1
|
Ramos LDSP, Biazús JV. Outcomes after elevation of serratus anterior fascia flap versus serratus muscle flap in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a prospective study. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2024; 46:e-rbgo13. [PMID: 38765542 PMCID: PMC11075384 DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024ao13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative pain between SF flap and serratus anterior muscle (SM) in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Methods This is a prospective cohort study that included 53 women diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy and one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction from January 2020 to March 2021. Twenty-nine patients (54.7%) had SF elevation, and 24 patients (45.3%) underwent SM elevation. We evaluated patient-reported early postoperative pain on the first day after surgery. Also, it was reported that all surgical complications in the first month and patient reported outcomes (PROs) were measured with the BRECON 23 questionnaire. Results The serratus fascia group used implants with larger volumes, 407.6 ± 98.9 cc (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference between the fascial and muscular groups regarding the postoperative pain score reported by the patients (2 versus 3; p = 0.30). Also, there was no difference between the groups regarding early surgical complications and PROs after breast reconstruction. Conclusion The use of SF seems to cause less morbidity, which makes the technique an alternative to be considered in breast reconstruction. Although there was no statistical difference in postoperative pain scores between the fascia and serratus muscle groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilian de Sá Paz Ramos
- Federal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreRSBrazilFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
| | - Jorge Villanova Biazús
- Federal University of Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreRSBrazilFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Doan LV, Yoon J, Chun J, Perez R, Wang J. Pain associated with breast cancer: etiologies and therapies. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2023; 4:1182488. [PMID: 38148788 PMCID: PMC10750403 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1182488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pain associated with breast cancer is a prevalent problem that negatively affects quality of life. Breast cancer pain is not limited to the disease course itself but is also induced by current therapeutic strategies. This, combined with the increasing number of patients living with breast cancer, make pain management for breast cancer patients an increasingly important area of research. This narrative review presents a summary of pain associated with breast cancer, including pain related to the cancer disease process itself and pain associated with current therapeutic modalities including radiation, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. Current pain management techniques, their limitations, and novel analgesic strategies are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa V. Doan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jenny Yoon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jeana Chun
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Raven Perez
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Care, and Pain Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Neuroscience and Physiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Santosa KB, Wang CS, Hu HM, Mullen CR, Brummett CM, Englesbe MJ, Bicket MC, Myers PL, Waljee JF. Opioid Coprescribing with Sedatives after Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150:1224e-1235e. [PMID: 36103669 PMCID: PMC9712174 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000009726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Skeletal muscle relaxants and benzodiazepines are thought to mitigate against postoperative muscle contraction. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration warn against coprescribing them with opioids because of increased risks of overdose and death. The authors evaluated the frequency of coprescribing of opioids with skeletal muscle relaxants or benzodiazepines after implant-based reconstruction. METHODS The authors examined health care claims to identify women (18 to 64 years old) who underwent implant-based breast reconstruction between January of 2008 and June of 2019 to determine the frequency of coprescribing, factors associated with coprescribing opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants or benzodiazepines, and the impact on opioid refills within 90 days of reconstruction. RESULTS A total of 86.7 percent of women ( n = 7574) who had implant-based breast reconstruction filled an opioid prescription perioperatively. Of these, 27.7 percent of women filled prescriptions for opioids and benzodiazepines, 14.4 percent for opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants, and 2.4 percent for opioids, benzodiazepines, and skeletal muscle relaxants. Risk factors for coprescribing opioids and benzodiazepines included use of acellular dermal matrix, immediate reconstruction, and history of anxiety. Women who filled prescriptions for opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants, opioids and benzodiazepines, and opioids with skeletal muscle relaxants and benzodiazepines were significantly more likely to refill opioid prescriptions, even when controlling for preoperative opioid exposure. CONCLUSIONS Nearly half of women filled an opioid prescription with a benzodiazepine, skeletal muscle relaxant, or both after implant-based breast reconstruction. Coprescribing of opioids with skeletal muscle relaxants may potentiate opioid use after surgery and should be avoided given the risks of sedation. Identifying strategies that avoid sedatives to manage pain after breast reconstruction is critical to mitigate high-risk prescribing practices. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Risk, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine B. Santosa
- House Officer, Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Christine S. Wang
- House Officer, Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Hsou-Mei Hu
- Analyst, Michigan Opioid Prescribing Engagement Network (Michigan OPEN), University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Connor R. Mullen
- House Officer, Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Chad M. Brummett
- Professor, Division of Pain Research, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael J. Englesbe
- Professor of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark C. Bicket
- Assistant Professor, Division of Pain Research, Department of Anesthesiology University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Paige L. Myers
- Assistant Professor, Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jennifer F. Waljee
- Associate Professor, Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System; 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Darrach H, Kraenzlin FS, Khavanin N, He W, Lee E, Sacks JM. Pectoral placement of tissue expanders affects inpatient opioid use. Breast J 2021; 27:126-133. [PMID: 33438303 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.14149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Prepectoral breast reconstruction promises to minimize breast animation deformity and decrease pain associated with subpectoral dissection and tissue expansion. This latter benefit is particularly timely given the ongoing opioid epidemic; however, this theoretical benefit remains to be demonstrated clinically. As such, this study aimed to compare inpatient opioid use and prescription practices following prepectoral and subpectoral expander-based breast reconstruction. A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing immediate tissue expander placement between January 2017 and April 2018. Medical records were reviewed for surgical details, 24-hour inpatient PRN opioid usage (oral morphine equivalents [OME]), and discharge prescriptions. Comparisons were made using chi-squared and student's t tests where appropriate. Two hundred and thirty-one patients were identified, (mean age 48.8 years), 222 of which met inclusion criteria. 89 underwent subpectoral and 133 prepectoral tissue expander placements. All but two subpectoral patients and two prepectoral patients were opioid-naïve. The rate of bilateral procedures did not differ between cohorts (P = .194). Overall, 94% of patients were discharged within 24 hours, and length of stay did not differ between cohorts (P = .0753). Two subpectoral and two prepectoral patients required prolonged admission due to postoperative pain. All patients were ordered standing acetaminophen, celecoxib, and gabapentin, and subpectoral patients cyclobenzaprine. Narcotic pain medication was offered on an "as needed" (PRN) basis. Opioid usage within the first 24-hours was halved in the prepectoral cohort (22.2 vs 44.5 OME, P = .0003), which was not associated with bi/unilaterality of procedure or the presence of any psychiatric conditions. The amount of opioids prescribed on discharge was not significantly different between cohorts (308.42 OME prepectoral vs 336.99 subpectoral, P = .3197). Prepectoral expander placement appears to be associated with decreased inpatient opioid use postoperatively. This may represent an opportunity to improve patient satisfaction and safety by decreasing outpatient opioid prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Halley Darrach
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Franca S Kraenzlin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nima Khavanin
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Waverley He
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Erica Lee
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Justin M Sacks
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in the Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Johnson AC, Colakoglu S, Reddy A, Kerwin CM, Flores RA, Iorio ML, Mathes DW. Perioperative Blocks for Decreasing Postoperative Narcotics in Breast Reconstruction. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e105686. [PMID: 34150564 PMCID: PMC8207839 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.105686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Context High rates of mortality and chemical dependence occur following the overuse of narcotic medications, and the prescription of these medications has become a central discussion in health care. Efforts to curtail opioid prescribing include Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines, which describe local anesthesia techniques to decrease or eliminate the need for opioids when used in a comprehensive protocol. Here, we review effective perioperative blocks for the decreased use of opioid medications post-breast reconstruction surgery. Evidence Acquisition A comprehensive review was conducted using keywords narcotics, opioid, surgery, breast reconstruction, pain pump, nerve block, regional anesthesia, and analgesia. Papers that described a local anesthetic option for breast reconstruction for decreasing postoperative narcotic consumption, written in English, were included. Results A total of 52 papers were included in this review. Local anesthetic options included single-shot nerve blocks, nerve block catheters, and local and regional anesthesia. Most papers reported equal or even superior pain control with decreased nausea and vomiting, length of hospital stay, and other outcomes. Conclusions Though opioid medications are currently the gold standard medication for pain management following surgery, strategies to decrease the dose or number of opioids prescribed may lead to better patient outcomes. The use of a local anesthetic technique has been shown to reduce narcotic use and improve patients’ pain scores after breast reconstruction surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Clare Johnson
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Salih Colakoglu
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Angela Reddy
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Clara Marie Kerwin
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Roland A Flores
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Matthew L Iorio
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - David W Mathes
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Corresponding Author: MD, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Predictors of Opioid Consumption in Immediate, Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146:734-741. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
7
|
Azad AD, Bozkurt S, Wheeler AJ, Curtin C, Wagner TH, Hernandez-Boussard T. Acute pain after breast surgery and reconstruction: A two-institution study of surgical factors influencing short-term pain outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:623-631. [PMID: 32563208 PMCID: PMC7749807 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Acute postoperative pain following surgery is known to be associated with chronic pain development and lower quality of life. We sought to analyze the relationship between differing breast cancer excisional procedures, reconstruction, and short-term pain outcomes. METHODS Women undergoing breast cancer excisional procedures with or without reconstruction at two systems: an academic hospital (AH) and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) were included. Average pain scores at the time of discharge and at 30-day follow-up were analyzed across demographic and clinical characteristics. Linear mixed effects modeling was used to assess the relationship between patient/clinical characteristics and interval pain scores with a random slope to account for differences in baseline pain. RESULTS Our study included 1402 patients at AH and 1435 at VHA, of which 426 AH and 165 patients with VHA underwent reconstruction. Pain scores improved over time and were found to be highest at discharge. Time at discharge, 30-day follow-up, and preoperative opioid use were the strongest predictors of high pain scores. Younger age and longer length of stay were independently associated with worse pain scores. CONCLUSIONS Younger age, preoperative opioid use, and longer length of stay were associated with higher levels of postoperative pain across both sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amee D. Azad
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Selen Bozkurt
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Amanda J. Wheeler
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Catherine Curtin
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Department of Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Todd H. Wagner
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Department of Surgery, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
| | - Tina Hernandez-Boussard
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
- Department of Medicine (Biomedical Informatics), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oliver JD, Knackstedt R, Gatherwright J. Optimizing non-opioid pain control after implant-based breast reconstruction: a review of the literature and proposed pain control algorithm. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2020; 54:328-336. [PMID: 32734796 DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2020.1800480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite the intense focus on the opioid epidemic and its known association with surgical procedures, there is a paucity of evidence-based literature on pain management in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Herein, we present an updated review of the literature aimed at identifying pain treatment protocols to minimize narcotic use and its associated potential addiction in IBR. A comprehensive review of the published English literature was conducted using Ovid Medline/PubMed Database without timeframe limitations. The inclusion criteria of selected articles presented in this review included studies reporting objective outcomes of pain modulation (preoperatively, intraoperatively and postoperatively) in IBR. Articles for inclusion were stratified based on intervention. A total of 219 articles were identified in the initial search query, with 23 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Pain optimization interventions in IBR are herein summarized and analyzed based on the reported outcomes of each respective study. There is a substantial need for evidence-based guidelines in the plastic surgery literature for pain optimization without the use of opioids. While this review of studies to date investigates potential solutions, we hope this area of study continues to be a top priority for plastic surgeons to allow for optimized post-operative care for patients following IBR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremie D Oliver
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and School of Dentistry, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Urits I, Lavin C, Patel M, Maganty N, Jacobson X, Ngo AL, Urman RD, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. Chronic Pain Following Cosmetic Breast Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. Pain Ther 2020; 9:71-82. [PMID: 31994018 PMCID: PMC7203369 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-020-00150-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Cosmetic breast surgery is commonly performed in the United States; 520,000 procedures of the total 1.8 million cosmetic surgical procedures performed in 2018 were breast related. Postoperative chronic pain, defined as lasting 3 or more months, has been reported in a wide variety of breast surgical procedures including breast augmentation, reduction mammaplasty, mastectomy, and mastectomy with reconstruction. Patient characteristics associated with the development of postoperative chronic pain following cosmetic breast surgery include a younger age, larger BMI, smaller height, postoperative hyperesthesia, and elevated baseline depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing scores. The anatomical distribution of chronic pain following breast augmentation procedures is dependent upon incision site placement; pectoral and intercostal nerves have been implicated. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the current literature addressing the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of patients presenting with chronic postoperative pain following cosmetic breast surgery. Methods A comprehensive literature review was performed in MEDLINE, PubMed, and Cochrane databases from 1996 to 2019 using the terms “cosmetic surgery”, “breast surgery”, “postoperative pain”, and “chronic pain”. Results Cosmetic breast surgery can have a similar presentation as post-mastectomy pain syndrome and thus have overlapping diagnostic criteria. Seven domains are identified for a diagnosis of PBSPS: Pain after breast surgery, neuropathic in nature, at least a moderate intensity of pain, as defined as within the middle one-third of the selected pain scale, pain for at least 6 months, symptoms occurring for 12 or more hours a day for a minimum of 4 days each week, pain in at least one of the following sites: breast, chest wall, axilla, or arm on the affected side, pain exacerbated by movement. Patient risk factors and surgical risk factors may influence the development of chronic post-cosmetic surgery breast pain. Improved perioperative analgesia including preoperative regional nerve anesthesia and postoperative catheter infusion have been shown to improve chronic postoperative pain outcomes. Conclusions The present review provides a discussion of clinical presentation, pathophysiology, and treatment and preventative strategies for chronic breast pain following cosmetic surgery. This review provides evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of efficacy and effectiveness. While chronic postoperative breast pain remains challenging to treat, various preventative strategies have been described to improve postoperative pain outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Urits
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Megha Patel
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Nishita Maganty
- University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Xander Jacobson
- Creighton University School of Medicine-Phoenix Regional Campus, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Anh L Ngo
- Department of Pain Medicine, Pain Specialty Group, Newington, NH, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan D Kaye
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Omar Viswanath
- Valley Anesthesiology and Pain Consultants-Envision Physician Services, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schreiber KL, Belfer I, Miaskowski C, Schumacher M, Stacey BR, Van De Ven T. AAAPT Diagnostic Criteria for Acute Pain Following Breast Surgery. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2019; 21:294-305. [PMID: 31493489 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Acute pain after breast surgery decreases the quality of life of cancer survivors. Previous studies using a variety of definitions and methods report prevalence rates between 10% and 80%, which suggests the need for a comprehensive framework that can be used to guide assessment of acute pain and pain-related outcomes after breast surgery. A multidisciplinary task force with clinical and research expertise performed a focused review and synthesis and applied the 5 dimensional framework of the AAAPT (Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks [ACTTION], American Academy of Pain Medicine [AAPM], American Pain Society [APS] Pain Taxonomy) to acute pain after breast surgery. Application of the AAAPT taxonomy yielded the following: 1) Core Criteria: Location, timing, severity, and impact of breast surgery pain were defined; 2) Common Features: Character and expected trajectories were established in relevant surgical subgroups, and common pain assessment tools for acute breast surgery pain identified; 3) Modulating Factors: Biological, psychological, and social factors that modulate interindividual variability were delineated; 4) Impact/Functional Consequences: Domains of impact were outlined and defined; 5) Neurobiologic Mechanisms: Putative mechanisms were specified ranging from nerve injury, inflammation, peripheral and central sensitization, to affective and social processing of pain. PERSPECTIVE: The AAAPT provides a framework to define and guide improved assessment of acute pain after breast surgery, which will enhance generalizability of results across studies and facilitate meta-analyses and studies of interindividual variation, and underlying mechanism. It will allow researchers and clinicians to better compare between treatments, across institutions, and with other types of acute pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin L Schreiber
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Inna Belfer
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Christine Miaskowski
- Department of Physiological Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mark Schumacher
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, Division of Pain Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Brett R Stacey
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Thomas Van De Ven
- Duke University Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kulkarni AR, Pusic AL, Hamill JB, Kim HM, Qi J, Wilkins EG, Roth RS. Factors Associated with Acute Postoperative Pain Following Breast Reconstruction. JPRAS Open 2016; 11:1-13. [PMID: 28713853 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2016.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction has become an increasingly important component of breast cancer treatment. Unfortunately, some patients experience severe postoperative pain, placing them at risk for increased clinical morbidity and the development of disabling chronic pain. In an attempt to identify at-risk patients, we prospectively evaluated patient characteristics and medical/surgical variables associated with more severe acute post-reconstruction pain. METHODS Women (N = 2207; one-week 82.8% response rate) undergoing breast reconstruction were assessed for pain experience, anxiety, depression, and sociodemographic characteristics prior to surgery. Pain assessments were made preoperatively and postoperative at 1-week using validated survey instruments including the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (MPQ-SF), Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and BREAST-Q Chest and Upper Body scale. Depressive symptoms and anxiety severity were assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorders Scale, respectively. Mixed-effects regression modeling was used to examine the relationships between patient characteristics and medical/surgical factors and 1-week postoperative pain. RESULTS Younger age, bilateral reconstruction, and severity of preoperative pain, anxiety and depression were all associated with more severe acute postoperative pain on all the pain measures and BREAST-Q. Comparison of surgical procedure type indicated less severe postoperative pain for PTRAM, DIEP and SIEA reconstructive surgery compared to tissue expander/implant reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS This study identified patients at risk for greater acute postoperative pain following breast reconstruction. These findings will allow plastic surgeons to better tailor postoperative care to improve patient comfort, reduce clinical morbidity, and further enhance patient satisfaction with their surgical outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Hyungjin M Kim
- Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ji Qi
- University of Michigan Healthcare Systems, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Randy S Roth
- University of Michigan Healthcare Systems, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|