The A12.2 Subunit Is an Intrinsic Destabilizer of the RNA Polymerase I Elongation Complex

NTPs compete in the active site of RNA polymerases I and II

Eukaryotes express at least three RNA polymerases (Pols) carry out transcription, while bacteria and archaea use only one. Using transient state kinetics, we have extensively examined and compared the kinetics of both single and multi-nucleotide additions catalyzed by the three Pols. In single nucleotide addition experiments we have observed unexpected extension products beyond one incorporation, which can be attributed to misincorporation, the presence of nearly undetectable amounts of contaminating NTPs, or a mixture of the two. Here we report the development and validation of an analysis strategy to account for the presence of unexpected extension products, when they occur. Using this approach, we uncovered evidence showing that non-cognate nucleotide, thermodynamically, competes with cognate nucleotide for the active site within the elongation complex of Pol I, ΔA12 Pol I, and Pol II. This observation is unexpected because base pairing interactions provide favorable energetics for selectivity and competitive binding indicates that the affinities of cognate and non-cognate nucleotides are within an order of magnitude. Thus, we show that application of our approach will allow for the extraction of additional information that reports on the energetics of nucleotide entry and selectivity.

Global kinetic mechanism describing single nucleotide incorporation for RNA polymerase I reveals fast UMP incorporation

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) is responsible for synthesizing ribosomal RNA, which is the rate limiting step in ribosome biogenesis. We have reported wide variability in the magnitude of the rate constants defining the rate limiting step in sequential nucleotide additions catalyzed by Pol I. in this study we sought to determine if base identity impacts the rate limiting step of nucleotide addition catalyzed by Pol I. To this end, we report a transient state kinetic interrogation of AMP, CMP, GMP, and UMP incorporations catalyzed by Pol I. We found that Pol I uses one kinetic mechanism to incorporate all nucleotides. However, we found that UMP incorporation is faster than AMP, CMP, and GMP additions. Further, we found that endonucleolytic removal of a dimer from the 3' end was fastest when the 3' terminal base is a UMP. It has been previously shown that both downstream and upstream template sequence identity impacts the kinetics of nucleotide addition. The results reported here show that the incoming base identity also impacts the magnitude of the observed rate limiting step.

Reversible Kinetics in Multi-nucleotide Addition Catalyzed by S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase II Reveal Slow Pyrophosphate Release

Eukaryotes express at least three nuclear DNA dependent RNA polymerases (Pols). Pols I, II, and III synthesize ribosomal (r) RNA, messenger (m) RNA, and transfer (t) RNA, respectively. Pol I and Pol III have intrinsic nuclease activity conferred by the A12.2 and C11 subunits, respectively. In contrast, Pol II requires the transcription factor (TF) IIS to confer robust nuclease activity. We recently reported that in the absence of the A12.2 subunit Pol I reverses bond formation by pyrophosphorolysis in the absence of added PPi, indicating slow PPi release. Thus, we hypothesized that Pol II, naturally lacking TFIIS, would reverse bond formation through pyrophosphorolysis. Here we report the results of transient-state kinetic experiments to examine the addition of nine nucleotides to a growing RNA chain catalyzed by Pol II. Our results indicate that Pol II reverses bond formation by pyrophosphorolysis in the absence of added PPi. We propose that, in the absence of endonuclease activity, this bond reversal may represent kinetic proofreading. Thus, given the hypothesis that Pol I evolved from Pol II through the incorporation of general transcription factors, pyrophosphorolysis may represent a more ancient form of proofreading that has been evolutionarily replaced with nuclease activity.

Transcription elongation mechanisms of RNA polymerases I, II, and III and their therapeutic implications

Transcription is a tightly regulated, complex, and essential cellular process in all living organisms. Transcription is comprised of three steps, transcription initiation, elongation, and termination. The distinct transcription initiation and termination mechanisms of eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III (Pols I, II, and III) have long been appreciated. Recent methodological advances have empowered high-resolution investigations of the Pols' transcription elongation mechanisms. Here, we review the kinetic similarities and differences in the individual steps of Pol I-, II-, and III-catalyzed transcription elongation, including NTP binding, bond formation, pyrophosphate release, and translocation. This review serves as an important summation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) Pol I, II, and III kinetic investigations which reveal that transcription elongation by the Pols is governed by distinct mechanisms. Further, these studies illustrate how basic, biochemical investigations of the Pols can empower the development of chemotherapeutic compounds.

Features of yeast RNA polymerase I with special consideration of the lobe binding subunits

Ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are structural components of ribosomes and represent the most abundant cellular RNA fraction. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, they account for more than 60 % of the RNA content in a growing cell. The major amount of rRNA is synthesized by RNA polymerase I (Pol I). This enzyme transcribes exclusively the rRNA gene which is tandemly repeated in about 150 copies on chromosome XII. The high number of transcribed rRNA genes, the efficient recruitment of the transcription machinery and the dense packaging of elongating Pol I molecules on the gene ensure that enough rRNA is generated. Specific features of Pol I and of associated factors confer promoter selectivity and both elongation and termination competence. Many excellent reviews exist about the state of research about function and regulation of Pol I and how Pol I initiation complexes are assembled. In this report we focus on the Pol I specific lobe binding subunits which support efficient, error-free, and correctly terminated rRNA synthesis.

The A12.2 Subunit Plays an Integral Role in Pyrophosphate Release of RNA Polymerase I

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) synthesizes ribosomal RNA (rRNA), which is the first and rate-limiting step in ribosome biosynthesis. A12.2 (A12) is a critical subunit of Pol I that is responsible for activating Pol I's exonuclease activity. We previously reported a kinetic mechanism for single-nucleotide incorporation catalyzed by Pol I lacking the A12 subunit (ΔA12 Pol I) purified from S. cerevisae and revealed that ΔA12 Pol I exhibited much slower incorporation compared to Pol I. However, it is unknown if A12 influences each nucleotide incorporation in the context of transcription elongation. Here, we show that A12 contributes to every repeating cycle of nucleotide addition and that deletion of A12 results in an entirely different kinetic mechanism compared to WT Pol I. We found that instead of one irreversible step between each nucleotide addition cycle, as reported for wild type (WT) Pol I, the ΔA12 variant requires one reversible step to describe each nucleotide addition. Reversibility fundamentally requires slow PPi release. Consistently, we show that Pol I is more pyrophosphate (PPi) concentration dependent than ΔA12 Pol I. This observation supports the model that PPi is retained in the active site of ΔA12 Pol I longer than WT Pol I. These results suggest that A12 promotes PPi release, revealing a larger role for the A12.2 subunit in the nucleotide addition cycle beyond merely activating exonuclease activity.

Expression of RNA polymerase I catalytic core is influenced by RPA12

RNA Polymerase I (Pol I) has recently been recognized as a cancer therapeutic target. The activity of this enzyme is essential for ribosome biogenesis and is universally activated in cancers. The enzymatic activity of this multi-subunit complex resides in its catalytic core composed of RPA194, RPA135, and RPA12, a subunit with functions in RNA cleavage, transcription initiation and elongation. Here we explore whether RPA12 influences the regulation of RPA194 in human cancer cells. We use a specific small-molecule Pol I inhibitor BMH-21 that inhibits transcription initiation, elongation and ultimately activates the degradation of Pol I catalytic subunit RPA194. We show that silencing RPA12 causes alterations in the expression and localization of Pol I subunits RPA194 and RPA135. Furthermore, we find that despite these alterations not only does the Pol I core complex between RPA194 and RPA135 remain intact upon RPA12 knockdown, but the transcription of Pol I and its engagement with chromatin remain unaffected. The BMH-21-mediated degradation of RPA194 was independent of RPA12 suggesting that RPA12 affects the basal expression, but not the drug-inducible turnover of RPA194. These studies add to knowledge defining regulatory factors for the expression of this Pol I catalytic subunit.

Transient-State Kinetic Analysis of the RNA Polymerase II Nucleotide Incorporation Mechanism

Eukaryotic RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is an essential enzyme that lies at the core of eukaryotic biology. Due to its pivotal role in gene expression, Pol II has been subjected to a substantial number of investigations. We aim to further our understanding of Pol II nucleotide incorporation by utilizing transient-state kinetic techniques to examine Pol II single nucleotide addition on the millisecond time scale. We analyzed Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pol II incorporation of ATP or an ATP analog, Sp-ATP-α-S. Here we have measured the rate constants governing individual steps of the Pol II transcription cycle in the presence of ATP or Sp-ATP-α-S. These results suggest that Pol II catalyzes nucleotide incorporation by binding the next cognate nucleotide and immediately catalyzes bond formation and bond formation is either followed by a conformational change or pyrophosphate release. By comparing our previously published RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and Pol I lacking the A12 subunit (Pol I ΔA12) results that we collected under the same conditions with the identical technique, we show that Pol II and Pol I ΔA12 exhibit similar nucleotide addition mechanisms. This observation indicates that removal of the A12 subunit from Pol I results in a Pol II like enzyme. Taken together, these data further our collective understanding of Pol II's nucleotide incorporation mechanism and the evolutionary divergence of RNA polymerases across the three domains of life.

Regulation of RNA Polymerase I Stability and Function

RNA polymerase I is a highly processive enzyme with fast initiation and elongation rates. The structure of Pol I, with its in-built RNA cleavage ability and incorporation of subunits homologous to transcription factors, enables it to quickly and efficiently synthesize the enormous amount of rRNA required for ribosome biogenesis. Each step of Pol I transcription is carefully controlled. However, cancers have highjacked these control points to switch the enzyme, and its transcription, on permanently. While this provides an exceptional benefit to cancer cells, it also creates a potential cancer therapeutic vulnerability. We review the current research on the regulation of Pol I transcription, and we discuss chemical biology efforts to develop new targeted agents against this process. Lastly, we highlight challenges that have arisen from the introduction of agents with promiscuous mechanisms of action and provide examples of agents with specificity and selectivity against Pol I.

Uncovering the mechanisms of transcription elongation by eukaryotic RNA polymerases I, II, and III

Eukaryotes express three nuclear RNA polymerases (Pols I, II, and III) that are essential for cell survival. Despite extensive investigation of the three Pols, significant knowledge gaps regarding their biochemical properties remain because each Pol has been evaluated independently under disparate experimental conditions and methodologies. To advance our understanding of the Pols, we employed identical in vitro transcription assays for direct comparison of their elongation rates, elongation complex (EC) stabilities, and fidelities. Pol I is the fastest, most likely to misincorporate, forms the least stable EC, and is most sensitive to alterations in reaction buffers. Pol II is the slowest of the Pols, forms the most stable EC, and negligibly misincorporated an incorrect nucleotide. The enzymatic properties of Pol III were intermediate between Pols I and II in all assays examined. These results reveal unique enzymatic characteristics of the Pols that provide new insights into their evolutionary divergence.

RNA Polymerase I Is Uniquely Vulnerable to the Small-Molecule Inhibitor BMH-21

Cancer cells require robust ribosome biogenesis to maintain rapid cell growth during tumorigenesis. Because RNA polymerase I (Pol I) transcription of the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is the first and rate-limiting step of ribosome biogenesis, it has emerged as a promising anti-cancer target. Over the last decade, novel cancer therapeutics targeting Pol I have progressed to clinical trials. BMH-21 is a first-in-class small molecule that inhibits Pol I transcription and represses cancer cell growth. Several recent studies have uncovered key mechanisms by which BMH-21 inhibits ribosome biosynthesis but the selectivity of BMH-21 for Pol I has not been directly measured. Here, we quantify the effects of BMH-21 on Pol I, RNA polymerase II (Pol II), and RNA polymerase III (Pol III) in vitro using purified components. We found that BMH-21 directly impairs nucleotide addition by Pol I, with no or modest effect on Pols II and III, respectively. Additionally, we found that BMH-21 does not affect the stability of any of the Pols' elongation complexes. These data demonstrate that BMH-21 directly exploits unique vulnerabilities of Pol I.

RNA polymerase I (Pol I) lobe-binding subunit Rpa12.2 promotes RNA cleavage and proofreading

Elongating nuclear RNA polymerases (Pols) frequently pause, backtrack, and are then reactivated by endonucleolytic cleavage. Pol backtracking and RNA cleavage are also crucial for proofreading, which contributes to transcription fidelity. RNA polymerase I (Pol I) of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae synthesizes exclusively 35S rRNA, the precursor transcript of mature ribosomal 5.8S, 18S, and 25S rRNA. Pol I contains the specific heterodimeric subunits Rpa34.5/49 and subunit Rpa12.2, which have been implicated in RNA cleavage and elongation activity, respectively. These subunits are associated with the Pol I lobe structure and encompass different structural domains, but the contribution of these domains to RNA elongation is unclear. Here, we used Pol I mutants or reconstituted Pol I enzymes to study the effects of these subunits and/or their distinct domains on RNA cleavage, backtracking, and transcription fidelity in defined in vitro systems. Our findings suggest that the presence of the intact C-terminal domain of Rpa12.2 is sufficient to support the cleavage reaction, but that the N-terminal domains of Rpa12.2 and the heterodimer facilitate backtracking and RNA cleavage. Since both N-terminal and C-terminal domains of Rpa12.2 were also required to faithfully incorporate NTPs in the growing RNA chain, efficient backtracking and RNA cleavage might be a prerequisite for transcription fidelity. We propose that RNA Pols containing efficient RNA cleavage activity are able to add and remove nucleotides until the matching nucleotide supports RNA chain elongation, whereas cleavage-deficient enzymes can escape this proofreading process by incorporating incorrect nucleotides.

Specialization of RNA Polymerase I in Comparison to Other Nuclear RNA Polymerases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In archaea and bacteria the major classes of RNAs are synthesized by one DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP). In contrast, most eukaryotes have three highly specialized RNAPs to transcribe the nuclear genome. RNAP I synthesizes almost exclusively ribosomal (r)RNA, RNAP II synthesizes mRNA as well as many noncoding RNAs involved in RNA processing or RNA silencing pathways and RNAP III synthesizes mainly tRNA and 5S rRNA. This review discusses functional differences of the three nuclear core RNAPs in the yeast S. cerevisiae with a particular focus on RNAP I transcription of nucleolar ribosomal (r)DNA chromatin.

Structure and function of the poxvirus transcription machinery

Members of the Poxviridae family are large double-stranded DNA viruses that replicate exclusively in the cytoplasm of their hosts. This goes in hand with a high level of independence from the host cell, which supports transcription and replication events only in the nucleus or in DNA-containing organelles. Consequently, virus specific, rather than cellular enzymes mediate most processes involving DNA replication and mRNA synthesis. Recent technological advances allowed a detailed functional and structural investigation of the transcription machinery of the prototypic poxvirus vaccinia. The DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) at its core displays distinct similarities to eukaryotic RNAPs. Strong idiosyncrasies, however, are apparent for viral factors that are associated with the viral RNAP during mRNA production. We expect that future studies will unravel more key aspects of poxvirus gene expression, helping also the understanding of nuclear transcription mechanisms.

Defining the Influence of the A12.2 Subunit on Transcription Elongation and Termination by RNA Polymerase I In Vivo

Saccharomyces cerevisiae has approximately 200 copies of the 35S rDNA gene, arranged tandemly on chromosome XII. This gene is transcribed by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and the 35S rRNA transcript is processed to produce three of the four rRNAs required for ribosome biogenesis. An intergenic spacer (IGS) separates each copy of the 35S gene and contains the 5S rDNA gene, the origin of DNA replication, and the promoter for the adjacent 35S gene. Pol I is a 14-subunit enzyme responsible for the majority of rRNA synthesis, thereby sustaining normal cellular function and growth. The A12.2 subunit of Pol I plays a crucial role in cleavage, termination, and nucleotide addition during transcription. Deletion of this subunit causes alteration of nucleotide addition kinetics and read-through of transcription termination sites. To interrogate both of these phenomena, we performed native elongating transcript sequencing (NET-seq) with an rpa12Δ strain of S. cerevisiae and evaluated the resultant change in Pol I occupancy across the 35S gene and the IGS. Compared to wild-type (WT), we observed template sequence-specific changes in Pol I occupancy throughout the 35S gene. We also observed rpa12Δ Pol I occupancy downstream of both termination sites and throughout most of the IGS, including the 5S gene. Relative occupancy of rpa12Δ Pol I increased upstream of the promoter-proximal Reb1 binding site and dropped significantly downstream, implicating this site as a third terminator for Pol I transcription. Collectively, these high-resolution results indicate that the A12.2 subunit of Pol I plays an important role in transcription elongation and termination.

Coupling Between Production of Ribosomal RNA and Maturation: Just at the Beginning

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) production represents the most active transcription in the cell. Synthesis of the large rRNA precursors (35S/47S in yeast/human) is achieved by up to hundreds of RNA polymerase I (Pol I) enzymes simultaneously transcribing a single rRNA gene. In this review, we present recent advances in understanding the coupling between rRNA production and nascent rRNA folding. Mapping of the distribution of Pol I along ribosomal DNA at nucleotide resolution, using either native elongating transcript sequencing (NET-Seq) or crosslinking and analysis of cDNAs (CRAC), revealed frequent Pol I pausing, and CRAC results revealed a direct coupling between pausing and nascent RNA folding. High density of Pol I per gene imposes topological constraints that establish a defined pattern of polymerase distribution along the gene, with a persistent spacing between transcribing enzymes. RNA folding during transcription directly acts as an anti-pausing mechanism, implying that proper folding of the nascent rRNA favors elongation in vivo. Defects in co-transcriptional folding of rRNA are likely to induce Pol I pausing. We propose that premature termination of transcription, at defined positions, can control rRNA production in vivo.

Transient-state kinetic analysis of multi-nucleotide addition catalyzed by RNA polymerase I

RNA polymerases execute the first step in gene expression: transcription of DNA into RNA. Eukaryotes, unlike prokaryotes, express at least three specialized nuclear multisubunit RNA polymerases (Pol I, Pol II, and Pol III). RNA polymerase I (Pol I) synthesizes the most abundant RNA, ribosomal RNA. Nearly 60% of total transcription is devoted to ribosomal RNA synthesis, making it one of the cell's most energy consuming tasks. While a kinetic mechanism for nucleotide addition catalyzed by Pol I has been reported, it remains unclear to what degree different nucleotide sequences impact the incorporation rate constants. Furthermore, it is currently unknown if the previous investigation of a single-nucleotide incorporation was sensitive to the translocation step. Here, we show that Pol I exhibits considerable variability in both k_max and K_1/2values using an in vitro multi-NTP incorporation assay measuring AMP and GMP incorporations. We found the first two observed nucleotide incorporations exhibited faster k_max-values (∼200 s^-1) compared with the remaining seven positions (∼60 s^-1). Additionally, the average K_1/2 for ATP incorporation was found to be approximately threefold higher compared with GTP, suggesting Pol I has a tighter affinity for GTP compared with ATP. Our results demonstrate that Pol I exhibits significant variability in the observed rate constant describing each nucleotide incorporation. Understanding of the differences between the Pol enzymes will provide insight on the evolutionary pressures that led to their specialized roles. Therefore, the findings resulting from this work are critically important for comparisons with other polymerases across all domains of life.

Multi-start Evolutionary Nonlinear OpTimizeR (MENOTR): A hybrid parameter optimization toolbox

Parameter optimization or "data fitting" is a computational process that identifies a set of parameter values that best describe an experimental data set. Parameter optimization is commonly carried out using a computer program utilizing a non-linear least squares (NLLS) algorithm. These algorithms work by continuously refining a user supplied initial guess resulting in a systematic increase in the goodness of fit. A well-understood problem with this class of algorithms is that in the case of models with correlated parameters the optimized output parameters are initial guess dependent. This dependency can potentially introduce user bias into the resultant analysis. While many optimization programs exist, few address this dilemma. Here we present a data analysis tool, MENOTR, that is capable of overcoming the initial guess dependence in parameter optimization. Several case studies with published experimental data are presented to demonstrate the capabilities of this tool. The results presented here demonstrate how to effectively overcome the initial guess dependence of NLLS leading to greater confidence that the resultant optimized parameters are the best possible set of parameters to describe an experimental data set. While the optimization strategies implemented within MENOTR are not entirely novel, the application of these strategies to optimize parameters in kinetic and thermodynamic biochemical models is uncommon. MENOTR was designed to require minimal modification to accommodate a new model making it immediately accessible to researchers with a limited programming background. We anticipate that this toolbox can be used in a wide variety of data analysis applications. Prototype versions of this toolbox have been used in a number of published investigations already, as well as ongoing work with chemical-quenched flow, stopped-flow, and molecular tweezers data sets. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Non-linear least squares (NLLS) is a common form of parameter optimization in biochemistry kinetic and thermodynamic investigations These algorithms are used to fit experimental data sets and report corresponding parameter values. The algorithms are fast and able to provide good quality solutions for models involving few parameters. However, initial guess dependence is a well-known drawback of this optimization strategy that can introduce user bias. An alternative method of parameter optimization are genetic algorithms (GA). Genetic algorithms do not have an initial guess dependence but are slow at arriving at the best set of fit parameters. Here, we present MENOTR, a parameter optimization toolbox utilizing a hybrid GA/NLLS algorithm. The toolbox maximizes the strength of each strategy while minimizing the inherent drawbacks.

The N-terminal domain of the A12.2 subunit stimulates RNA polymerase I transcription elongation

Eukaryotes express three DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (Pols) that are responsible for the entirety of cellular genomic expression. The three Pols have evolved to express specific cohorts of RNAs and thus have diverged both structurally and functionally to efficiently execute their specific transcriptional roles. One example of this divergence is Pol I's inclusion of a proofreading factor as a bona fide subunit, as opposed to Pol II, which recruits a transcription factor, TFIIS, for proofreading. The A12.2 (A12) subunit of Pol I shares homology with both the Rpb9 subunit of Pol II as well as the transcription factor TFIIS, which promotes RNA cleavage and proofreading by Pol II. In this study, the functional contribution of the TFIIS-like C-terminal domain and the Rpb9-like N-terminal domain of the A12 subunit are probed through mutational analysis. We found that a Pol I mutant lacking the C-terminal domain of the A12 subunit (ΔA12CTD Pol I) is slightly faster than wild-type Pol I in single-nucleotide addition, but ΔA12CTD Pol I lacks RNA cleavage activity. ΔA12CTD Pol I is likewise similar to wild-type Pol I in elongation complex stability, whereas removal of the entire A12 subunit (ΔA12 Pol I) was previously demonstrated to stabilize transcription elongation complexes. Furthermore, the ΔA12CTD Pol I is sensitive to downstream sequence context, as ΔA12CTD Pol I exposed to AT-rich downstream DNA is more arrest prone than ΔA12 Pol I. These data demonstrate that the N-terminal domain of A12 does not stimulate Pol I intrinsic RNA cleavage activity, but rather contributes to core transcription elongation properties of Pol I.

Defining the divergent enzymatic properties of RNA polymerases I and II

Eukaryotes express at least three nuclear DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (Pols) responsible for synthesizing all RNA required by the cell. Despite sharing structural homology, they have functionally diverged to suit their distinct cellular roles. Although the Pols have been studied extensively, direct comparison of their enzymatic properties is difficult because studies are often conducted under disparate experimental conditions and techniques. Here, we directly compare and reveal functional differences between Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pols I and II using a series of quantitative in vitro transcription assays. We find that Pol I single-nucleotide and multinucleotide addition rate constants are faster than those of Pol II. Pol I elongation complexes are less stable than Pol II elongation complexes, and Pol I is more error prone than Pol II. Collectively, these data show that the enzymatic properties of the Pols have diverged over the course of evolution, optimizing these enzymes for their unique cellular responsibilities.

Downstream sequence-dependent RNA cleavage and pausing by RNA polymerase I

The sequence of the DNA template has long been thought to influence the rate of transcription by DNA-dependent RNA polymerases, but the influence of DNA sequence on transcription elongation properties of eukaryotic RNA polymerase I (Pol I) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae has not been defined. In this study, we observe changes in dinucleotide production, transcription elongation complex stability, and Pol I pausing in vitro in response to downstream DNA. In vitro studies demonstrate that AT-rich downstream DNA enhances pausing by Pol I and inhibits Pol I nucleolytic cleavage activity. Analysis of Pol I native elongating transcript sequencing data in Saccharomyces cerevisiae suggests that these downstream sequence elements influence Pol I in vivo Native elongating transcript sequencing studies reveal that Pol I occupancy increases as downstream AT content increases and decreases as downstream GC content increases. Collectively, these data demonstrate that the downstream DNA sequence directly impacts the kinetics of transcription elongation prior to the sequence entering the active site of Pol I both in vivo and in vitro.

Coordinated Control of rRNA Processing by RNA Polymerase I

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) is co- and post-transcriptionally processed into active ribosomes. This process is dynamically regulated by direct covalent modifications of the polymerase that synthesizes the rRNA, RNA polymerase I (Pol I), and by interactions with cofactors that influence initiation, elongation, and termination activities of Pol I. The rate of transcription elongation by Pol I directly influences processing of nascent rRNA, and changes in Pol I transcription rate result in alternative rRNA processing events that lead to cellular signaling alterations and stress. It is clear that in divergent species, there exists robust organization of nascent rRNA processing events during transcription elongation. This review evaluates the current state of our understanding of the complex relationship between transcription elongation and rRNA processing.

The cryo-EM structure of a 12-subunit variant of RNA polymerase I reveals dissociation of the A49-A34.5 heterodimer and rearrangement of subunit A12.2

RNA polymerase (Pol) I is a 14-subunit enzyme that solely transcribes pre-ribosomal RNA. Cryo-electron microscopy (EM) structures of Pol I initiation and elongation complexes have given first insights into the molecular mechanisms of Pol I transcription. Here, we present cryo-EM structures of yeast Pol I elongation complexes (ECs) bound to the nucleotide analog GMPCPP at 3.2 to 3.4 Å resolution that provide additional insight into the functional interplay between the Pol I-specific transcription-like factors A49-A34.5 and A12.2. Strikingly, most of the nucleotide-bound ECs lack the A49-A34.5 heterodimer and adopt a Pol II-like conformation, in which the A12.2 C-terminal domain is bound in a previously unobserved position at the A135 surface. Our structural and biochemical data suggest a mechanism where reversible binding of the A49-A34.5 heterodimer could contribute to the regulation of Pol I transcription initiation and elongation.

RNA polymerase III subunits C37/53 modulate rU:dA hybrid 3' end dynamics during transcription termination

RNA polymerase (RNAP) III synthesizes tRNAs and other transcripts, and mutations to its subunits cause human disorders. The RNAP III subunit-heterodimer C37/53 functions in initiation, elongation and in termination-associated reinitiation with subunit C11. C37/53 is related to heterodimers associated with RNAPs I and II, and C11 is related to TFIIS and Rpa12.2, the active site RNA 3' cleavage factors for RNAPs II and I. Critical to termination is stability of the RNA:DNA hybrid bound in the active center, which is loose for RNAP III relative to other RNAPs. Here, we examined RNAP III lacking C37/53/C11 and various reconstituted forms during termination. First, we established a minimal terminator as 5T and 3A on the non-template and template DNA strands, respectively. We demonstrate that C11 stimulates termination, and does so independently of its RNA cleavage activity. We found that C37/53 sensitizes RNAP III termination to RNA:DNA hybrid strength and promotes RNA 3' end pairing/annealing with the template. The latter counteracts C11-insensitive arrest in the proximal part of the oligo(T)-tract, promoting oligo(rU:dA) extension toward greater hybrid instability and RNA release. The data also indicate that RNA 3' end engagement with the active site is a determinant of termination. Broader implications are also discussed.