Early clinical features and diagnosis of Dravet syndrome in 138 Chinese patients with SCN1A mutations

[An adult case of Dravet syndrome in which seizures worsened after discontinuation of lamotrigine and administration of stiripentol]

The patient was a 21-year-old female. She had frequently had status seizures when she had a fever or while taking a bath since she was 6 months old. At 1 year and 8 months old, she developed epilepsy. She was treated with multiple antiepileptic drugs, but her condition was intractable. At the age of 3, the patient suffered from acute encephalopathy, which was complicated by severe psychomotor developmental retardation. Tonic seizures continued to occur on a daily basis even after school age, but they did not worsen even during periods of fever, and the patient was not hospitalized until the age of 8. At the age of 19, the diagnosis was revised and Dravet syndrome was diagnosed. Lamotrigine, which had been taken at the time of diagnosis, was discontinued and stiripentol was administered, but the seizure frequency worsened. Because of the pathology of Dravet syndrome in adults may differ from that in children, care must be taken when selecting antiepileptic drugs.

SCN1A Channels a Wide Range of Epileptic Phenotypes: Report of Novel and Known Variants with Variable Presentations

SCN1A, the gene encoding for the Nav1.1 channel, exhibits dominant interneuron-specific expression, whereby variants disrupting the channel's function affect the initiation and propagation of action potentials and neuronal excitability causing various types of epilepsy. Dravet syndrome (DS), the first described clinical presentation of SCN1A channelopathy, is characterized by severe myoclonic epilepsy in infancy (SMEI). Variants' characteristics and other genetic or epigenetic factors lead to extreme clinical heterogeneity, ranging from non-epileptic conditions to developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). This current study reports on findings from 343 patients referred by physicians in hospitals and tertiary care centers in Greece between 2017 and 2023. Positive family history for specific neurologic disorders was disclosed in 89 cases and the one common clinical feature was the onset of seizures, at a mean age of 17 months (range from birth to 15 years old). Most patients were specifically referred for SCN1A investigation (Sanger Sequencing and MLPA) and only five for next generation sequencing. Twenty-six SCN1A variants were detected, including nine novel causative variants (c.4567A>Τ, c.5564C>A, c.2176+2T>C, c.3646G>C, c.4331C>A, c.1130_1131delGAinsAC, c.1574_1580delCTGAGGA, c.4620A>G and c.5462A>C), and are herein presented, along with subsequent genotype-phenotype associations. The identification of novel variants complements SCN1A databases extending our expertise on genetic counseling and patient and family management including gene-based personalized interventions.

SCN1A-Characterization of the Gene's Variants in the Polish Cohort of Patients with Dravet Syndrome: One Center Experience

The aim of this study was to characterize the genotype and phenotype heterogeneity of patients with SCN1A gene mutations in the Polish population, fulfilling the criteria for the diagnosis of Dravet syndrome (DRVT). Particularly important was the analysis of the clinical course, the type of epileptic seizures and the co-occurrence of additional features such as intellectual disability, autism or neurological symptoms such as ataxia or gait disturbances. Based on their results and the available literature, the authors discuss potential predictors for DRVT. Identifying these early symptoms has important clinical significance, affecting the course and disease prognosis. 50 patients of the Pediatric Neurology Clinic of the Institute of Mother and Child in Warsaw clinically diagnosed with DRVT and carriers of SCN1A pathogenic variants were included. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from caregivers and available medical records. Patients in the study group did not differ significantly in parameters such as type of first seizure and typical epileptic seizures from those described in other studies. The age of onset of the first epileptic seizure was 2-9 months. The co-occurrence of intellectual disability was confirmed in 71% of patients and autism in 18%. The study did not show a correlation between genotype and phenotype, considering the severity of the disease course, clinical symptoms, response to treatment, the presence of intellectual disability, autism symptoms or ataxia. From the clinical course, a significant problem was the differentiation between complex febrile convulsions and symptoms of DRVT. The authors suggest that parameters such as the age of the first seizure, less than one year of age, the onset of a seizure up to 72 h after vaccination and the presence of more than two features of complex febrile seizures are more typical of DRVT, which should translate into adequate diagnostic and clinical management. The substantial decrease in the age of genetic verification of the diagnosis, as well as the decline in the use of sodium channel inhibitors, underscores the growing attention of pediatric neurologists in Poland to the diagnosis of DRVT.

Integrating Proteomics and Transcriptomics Reveals the Potential Pathways of Hippocampal Neuron Apoptosis in Dravet Syndrome Model Mice

An important component contributing to the onset of epilepsy is the death of hippocampal neurons. Several studies have shown that Dravet syndrome model mice: Scn1a KO mice have a high number of apoptotic neurons following seizures, but the precise mechanism underlying this remains unclear. The aim of this research was to elucidate the potential molecular mechanism of neuronal apoptosis in Scn1a KO mice by integrating proteomics and transcriptomics, with the ultimate goal of offering better neuroprotection. We found that apoptotic processes were enriched in both proteomic and transcriptomic GO analyses, and KEGG results also indicated that differential proteins and genes play a role in neurotransmission, the cell cycle, apoptosis, and neuroinflammation. Then, we examined the upstream and downstream KGML interactions of the pathways to determine the relationship between the two omics, and we found that the HIF-1 signaling pathway plays a significant role in the onset and apoptosis of epilepsy. Meanwhile, the expression of the apoptosis-related protein VHL decreased in this pathway, and the expression of p21 was upregulated. Therefore, this study suggests that VHL/HIF-1α/p21 might be involved in the apoptosis of hippocampal neurons in Scn1a KO mice.

Prediction of molecular phenotypes for novel SCN1A variants from a Turkish genetic epilepsy syndromes cohort and report of two new patients with recessive Dravet syndrome

Dravet syndrome and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) are both epilepsy syndromes that can be attributed to deleterious mutations occurring in SCN1A, the gene encoding the pore-forming α-subunit of the NaV 1.1 voltage-gated sodium channel predominantly expressed in the central nervous system. In this research endeavor, our goal is to expand our prior cohort of Turkish patients affected by SCN1A-positive genetic epilepsy disorders. This will be accomplished by incorporating two recently discovered and infrequent index cases who possess a novel biallelic (homozygous) SCN1A missense variant, namely E158G, associated with Dravet syndrome. Furthermore, our intention is to use computational techniques to predict the molecular phenotypes of each distinct SCN1A variant that has been detected to date within our center. The correlation between genotype and phenotype in Dravet syndrome/GEFS+ is intricate and necessitates meticulous clinical investigation as well as advanced scientific exploration. Broadened mechanistic and structural insights into NaV 1.1 dysfunction offer significant promise in facilitating the development of targeted and effective therapies, which will ultimately enhance clinical outcomes in the treatment of epilepsy.

Clinical and Genetic Features of Dravet Syndrome: A Prime Example of the Role of Precision Medicine in Genetic Epilepsy

Dravet syndrome (DS), also known as severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy, is a rare and drug-resistant form of developmental and epileptic encephalopathies, which is both debilitating and challenging to manage, typically arising during the first year of life, with seizures often triggered by fever, infections, or vaccinations. It is characterized by frequent and prolonged seizures, developmental delays, and various other neurological and behavioral impairments. Most cases result from pathogenic mutations in the sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 1 (SCN1A) gene, which encodes a critical voltage-gated sodium channel subunit involved in neuronal excitability. Precision medicine offers significant potential for improving DS diagnosis and treatment. Early genetic testing enables timely and accurate diagnosis. Advances in our understanding of DS's underlying genetic mechanisms and neurobiology have enabled the development of targeted therapies, such as gene therapy, offering more effective and less invasive treatment options for patients with DS. Targeted and gene therapies provide hope for more effective and personalized treatments. However, research into novel approaches remains in its early stages, and their clinical application remains to be seen. This review addresses the current understanding of clinical DS features, genetic involvement in DS development, and outcomes of novel DS therapies.

A novel rat model of Dravet syndrome recapitulates clinical hallmarks

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a debilitating infantile epileptic encephalopathy characterized by seizures induced by high body temperature (hyperthermia), sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), cognitive impairment, and behavioral disturbances. The most common cause of DS is haploinsufficiency of the SCN1A gene, which encodes the voltage-gated sodium channel Nav_1.1. In current mouse models of DS, the epileptic phenotype is strictly dependent on the genetic background and most mouse models exhibit drastically higher SUDEP rates than patients. Therefore, we sought to develop an alternative animal model for DS. Here, we report the generation and characterization of a Scn1a halploinsufficiency rat model of DS by disrupting the Scn1a allele. Scn1a^+/- rats show reduced Scn1a expression in the cerebral cortex, hippocampus and thalamus. Homozygous null rats die prematurely. Heterozygous animals are highly susceptible to heat-induced seizures, the clinical hallmark of DS, but are otherwise normal in survival, growth, and behavior without seizure induction. Hyperthermia-induced seizures activate distinct sets of neurons in the hippocampus and hypothalamus in Scn1a^+/- rats. Electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings in Scn1a^+/- rats reveal characteristic ictal EEG with high amplitude bursts with significantly increased delta and theta power. After the initial hyperthermia-induced seizures, non-convulsive, and convulsive seizures occur spontaneously in Scn1a^+/- rats. In conclusion, we generate a Scn1a haploinsufficiency rat model with phenotypes closely resembling DS, providing a unique platform for establishing therapies for DS.

Gain of function SCN1A disease-causing variants: Expanding the phenotypic spectrum and functional studies guiding the choice of effective antiseizure medication

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to refine the spectrum of SCN1A epileptic disorders other than Dravet syndrome (DS) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+) and optimize antiseizure management by correlating phenotype-genotype relationship and functional consequences of SCN1A variants in a cohort of patients.

METHODS

Sixteen probands carrying SCN1A pathogenic variants were ascertained via a national collaborative network. We also performed a literature review including individuals with SCN1A variants causing non-DS and non-GEFS+ phenotypes and compared the features of the two cohorts. Whole cell patch clamp experiments were performed for three representative SCN1A pathogenic variants.

RESULTS

Nine of the 16 probands (56%) had de novo pathogenic variants causing developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) with seizure onset at a median age of 2 months and severe intellectual disability. Seven of the 16 probands (54%), five with inherited and two with de novo variants, manifested focal epilepsies with mild or no intellectual disability. Sodium channel blockers never worsened seizures, and 50% of patients experienced long periods of seizure freedom. We found 13 SCN1A missense variants; eight of them were novel and never reported. Functional studies of three representative variants showed a gain of channel function. The literature review led to the identification of 44 individuals with SCN1A variants and non-DS, non-GEFS+ phenotypes. The comparison with our cohort highlighted that DEE phenotypes are a common feature.

SIGNIFICANCE

The boundaries of SCN1A disorders are wide and still expanding. In our cohort, >50% of patients manifested focal epilepsies, which are thus a frequent feature of SCN1A pathogenic variants beyond DS and GEFS+. SCN1A testing should therefore be included in the diagnostic workup of pediatric, familial and nonfamilial, focal epilepsies. Alternatively, non-DS/non-GEFS+ phenotypes might be associated with gain of channel function, and sodium channel blockers could control seizures by counteracting excessive channel function. Functional analysis evaluating the consequences of pathogenic SCN1A variants is thus relevant to tailor the appropriate antiseizure medication.

Gene mutations in comorbidity of epilepsy and arrhythmia

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the most severe outcome of refractory epilepsy. Arrhythmia is one of the heterogeneous factors in the pathophysiological mechanism of SUDEP with a high incidence in patients with refractory epilepsy, increasing the risk of premature death. The gene co-expressed in the brain and heart is supposed to be the genetic basis between epilepsy and arrhythmia, among which the gene encoding ion channel contributes to the prevalence of "cardiocerebral channelopathy" theory. Nevertheless, this theory could only explain the molecular mechanism of comorbid arrhythmia in part of patients with epilepsy (PWE). Therefore, we summarized the mutant genes that can induce comorbidity of epilepsy and arrhythmia and the possible corresponding treatments. These variants involved the genes encoding sodium, potassium, calcium and HCN channels, as well as some non-ion channel coding genes such as CHD4, PKP2, FHF1, GNB5, and mitochondrial genes. The relationship between genotype and clinical phenotype was not simple linear. Indeed, genes co-expressed in the brain and heart could independently induce epilepsy and/or arrhythmia. Mutant genes in brain could affect cardiac rhythm through central or peripheral regulation, while in the heart it could also affect cerebral electrical activity by changing the hemodynamics or internal environment. Analysis of mutations in comorbidity of epilepsy and arrhythmia could refine and expand the theory of "cardiocerebral channelopathy" and provide new insights for risk stratification of premature death and corresponding precision therapy in PWE.

The serine hydrolase ABHD6 controls survival and thermally induced seizures in a mouse model of Dravet syndrome

Evidence suggests that inhibition of α/β hydrolase-domain containing 6 (ABHD6) reduces seizures; however, the molecular mechanism of this therapeutic response remains unknown. We discovered that heterozygous expression of Abhd6 (Abhd6^+/-) significantly reduced the premature lethality of Scn1a^+/- mouse pups, a genetic mouse model of Dravet Syndrome (DS). Both Abhd6^+/- mutation and pharmacological inhibition of ABHD6 reduced the duration and incidence of thermally induced seizures in Scn1a^+/- pups. Mechanistically, the in vivo anti-seizure response resulting from ABHD6 inhibition is mediated by potentiation of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors Type-A (GABA_AR). Brain slice electrophysiology showed that blocking ABHD6 potentiates extrasynaptic (tonic) GABA_AR currents that reduce dentate granule cell excitatory output without affecting synaptic (phasic) GABA_AR currents. Our results unravel an unexpected mechanistic link between ABHD6 activity and extrasynaptic GABA_AR currents that controls hippocampal hyperexcitability in a genetic mouse model of DS. BRIEF SUMMARY: This study provides the first evidence for a mechanistic link between ABHD6 activity and the control of extrasynaptic GABA_AR currents that controls hippocampal hyperexcitability in a genetic mouse model of Dravet Syndrome and can be targeted to dampened seizures.

Dravet syndrome and hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome associated with an intronic deletion of SCN1A

OBJECTIVE

Hemorrhagic shock and encephalopathy syndrome (HSES) is a serious condition that requires intensive care and is associated with a high mortality rate. However, its pathogenesis remains unclear. In the present study, a genetic analysis was performed to determine the genetic background of patients with clinically suspected Dravet syndrome (DS) who developed HSES.

METHODS

Whole exome sequencing was performed, followed by minigene analysis of the intron variant detected by whole exome sequencing to confirm its effect on splicing.

RESULTS

Whole exome sequencing revealed a novel 21-bp deletion in intron 3 of SCN1A NM_001165963.4 (NC_000002.11:g.166073675_166073695del). This deletion was not found in the patient's parents and was proven to be de novo. Minigene analysis revealed an aberrant mRNA lacking 40 and 106 bp from the 5' end of exon 4 of SCN1A. Therefore, we diagnosed this case as DS due to the deletion in intron 3 of SCN1A.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a case of DS with HSES caused by a 21-bp deletion in the intron of SCN1A that was confirmed by minigene analysis. The present case met Levin's criteria for HSES and the splicing analysis of SCN1A is an important finding. This study has important implications for understanding HSES pathogenesis.

The clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of Dravet syndrome - A systematic literature review

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with evolving disease course as individuals age. In recent years, the treatment landscape of DS has changed considerably, and a comprehensive systematic review of the contemporary literature is lacking. Here we synthesized published evidence on the occurrence of clinical impacts by age, the economic and humanistic (health-related quality-of-life [HRQoL]) burden, and health state utility. We provide an evidence-based, contemporary visualization of the clinical manifestations, highlighting that DS is not limited to seizures; non-seizure manifestations appear early in life and increase over time, contributing significantly to the economic and humanistic burden of disease. The primary drivers of HRQoL in DS include seizure severity, cognition, and motor and behavioral problems; in turn, these directly affect caregivers through the extent of assistance required and consequent impact on activities of daily living. Unsurprisingly, costs are driven by seizure-related events, hospitalizations, and in-home medical care visits. This systematic review highlights a paucity of longitudinal data; most studies meeting inclusion criteria were cross-sectional or had short follow-up. Nonetheless, available data illustrate the substantial impact on individuals, their families, and healthcare systems and establish the need for novel therapies to address the complex spectrum of DS manifestations.

The Role of Focal Epilepsy Features in Defining SCN1A Mutation-positive Dravet Syndrome as Generalized and Focal Epilepsy

Background and Purpose

This study was aimed to describe focal epilepsy features of SCN1A mutation-positive Dravet syndrome patients.

Methods

A total of 82 SCN1A mutation-positive patients were reviewed retrospectively (39 boys and 43 girls). Seizure type and electroencephalography (EEG) findings were investigated according to the stage, disease onset, and steady state (after age 2 years). Long-term video EEG data were used to classify the seizure type.

Results

Focal seizures at onset and the steady state were found in 54.9% (45/82) and 90% (63/70) of patients, respectively. Afebrile focal seizures were an initial seizure in about one fourth of the patients (22/82, 26.8%). Of 48 seizures captured during long-term video EEG monitoring of 30 patients, 19 seizures were classified as focal onset (39.6%). Of the 19 focal seizures, 12 were either focal motor or focal non-motor seizures, and seven were focal onset bilateral tonic-clonic seizure. Focal epileptiform discharges were more frequent than generalized epileptiform discharges at seizure onset and during the clinical course on conventional EEG (3.7% vs. 0%, 52.9% vs. 32.9%, respectively).

Conclusions

Our study provides a comprehensive description of focal epilepsy features of SCN1A mutation-positive Dravet syndrome patients. Recognizing these features as defining the clinical spectrum of Dravet syndrome may lead to earlier genetic diagnosis and tailored management.

SCN1A Mutation-Beyond Dravet Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Background: SCN1A is one of the most common epilepsy genes. About 80% of SCN1A gene mutations cause Dravet syndrome (DS), which is a severe and catastrophic epileptic encephalopathy. More than 1,800 mutations have been identified in SCN1A. Although it is known that SCN1A is the main cause of DS and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+), there is a dearth of information on the other related diseases caused by mutations of SCN1A. Objective: The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature associated with SCN1A and other non-DS-related disorders. Methods: We searched PubMed and SCOPUS for all the published cases related to gene mutations of SCN1A until October 20, 2021. The results reported by each study were summarized narratively. Results: The PubMed and SCOPUS search yielded 2,889 items. A total of 453 studies published between 2005 and 2020 met the final inclusion criteria. Overall, 303 studies on DS, 93 on GEFS+, three on Doose syndrome, nine on the epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures (EIMFS), six on the West syndrome, two on the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS), one on the Rett syndrome, seven on the nonsyndromic epileptic encephalopathy (NEE), 19 on hemiplegia migraine, six on autism spectrum disorder (ASD), two on nonepileptic SCN1A-related sudden deaths, and two on the arthrogryposis multiplex congenital were included. Conclusion: Aside from DS, SCN1A also causes other epileptic encephalopathies, such as GEFS+, Doose syndrome, EIMFS, West syndrome, LGS, Rett syndrome, and NEE. In addition to epilepsy, hemiplegic migraine, ASD, sudden death, and arthrogryposis multiplex congenital can also be caused by mutations of SCN1A.

The relation of etiology based on the 2017 ILAE classification to the effectiveness of the ketogenic diet in drug-resistant epilepsy in childhood

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of the ketogenic diet (KD) in drug‐resistant epilepsy in childhood in relation to the new 2017 International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification of etiology.

Methods

A consecutive cohort of patients treated with the KD were categorized according to the ILAE classification into known (structural, genetic, metabolic, infectious, and immune‐mediated) and unknown etiology. Primary outcome was the frequency of patients achieving seizure freedom with the KD at 3 months, secondary outcomes were seizure reduction >50% at 3 months, and both seizure freedom and seizure reduction >50% at 6, 12 months, and at last follow‐up (LFU), and adverse effects. Outcomes were compared between etiology groups.

Results

Etiology was known in 70% (129/183). Outcomes did not differ at 3 months (known vs unknown: seizure freedom 28% vs 33%, seizure reduction 62 vs 67%), but seizure freedom was significantly less frequent in known etiology at 6 months (26% vs 43%) and beyond (22% vs 37%). Logistic regression identified duration of epilepsy, number of previous antiseizure medications (ASMs), and age‐appropriate psychomotor development as positive determinants of outcome. Among individual etiology groups, the effectiveness of KD was relatively best for genetic (33% at LFU) and poorest for metabolic etiology (8% at LFU). The small number of patients with infectious and immune‐mediated etiology requires larger numbers in each etiology group to corroborate our results. No differences in type and frequency of adverse effects (in 71%) between etiology groups were observed, requiring medical intervention in 21%.

Significance

The KD was most effective in genetic and unknown etiology, many unknowns probably represent yet unidentified genetic causes. We recommend consequent diagnostic and genetic work‐up to identify etiologies that respond best to the KD. The KD should be offered early to infants with genetic epilepsy before deterioration of epileptic symptoms and of psychomotor development.

The impact of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Dravet syndrome: A UK survey

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the urgent need for accelerated vaccine development. Approved vaccines have proved to be safe and well tolerated across millions of people in the general population. Dravet syndrome (DS) is a severe, early onset, developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Vaccination is a precipitating factor for seizures. While there is no evidence that vaccine-precipitated seizures lead to adverse outcomes in people with DS, fear surrounding vaccination can remain for caregivers of people with DS, in some cases resulting in rejection of recommended vaccinations, leaving individuals more vulnerable to the relevant infections. A greater understanding of the safety profile of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in this vulnerable group will help provide guidance for caregivers and clinicians when considering vaccination.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey regarding COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, in people with DS, was conducted by Dravet Syndrome UK (DSUK). Concomitantly, a review of individuals with DS who had recently received the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and who are resident at the Chalfont Centre for Epilepsy (CCE), or attend epilepsy clinics at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (NHNN), was undertaken.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight people completed the DSUK survey. Thirty-seven percent of caregivers reported being concerned about someone with DS receiving the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; with some reporting that they would decline a vaccine when offered. Seventy-seven percent had not received any advice from a healthcare professional about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. 18/38 were eligible for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, of whom nine had received their first vaccine dose. Combining the results of the DSUK survey and the review of individuals monitored at CCE or NHNN, fifteen people with DS had received their first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. 11/15 (73%) reported at least one side effect, the most common being fatigue (6/15; 40%) and fever (6/15; 40%). Three individuals (20%) reported an increase in seizure frequency after the first vaccine dose. No increase in seizure frequency or duration was reported after the second dose.

CONCLUSION

Overall, these results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are safe and well tolerated in individuals with DS, as they are in most people without DS. In most people with DS, SARS-CoV-2 vaccine does not appear to be associated with an increase in the frequency or duration of seizures, even in those who develop fever post-vaccination. Many caregivers are concerned about a person with DS receiving a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, with some reporting that they would decline a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine when offered. It is crucial that healthcare professionals are proactive in providing accurate information regarding the risks and benefits of vaccination in this population, given the potential for serious outcomes from infection.

Defining Dravet syndrome: An essential pre-requisite for precision medicine trials

OBJECTIVE

The classical description of Dravet syndrome, the prototypic developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, is of a normal 6-month-old infant presenting with a prolonged, febrile, hemiclonic seizure and showing developmental slowing after age 1 year. SCN1A pathogenic variants are found in >80% of patients. Many patients have atypical features resulting in diagnostic delay and inappropriate therapy. We aimed to provide an evidence-based definition of SCN1A-Dravet syndrome in readiness for precision medicine trials.

METHODS

Epilepsy patients were recruited to the University of Melbourne Epilepsy Genetics Research Program between 1995 and 2020 by neurologists from around the world. Patients with SCN1A pathogenic variants were reviewed and only those with Dravet syndrome were included. Clinical data, including seizure and developmental course, were analyzed in all patients with SCN1A-Dravet syndrome.

RESULTS

Two hundred and five patients were studied at a median age of 8.5 years (range 10 months to 60 years); 25 were deceased. The median seizure-onset age was 5.7 months (range 1.5-20.6 months). Initial seizures were tonic-clonic (52%) and hemiclonic (35%), with only 55% being associated with fever. Only 34% of patients presented with status epilepticus (seizure lasting ≥30 minutes). Median time between first and second seizure was 30 days (range 4 hours to 8 months), and seven patients (5%) had at least 6 months between initial seizures. Median ages at onset of second and third seizure types were 9.1 months (range 3 months-25.4 years) and 15.5 months (range 4 months-8.2 years), respectively. Developmental slowing occurred prior to 12 months in 27%.

SIGNIFICANCE

An evidence-based definition of SCN1A-Dravet syndrome is essential for early diagnosis. We refine the spectrum of Dravet syndrome, based on patterns of seizure onset, type, and progression. Understanding of the full spectrum of SCN1A-Dravet syndrome presentation is essential for early diagnosis and optimization of treatment, especially as precision medicine trials become available.

[Early identification and diagnosis of epilepsy related to fever sensitivity]

Febrile seizures are the most common nervous system disease in childhood, and most children have a good prognosis. However, some epilepsy cases are easily induced by fever and are characterized by "fever sensitivity", and it is difficult to differentiate such cases from febrile seizures. Epilepsy related to fever sensitivity includes hereditary epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, Dravet syndrome, and PCDH19 gene-related epilepsy. This article mainly describes the clinical manifestations of these three types of epilepsy and summarizes their clinical features in the early stage of disease onset, so as to achieve early identification, early diagnosis, and early intervention to improve prognosis.

Mutations in the sodium channel genes SCN1A, SCN3A, and SCN9A in children with epilepsy with febrile seizures plus(EFS+)

PURPOSE

To explore disease-causing gene mutations of epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (EFS+) in Southern Chinese Han population.

METHODS

Blood samples and clinical data were collected from 49 Southern Han Chinese patients with EFS+. Gene screening was performed using whole-exome sequencing and panel sequencing for 485 epilepsy-related genes. The pathogenicity of variants was evaluated based on ACMG scoring and assessment of clinical concordance.

RESULTS

We identified 10 putatively causative sodium channel gene variants in 49 patients with EFS+, including 8 variants in SCN1A (R500Q appeared twice), one in SCN3A and one in SCN9A. All these missense mutations were inherited from maternal or paternal and were evaluated to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG. The clinical features of patients were in concordance with the EFS+ phenotype of the mutated SCN1A, SCN3A and SCN9A gene. The clinical phenotypes of 11 probands with these gene variants included febrile seizures plus (FS+, n=7), Dravet Syndrome (n=3), FS+ with focal seizures (n=1). Three probands with SCN1A variants (R500Q located in the non-voltage areas, or G1711D in the pore-forming domain) developed severe Dravet syndrome. The affected individuals with the other 6 SCN1A variants located outside the pore-forming domain showed mild phenotypes. Novel SCN3A variant ((D1688Y) and SCN9A variant (R185H) were identified in two probands respectively and both of the probands had FS+.

CONCLUSION

The SCN1A, SCN3A, and SCN9A gene mutations might be a pathogenic cause of EFS+ in Southern Chinese Han population.

Impact of predictive, preventive and precision medicine strategies in epilepsy

Over the last decade, advances in genetics, neuroimaging and EEG have enabled the aetiology of epilepsy to be identified earlier in the disease course than ever before. At the same time, progress in the study of experimental models of epilepsy has provided a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the condition and has enabled the identification of therapies that target specific aetiologies. We are now witnessing the impact of these advances in our daily clinical practice. Thus, now is the time for a paradigm shift in epilepsy treatment from a reactive attitude, treating patients after the onset of epilepsy and the initiation of seizures, to a proactive attitude that is more broadly integrated into a 'P4 medicine' approach. This P4 approach, which is personalized, predictive, preventive and participatory, puts patients at the centre of their own care and, ultimately, aims to prevent the onset of epilepsy. This aim will be achieved by adapting epilepsy treatments not only to a given syndrome but also to a given patient and moving from the usual anti-seizure treatments to personalized treatments designed to target specific aetiologies. In this Review, we present the current state of this ongoing revolution, emphasizing the impact on clinical practice.

Epilepsy-Related Voltage-Gated Sodium Channelopathies: A Review

Epilepsy is a disease characterized by abnormal brain activity and a predisposition to generate epileptic seizures, leading to neurobiological, cognitive, psychological, social, and economic impacts for the patient. There are several known causes for epilepsy; one of them is the malfunction of ion channels, resulting from mutations. Voltage-gated sodium channels (NaV) play an essential role in the generation and propagation of action potential, and malfunction caused by mutations can induce irregular neuronal activity. That said, several genetic variations in NaV channels have been described and associated with epilepsy. These mutations can affect channel kinetics, modifying channel activation, inactivation, recovery from inactivation, and/or the current window. Among the NaV subtypes related to epilepsy, NaV1.1 is doubtless the most relevant, with more than 1500 mutations described. Truncation and missense mutations are the most observed alterations. In addition, several studies have already related mutated NaV channels with the electrophysiological functioning of the channel, aiming to correlate with the epilepsy phenotype. The present review provides an overview of studies on epilepsy-associated mutated human NaV1.1, NaV1.2, NaV1.3, NaV1.6, and NaV1.7.

Receptors and Channels Possibly Mediating the Effects of Phytocannabinoids on Seizures and Epilepsy

Epilepsy contributes to approximately 1% of the global disease burden. By affecting especially young children as well as older persons of all social and racial variety, epilepsy is a present disorder worldwide. Currently, only 65% of epileptic patients can be successfully treated with antiepileptic drugs. For this reason, alternative medicine receives more attention. Cannabis has been cultivated for over 6000 years to treat pain and insomnia and used since the 19th century to suppress epileptic seizures. The two best described phytocannabinoids, (−)-trans-Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) are claimed to have positive effects on different neurological as well as neurodegenerative diseases, including epilepsy. There are different cannabinoids which act through different types of receptors and channels, including the cannabinoid receptor 1 and 2 (CB₁, CB₂), G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) and 18 (GPR18), opioid receptor µ and δ, transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) and 2 (TRPV2), type A γ-aminobutyric acid receptor (GABA_AR) and voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC). The mechanisms and importance of the interaction between phytocannabinoids and their different sites of action regarding epileptic seizures and their clinical value are described in this review.

Recent advances in treatment of epilepsy-related sodium channelopathies

Voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) play a crucial role in generation of action potentials. Pathogenic variants in the five human brain expressed VGSC genes, SCN1A, SCN2A, SCN3A, SCN8A and SCN1B have been associated with a spectrum of epilepsy phenotypes and neurodevelopmental disorders. In the last decade, next generation sequencing techniques have revolutionized the way we diagnose these channelopathies, which is paving the way towards precision medicine. Knowing the functional effect (Loss-of-function versus Gain-of-function) of a variant is not only important for understanding the underlying pathophysiology, but it is particularly crucial to orient therapeutic decisions. Here we provide a review of the literature dealing with treatment options in epilepsy-related sodium channelopathies, including the current and emerging medications.

Seizure-precipitating factors in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy

Background

Stress, sleep deprivation, and infectious diseases are important seizure‐precipitating factors in human epilepsy patients. However, these factors have not been thoroughly studied in epileptic dogs.

Objective

Seizure‐precipitating factors are common in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy and the occurrence of these factors associate with the dogs' signalment, personality, and epilepsy‐related factors.

Animals

Fifty dogs with diagnosed idiopathic epilepsy from the hospital populations of University Veterinary Teaching Hospital of University of Helsinki and Referral Animal Hospital Aisti.

Methods

In a retrospective cross‐sectional observational study, owners were interviewed about their dogs' possible seizure‐precipitating factors according to a predefined questionnaire. The dogs were identified and selected by searching the medical records of the participating animal hospitals.

Results

The prevalence of seizure‐precipitating factors in the study population was 74% (37/50). The most frequently reported factors included stress‐related situations, sleep deprivation, weather, and hormonal factors. In dogs with focal onset seizures, the number of precipitating factors was 1.9 (95% CI 1.1‐3.4) times higher compared to dogs with generalized seizures.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Seizure‐precipitating factors are common in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy, and the nature of these factors is consistent with those of human patients. Aside from antiepileptic medication, acknowledging and avoiding seizure‐precipitating factors could help veterinarians achieve better treatment outcomes.

Clinical and molecular analysis of epilepsy-related genes in patients with Dravet syndrome

Dravet syndrome is considered to be one of the most severe types of genetic epilepsy. Mutations in SCN1A gene have been found to be responsible for at least 80% of patients with Dravet syndrome, and 90% of these mutations arise de novo. The variable clinical phenotype is commonly observed among these patients with SCN1A mutations, suggesting that genetic modifiers may influence the phenotypic expression of Dravet syndrome. In the present study, we described the clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics of 13 Han Chinese pedigrees clinically diagnosed with Dravet syndrome. By targeted-exome sequencing, bioinformatics analysis and Sanger sequencing verification, 11 variants were identified in SCN1A gene among 11 pedigrees including 7 missense mutations, 2 splice site mutations, and 2 frameshift mutations (9 novel variants and 2 reported mutations). Particularly, 2 of these Dravet syndrome patients with SCN1A variants also harbored SCN9A, KCNQ2, or SLC6A8 variants. In addition, 2 subjects were failed to detect any pathogenic mutations in SCN1A and other epilepsy-related genes. These data suggested that SCN1A variants account for about 84.6% of Dravet syndrome in our cohort. This study expanded the mutational spectrum for the SCN1A gene, and also provided clinical and genetic evidence for the hypothesis that genetic modifiers may contribute to the variable manifestation of Dravet syndrome patients with SCN1A mutations. Thus, targeted-exome sequencing will make it possible to detect the interactions of epilepsy-related genes and reveal their modification on the severity of SCN1A mutation-related Dravet syndrome.

Pathogenic significance of SCN1A splicing variants causing Dravet syndrome: Improving diagnosis with targeted sequencing for variants by in silico analysis

OBJECTIVES

Genetic heterogeneity of epileptic encephalopathy (IEE) mandates the use of gene-panels for diagnosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A 36-gene-panel next-generation sequencing was applied for IEE in two Iranian families. A literature search was performed using keywords to identify reported splicing mutations in SCN1A and perform genotype-phenotype correlation.

RESULTS

An update of splicing mutations revealed 147 variants with 65.75% of them de novo mutations. Most of the familial variants were of parental origin. The structure of the protein was often affected in the linker and transmembrane segments. 92% of intronic variants were pathogenic. A de novo heterozygous mutation was found in the first patient, but not in her sibling and parents. In the second family, a novel de novo heterozygous mutation was found at position c.1210insT leading to a truncated protein.

CONCLUSION

Gene-panel sequencing is helpful for reducing the time and cost, guiding early treatment, and estimating the recurrence risks. The importance of characterization of intronic variants was noticed; though bioinformatics analysis of novel intronic variants should be of concern for rapid reporting the pathogenic effect of variants.

Genomic mosaicism in paternal sperm and multiple parental tissues in a Dravet syndrome cohort

Genomic mosaicism in parental gametes and peripheral tissues is an important consideration for genetic counseling. We studied a Chinese cohort affected by a severe epileptic disorder, Dravet syndrome (DS). There were 56 fathers who donated semen and 15 parents who donated multiple peripheral tissue samples. We used an ultra-sensitive quantification method, micro-droplet digital PCR (mDDPCR), to detect parental mosaicism of the proband's pathogenic mutation in SCN1A, the causal gene of DS in 112 families. Ten of the 56 paternal sperm samples were found to exhibit mosaicism of the proband's mutations, with mutant allelic fractions (MAFs) ranging from 0.03% to 39.04%. MAFs in the mosaic fathers' sperm were significantly higher than those in their blood (p = 0.00098), even after conditional probability correction (p' = 0.033). In three mosaic fathers, ultra-low fractions of mosaicism (MAF < 1%) were detected in the sperm samples. In 44 of 45 cases, mosaicism was also observed in other parental peripheral tissues. Hierarchical clustering showed that MAFs measured in the paternal sperm, hair follicles and urine samples were clustered closest together. Milder epileptic phenotypes were more likely to be observed in mosaic parents (p = 3.006e-06). Our study provides new insights for genetic counseling.

Unexplained Early Infantile Epileptic Encephalopathy in Han Chinese Children: Next-Generation Sequencing and Phenotype Enriching

Early Infantile Epileptic Encephalopathy (EIEE) presents shortly after birth with frequent, severe seizures and progressive disturbance of cerebral function. This study was to investigate a cohort of Chinese children with unexplained EIEE, infants with previous genetic diagnoses, causative brain malformations, or inborn errors of metabolism were excluded. We used targeted next-generation sequencing to identify potential pathogenic variants of 308 genes in 68 Han Chinese patients with unexplained EIEE. A filter process was performed to prioritize rare variants of potential functional significance. In all cases where parental testing was accessible, Sanger sequencing confirmed the variants and determined the parental origin. In 15% of patients (n = 10/68), we identified nine de novo pathogenic variants, and one assumed de novo pathogenic variant in the following genes: CDKL5 (n = 2), STXBP1 (n = 2), SCN1A (n = 3), KCNQ2 (n = 2), SCN8A (n = 1), four of the variants are novel variants. In 4% patients (n = 3/68), we identified three likely pathogenic variants; two assumed de novo and one X-linked in the following genes: SCN1A (n = 2) and ARX (n = 1), two of these variants are novel. Variants were assumed de novo when parental testing was not available. Our findings were first reported in Han Chinese patients with unexplained EIEE, enriching the EIEE mutation spectrum bank.

Optimizing the Diagnosis and Management of Dravet Syndrome: Recommendations From a North American Consensus Panel

OBJECTIVES

To establish standards for early, cost-effective, and accurate diagnosis; optimal therapies for seizures; and recommendations for evaluation and management of comorbidities for children and adults with Dravet syndrome, using a modified Delphi process.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened comprising epileptologists with nationally recognized expertise in Dravet syndrome and parents of children with Dravet syndrome, whose experience and understanding was enhanced by their active roles in Dravet syndrome associations. Panelists were asked to base their responses to questions both on their clinical expertise and results of a literature review that was forwarded to each panelist. Three rounds of online questionnaires were conducted to identify areas of consensus and strength of that consensus, as well as areas of contention.

RESULTS

The panel consisted of 13 physicians and five family members. Strong consensus was reached regarding typical clinical presentation of Dravet syndrome, range of electroencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging findings, need for genetic testing, critical information that should be conveyed to families at diagnosis, priorities for seizure control and typical degree of control, seizure triggers and recommendations for avoidance, first- and second-line therapies for seizures, requirement and indications for rescue therapy, specific recommendations for comorbidity screening, and need for family support. Consensus was not as strong regarding later therapies, including vagus nerve stimulation and callosotomy, and for specific therapies of associated comorbidities. Beyond the initial treatment with benzodiazepines and use of valproate, there was no consensus on the optimal in-hospital management of convulsive status epilepticus.

CONCLUSIONS

We were able to identify areas where there was strong consensus that we hope will (1) inform health care providers on optimal diagnosis and management of patients with Dravet syndrome, (2) support reimbursement from insurance companies for genetic testing and Dravet syndrome-specific therapies, and (3) improve quality of life for patients with Dravet syndrome and their families by avoidance of unnecessary testing and provision of an early accurate diagnosis allowing optimal selection of therapeutic strategies.

Dravet Syndrome: Diagnosis and Long-Term Course

Dravet syndrome is one of the most severe epilepsy syndromes of early childhood, and it comes with very high morbidity and mortality. The typical presentation is characterized by hemiclonic or generalized clonic seizures triggered by fever during the first year of life, followed by myoclonic, absence, focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Non-convulsive status epilepticus and epileptic encephalopathy are common. Development is normal in the first year of life, but most individuals eventually suffer from intellectual impairment. Dravet syndrome is associated with mutations in the sodium channel alpha1 subunit gene (SCN1A) in 70-80% of individuals. SCN1A mutation results in inhibition of the GABAergic inhibitory interneurons, leading to excessive neuronal excitation. The "interneuron hypothesis" is the current most accepted pathophysiological mechanism of Dravet syndrome. The mortality rate is increased significantly in Dravet syndrome. Ataxia, a characteristic crouched gait and Parkinson's symptoms may develop in some individuals. It is likely that Dravet syndrome is underdiagnosed in adults with treatment-resistant epilepsy. Early diagnosis is important to avoid anti-seizure medications that exacerbate seizures.

Two mild cases of Dravet syndrome with truncating mutation of SCN1A

BACKGROUND

SCN1A is the gene that codes for the neuronal voltage-gated sodium-channel alpha-subunit 1. It is generally considered that an SCN1A truncating mutation causes the severe phenotype of Dravet syndrome.

PATIENTS

We describe 11- and 4-year-old male patients presenting with mild Dravet syndrome with a truncating mutation of SCN1A. The former patient showed moderate mental retardation; however, seizure was controlled to almost one incident a year by levetiracetam and topiramate. Carbamazepine was also effective, which is atypical of Dravet syndrome. The latter patient showed a borderline developmental quotient and did not have episodes of afebrile seizure.

CONCLUSION

Two patients presented with mild Dravet syndrome, even though they had a truncating mutation of SCN1A. Not all truncating mutations of SCN1A cause the severe phenotype of Dravet syndrome.

Amplicon Resequencing Identified Parental Mosaicism for Approximately 10% of "de novo" SCN1A Mutations in Children with Dravet Syndrome

The majority of children with Dravet syndrome (DS) are caused by de novo SCN1A mutations. To investigate the origin of the mutations, we developed and applied a new method that combined deep amplicon resequencing with a Bayesian model to detect and quantify allelic fractions with improved sensitivity. Of 174 SCN1A mutations in DS probands which were considered "de novo" by Sanger sequencing, we identified 15 cases (8.6%) of parental mosaicism. We identified another five cases of parental mosaicism that were also detectable by Sanger sequencing. Fraction of mutant alleles in the 20 cases of parental mosaicism ranged from 1.1% to 32.6%. Thirteen (65% of 20) mutations originated paternally and seven (35% of 20) maternally. Twelve (60% of 20) mosaic parents did not have any epileptic symptoms. Their mutant allelic fractions were significantly lower than those in mosaic parents with epileptic symptoms (P = 0.016). We identified mosaicism with varied allelic fractions in blood, saliva, urine, hair follicle, oral epithelium, and semen, demonstrating that postzygotic mutations could affect multiple somatic cells as well as germ cells. Our results suggest that more sensitive tools for detecting low-level mosaicism in parents of families with seemingly "de novo" mutations will allow for better informed genetic counseling.

Effect of vaccinations on seizure risk and disease course in Dravet syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of vaccination-associated seizure onset on disease course and estimate the risk of subsequent seizures after infant pertussis combination and measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccinations in Dravet syndrome (DS).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from hospital medical files, child health clinics, and the vaccination register for children with DS and pathogenic SCN1A mutations. Seizures within 24 hours after infant whole-cell, acellular, or nonpertussis combination vaccination or within 5 to 12 days after MMR vaccination were defined as "vaccination-associated." Risks of vaccination-associated seizures for the different vaccines were analyzed in univariable and in multivariable logistic regression for pertussis combination vaccines and by a self-controlled case series analysis using parental seizure registries for MMR vaccines. Disease courses of children with and without vaccination-associated seizure onset were compared.

RESULTS

Children who had DS (n = 77) with and without vaccination-associated seizure onset (21% and 79%, respectively) differed in age at first seizure (median 3.7 vs 6.1 months, p < 0.001) but not in age at first nonvaccination-associated seizure, age at first report of developmental delay, or cognitive outcome. The risk of subsequent vaccination-associated seizures was significantly lower for acellular pertussis (9%; odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.71) and nonpertussis (8%; odds ratio 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.59) than whole-cell pertussis (37%; reference) vaccines. Self-controlled case series analysis showed an increased incidence rate ratio of seizures of 2.3 (95% CI 1.5-3.4) within the risk period of 5 to 12 days following MMR vaccination.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that vaccination-associated earlier seizure onset does not alter disease course in DS, while the risk of subsequent vaccination-associated seizures is probably vaccine-specific.

Seizure precipitants in Dravet syndrome: What events and activities are specifically provocative compared with other epilepsies?

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to describe seizure precipitants in Dravet syndrome (DS) compared with other epilepsies.

METHODS

Seizure precipitants as reported in a Dutch cohort of patients with DS with pathogenic SCN1A mutations (n=71) were compared with those of a cohort with childhood epilepsy (n=149) and of a community-based cohort with epilepsy (n=248); for all three Dutch cohorts, the same type of questionnaire was used. Seizure precipitants were categorized as 'fever', 'visual stimuli', 'sleep deprivation', 'stress, including physical exercise', 'auditory stimuli', and 'other'.

RESULTS

For 70 (99%) of 71 patients with DS, at least one seizure precipitant was recalled by parents. Seizure precipitants that were reported in more than half of the cohort with DS were as follows: having a fever (97%), having a cold (68%), taking a bath (61%), having acute moments of stress (58%), and engaging in physical exercise (56%). Seizure precipitants freely recalled by parents were often related to ambient warmth or cold-warmth shifts (41%) and to various visual stimuli (18%). Patients with DS had more positive seizure precipitant categories (median 4) compared with the cohort with childhood epilepsy (median 2) and the community-based cohort with epilepsy (median 0) (p<0.001) and showed the highest percentage in each category (all p<0.001). Within the category 'stress, including physical exercise', physical exercise was more often reported to provoke seizures in stress-sensitive patients in the cohort with DS than in the cohort with childhood epilepsy (78% vs. 35%, p<0.001). In the cohort with childhood epilepsy, physical exercise was more often reported in fever-sensitive children than in other children (25% vs. 12%, p=0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows a high prevalence of a range of seizure precipitants in DS. Our results underscore elevated body temperature as an important seizure precipitant, whether caused by fever, warm bath, ambient warmth, or physical exercise. Knowledge of these seizure precipitants may improve preventive strategies in the otherwise difficult treatment of DS.

Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine in adult patients with Dravet syndrome: Friend or foe?

PURPOSE

In newly diagnosed patients with Dravet syndrome sodium channel blockers are usually avoided. However, in many adult patients the diagnosis was made long after the initiation of therapy. The purpose of our study was to acquire information concerning the potential risks and benefits of (ox)carba(ma)zepine withdrawal in adult patients with genetically confirmed Dravet syndrome.

METHOD

We identified 16 adults with Dravet syndrome, living in a tertiary care facility for people with epilepsy and an intellectual disability. We reviewed clinical history, genetic findings, the type and duration of sodium channels blockers that were used, seizure types and frequency, and the effect of a change in these medications.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 9 men and 7 women. Median age was 35 years (range 20-61 years). An attempt to withdraw carbamazepine (CBZ) was made in 9 patients. In 3 of these patients an increase in tonic-clonic seizures was observed. An attempt to withdraw oxcarbazepine (OXC) was made in 3 patients, leading to a complete stop in 2 patients. 3 of the 4 deaths in the withdrawal-group were related to epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

In adult patients with Dravet syndrome withdrawal of CBZ or OXC is not without risks. We suggest that (ox)carba(ma)zepine withdrawal should be considered in these patients but only if there is a good reason to do so and only if they are closely monitored.

Pediatric status epilepticus: identification and evaluation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Status epilepticus is an acute neurologic emergency, the incidence of which is increasing in the United States as the definition evolves and our detection abilities improve. We will present the current definition of status epilepticus, including a recently modified operational definition for use in the clinical setting. We will also provide updates on identifying children in status epilepticus, etiologic considerations, and the rationale for diagnostic testing.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data reveal the benefits of MRI vs. computed tomography in new-onset status epilepticus, as well as high rates of identification of electrographic seizures in patients with unexplained acute encephalopathy in pediatric ICU settings. Genetic testing should be considered in young children with recurrent status epilepticus.

SUMMARY

Prompt recognition and diagnostic evaluation of the child in status epilepticus will help identify causes, which may require specific treatment, and help in the management of this life-threatening condition. Laboratory work, neuroimaging, electroencephalogram or continuous video electroencephalogram, lumbar puncture, and genetic testing may be considered in the evaluation of the child in status epilepticus.