Spinal synergy between nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors and morphine antinociception in mice

Side effects can enhance treatment response through expectancy effects: an experimental analgesic randomized controlled trial

In randomized controlled trials, medication side effects may lead to beliefs that one is receiving the active intervention and enhance active treatment responses, thereby increasing drug-placebo differences. We tested these hypotheses with an experimental double-blind randomized controlled trial of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with and without the addition of atropine to induce side effects. One hundred healthy volunteers were told they would be randomized to either combined analgesics that might produce dry mouth or inert placebos. In reality, they were randomized double blind, double-dummy to 1 of the 4 conditions: (1) 100 mg diclofenac + 1.2 mg atropine, (2) placebo + 1.2 mg atropine, (3) 100 mg diclofenac + placebo, or (4) placebo + placebo, and tested with heat-induced pain. Groups did not differ significantly in demographics, temperature producing moderate pain, state anxiety, or depression. Analgesia was observed in all groups; there was a significant interaction between diclofenac and atropine, without main effects. Diclofenac alone was not better than double-placebo. The addition of atropine increased pain relief more than 3-fold among participants given diclofenac (d = 0.77), but did not enhance the response to placebo (d = 0.09). A chain of mediation analysis demonstrated that the addition of atropine increased dry mouth symptoms, which increased beliefs that one had received the active medication, which, in turn, increased analgesia. In addition to this indirect effect of atropine on analgesia (via dry mouth and beliefs), analyses suggest that among those who received diclofenac, atropine directly increased analgesia. This possible synergistic effect between diclofenac and atropine might warrant future research.

Evaluation of Postoperative Anti-nociceptive Efficacy of Intrathecal Dexketoprofen in Rats

BACKGROUND

Some studies have suggested that the intrathecal use of cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibitors provides an anti-nociceptive effect. Therefore, the occurrence of side effects seen in systemic usage can be eliminated.

AIMS

The primary objective of this experimental, randomized, controlled trial was to test the hypothesis asserting that intrathecal dexketoprofen trometamol would demonstrate an analgesic effect during postoperative period.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal experimentation.

METHODS

Forty rats were randomized into 4 groups 7 days after intrathecal catheterization; the following drugs were given through catheter lumens: Group Lidocaine (Group L): Lidocaine 20 μg; Group Lidocaine-Morphine (Group LM): Lidocaine 20 μg and morphine 0.5 μgr; Group Lidocaine-Dexketoprofen (Group LD): Lidocaine 20 μg and dexketoprofen trometamol 100 μg; and Group Dexketoprofen (Group D): Dexketoprofen trometamol 100 μg. Paw incision was achieved under ether inhalation. To measure analgesic potential, hot plate and tail immersion tests were used as nociceptive tests during the postoperative period.

RESULTS

The mean reaction times detected in groups during hot plate and tail immersion tests were shortest in Group L at 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, 90, 105, and 120 minutes after start of surgery (p<0.01, all others). In the groups using dexketoprofen, as in the morphine group, longer reaction times were detected than in the lidocaine group at all measurement times except 120 minutes (p<0.01).

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal dexketoprofen in the optimal perioperative pain management is effective, and can be administered as an adjuvant in clinics after neurotoxicity studies in animals, and effective dose studies in volunteers.

Antinociceptive synergy between diclofenac and morphine after local injection into the inflamed site

BACKGROUND

Combinations of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with opioids are frequently used to reduce opioid doses required in the clinical management of acute pain. The present study was designed to evaluate the possible antinociceptive interaction between morphine and diclofenac at peripheral level in male rats.

METHODS

Drugs were chosen based on their efficacy in the treatment of this kind of pain and as representative drugs of their respective analgesic groups. For the formalin test, 50 μ of 1% formalin solution was injected subcutaneously into the right hind paw. The interaction between morphine and diclofenac was evaluated by using isobolographic analysis and interaction index. Drug interaction was examined by administering fixed-ratio combinations of morphine-diclofenac (1 : 1 and 3 : 1) of their respective ED30 fractions.

RESULTS

Diclofenac and morphine reduced flinching behavior in a dose-dependent manner during phase 2 but not phase 1 of the formalin test. Isobolographic analysis showed a synergistic interaction for the combination of morphine and diclofenac after local peripheral administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that the combination of morphine with diclofenac at the site of injury is synergistic and could be useful in the treatment of wounds, bruises, rheumatisms and other painful peripheral conditions associated with an inflammatory process.

Antinociceptive interaction of (±)-CPP and propentofylline in monoarthritic rats

Introduction

Multiple studies have shown that glial cells of the spinal cord, such as astrocytes and microglia, have close contact with neurons, suggesting the term tripartite synapse. In these synapses, astrocytes surrounding neurons contribute to neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission, thereby increasing nociception and thus the persistence of chronic pain. Conversely, the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor is crucial in the generation and maintenance of chronic pain. It has multiple sites of modulation. One is the site of recognition of extracellular neurotransmitter (glutamate), which can be blocked by competitive antagonists such as (3-(2-carboxipiperazin-4)1-propyl phosphonic acid), (±)-CPP, resulting in a blockade of the calcium current and thus the intracellular transduction process. In the present study, we investigated whether the potential antinociceptive effect of glial inhibition produced by propentofylline (PPF) can be enhanced when combined with an NMDA-receptor inhibitor such as (±)-CPP.

Methods

We used Sprague-Dawley monoarthritic rats. The monoarthritis was induced by injection of complete Freund adjuvant in the right tibiotarsal joint. Four weeks later, rats were treated with PPF (1, 10, 30, and 100 μg/10 μl) intrathecally (i.t.) for 10 days, injected once with (±)-CPP (2.5, 5, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/10 μl, i.t.), or both treatments combined. The antinociceptive effect was evaluated on day 11 for PPF and immediately to (±)-CPP, by assessing the vocalization threshold to mechanical stimulation of the arthritic paw.

Results

The data indicate that intrathecal administration of increasing concentrations of (±)-CPP or PPF produced a significant dose-dependent antinociceptive effect with respect to monoarthritic rats receiving saline. The linear regression analysis showed that the dose that produces 30% of maximal effect (ED₃₀) for i.t. (±)-CPP was 3.97 μg, and 1.42 μg for i.t. PPF. The administration of the PPF and (±)-CPP combination in fixed proportions of ED₃₀ produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect, showing an interaction of the supraadditive type.

Conclusions

The results suggest that glia inhibitors can synergically potentiate the effect of glutamate blockers for the treatment of chronic inflammatory pain.

Gabapentin augments the antihyperalgesic effects of diclofenac sodium through spinal action in a rat postoperative pain model

BACKGROUND

Gabapentin and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) attenuate postoperative pain and neuropathic pain in humans. The combination of gabapentin and NSAIDs is effective for postoperative pain and enhances functional recovery after surgery. Intrathecal administration of gabapentin or NSAIDs inhibits hyperalgesia in a rat postoperative pain model. However, there is no information on the effects of intrathecal administration of a combination of gabapentin and NSAIDs. We therefore investigated the effects of intrathecal administration of gabapentin and NSAIDs in a rat model of postoperative pain.

METHODS

Rats were prepared for intrathecal catheters under halothane anesthesia. Two days after catheterization, gabapentin (4, 40, or 400 μg per 20 μL of saline), diclofenac sodium, a nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor (2, 20, or 200 μg per 20 μL of 6% glucose), 20 μL saline, 20 μL 6% glucose, and a combination of gabapentin and diclofenac (40 μg gabapentin + 20 μg diclofenac and 4 μg gabapentin + 2 μg diclofenac per 20 μL 6% glucose) were injected intrathecally. We performed a hindpaw incision 30 minutes after injection. Each group consisted of 6 rats. The mechanical threshold was measured to evaluate secondary hyperalgesia using von Frey filaments before intrathecal catheterization and at 2 hours, and 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after paw incision.

RESULTS

Gabapentin 400 μg attenuated mechanical hyperalgesia for 7 days compared with the control group. Diclofenac 200 μg inhibited hyperalgesia for 5 days compared with the control group. The 40 μg gabapentin + 20 μg diclofenac group had a significantly reduced secondary hyperalgesic response in 2 hours and 1 day compared with 40 μg gabapentin and 20 μg diclofenac, respectively. The 4 μg gabapentin + 2 μg diclofenac group had a significantly reduced secondary hyperalgesic response in 2 hours and 1 day compared with 2 μg diclofenac. The withdrawal threshold on the contralateral paw did not change compared with the preincision threshold.

CONCLUSION

Intrathecal administration of gabapentin and diclofenac in combination reduced secondary hyperalgesia at doses having no antihyperalgesic effects when given individually. Our results suggest that gabapentin and diclofenac have an important role in postoperative pain reduction at the spinal level, and that gabapentin augments the antihyperalgesic effects of diclofenac through action in the spinal cord.

The role of cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors in attenuating opioid-induced tolerance, hyperalgesia, and dependence

There is no denying that opioids are the most important analgesic drugs which are widely used in clinical situations. Still, prolonged administration of these drugs can cause to reduce their analgesic efficacy due to the development of tolerance. These drugs can also cause induction of hyperalgesia. In addition, long-term administration of opioids through reinforcing- and rewarding pathways of limbic system can result in expression of opioid dependence with the unintended consequences of opioid abuse/misuse and finally opioid addiction. As studies show, over-activity in cyclo-oxygenase pathways and production of prostaglandins due to long-term exposures of opioid have a critical role in the development of tolerance to antinociceptive effect of opioid, hyperalgesia, and opioid dependence. The present study aims at suggesting the hypothesis that through blending a non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug with opioid actively causes reduction in unwanted effects of opioid i.e. by inhibition of opioid-induced cyclo-oxygenase overactivity whereas it is well-known that the combination therapy via reducing opioid dosage reduces the unwanted effects.

Antihypernociceptive synergy between ibuprofen, paracetamol and codeine in rats

We investigated the effects of intraperitoneal injections of a combination of two cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors, ibuprofen and paracetamol, with a weak opiate, codeine, on nociception in Sprague Dawley rats. Administration of paracetamol (11, 44, and 88 mg/kg), ibuprofen (8.75, 35, and 140 mg/kg) or codeine (0.44, 1.75, and 3.5mg/kg) alone caused a dose-dependent inhibition of reperfusion hypernociception. Administration of a combination of 0.44 mg/kg codeine+8.75 mg/kg ibuprofen+11 mg/kg paracetamol, drug doses that did not significantly reduce reperfusion hypernociception when administered individually or in pairs, abolished reperfusion hypernociception, such that the antihypernociceptive efficacy of the combination was approximately 2.5-fold greater than that of the sum of the antihypernociceptive efficacy of the individual drugs. Coordinated motor function, tested using a rotarod, was not impaired at the doses we used. Thus, we have demonstrated that codeine, paracetamol and ibuprofen act synergistically to induce antihypernociception in rats at doses which do not affect motor function.

Synthesis and investigations of double-pharmacophore ligands for treatment of chronic and neuropathic pain

Acids 9a-f as possible bivalent ligands designed as a structural combination of opioid mu-agonist (Fentanyl) and NSAID (Indomethacin) activities and produced compounds which were tested as analgesics. The obtained series of compounds exhibits low affinity and activity both at opioid receptors and as cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors. One explanation of the weak opioid activity could be stereochemical peculiarities of these bivalent compounds which differ significantly from the fentanyl skeleton. The absence of significant COX inhibitory properties could be explained by the required substitution of an acyl fragment in the indomethacin structure for 4-piperidyl.

Lack of effect of naltrexone on the spinal synergism between morphine and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

To enhance analgesia, the combinatorial use of analgesic drugs with proven efficacies is a widely-used strategy to reduce adverse side effects. The present study characterizes the antinociceptive interaction of intrathecal morphine co-administered with different NSAIDs using isobolographic analysis.Antinoceptive activity was evaluated using a model for acute visceral pain, the writhing test of mice. The possible involvement of opioid receptors in the mechanism of action of the intrathecal co-administration of morphine and NSAIDs was investigated using the non-selective receptor antagonist naltrexone. The study demonstrated a synergistic antinociception of intrathecal administered combinations of morphine with the following NSAIDs: diclofenac, ketoprofen, meloxicam, metamizol, naproxen, nimesulide, parecoxib and piroxicam. The supra additive effect was obtained with very low doses of each drug and it appeared to be independent of the COX-1 or COX-2 inhibition selectivity of each NSAID and was not significantly modified by intrathecal naltrexone. The findings of the present work suggest that the combination of opioids and NSAIDs has a direct action on spinal nociceptive processing, which may be achieved via mechanisms that are independent of the activation of opioid receptors. The ineffectiveness of naltrexone to reverse the analgesic activity of opioids + NSAIDs combinations indicates that other complex pain regulatory systems are involved in this effect.

Nitroparacetamol (NCX-701) and pain: first in a series of novel analgesics

The combination of numerous classic drugs with nitric oxide donors has led to the development of new compounds with promising therapeutic activities in a great variety of situations, including cardiovascular and respiratory systems, ocular pressure, inflammation, and pain. One of the first compounds developed was NCX-701 or nitroparacetamol, resulting from the combination of paracetamol, a classic and popular analgesic used in a great number of over-the-counter medications because of its antipyretic and analgesic properties, and a nitrooxybutyroyl moiety, which releases nitric oxide at a low but steady level. Although paracetamol is devoid of most of the gastrointestinal toxicity associated with aspirin-like drugs, this type of compounds was first designed to take advantage of the cytoprotective properties of nitric oxide when released at low concentrations. However, the combination of these molecules also resulted in an unexpected enhancement of the analgesic activity of paracetamol. In fact, NCX-701 has been shown to be effective in acute nociception as well as in neuropathic pain, situations in which paracetamol and other COX inhibitors are devoid of any effect. In addition, NCX-701 is more potent and, in some circumstances, more effective than its parent compound in different models of inflammatory pain. Furthermore, whereas paracetamol lacks any effective antiinflammatory action, NCX-701 might reduce inflammation. All these results taken together imply that the mechanism of action of NCX-701 is different from that of paracetamol, although it is not yet established for either molecule. NCX-701 appears to be a promising compound in the treatment of different types of pain, with a likely better profile of side effects than its parent molecule, paracetamol. Although recent clinical trials provided data consistent with the preclinical profile of NCX-701, further studies are needed to support its clinical use.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2005

This paper is the 28th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over a quarter-century of research. It summarizes papers published during 2005 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity, neurophysiology and transmitter release (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); immunological responses (Section 17).

Lack of Reciprocity between Opioid and 5-HT3 Receptors for Antinociception in Rat Spinal Cord

We examined the properties of the drug interaction between morphine and 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist at the spinal level. The nociceptive state was induced by subcutaneously injecting formalin solution (5%, 50 microl) into the hindpaw of the rats. Intrathecal morphine and m-CPBG (5-HT(3) receptor agonist) dose-dependently decreased the flinching response during phase 1 and phase 2 in the formalin test. Intrathecal 5-HT(3) receptor antagonists (LY-278,584 and ondansetron) did not reverse the antinociceptive effect of intrathecal morphine. Intrathecal naloxone had little effect on attenuation of the antinociception of intrathecal m-CPBG. Taken together, no reciprocal interaction was noted between 5-HT(3) receptor and opioid receptors at the spinal level. Thus, the 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist may be useful to manage opioid-induced emesis at the spinal level.

Endogenous opioids are involved in morphine and dipyrone analgesic potentiation in the tail flick test in rats

The combined administration of low doses of opiates with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can produce additive or supra-additive analgesic effects while reducing unwanted side effects. We have recently reported that co-administration of morphine with dipyrone (metamizol) produces analgesic potentiation both in naïve and in morphine-tolerant rats. The purpose of this work was to determine the role of opioids on the acute potentiation observed between morphine and dipyrone i.v. in the rat tail flick test. To do this, two experiments were done. In the first one, naloxone was administered 10 min before morphine (3.1 mg/kg), dipyrone (600 mg/kg) or their combination at the same doses. Control animals received saline instead of naloxone. In the second experiment, naloxone (or saline) was given 2 min after reaching the maximal peak effect with each individual analgesic treatment. When naloxone was i.v. administered prior to analgesics, it completely blocked morphine effects, partially prevented morphine/dipyrone antinociception and delayed dipyrone-induced nociception. At 3.1 mg/kg, naloxone produced an increased nociception. When naloxone was given after analgesics, it dose-dependently blocked the effects of morphine alone and in combination with dipyrone but with different potency in each case. As to dipyrone, naloxone delayed the time to antinociceptive peak effect. Taken together, these results support the notion that endogenous opioids are involved in the analgesic potentiation observed with the combination of morphine plus dipyrone.

Visceral, inflammatory and neuropathic pain in glycine receptor alpha 3-deficient mice

The alpha3-subunit of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors is an important modulator of the pain-sensitizing effects of spinal prostaglandin prostaglandin E(2). Mice deficient for alpha3-subunit of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors lack the prostaglandin E(2)-induced inhibition of glycinergic neurotransmission and recover faster from inflammation-induced hyperalgesia. It, however, remains unclear whether alpha3-subunit of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors plays a role in other pain models involving prostaglandin synthesis, such as chemically induced pain or neuropathic pain. In this paper, we show a reduction of acetic acid-induced writhing responses in the absence of alpha3-subunit of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors, but no changes in formalin-induced pain. Furthermore, alpha3-subunit of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors-deficient mice develop normal thermal hyperalgesia and tactile allodynia. Thus, alpha3-subunit of strychnine-sensitive glycine receptors is involved in the modulation of moderate inflammatory acetic acid-induced pain responses, but neither in formalin-induced pain nor in neuropathic pain.