Convex bone deformity after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture

Evaluating the Outcomes of Closed Reduction of Different Types of Nasal Bone Fractures

This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of closed reduction of different types of nasal bone fractures depending on time between onset of injury and reduction and comparing the outcomes of early closed reduction (within 6 h) of nasal bone fracture with late closed reduction (after 2 weeks). A hospital based Prospective cohort type of study was conducted among cases of nasal bone fracture attending the outpatient department of Otorhinolaryngology at Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Chennai during the months of August 2021 to January 2022. A total of 54 participants were included in the study. Primary outcome was to assess the effectiveness of closed reduction of different types of nasal bone fractures postoperatively. The second objective was to compare the outcomes of early closed reduction (within 6 h) of nasal bone fracture with late closed reduction (after 2 weeks). Using chi square test, the association of factors such as age, sex, mode of injury, external framework deformity, type of fracture and treatment was analyzed with outcome measures such as post op degree of deviation, arch irregularity, malalignment, bony irregularity, bony displacement, olfactory disturbances and result. We analyzed the sample data statistically and measured the outcomes which showed that post operatively after undergoing closed reduction, some degree of deviation was present in 17(31.48./.), arch irregularity present in 12(22.2./.), malalignment in 11(20.37./.), bony irregularity in 24(44.44./.), bony displacement in 19(35.19./.), olfactory disturbances in 2(3.70./.). Comparing the outcome factors between early and late reduction, we found that the outcome was better in early closed reduction when compared with late closed reduction. Among the 54 patients studied, the results of closed reduction were found to be excellent in 27(50./.), Fair in 16(29.63./.), Good in 10(18.52./.) and poor in 1(1.85./.) We could thus conclude from this study that early closed reduction of nasal bone fracture gave better results than a late closed reduction in terms of post operative deformity, arch irregularity, malalignment, bony irregularity, bony displacement and olfactory disturbances.

Precisely Closed Reduction of Nasal Bone Fracture Assisted With Plain Film Measurements Under the Picture Archiving and Communication System

OBJECTIVES

To prevent aesthetic and functional deformities, precisely closed reduction is crucial in the management of nasal fractures. Plain film radiography (PF), ultrasonography (USG), and computed tomography can help confirm the diagnosis and classification of fractures and assist in performing closed reduction. However, no study in the literature reports on precisely closed reduction assisted with PF measurements under the picture archiving and communication system (PACS).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 153 patients with nasal bone fracture between January 2013 and December 2017. Surgeons conducted precisely closed reduction assisted with PF measurement of the distance between the fracture site and nasal tip under PACS on 34 patients (group A). Another group on 119 patients were reduced under surgeon's experience (group B).

RESULTS

No significant differences in age, gender, Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification, and reduction outcome were observed between group A and group B (P > .05). The operative time of the group A was significantly lower (12.50 ± 4.64 minutes) compared to group B (23.78 ± 11.20 minutes; P < .001). After adjusted age, gender, and AO classification, patients in group A scored 10.46 minutes less on the operative time than those in group B (P < .001). In addition, the severity of nasal bone fracture (AO classification, β = 3.37, P = .002) was positive associated with the operative time.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, closed reduction in nasal bone fracture assisted with PF measurements under PACS was performed precisely, thereby effectively decreasing operative time and the occurrence of complications. This procedure requires neither the use of new instruments or C-arm nor USG or navigation experience. Moreover, reduction can be easily performed using this method, and it requires short operative time, helps achieve great reduction, less radiation exposures, and is cost-effective.

A retrospective clinical investigation for the effectiveness of closed reduction on nasal bone fracture

Background

The nasal bone is the most protruding bony structure of the facial bones. Nasal bone fracture is the most common facial bone fracture. The high rate of incidence of nasal bone fracture emphasizes the need for systematical investigation of epidemiology, surgical techniques, and complications after surgery. The objective of this study is to investigate the current trends in the treatment of nasal bone fractures and the effectiveness of closed reduction depending on the severity of the nasal bone fracture.

Patients and methods

A total of 179 patients with a nasal bone fracture from 2009 to 2017 were enrolled. Their clinical examination, patient’s records, and radiographic images of nasal bone fractures were evaluated.

Results

Patients ranged from children to elderly. There were 156 (87.2%) males and 23 (12.8%) females. Traffic accident (36.9%) was the most common cause of nasal fracture. Orbit fracture (44 patients, 24.6%) was the most common fracture associated with a nasal bone fracture.

Complications after surgery included postoperative deformity in 20 (11.2%) patients, nasal obstruction in 11 (6.1%) patients, and olfactory disturbances in 2 (1.1%) patients and patients with more severe nasal bone fractures had higher rates of these complications.

Conclusion

Closed reduction could be performed successfully within 2 weeks after injury.

Clinical Analysis of Nasal Bone Fracture in Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Dorsal Augmentation Using Silicone Implants: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

There are no studies about the treatment of nasal bone fractures in patients with dorsal augmentations using silicone implants. We aimed to describe the characteristics of nasal bone fracture in patients who underwent rhinoplasty and compare the difference between closed reduction and conservative treatment of nasal bone fractures in patients with a history of rhinoplasty.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and June 2018, a total of 463 patients were admitted to our center for nasal bone fracture; 17 patients with nasal bone fractures who underwent rhinoplasty were included, of which, five underwent closed reduction in the nasal bone and 12 underwent conservative treatment. Three of 12 patients who were initially treated conservatively underwent a secondary rhinoplasty for esthetic improvements. All patients were classified according to fracture site and the presence of a nasal septal fracture-in accordance with the modified Murray classification-and were analyzed for the correlation between fracture type and disease course.

RESULTS

The nasal bone fracture types per computed tomography findings were unilateral (n = 13), bilateral (n = 4), septal (n = 1), and M-type (n = 1). No significant differences in fracture site (P > 0.05) and the presence of a nasal septal fracture (P > 0.05) were found between the groups. Fracture type did not significantly differ among patients who underwent closed reduction, conservative treatment without secondary rhinoplasty, and secondary rhinoplasty (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite risking traumatic capsular rupture, implant removal is seldom required and closed reduction is recommended if visible deviations are present; otherwise, only conservative treatment is recommended.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Blunt nasal trauma in children: a frequent diagnostic challenge

OBJECTIVE

The clinical challenge in blunt nasal trauma in children, is to identify cases requiring specialized care among frequently encountered banalities, whilst trying to minimize the exposure to diagnostic procedures. We aim to evaluate the related diagnostic and therapeutic pathways and its outcome during follow-up.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes children up to 16 years presenting at the emergency department with blunt nasal trauma of our tertiary reference center.

RESULTS

The incidence of blunt nasal injuries was estimated 1750 cases in 7 years. A total of 459 consecutive cases with suspected complications were enrolled. Univariate comparison between age groups revealed a statistically significant diminution of downfall related injuries with growing up, whereas blows (including violence) significantly increased with age (p < 0.001 each). The logistic regression model identified male sex as an independent risk factor for soft tissue lesions (OR 1.699, p = 0.017) and for frontobasal fractures (OR 2.415, p = 0.050). Age was not identified to play a significant role regarding localization of injuries. Delayed septorhinoplasties became necessary in 2 cases only (0.4%). The logistic regression model identified nasal bone fracture (OR 17.038, p < 0.001) and mandibular fracture (OR 4.753, p = 0.004) as independent risk factor for a surgical intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Blunt trauma to the nose is frequent in children. Trauma mechanisms differ significantly between age groups, whereas localization and concomitant injuries do not. Male sex was identified as an independent risk factor for soft tissue lesions and frontobasal fractures. In our experience, initial triage by the pediatric department with consecutive involvement of the ENT specialists in case of suspected complications is safe and effective and may help to reduce unnecessary diagnostic procedures/irradiation to the young patients.