Acute and chronic administration of clorazepate modifies the cell surface regulation of mu opioid receptors induced by buprenorphine in specific regions of the rat brain

Mechanisms of respiratory depression induced by the combination of buprenorphine and diazepam in rats

BACKGROUND

The safety profile of buprenorphine has encouraged its widespread use. However, fatalities have been attributed to benzodiazepine/buprenorphine combinations, by poorly understood mechanisms of toxicity. Mechanistic hypotheses include (i) benzodiazepine-mediated increase in brain buprenorphine (pharmacokinetic hypothesis); (ii) benzodiazepine-mediated potentiation of buprenorphine interaction with opioid receptors (receptor hypothesis); and (iii) combined effects of buprenorphine and benzodiazepine on respiratory parameters (pharmacodynamic hypothesis).

METHODS

We studied the neuro-respiratory effects of buprenorphine (30 mg kg-1, i.p.), diazepam (20 mg kg-1, s.c.), and diazepam/buprenorphine combination in rats using arterial blood gas analysis, plethysmography, and diaphragm electromyography. Pretreatments with various opioid and gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor antagonists were tested. Diazepam impact on brain 11C-buprenorphine kinetics and binding to opioid receptors was studied using positron emission tomography imaging.

RESULTS

In contrast to diazepam and buprenorphine alone, diazepam/buprenorphine induced early-onset sedation (P<0.05) and respiratory depression (P<0.001). Diazepam did not alter 11C-buprenorphine brain kinetics or binding to opioid receptors. Diazepam/buprenorphine-induced effects on inspiratory time were additive, driven by buprenorphine (P<0.0001) and were blocked by naloxonazine (P<0.01). Diazepam/buprenorphine-induced effects on expiratory time were non-additive (P<0.001), different from buprenorphine-induced effects (P<0.05) and were blocked by flumazenil (P<0.01). Diazepam/buprenorphine-induced effects on tidal volume were non-additive (P<0.01), different from diazepam- (P<0.05) and buprenorphine-induced effects (P<0.0001) and were blocked by naloxonazine (P<0.05) and flumazenil (P<0.05). Compared with buprenorphine, diazepam/buprenorphine decreased diaphragm contraction amplitude (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacodynamic parameters and antagonist pretreatments indicate that diazepam/buprenorphine-induced respiratory depression results from a pharmacodynamic interaction between both drugs on ventilatory parameters.

New developments in the management of opioid dependence: focus on sublingual buprenorphine-naloxone

Opioid maintenance therapy is a well-established first-line treatment approach in opioid dependence. Buprenorphine, a partial opioid agonist, has been found by numerous studies to be an effective and safe medication in the treatment of opioid dependence. At present, buprenorphine is available as a monodrug or in a fixed 4:1 ratio combination with naloxone. A diminished risk of diversion and abuse for the buprenorphine-naloxone combination is likely but not firmly established. Conventional formulations are given sublingually to avoid the hepatic first-pass effect. A novel film tablet is available only in the US and Australia. Other novel, sustained-release formulations (implant, depot) are currently being developed and tested. Recent studies, including a Cochrane meta-analysis, suggest that the retention with buprenorphine is lower than for methadone, but that buprenorphine may be associated with less drug use. Higher doses of buprenorphine are associated with better retention rates. Buprenorphine has a ceiling effect at the opioid receptor with regard to respiratory depression, and may cause fewer fatal intoxications than methadone. Possible antidepressant effects of buprenorphine and its use in comorbid psychiatric patients has not been studied in much detail. Clinical implications are discussed.

Comparison of toxicity associated with nonmedical use of benzodiazepines with buprenorphine or methadone

BACKGROUND

Polysubstance use is prevalent in individuals using buprenorphine or methadone nonmedically, with benzodiazepines being a common co-ingestant. The objective of this study was to compare the severity of buprenorphine and methadone toxicity with concomitant use of benzodiazepines.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of buprenorphine and methadone cases from November 1, 2002 to December 31, 2010 reported to the American Association of Poison Control Centers' National Poison Data System (NPDS) was conducted.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age ≥ 18 years, nonmedical use of methadone with benzodiazepines (methadone-BZD) or buprenorphine with benzodiazepines (BUP-BZD), and case followed to a documented outcome. Cases with co-ingestants other than benzodiazepines were excluded. Clinical effects, treatments, disposition and final medical outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 692 methadone-BZD cases and 72 BUP-BZD cases. Clinical effects in methadone-BZD and BUP-BZD groups were lethargy (71.1%, 59.7%), respiratory depression (29.0%, 15.3%), coma (22.4%, 5.6%), respiratory arrest (4.5%, 0), hypotension (11.8%, 2.8%) and cardiac arrest (1.9%, 0), respectively. Patients in the methadone-BZD group were four-times more likely to receive naloxone (60.4% vs 15.3%) or be intubated (16.3% vs 4.2%) than in the BUP-BZD group. Hospitalization rates were highest for methadone-BZD patients with 67.3% receiving medical admissions compared to 43.3% of BUP-BZD patients. Outcomes were more serious for methadone-BZD cases (p<0.0001); while there were no BUP-BZD deaths, exposure to methadone-BZD yielded 16 deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonmedical use of benzodiazepines with methadone is associated with higher hospitalization rates, greater ICU utilization rates and considerably worse medical outcomes when compared to nonmedical use of benzodiazepines with buprenorphine.

Polydrug abuse: a review of opioid and benzodiazepine combination use

This paper reviews studies examining the pharmacological interactions and epidemiology of the combined use of opioids and benzodiazepines (BZDs). A search of English language publications from 1970 to 2012 was conducted using PubMed and PsycINFO(®). Our search found approximately 200 articles appropriate for inclusion in this paper. While numerous reports indicate that the co-abuse of opioids and BZDs is ubiquitous around the world, the reasons for the co-abuse of these medications are not entirely clear. Though the possibility remains that opioid abusers are using BZDs therapeutically to self-medicate anxiety, mania or insomnia, the data reviewed in this paper suggest that BZD use is primarily recreational. For example, co-users report seeking BZD prescriptions for the purpose of enhancing opioid intoxication or "high," and use doses that exceed the therapeutic range. Since there are few clinical studies investigating the pharmacological interaction and abuse liability of their combined use, this hypothesis has not been extensively evaluated in clinical settings. As such, our analysis encourages further systematic investigation of BZD abuse among opioid abusers. The co-abuse of BZDs and opioids is substantial and has negative consequences for general health, overdose lethality, and treatment outcome. Physicians should address this important and underappreciated problem with more cautious prescribing practices, and increased vigilance for abusive patterns of use.

Prolonged use of benzodiazepines is associated with childhood trauma in opioid-maintained patients

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepine (BZD) misuse in opioid-maintained patients is widespread and has been related to poorer treatment success. Associated factors, in particular, traumatic childhood experiences, have not been investigated extensively.

METHODS

Cross-sectional survey including the childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ) and clinical data among 193 patients prescribed oral opioids or injectable diacetylmorphine for opioid dependence.

RESULTS

BZD use was prevalent (61%) and the burden of childhood traumatic experiences was high with 67% reporting at least one trauma subscore of moderate-to-severe level. In univariate analysis, CTQ-subcategories "emotional abuse" (p<0.05), "emotional neglect" (p<0.01) and "physical neglect" (p<0.001) were significantly associated with prolonged BZD use. In multivariate analysis, prolonged BZD use was associated with categorized overall CTQ-scores (OR 1.5), HCV-seropositivity (OR 4.0), psychiatric family history (OR 2.3), and opioid dose (mg methadone equivalents, OR 1.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Childhood traumatic experiences may be associated with prolonged BZD use in opioid-maintained patients and could pose an important starting-point for prevention.

Case series of buprenorphine injectors in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Diversion of buprenorphine has been described in settings where it is legally prescribed and has become an increasing concern in Malaysia; it resulted in banning of buprenorphine in Singapore where unsubstantiated case reports suggested that buprenorphine injection was associated with particularly poor outcomes. We therefore conducted a case series of qualitative interviews with buprenorphine injectors in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to examine further the issues surrounding buprenorphine injection as well as the abuse of midazolam in combination with buprenorphine. Interviews with 19 men do not suggest significant adverse health consequences from buprenorphine injection alone and injectors have adapted diverted buprenorphine as a treatment modality. A subset of these injectors, however, combined buprenorphine and midazolam for euphoric effects with resultant symptoms of a possible pharmacological interaction. Prospective cohort studies, rather than hospital-derived samples, are needed to better understand the safety of buprenorphine injection.

Comparison of buprenorphine and methadone in the treatment of opiate withdrawal: possible advantages of buprenorphine for the treatment of opiate-benzodiazepine codependent patients?

The study is a preliminary investigation to compare the effectiveness of buprenorphine and methadone as opiate detoxification treatments. The sample comprised 123 drug misusers who were dependent upon opiates only or who were codependent upon opiates and benzodiazepines. Drug misusers dependent upon methadone doses up to 70 mg were eligible for the study. Detoxification took place within a specialist inpatient drug-dependence unit. Withdrawal symptom severity was assessed on a daily basis by means of the Short Opiate Withdrawal Scale. Outcome was assessed for reductions in severity of withdrawal symptoms, treatment retention, and treatment completion. Buprenorphine detoxification was associated with less severe opiate withdrawal symptoms than methadone. Opiate/Benzodiazepine codependent patients reported less severe withdrawal symptoms during treatment with buprenorphine than with methadone and were also more likely to complete detoxification when treated with buprenorphine.

Does high-dose buprenorphine cause respiratory depression?: possible mechanisms and therapeutic consequences

Buprenorphine is an opioid agonist-antagonist with a 'ceiling effect' for respiratory depression. Compared with methadone, its unique pharmacology offers practical advantages and enhanced safety when prescribed as recommended and supervised by a physician. Buprenorphine has been approved in several countries as an efficient and safe maintenance therapy for heroin addiction. Its use resulted in a salutary effect with a reduction in heroin overdose-related deaths in countries that implemented office-based buprenorphine maintenance. In France, however, where high-dose buprenorphine has been marketed since 1996, several cases of asphyxic deaths were reported among addicts treated with buprenorphine. Death resulted from buprenorphine intravenous misuse or concomitant sedative drug ingestion, such as benzodiazepines. In these situations of abuse, misuse, or in association with elevated doses of psychotropic drugs, buprenorphine may cause severe respiratory depression. Unlike other opiates, the respiratory effects from buprenorphine are not responsive to naloxone. However, the exact mechanism of buprenorphine-induced effects on ventilation is still unknown. The role of norbuprenorphine, the main N-dealkylated buprenorphine metabolite with potent respiratory depressor activity, also remains unclear. Experimental studies investigating the respiratory effects of combinations of high doses of buprenorphine and benzodiazepines suggested that this drug-drug interaction may result from a pharmacodynamic interaction. A pharmacokinetic interaction between buprenorphine and flunitrazepam is also considered. As there are many questions regarding the possible dangers of death or respiratory depression associated with buprenorphine use, we aimed to present a comprehensive critical review of the published clinical and experimental studies on buprenorphine respiratory effects.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2005

This paper is the 28th consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system, now spanning over a quarter-century of research. It summarizes papers published during 2005 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity, neurophysiology and transmitter release (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); immunological responses (Section 17).

Interactions of buprenorphine and dipotassium clorazepate on anxiety and memory functions in the mouse

Buprenorphine, a partial mu-receptor agonist widely substituted for heroin in the treatment of addiction, is often misused in combination with benzodiazepines. Improved hedonic properties may result, but only at the cost of increased buprenorphine toxicity. In order to elucidate the appeal of the benzodiazepine-buprenorphine combination, the present study looked at its neuropsycho-pharmacological effects on various emotional and cognitive parameters in the mouse. On the basis of previous dose-response studies, the regimen used was buprenorphine 0.3mg/kg, s.c. plus dipotassium clorazepate 1, 4 and 16 mg/kg, i.p. Anxiety-like behaviour was assessed using the black and white test box, and memory processes were examined via the spontaneous alternation paradigm in the Y-maze, and passive avoidance tests. Spontaneous locomotor activity was also evaluated. High doses of clorazepate impaired buprenorphine-induced hyperactivity and anxiogenic-like effects. They also increased buprenorphine-induced spontaneous alternation impairment, but did not modify its impact on long-term memory processes. These results suggest that the positive reinforcement experienced with the buprenorphine-benzodiazepine combination may be attributable, at least in part, to an increase in buprenorphine's sedative effect associated with a decrease in anxiogenicity.

The effects of long-term chronic buprenorphine treatment on the locomotor and nucleus accumbens dopamine response to acute heroin and cocaine in rats

We have previously shown that chronic treatment with the partial mu-opioid receptor agonist, buprenorphine, blocks the nucleus accumbens dopamine response to an acute injection of heroin, whereas it potentiates the response to an acute injection of cocaine after 4-5 days of treatment. Here we studied the effects of chronic exposure to buprenorphine via osmotic minipumps for up to 28 days (1.5 or 3.0 mg/kg/day) on responses to acute injections of heroin and cocaine. Increases in locomotion induced by heroin (0.25 mg/kg, sc), given on the 5th, 15th or 25th day of treatment were unaffected by buprenorphine, whereas increases induced by cocaine (20 mg/kg, ip) were enhanced early in treatment but not on the 15th or 25th days. Using in vivo microdialysis we found that both the suppression of the dopaminergic response in the nucleus accumbens to heroin and the potentiation to cocaine seen early in treatment diminished over the 26-27 days, whereas basal dopamine levels remained elevated throughout. Therefore, although these studies do not explain the mechanism whereby buprenorphine reduces heroin and cocaine intake, they do indicate that there is little tolerance to the presence of chronic buprenorphine.

Clorazepate affects cell surface regulation of delta and kappa opioid receptors, thereby altering buprenorphine-induced adaptation in the rat brain

Concomitant abuse of buprenorphine (BPN) and benzodiazepines (BZD) may relate to a pharmacodynamic interaction between the two. The objective of the present work was to investigate the acute and chronic effects of clorazepate (CRZ) alone or in combination with BPN on selective kappa opiate tritiated ligand [3H]-U69 593 and delta opiate radioligand [3H]-deltorphine II binding in the rat brain. Bmax (maximal receptor density) and Kd (the dissociation constant) were directly determined at different brain regions of interest (ROI) selected for high densities of kappa and/or delta receptors in rats treated with BPN and/or CRZ. The agents were administered either once or for 21 consecutive days. Differences in Bmax and Kd (for both specific ligands) were related to drug treatment and receptor location. Globally, single BPN administration induced no changes in kappa or delta opiate receptor binding, whereas repeated BPN administration up-regulated kappa receptor density and decreased delta affinity. At the kappa receptor level, repeated administration of CRZ acted only on Kd, whereas the delta receptor was up-regulated. Repeated addition of CRZ to BPN had no effect on kappa receptor Bmax versus chronic controls. By significantly decreasing Bmax, CRZ nullified the effect of chronic BPN on the kappa receptor. The modifications were strongest in the nucleus accumbens, where both types of receptor occur. Treatments had region-selective effects in some brain areas, such as the amygdala, periaqueductal gray matter, hypothalamus and caudate putamen. Increased mu and delta receptor densities would be expected to provide reinforcement by enhancing reward, and impairment of kappa receptor availability would be expected to decrease aversion. The effects described are likely to influence addictive behavior among people abusing BZD and BPN.