Systematic review on the reporting accuracy of experimental details in publications using mouse femoral fracture models

Embracing ethical research: Implementing the 3R principles into fracture healing research for sustainable scientific progress

As scientific advancements continue to reshape the world, it becomes increasingly crucial to uphold ethical standards and minimize the potentially adverse impact of research activities. In this context, the implementation of the 3R principles-Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement-has emerged as a prominent framework for promoting ethical research practices in the use of animals. This article aims to explore recent advances in integrating the 3R principles into fracture healing research, highlighting their potential to enhance animal welfare, scientific validity, and societal trust. The review focuses on in vitro, in silico, ex vivo, and refined in vivo methods, which have the potential to replace, reduce, and refine animal experiments in musculoskeletal, bone, and fracture healing research. Here, we review material that was presented at the workshop "Implementing 3R Principles into Fracture Healing Research" at the 2023 Orthopedic Research Society (ORS) Annual Meeting in Dallas, Texas.

Influence of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Parameters on the Bone Mineral Density in Rat Model: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Bone recovery typically depends on the age of organisms or the prevalence of metabolic disorders such as osteoporosis, which is a metabolic condition characterized by decreased bone strength and bone mineral density (BMD). Therefore, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), a non-invasive method for osteogenic stimulation, presents promising results. However, heterogeneity in animal study designs is a typical characteristic. Hence, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of LIPUS in the recovery of experimental bone defects using rat models. We examined the areal and volumetric BMD to identify LIPUS doses to be applied and evaluated the accuracy reported by previous studies.

METHODS

The Virtual Health Library regional portal, PubMed, Embase, EBSCOhost, Scopus and CAPES were reviewed for animal studies that compared fracture treatments based on LIPUS with sham or no treatments using rat models and reported BMD as an outcome. The tool provided by the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) and the Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies (CAMARADES) checklist were used to assess the bias and quality of such studies.

RESULTS

Of the six studies reviewed, the most frequently used LIPUS dose had an ultrasonic frequency of 1.0 MHz, repetition rate of 0.1 kHz and pulse duration of 2000 μs. An intensity (ISATA) of 30 mW/cm2 was the most preferred for bone recovery. However, the BMD could not solely irrefutably evaluate the effectiveness of LIPUS in bone recovery as the results were discordant with each other. The discrepancies in experimental methodologies, low-quality classifications and high risk of bias in the selected studies, however, did not validate the undertaking of a meta-analysis.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of the BMD results, no sufficient evidence was found to recommend the use of LIPUS for bone recovery in rat models. Thus, this systematic review indicates that the accuracy of such reports must be improved to improve their scientific quality to facilitate a transition of LIPUS applications from pre-clinical research to clinic use.

A buprenorphine depot formulation provides effective sustained post-surgical analgesia for 72 h in mouse femoral fracture models

Adequate pain management is essential for ethical and scientific reasons in animal experiments and should completely cover the period of expected pain without the need for frequent re-application. However, current depot formulations of Buprenorphine are only available in the USA and have limited duration of action. Recently, a new microparticulate Buprenorphine formulation (BUP-Depot) for sustained release has been developed as a potential future alternative to standard formulations available in Europe. Pharmacokinetics indicate a possible effectiveness for about 72 h. Here, we investigated whether the administration of the BUP-Depot ensures continuous and sufficient analgesia in two mouse fracture models (femoral osteotomy) and could, therefore, serve as a potent alternative to the application of Tramadol via the drinking water. Both protocols were examined for analgesic effectiveness, side effects on experimental readout, and effects on fracture healing outcomes in male and female C57BL/6N mice. The BUP-Depot provided effective analgesia for 72 h, comparable to the effectiveness of Tramadol in the drinking water. Fracture healing outcome was not different between analgesic regimes. The availability of a Buprenorphine depot formulation for rodents in Europe would be a beneficial addition for extended pain relief in mice, thereby increasing animal welfare.

A systematic review on the reporting quality in mouse telemetry implantation surgery using electrocardiogram recording devices

Telemetric monitoring is used in many scientific fields, such as cardiovascular research, neurology, endocrinology, animal welfare research and many more. Nowadays, implanted electrocardiogram (ECG) radiotelemetry units are the gold standard for monitoring ECG traces, heart rate and heart rate variability in freely moving mice. This technology can be a valuable tool when studies utilise it adequately, while also prioritizing animal welfare. Recently, concerns about the reproducibility of research findings have been raised in many scientific fields with insufficient reporting being one of the underlying causes. A systematic review was performed in three literature databases to include all published studies until 31.12.2019 using surgery that involves the placing of ECG recording telemetry devices in adult mice. Data extracted from the publications included selected items recommended by the ARRIVE guidelines and SYRCLE`s tool for assessing risk of bias. We focused on aspects related to quality of reporting, risk of bias reduction measures and ECG measurements characteristics. In general, the quality of reporting was low to moderate in the 234 analyzed publications regarding the animal, husbandry, statistics, and risk of bias related items, but good for more specific telemetry study characteristics. Based on our analyses we assume that there is no or only slight improvement in the reporting quality since 2010, when the ARRIVE guidelines were published.