An observational study of self-reported sedentary behaviour in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and bronchiectasis

Complex patterns and determinants of regional multiple chronic conditions across the United States

Noncommunicable chronic diseases (NCDs) are a rapidly growing global public health concern, posing substantial challenges to healthcare systems. The presence of multiple (≥2) chronic conditions (MCC) exacerbates these challenges. In this study, we constructed an integrated MCC network to comprehensively evaluate the impact of NCD prevalence and associated factors on MCC patterns. We identified four distinct MCC patterns, each with its unique set of associated risk factors. Firstly, we found that race, sedentary lifestyles, and smoking habits were significant contributors to the co-occurrence of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cancer. Secondly, smoking habits and mental health were identified as risk factors associated with the clusters of high cholesterol, hypertension, coronary heart disease, and arthritis. Furthermore, the comorbidity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma was affected by socioeconomic status, smoking habits, and educational attainment, and a noteworthy reciprocal relationship existed between these two MCC combinations. Thirdly, the combination of asthma and obesity is associated with risk factors such as mental health, smoking habits, sedentary lifestyles, and binge drinking behaviors. Finally, the pattern of depression-stroke comorbidity was influenced by risk factors including mental health, age, and sleep duration. Our findings hold valuable implications for healthcare system optimization, offering a pathway to mitigate the escalating burden of NCDs. Additionally, they provide a foundation for scientific strategies aimed at the joint prevention and management of these complex conditions, ultimately enhancing public health and safety on a global scale.

Functional Measures in Non-COPD Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Systematic Review

Background/Objectives: The extensive range of instruments designed for evaluating functional performance (FP) in chronic respiratory diseases (CRD) other than chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) presents a challenge in selecting the most appropriate one. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to summarise FP instruments, their measurement properties, their minimum clinically important differences, and their associations with CRD course-related events or prognosis in non-COPD CRD. Methods: Studies employing patient-reported or performance-based instruments to assess FP in non-COPD CRD were systematically identified in the PubMed, PEDro, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. COPD-exclusive studies or those solely reporting exercise capacity tests were excluded. Examination focused on measurement properties and associations with CRD course-related events or prognosis. The risk of bias was evaluated using the COSMIN, Downs and Black, and PEDro checklists based on the study design. Results: A total of 216 studies across seven CRD categories [asthma, bronchiectasis, cystic fibrosis, interstitial lung disease (ILD), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), pre-/post-lung-transplantation] from various study types were included. Thirty-three instruments were identified, with the SF-36 questionnaire's physical function domain being the most commonly used patient-reported tool. The 1 min sit-to-stand test was the most extensively studied performance-based measure, with its measurement properties frequently reported in non-COPD CRD studies. Associations with events were infrequently documented, primarily in ILD and PAH studies related to mortality. Conclusions: Despite the prevalent use of FP instruments, limited information exists concerning their measurement properties and clinical implications. This review furnishes a concise summary of available evidence, aiding informed clinical decisions when selecting FP tools for non-COPD CRD.

Influencing factors of sedentary behaviour in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

People with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are more likely to adopt a sedentary lifestyle. Increased sedentary behaviour is associated with adverse health consequences and reduced life expectancy.

AIM

This mixed-methods systematic review aimed to report the factors contributing to sedentary behaviour in people with COPD.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library) was conducted and supported by a clinician librarian in March 2023. Papers were identified and screened by two independent researchers against the inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by data extraction and analysis of quality. Quantitative and qualitative data synthesis was performed.

RESULTS

1037 records were identified, 29 studies were included (26 quantitative and 3 qualitative studies) and most studies were conducted in high-income countries. The most common influencers of sedentary behaviour were associated with disease severity, dyspnoea, comorbidities, exercise capacity, use of supplemental oxygen and walking aids, and environmental factors. In-depth findings from qualitative studies included a lack of knowledge, self-perception and motivation. However, sedentarism in some was also a conscious approach, enabling enjoyment when participating in hobbies or activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Influencers of sedentary behaviour in people living with COPD are multifactorial. Identifying and understanding these factors should inform the design of future interventions and guidelines. A tailored, multimodal approach could have the potential to address sedentary behaviour.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023387335.

Clinical determinants of the modified incremental step test in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

OBJECTIVES

This study primarily aimed to investigate the clinical determinants of the Modified Incremental Step Test (MIST) in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFB). A secondary objective was to compare the cardiopulmonary responses after the MIST and Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (ISWT), two commonly adopted symptom-limited maximum field tests in chronic respiratory diseases.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with clinically stable bronchiectasis participated in this cross-sectional study. MIST and ISWT were performed to determine exercise capacity, while disease severity, fatigue, and quality of life were assessed using the Bronchiectasis Severity Index (BSI), the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), respectively. Quadriceps muscle strength was evaluated using a hand-held dynamometer, walking speed with a wireless inertial sensing device, and the level of physical activity (steps/day) with a pedometer.

RESULTS

The BSI score, quadriceps muscle strength, daily step count, and the SGRQ total score explained 61.9% of the variance in the MIST (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.67, AR2 = 0.619). The BSI score (r = -0.412, p = 0.004), quadriceps muscle strength (r = 0.574, p = 0.001), daily step count (r = 0.523, p < 0.001), walking speed (r = 0.402, p = 0.006), FSS score (r = -0.551, p < 0.001), and SGRQ total score (r = -0.570, p < 0.001) correlated with the MIST. The patients achieved higher heart rates (HR), HR%, desaturation, dyspnea, and leg fatigue in the MIST compared to the ISWT (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Disease severity, quadriceps muscle strength, physical activity level, and quality of life were determinants of MIST. The advantages of the MIST, including higher cardiopulmonary response than ISWT and greater portability, which facilitates its use in various settings, make MIST the preferred choice for investigating symptom-limited exercise capacity in patients with NCFB.

Physical activity level and sedentary behavior in patients with bronchiectasis: A systematic review of outcome measures and determinants

BACKGROUND

Changes in respiratory functions negatively affect the physical activity (PA) levels of patients with bronchiectasis. Therefore, detecting the most frequently used assessments of PA is essential as determining related factors and improving PA. This review study aimed to investigate the PA levels, compare levels with the recommended PA guidelines, determine the outcome measurements of PA and examine the determinants related to PA in patients with bronchiectasis.

METHOD

This review was conducted using databases of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and PEDro. The searched terms were the variations of the words "bronchiectasis" and "physical activity". Full texts of cross-sectional studies and clinical trials were included. Two authors independently screened the studies for inclusion.

RESULT

The initial search identified 494 studies. A hundred articles were selected for full-text review. Following the application of the eligibility process, 15 articles were included. Twelve studies used activity monitors and five studies used questionnaires. The studies that used activity monitors presented daily step counts. The mean number of steps ranged between 4657 and 9164 for adult patients. It was approximately 5350 steps/day in older patients. One study investigated children's PA level reported 8229 steps/day. The functional exercise capacity, dyspnea, FEV1 and, quality of life as related determinants with PA have been reported in the studies.

CONCLUSION

PA levels of patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis were lower than the recommended levels. The objective measurements were frequently used in PA assessment. In further studies, it is needed to investigate the related determinants of PA in patients.

Validation of Simple Prediction Equations for Step Count in Japanese Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Physical activity is decreased in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and decreased physical activity leads to a poor prognosis. To determine an individual’s target step count from the measured step counts and predicted step counts, simple and detailed prediction equations for step count were developed. To verify the validity of the simple prediction equation, the validity of the simple equation was evaluated in a different cohort and the correlation between the step counts calculated by the simple equation and those by the detailed prediction equation were evaluated. When the step counts calculated by the simple prediction equation for all participants were compared with the measured step counts, a significant correlation was obtained among them, and the calculated values were found to be reproducible with the measured values in patients with a measured step count of <6500 by Bland−Altman plots. Furthermore, the values calculated by the simple prediction equation and those calculated by the detailed prediction equation showed a significant correlation. In conclusion, the simple prediction equation was considered reasonable.

Comportamento sedentário e associação com multimorbidade e padrões de multimorbidade em idosos brasileiros: dados da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde de 2019

Resumo: O comportamento sedentário emerge como um importante determinante da saúde da pessoa idosa, no entanto, sua relação com a multimorbidade e seus padrões de acometimento em estudos epidemiológicos têm sido pouco explorados na população brasileira. Tais associações poderão auxiliar na elaboração de políticas públicas visando à modificação desse comportamento. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a associação entre comportamento sedentário com multimorbidade e seus padrões em idosos brasileiros. Estudo transversal, com 43.554 idosos da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde de 2019. O comportamento sedentário autorreferido foi categorizado em < 3; 3-6; e > 6 horas por dia. A presença de multimorbidade e seus padrões foram analisados pelo autorrelato da coexistência de duas ou mais doenças crônicas, sendo que os três padrões estabelecidos consideraram as doenças com características clínicas similares: (1) cardiopulmonar; (2) vascular-metabólico; e (3) mental-musculoesquelético. As associações foram realizadas pela regressão logística binária. Os idosos que despendiam 3-6 horas/dia em comportamento sedentário tiveram maiores chances (OR = 1,39; IC95%: 1,29; 1,50) de apresentar multimorbidade, padrão vascular-metabólico (OR = 1,39; IC95%: 1,29; 1,50) e mental-musculoesquelético (OR = 1,11; IC95%: 1,00; 1,24). Quando o comportamento sedentário foi > 6 horas/dia, houve maiores chances de multimorbidade (OR = 1,58; IC95%: 1,43; 1,74) e dos padrões cardiopulmonar (OR = 1,73; IC95%: 1,33; 2,27), vascular-metabólico (OR = 1,49; IC95%: 1,35; 1,64) e mental-musculoesquelético (OR = 1,15; IC95%: 1,01; 1,31), quando comparados àqueles que ficavam até 3 horas/dia. Dessa forma, evidenciou-se que tempos elevados em comportamento sedentário são fatores de risco relevantes para a ocorrência de multimorbidade e seus padrões em idosos.