals of treatment are to provide the patient with a functional extremity without local tumor relapse. The purpose of this article is to review the treatment of extremity STS, with a focus on staging, treatment options, and outcomes.

Patient, tumour and treatment factors affect complication rates in soft tissue sarcoma flap reconstruction in a synergistic manner

INTRODUCTION

Flap reconstruction plays an essential role in the management of soft tissue sarcoma, facilitating wide resection while maximizing preservation of function. The addition of reconstruction increases the complexity of the surgery and identification of patients who are at high risk for post-operative complications is an important part of the preoperative assessment. This study examines predictors of complications in these patients.

METHODS

294 patients undergoing flap reconstruction following sarcoma resection were evaluated. Data on patient, tumour and treatment variables as well as post-operative complications were collected. Bivariate and multivariate regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of complications. Analysis of synergistic interaction between key patient and tumour risk factors was subsequently performed.

RESULTS

A history of cerebrovascular events or cardiac disease were found to be the strongest independent predictors of post-operative complications (OR 14.84, p = 0.003 and OR 5.71, p = 0.001, respectively). Further strong independent tumour and treatment-related predictors were high grade tumours (OR 1.91, p = 0.038) and the need for additional reconstructive procedures (OR 2.78, p = 0.001). Obesity had significant synergistic interaction with tumour resection diameter (RERI 1.1, SI 1.99, p = 0.02) and high tumour grade (RERI 0.86, SI 1.5, p = 0.01). Comorbidities showed significant synergistic interaction with large tumour resections (RERI 0.91, SI 1.83, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patient, tumour and treatment-related variables contribute to complications following flap reconstruction of sarcoma defects. This study highlights the importance of considering the combined effect of multiple risk factors when evaluating and counselling patients as significant synergistic interaction between variables can further increase the risk of complications.

Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Arm - Oncosurgical and Reconstructive Principles within a Multimodal, Interdisciplinary Setting

Soft tissue sarcomas of the upper extremity represent a severe threat for the patient and a difficult task for the treatment team. Due to the complex anatomy of the arm, most sarcomas involve valuable functional structures. Nonetheless, a large portion of the patients can be treated in a limb-sparing manner, and surgery is the mainstay of local tumor control. This review gives an overview of the disease entities and their epidemiology, on necessary patient work-up, staging, and imaging modalities, as well as the importance of interdisciplinary decision-making. The surgical therapies and principles of tumor excision are outlined, as well as reconstructive options. Furthermore, adjuvant treatments are discussed with a special focus on the various application techniques for radiation therapy. In spite of established treatment algorithms, each case is an individual challenge and individually tailored therapy is required. This aspect is illustrated by presenting three comprehensive cases demonstrating useful strategies. A summary of the relevant literature is given.

Quality of life measures in soft tissue sarcoma

The assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQL) via patient-reported outcomes has the potential to answer critical questions and improve the care of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). This review outlines the rationale for quality of life measures in sarcoma, and details various instrument types: disease- and anatomic-specific, provider-generated, generic HRQL and health state utilities. Prior usage in STS populations, relative advantages of specific patient-reported outcome measures and a framework for selecting appropriate measures are discussed. Uniform incorporation of validated HRQL measures in STS clinical research would further the understanding of patient wellbeing beyond traditional clinical measures, and more widespread use of health state utilities measures in particular has the potential to facilitate comparative effectiveness research.

Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology: Recent advances

The treatment of musculoskeletal sarcomas has made vast strides in the last few decades. From an era where amputation was the only option to the current day function preserving resections and complex reconstructions has been a major advance. The objectives of extremity reconstruction after oncologic resection include providing skeletal stability where necessary, adequate wound coverage to allow early subsequent adjuvant therapy, optimising the aesthetic outcome and preservation of functional capability with early return to function. This article highlights the concepts of surgical margins in oncology, discusses the principles governing safe surgical resection in these tumors and summarises the current modalities and recent developments relevant to reconstruction after limb salvage. The rationale of choice of a particular resection modality, the unique challenges of reconstruction in skeletally immature individuals and the impact of adjuvant modalities like chemotherapy and radiotherapy on surgical outcomes are also discussed.

An effective method to access recipient vessels outside the zone of injury in free flap reconstruction of the lower extremity

INTRODUCTION

A principle of microvascular surgery in lower extremity reconstruction is to identify recipient vessels and perform the anastomosis outside the zone of injury. Microsurgeons will often create an incision that extends from the wound several centimeters proximally to access the recipient vessels through healthy tissue. This iatrogenic wound, however, traverses the zone of injury and is susceptible to delayed healing and wound breakdown. These complications can be avoided by creating a unique incision proximal to the zone of injury through which the recipient vessels are dissected and the anastomosis performed.

METHODS

In 13 consecutive patients with lower extremity wounds requiring free flap reconstruction, a remote incision was made in healthy tissue proximal to the defect to access the recipient vessels outside the zone of injury. The pedicle was tunneled in the subcutaneous plane from the wound to this site, and the anastomosis was performed. The flap was inset in the standard fashion, and the remote incision was closed in layers.

RESULTS

There were 3 female and 10 male patients, and the median age was 65 years (18-85 years). Etiology of the wounds was traumatic (3 acute, 7 chronic), oncologic (2), and ischemic (1). Defects varied in size and were primarily located on the distal third of the extremity. Free flaps included radial forearm (4), anterolateral thigh (4), gracilis (2), vastus (1), latissimus dorsi (1), and parascapular (1). Postoperatively, there were no major complications related to the flap or any flap losses. There was 1 donor site hematoma requiring operative evacuation. There were no complications associated with the anastomotic incision.

CONCLUSIONS

Accessing the recipient vessels via a separate proximal incision in lower extremity free flap reconstruction allows excellent exposure outside the zone of injury, avoids wound healing problems, and protects the pedicle from injury in the setting of multiple-staged procedures.