The influence of deep brain stimulation intensity and duration on symptoms evolution in an OFF stimulation dystonia study

The role of genetics in the treatment of dystonia with deep brain stimulation: Systematic review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions that lead to involuntary postures or repetitive movements. Genetic mutations are being increasingly recognized as a cause of dystonia. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is one of the limited treatment options available. However, there are varying reports on its efficacy in genetic dystonias. This systematic review of the characteristics of genetic dystonias treated with DBS and their outcomes aims to aid in the evaluation of eligibility for such treatment.

METHODS

We performed a PUBMED search of all papers related to genetic dystonias and DBS up until April 2022. In addition to performing a systematic review, we also performed a meta-analysis to assess the role of the mutation on DBS response. We included cases that had a confirmed genetic mutation and DBS along with pre-and post-operative BFMDRS.

RESULTS

Ninety-one reports met our inclusion criteria and from them, 235 cases were analyzed. Based on our analysis DYT-TOR1A dystonia had the best evidence for DBS response and Rapid-Onset Dystonia Parkinsonism was among the least responsive to DBS.

CONCLUSION

While our report supports the role of genetics in DBS selection and response, it is limited by the rarity of the individual genetic conditions, the reliance on case reports and case series, and the limited ability to obtain genetic testing on a large scale in real-time as opposed to retrospectively as in many cases.

Theta-frequency medial septal nucleus deep brain stimulation increases neurovascular activity in MK-801-treated mice

Introduction

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has shown remarkable success treating neurological and psychiatric disorders including Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, dystonia, epilepsy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. DBS is now being explored to improve cognitive and functional outcomes in other psychiatric conditions, such as those characterized by reduced N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) function (i.e., schizophrenia). While DBS for movement disorders generally involves high-frequency (>100 Hz) stimulation, there is evidence that low-frequency stimulation may have beneficial and persisting effects when applied to cognitive brain networks.

Methods

In this study, we utilize a novel technology, functional ultrasound imaging (fUSI), to characterize the cerebrovascular impact of medial septal nucleus (MSN) DBS under conditions of NMDA antagonism (pharmacologically using Dizocilpine [MK-801]) in anesthetized male mice.

Results

Imaging from a sagittal plane across a variety of brain regions within and outside of the septohippocampal circuit, we find that MSN theta-frequency (7.7 Hz) DBS increases hippocampal cerebral blood volume (CBV) during and after stimulation. This effect was not present using standard high-frequency stimulation parameters [i.e., gamma (100 Hz)].

Discussion

These results indicate the MSN DBS increases circuit-specific hippocampal neurovascular activity in a frequency-dependent manner and does so in a way that continues beyond the period of electrical stimulation.

Electrophysiological variability as marker of dystonia worsening under deep brain stimulation successive withdrawal and renewal effects

DBS has been shown to be an effective intervention for neurological disorders. However, the intervention is complex and many aspects have not been understood. Various clinical situations have no solution and follow trial and error approaches. Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions, which gives rise to abnormal movements and postures. Status dystonicus (SD) represents a life-threatening condition that requires urgent assessment and management. Electrophysiological markers for risk of symptom worsening and SD related patterns of evolution in patients treated with long-term deep brain stimulation (DBS), and specially under the effect of withdrawal and renewals of simulation are needed. To this end, we study the variability of neural synchronization as a mechanism for symptom generation under successive perturbations to a system, i.e. withdrawals and renewals of neuromodulation, through computational simulation of clinical profiles under different plasticity conditions. The simulation shows that the neuroplasticity makeup influences the variability of oscillation synchronization patterns in virtual "patients". The difference between the effect of different electrophysiological signatures is remarkable and under a certain condition (equal medium long term potentiation and long term depression) the situation resembles that of a stable equilibrium, putatively making the sudden worsening or change less likely. Stability of variability can only be observed in this condition and is clearly distinct from other scenarios. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that the neuroplasticity makeup affects the variability of the oscillatory synchrony. This i) informs the shaping of the electrophysiological makeup and ii) might serve as a marker for clinical behavior.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Pediatric Patients with Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy and Deep Brain Stimulation

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been increasingly used in the management of dyskinetic cerebral palsy (DCP). Data on long-term effects and the safety profile are rare.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the efficacy and safety of pallidal DBS in pediatric patients with DCP.

METHODS

The STIM-CP trial was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study in which patients from the parental trial agreed to be followed-up for up to 36 months. Assessments included motor and non-motor domains.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients included initially, 14 (mean inclusion age 14 years) were assessed. There was a significant change in the (blinded) ratings of the total Dyskinesia Impairment Scale at 36 months. Twelve serious adverse events (possibly) related to treatment were documented.

CONCLUSION

DBS significantly improved dyskinesia, but other outcome parameters did not change significantly. Investigations of larger homogeneous cohorts are needed to further ascertain the impact of DBS and guide treatment decisions in DCP. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

What have we learned about the biology of dystonia from deep brain stimulation?

Deep brain stimulation has dramatically changed the management of patients with dystonia, therapeutic approach of dystonia with marked improvement of dystonia and functional disability. However, despite decades of experience and identification of good prognosis factors, prediction of beneficial effect at the individual level is still a challenge. There is inter-individual variability in therapeutic outcome. Genetic factors are identified but subgroups of patients still have relapse or worsening of dystonia in short or long term. Possible "biological factors" underlying such a difference among patients are discussed, including structural or functional differences including altered plasticity.

Microendoscopic transventricular deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus as a safe treatment in intractable epilepsy: A feasibility study

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) is proposed in patients with severe intractable epilepsy. When used, the transventricular approach increases the risk of bleeding due the anatomy around the entry point in the thalamus. To avoid such a complication, we used a transventricular microendoscopic technique.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of nine adult patients who were surgically treated for refractory epilepsy between 2010 and 2019 by DBS of the anterior thalamic nucleus.

RESULTS

Endoscopy provides a direct visual control of the entry point of the lead in the thalamus through the ventricle by avoiding ependymal vessels. No hemorrhage was recorded and accuracy was systematically checked by intraoperative stereotactic MRI. We reported a responder rate improvement in 88.9% of patients at 1 year and in 87.5% at 2 years. We showed a significant decrease in global seizure count per month one year after DBS (68.1%; P=0.013) leading to an overall improvement in quality of life. No major adverse effect was recorded during the follow-up. ANT DBS showed a prominent significant effect with a decrease of the number of generalized seizures.

CONCLUSION

We aimed at a better ANT/lead collimation using a vertical transventricular approach under microendoscopic monitoring. This technique permitted to demonstrate the safety and the accuracy of the procedure.

Toward personalized medicine in connectomic deep brain stimulation

At the group-level, deep brain stimulation leads to significant therapeutic benefit in a multitude of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders. At the single-patient level, however, symptoms may sometimes persist despite "optimal" electrode placement at established treatment coordinates. This may be partly explained by limitations of disease-centric strategies that are unable to account for heterogeneous phenotypes and comorbidities observed in clinical practice. Instead, tailoring electrode placement and programming to individual patients' symptom profiles may increase the fraction of top-responding patients. Here, we propose a three-step, circuit-based framework with the aim of developing patient-specific treatment targets that address the unique symptom constellation prevalent in each patient. First, we describe how a symptom network target library could be established by mapping beneficial or undesirable DBS effects to distinct circuits based on (retrospective) group-level data. Second, we suggest ways of matching the resulting symptom networks to circuits defined in the individual patient (template matching). Third, we introduce network blending as a strategy to calculate optimal stimulation targets and parameters by selecting and weighting a set of symptom-specific networks based on the symptom profile and subjective priorities of the individual patient. We integrate the approach with published literature and conclude by discussing limitations and future challenges.

Electrophysiological Signature and the Prediction of Deep Brain Stimulation Withdrawal and Insertion Effects

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) serves as a treatment for neurological and psychiatric disorders, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), essential tremor, dystonia, Tourette Syndrome (GTS), Huntington's disease, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). There is broad experience with the short-term effects of DBS in individual diseases and their signs/symptoms. However, even in acute treatment and for the same disorder or a given disorder, a prediction of effect is not perfect. Even further, the factors that influence the long-term effect of DBS and its withdrawal are hardly characterized. In this work, we aim to shed light on an important topic, the question of “DBS dependency.” To address this, we make use of the Kuramoto model of phase synchronization (oscillation feature) endowed with neuroplasticity to study the effects of DBS under successive withdrawals and renewals of neuromodulation as well as influence of treatment duration in de novo DBS “patients.” The results of our simulation show that the characteristics of neuroplasticity have a profound effect on the stability and mutability of oscillation synchronization patterns across successive withdrawal and renewal of DBS in chronic “patients” and also in de novo DBS “patients” with varying duration of treatment (here referred to as the “number of iterations”). Importantly, the results demonstrate the strong effect of the individual neuroplasticity makeup on the behavior of synchrony of oscillatory activity that promotes certain disorder/disease states or symptoms. The effect of DBS-mediated neuromodulation and withdrawal is highly dependent on the makeup of the neuroplastic signature of a disorder or an individual.

Longterm Improvement After Cessation of Chronic Deep Brain Stimulation in Acquired Dystonia

Introduction

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become an accepted treatment for inherited and idiopathic dystonia but less so for acquired dystonia. Patients benefit from long-term improvement with chronic DBS. Prolonged benefit over months has even been reported after cessation of stimulation on long-term follow-up.

Case report

We report a case of a 25-year-old man with acquired dystonia who had sustained symptom improvement despite battery depletion after 6.5 years of chronic bilateral thalamic and pallidal DBS.

Discussion

We posit that chronic pallidal DBS can be a genuine disease-modifying treatment in single patients with dystonia with regard to its long-term effect even after prolonged discontinuation.

Highlights

Chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an approved treatment for idiopathic and inherited dystonia. During the early course of chronic stimulation, cessation of DBS due to battery depletion results in rapid worsening of symptoms and rapid battery replacement is required. Few reports of sustained symptom relief in idiopathic dystonia have been published. We report a case of sustained symptom relief in acquired dystonia after DBS cessation which likely reflects neuroplasticity changes with a disease-modifying impact.

A practical guide to troubleshooting pallidal deep brain stimulation issues in patients with dystonia

High frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the internal portion of the globus pallidus has, in the last two decades, become a mainstream therapy for the management of medically-refractory dystonia syndromes. Such increasing uptake places an onus on movement disorder physicians to become familiar with this treatment modality, in particular optimal patient selection for the procedure and how to troubleshoot problems relating to sub-optimal efficacy and therapy-related side effects. Deep brain stimulation for dystonic conditions presents some unique challenges. For example, the frequent lack of immediate change in clinical status following stimulation alterations means that programming often relies on personal experience and local practice rather than real-time indicators of efficacy. Further, dystonia is a highly heterogeneous disorder, making the development of unifying guidelines and programming algorithms for DBS in this population difficult. Consequently, physicians may feel less confident in managing DBS for dystonia as compared to other indications e.g. Parkinson's disease. In this review, we integrate our years of personal experience of the programming of DBS systems for dystonia with a critical appraisal of the literature to produce a practical guide for troubleshooting common issues encountered in patients with dystonia treated with DBS, in the hope of improving the care for these patients.

Efficacy and safety of general anesthesia deep brain stimulation for dystonia: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 341 cases

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of deep brain stimulation (DBS) under general anesthesia for the treatment of dystonia have not yet been confirmed with high level of evidence. This meta-analysis with pooled individual patient data aims to assess the clinical outcomes and identify the potential prognostic factors of dystonia patients who underwent general anesthesia DBS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for articles describing patients with dystonia who underwent asleep DBS and had individual Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores. The relative improvement in BFMDRS scores was considered the primary outcome. Pearson correlation analyses and multivariate linear regression analysis were conducted to explore the prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies involving 341 patients were included. The mean postoperative improvement in BFMDRS-M (BFMDRS movement subscale) and BFMDRS-D (BFMDRS disability subscale) scores were 58.6±36.2% and 48.5±38.7% at the last follow-up visit, respectively, with a mean follow-up time of 22.4±27.6 months. Age at surgery and disease duration showed a negative correlation with the percent improvement of BFMDRS-M (%) at the last visit (r=-0.134, P=0.013; r=-0.165, P=0.006). In the stepwise multivariate regression, only disease duration remained a relevant factor. Additionally, the adverse events were acceptable.

CONCLUSION

General anesthesia DBS is a safe, effective, and feasible option for dystonia patients in the long term. Shorter disease duration predicts better clinical outcomes.

KMT2B-related disorders: expansion of the phenotypic spectrum and long-term efficacy of deep brain stimulation

Heterozygous mutations in KMT2B are associated with an early-onset, progressive and often complex dystonia (DYT28). Key characteristics of typical disease include focal motor features at disease presentation, evolving through a caudocranial pattern into generalized dystonia, with prominent oromandibular, laryngeal and cervical involvement. Although KMT2B-related disease is emerging as one of the most common causes of early-onset genetic dystonia, much remains to be understood about the full spectrum of the disease. We describe a cohort of 53 patients with KMT2B mutations, with detailed delineation of their clinical phenotype and molecular genetic features. We report new disease presentations, including atypical patterns of dystonia evolution and a subgroup of patients with a non-dystonic neurodevelopmental phenotype. In addition to the previously reported systemic features, our study has identified co-morbidities, including the risk of status dystonicus, intrauterine growth retardation, and endocrinopathies. Analysis of this study cohort (n = 53) in tandem with published cases (n = 80) revealed that patients with chromosomal deletions and protein truncating variants had a significantly higher burden of systemic disease (with earlier onset of dystonia) than those with missense variants. Eighteen individuals had detailed longitudinal data available after insertion of deep brain stimulation for medically refractory dystonia. Median age at deep brain stimulation was 11.5 years (range: 4.5-37.0 years). Follow-up after deep brain stimulation ranged from 0.25 to 22 years. Significant improvement of motor function and disability (as assessed by the Burke Fahn Marsden's Dystonia Rating Scales, BFMDRS-M and BFMDRS-D) was evident at 6 months, 1 year and last follow-up (motor, P = 0.001, P = 0.004, and P = 0.012; disability, P = 0.009, P = 0.002 and P = 0.012). At 1 year post-deep brain stimulation, >50% of subjects showed BFMDRS-M and BFMDRS-D improvements of >30%. In the long-term deep brain stimulation cohort (deep brain stimulation inserted for >5 years, n = 8), improvement of >30% was maintained in 5/8 and 3/8 subjects for the BFMDRS-M and BFMDRS-D, respectively. The greatest BFMDRS-M improvements were observed for trunk (53.2%) and cervical (50.5%) dystonia, with less clinical impact on laryngeal dystonia. Improvements in gait dystonia decreased from 20.9% at 1 year to 16.2% at last assessment; no patient maintained a fully independent gait. Reduction of BFMDRS-D was maintained for swallowing (52.9%). Five patients developed mild parkinsonism following deep brain stimulation. KMT2B-related disease comprises an expanding continuum from infancy to adulthood, with early evidence of genotype-phenotype correlations. Except for laryngeal dysphonia, deep brain stimulation provides a significant improvement in quality of life and function with sustained clinical benefit depending on symptoms distribution.

Reappearance of Symptoms after GPi-DBS Discontinuation in Cervical Dystonia

Background

Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus interna (GPi‐DBS) is a highly efficacious treatment for cervical dystonia. Typically, the treatment response is delayed, appearing and increasing even months after implantation. However, it is not known how fast the symptoms reappear and whether there is a long‐term therapeutic effect after the stimulation is discontinued.

Objectives

To study symptom reappearance after switching GPi‐DBS off in cervical dystonia.

Methods

Twelve patients with bilateral GPi‐DBS were included in the study. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) was evaluated during the study with DBS stimulation on, after switching the stimulation off and 2 days after the stimulation was switched off. Presurgical symptom severity and best postsurgical response were extracted from the hospital records.

Results

At the time of the investigation, GPi‐DBS was associated with 67 (SD 39)% symptom improvement of presurgical symptoms severity (P = 0.001). Symptom improvement decreased to 27 (53)% (P = 0.046) (n = 12) acutely after switching the stimulation off and was further reduced to 4 (56)% 2 days after discontinuation (P = 0.01) (n = 11), reaching the presurgical level (P = 0.42). In descriptive analyses, older age was associated with faster worsening of symptoms (P < 0.05). Presurgical symptoms severity, stimulation parameters or magnitude of treatment response did not predict symptom worsening. All but one patient tolerated 2 days DBS switched off.

Conclusions

The results provide novel information about the time frame and severity of symptom worsening after discontinuing GPi‐DBS in cervical dystonia. Symptoms partially reappear immediately after discontinuing GPi‐DBS and full presurgical symptom severity is reached within 2 days.

Secondary Worsening Following DYT1 Dystonia Deep Brain Stimulation: A Multi-country Cohort

Objective: To reveal clinical characteristics of suboptimal responses to deep brain stimulation (DBS) in a multi-country DYT1 dystonia cohort. Methods: In this multi-country multi-center retrospective study, we analyzed the clinical data of DYT1 patients who experienced suboptimal responses to DBS defined as <30% improvement in dystonia scales at the last follow-up compared with baseline. We used a literature-driven historical cohort of 112 DYT1 patients for comparison. Results: Approximately 8% of our study cohort (11 out of 132) experienced suboptimal responses to DBS. Compared with the historical cohort, the multi-country cohort with suboptimal responses had a significantly younger age at onset (mean, 7.0 vs. 8.4 years; p = 0.025) and younger age at DBS (mean, 12.0 vs. 18.6 years; p = 0.019). Additionally, cranial involvement was more common in the multi-country cohort (before DBS, 64% vs. 45%, p = 0.074; before or after DBS, 91% vs. 47%, p = 0.001). Mean motor improvement at the last follow-up from baseline were 0% and 66% for the multi-country and historical cohorts, respectively. All 11 patients of the multi-country cohort had generalization of dystonia within 2.5 years after disease onset. All patients experienced dystonia improvement of >30% postoperatively; however, secondary worsening of dystonia commenced between 6 months and 3 years following DBS. The improvement at the last follow-up was less than 30% despite optimally-placed leads, a trial of multiple programming settings, and additional DBS surgeries in all patients. The on-/off-stimulation comparison at the long-term follow-up demonstrated beneficial effects of DBS despite missing the threshold of 30% improvement over baseline. Conclusion: Approximately 8% of patients represent a more aggressive phenotype of DYT1 dystonia characterized by younger age at onset, faster disease progression, and cranial involvement, which seems to be associated with long-term suboptimal responses to DBS (e.g., secondary worsening). This information could be useful for both clinicians and patients in clinical decision making and patient counseling before and following DBS implantations. Patients with this phenotype may have different neuroplasticity, neurogenetics, or possibly distinct neurophysiology.

Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions

The clinical use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is among the most important advances in the clinical neurosciences in the past two decades. As a surgical tool, DBS can directly measure pathological brain activity and can deliver adjustable stimulation for therapeutic effect in neurological and psychiatric disorders correlated with dysfunctional circuitry. The development of DBS has opened new opportunities to access and interrogate malfunctioning brain circuits and to test the therapeutic potential of regulating the output of these circuits in a broad range of disorders. Despite the success and rapid adoption of DBS, crucial questions remain, including which brain areas should be targeted and in which patients. This Review considers how DBS has facilitated advances in our understanding of how circuit malfunction can lead to brain disorders and outlines the key unmet challenges and future directions in the DBS field. Determining the next steps in DBS science will help to define the future role of this technology in the development of novel therapeutics for the most challenging disorders affecting the human brain.

Deep brain stimulation for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration is a rare autosomal-recessive disorder, characterized by progressive neurodegeneration associated with brain iron accumulation. DBS has been trialed to treat related movement disorders, particularly dystonia. The objective of this study was to determine the outcome and safety of DBS for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis using independent participant data (n = 99) from 38 articles. Primary outcome was change in movement and disability scores of the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were response rate and complications.

RESULTS

Patients with classic-type (n = 58) and atypical-type (n = 15) pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration were operated on at a median age of 11 and 31 years, respectively (P < 0.001). GPi was primarily targeted (n = 87). Mean dystonia movement score improved 1 year following GPi-DBS (-26%; 95% confidence interval, -37% to -15%), particularly in atypical versus classic cases (-45% vs -16%; P < 0.001). At least 30% improvement was observed in 34% of classic versus 73% of atypical cases (P = 0.04). Higher preoperative score and atypical type predicted larger improvement. GPi-DBS improved dystonia disability score in atypical (-31%; 95% confidence interval, -49% to -13%) but not classic (-5%; 95% confidence interval, -17% to 8%) cases. Prevalence of surgical infections (6%) and hardware failure (7%) was similar to other dystonia etiologies. Two patients died within 3 months. There was insufficient data to describe outcome > 1 year following GPi-DBS or with other DBS targets. Overall, small sample sizes limited generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides level 4 evidence that GPi-DBS for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration may improve dystonia movement scores in classic type and atypical type and disability scores in atypical type 1 year postoperatively. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes

BACKGROUND

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is investigated to modulate neuronal function by applying a fixed low-intensity direct current to scalp.

OBJECTIVES

We critically discuss evidence for a monotonic response in effect size with increasing current intensity, with a specific focus on a question if increasing applied current enhance the efficacy of tDCS.

METHODS

We analyzed tDCS intensity does-response from different perspectives including biophysical modeling, animal modeling, human neurophysiology, neuroimaging and behavioral/clinical measures. Further, we discuss approaches to design dose-response trials.

RESULTS

Physical models predict electric field in the brain increases with applied tDCS intensity. Data from animal studies are lacking since a range of relevant low-intensities is rarely tested. Results from imaging studies are ambiguous while human neurophysiology, including using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a probe, suggests a complex state-dependent non-monotonic dose response. The diffusivity of brain current flow produced by conventional tDCS montages complicates this analysis, with relatively few studies on focal High Definition (HD)-tDCS. In behavioral and clinical trials, only a limited range of intensities (1-2 mA), and typically just one intensity, are conventionally tested; moreover, outcomes are subject brain-state dependent. Measurements and models of current flow show that for the same applied current, substantial differences in brain current occur across individuals. Trials are thus subject to inter-individual differences that complicate consideration of population-level dose response.

CONCLUSION

The presence or absence of simple dose response does not impact how efficacious a given tDCS dose is for a given indication. Understanding dose-response in human applications of tDCS is needed for protocol optimization including individualized dose to reduce outcome variability, which requires intelligent design of dose-response studies.

Chronic deep brain stimulation normalizes scalp EEG activity in isolated dystonia

OBJECTIVE

To investigate cortical activity using scalp EEG in patients with isolated dystonia treated with chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS), on and off stimulation.

METHODS

We analyzed 64-channel scalp EEG in 12 isolated dystonia patients treated with chronic DBS (7 generalized, 5 cervical/segmental; 7 globus pallidus (GP), 5 subthalamic nucleus (STN)), and 20 healthy age-matched controls. Recordings during rest and movement task, and clinical motor scores, were collected with DBS-on and during a 90-min DBS washout.

RESULTS

Resting state alpha power in the dominant (or contralateral to more dystonic side) motor cortex channel during DBS was comparable to healthy controls, but it increased when DBS was stopped. Resting state and movement-related alpha coherence between bilateral motor cortex channels was increased off DBS.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic DBS reduces exaggerated alpha oscillations and interhemispheric alpha coherence in the motor cortex of patients with isolated dystonia.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings complement related studies in Parkinson's disease and support the view that network desynchronization is a prominent mechanism of DBS in movement disorders.

Development of Hyperkinesias after Long-term Pallidal Stimulation for Idiopathic Segmental Dystonia

Background

Chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) has become an established treatment for dystonia. While bradykinetic symptoms may occur on chronic stimulation, the appearance of hyperkinetic movements has not been well characterized.

Case Report

We report on the development of hyperkinesias after more than 10 years of GPi DBS.

Discussion

Hyperkinesias may evolve upon long-term GPi DBS in dystonia. This might be related to a combined effect consisting of a reduced threshold for effective GPi stimulation for dystonia and spread of current to the globus pallidus externus.

Complications of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for dystonia in children - The challenges and 10 year experience in a large paediatric cohort

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been increasingly used for primary and secondary movement disorders in children and young people. Reports of hardware related complications have been sparse for this population and from small cohorts of patients. We report DBS complications from a single large DBS centre with 10 year experience. Data was collected as a prospective audit and additionally from a questionnaire on recharging of the stimulators. 129 patients with a minimum 6 months follow up were identified, mean age10.8 y (range 3.0-18.75), mean follow up 3.3y (range 0.5-10.3), weight 10.4-94.2 kg, 126 new implants (92 Activa RC) and 69 revisions for reasons other than infection. 26 patients were 7y or younger. Surgical site infections (SSI) rates were 10.3% for new implants and revisions, lower 8.6% for new Activa RC and even lower, 4.7%, for new Activa RC in patients under 7y (1/21). SSI occurred within first 6 months and necessitated total system removal in 86% of those infected. Electrode/extension problems were recorded in 18.4% of patients, fracture in 4.6% malfunction in 7.7%, short extension 3.8% and electrode migration in 2.3%. Other complications involved clinically silent intracranial bleed in 1 patient, skin erosions (2.3%), unexpected switching off in 18.7% of Soletra/Kinetra and 3.4% of Activa RC, transient seroma at IPG site in postoperative period (8%). Of the 48 returned recharging questionnaires, 38% of families required recharger replacement and 23% experienced frequent problems maintaining connection during recharging. However, 83% of responders considered recharging not at all or only a little care burden. We identified lower than previously reported DBS infection rates particularly for patients under 7 years, but relatively high incidence of technical problems with electrodes, extensions and in particular recharging. This has to be considered when offering DBS for children with movement disorders.

Historical developments in children's deep brain stimulation

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneous by the underlying pathobiology and clinical presentation, childhood onset dystonia is most frequently progressive, with related disability and limitations in functions of daily living. Consequently, there is an obvious need for efficient symptomatic therapies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Following lesional surgery to basal ganglia (BG) and thalamus, deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a more conservative and adjustable intervention to and validated for internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi), highly efficient in treating isolated "primary" dystonia and associated symptoms such as subcortical myoclonus. The role of DBS in acquired, neurometabolic and degenerative disorders with dystonia deserves further exploration to confirm as an efficient and lasting therapy. However, the pathobiological background with distribution of the sequellae over the central nervous system and related clinical features, will limit DBS efficacy in these conditions. Cumulative arguments propose DBS in severe life threatening dystonic conditions called status dystonicus as first line therapy, irrespective of the underlying cause. There are no currently available validated selection criteria for DBS in pediatric dystonia. Concurrent targets such as subthalamic nucleus (STN) and several motor nuclei of the thalamus are under exploration and only little information is available in children. DBS programming in paediatric population was adopted from experience in adults. The choice of neuromodulatory DBS parameters could influence not only the initial therapeutic outcome of dystonic symptoms but also its maintenance over time and potentially the occurrence of DBS related side effects.

CONCLUSION

DBS allows efficient symptomatic treatment of severe dystonia in children and advances pathophysiological knowledge about local and distributed abnormal neural activity over the motor cortical-subcortical networks in dystonia and other movement disorders.

Hypometric anticipatory postural adjustments in dystonia are not affected by deep brain stimulation of globus pallidus internus

BACKGROUND

Dystonia is a movement disorder with patterned, directional, and often sustained muscle contractions that produce abnormal postures or repetitive movements. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus (GPi) is an effective and safe treatment for medically refractory dystonia. However, recent studies reported gait problems, gait freezing and falls in patients treated with DBS. Because these symptoms may point to deficient gait initiation processes, we systematically assessed the anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) prior to stepping in dystonia patients with GPi-DBS.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with focal/segmental dystonia under GPi-DBS and twelve healthy control subjects were included in the study. Data were collected using pressure sensitive sensors and APAs were studied by centre of pressure measures. We compared APAs of both groups and analysed the influence of GPi-DBS on APAs in patients.

RESULTS

Medio-lateral and antero-posterior COP displacements, total COP path, maximal APA velocity and 1st step length were all smaller in patients for both ON (p=0.006, p=0.018, p=0.002, p=0.016, p=0.04) and OFF (p=0.001, p=0.01, p=0.001, p=0.03, p=0.024) condition compared to healthy subjects. GPi-DBS did not change APA parameters in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Observations that APAs are impaired in dystonia and are at the same time not affected by the stimulation current are compatible with the assumption that APAs and dystonic symptoms may rely on distinct networks, possibly within the same cortical and basal ganglia structures. With no effect of stimulation on APAs it is unlikely that this would be a mechanism of impaired balance in the patients after the surgery.

Update on Deep Brain Stimulation for Dyskinesia and Dystonia: A Literature Review

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been an established surgical treatment option for dyskinesia from Parkinson disease and for dystonia. The present article deals with the timing of surgical intervention, selecting an appropriate target, and minimizing adverse effects. We provide an overview of current evidences and issues for dyskinesia and dystonia as well as emerging DBS technology.

Technical aspects of neurostimulation: Focus on equipment, electric field modeling, and stimulation protocols

Neuromodulation is a field of science, medicine, and bioengineering that encompasses implantable and non-implantable technologies for the purpose of improving quality of life and functioning of humans. Brain neuromodulation involves different neurostimulation techniques: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and deep brain stimulation (DBS), which are being used both to study their effects on cognitive brain functions and to treat neuropsychiatric disorders. The mechanisms of action of neurostimulation remain incompletely understood. Insight into the technical basis of neurostimulation might be a first step towards a more profound understanding of these mechanisms, which might lead to improved clinical outcome and therapeutic potential. This review provides an overview of the technical basis of neurostimulation focusing on the equipment, the present understanding of induced electric fields, and the stimulation protocols. The review is written from a technical perspective aimed at supporting the use of neurostimulation in clinical practice.

Postural stability under globus pallidus internus stimulation for dystonia

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus (GPi-DBS) is an efficient and safe treatment for medically refractory dystonia. However, recent studies reported gait problems, falls and bradykinesia in patients after the DBS procedure. The aim of this study was to quantify the effect of GPi-DBS on postural performance in patients with cranio-cervical dystonia.

METHODS

Thirteen patients with focal/segmental dystonia and GPi-DBS participated in the study. We performed two postural tests (pull test and push and release test) in on- and off-stimulation conditions and recorded the movements of the patients with inertial sensors.

RESULTS

Under stimulation patients exhibited a higher number of steps (p=0.015), reduced first step length (p=0.011) and lower stepping velocity (p=0.001), compared to off stimulation. We observed a higher number of steps in the push and release test compared to the pull test (p=0.038). The interaction between stimulation condition and test type was significant (p=0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

The velocity and amplitude of postural reactions are compromised by GPi-DBS in patients with cranio-cervical dystonia.

SIGNIFICANCE

This information corresponds to patient's reports of falls and postural instability after GPi-DBS. Pre-operatively, patients should be informed about the possibility of the occurrence of such phenomena.

Defining a therapeutic target for pallidal deep brain stimulation for dystonia

OBJECTIVE

To create a data-driven computational model that identifies brain regions most frequently influenced by successful deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus (GP) for advanced, medication-resistant, generalized dystonia.

METHODS

We studied a retrospective cohort of 21 DYT1 primary dystonia patients treated for at least 1 year with bilateral pallidal DBS. We first created individual volume of tissue activation (VTA) models utilizing neuroimaging and postoperative stimulation and clinical data. These models were then combined into a standardized probabilistic dystonia stimulation atlas (DSA). Finally, we constructed a candidate target volume from electrodes demonstrating at least 75% improvement in contralateral symptoms, utilizing voxels stimulated by least 75% of these electrodes.

RESULTS

Pallidal DBS resulted in a median contralateral hemibody improvement of 90% (mean = 83%, standard deviation [SD] = 20) after 1 year of treatment. Individual VTA models of the 42 active electrodes included in the study demonstrated a mean stimulation volume of 501mm ([SD] = 284). The resulting DSA showed that areas most frequently stimulated were located squarely in the middle of the posterior GP, with a common target volume measuring 153mm(3) .

INTERPRETATION

Our results provide a map of the region of influence of therapeutic DBS for dystonia and represent a potential target to refine current methods of surgical planning and stimulation parameters selection. Based on their role in alleviating symptoms, these regions may also provide anatomical and physiological information relevant to disease models of dystonia. Further experimental and clinical studies will be needed to validate their importance.

Deep brain stimulation for Huntington's disease: long-term results of a prospective open-label study

OBJECT.: To date, experience of globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of Huntington's disease (HD) has been limited to a small number of case reports. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term motor outcome of a cohort of HD patients treated with GPi DBS.

METHODS

Seven patients with pharmacologically resistant chorea and functional impairment were included in a prospective open-label study from 2008 to 2011. The main outcome measure was the motor section of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale. The primary end point was reduction of chorea.

RESULTS

Patients underwent MRI-guided bilateral GPi implantation. The median duration of follow-up was 3 years. A significant reduction of chorea was observed in all patients, with sustained therapeutic effect; the mean improvement on the chorea subscore was 58.34% at the 12-month follow-up visit (p = 0.018) and 59.8% at the 3-year visit (p = 0.040). Bradykinesia and dystonia showed a nonsignificant trend toward progressive worsening related to disease evolution and partly to DBS. The frequency of stimulation was 130 Hz for all patients. DBS-induced bradykinesia was managed by pulse-width reduction or bipolar settings. Levodopa mildly improved bradykinesia in 4 patients. Regular off-stimulation tests confirmed a persistent therapeutic effect of DBS on chorea.

CONCLUSIONS

GPi DBS may provide sustained chorea improvement in selected HD patients with pharmacologically resistant chorea, with transient benefit in physical aspects of quality of life before progression of behavioral and cognitive disorders. DBS therapy did not improve dystonia or bradykinesia. Further studies including quality of life measures are needed to evaluate the impact of DBS in the long-term outcome of HD.

Onset latency of segmental dystonia after deep brain stimulation cessation: a randomized, double-blind crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the globus pallidus internus is an effective treatment for cervical dystonia (CD). Interestingly, the onset of initial DBS effects is significantly prolonged compared with that in other diseases, such as Parkinson's disease. The return of symptoms after cessation of DBS could be delayed as well, but this has not been studied systematically.

METHODS

In patients who were treated for CD using DBS and had a good treatment effect, we compared interruption of DBS with sham-OFF in a randomized, double-blind crossover trial.

RESULTS

We observed that dystonic features appeared within a few minutes at almost full intensity in all patients after the cessation of DBS.

CONCLUSIONS

The almost immediate onset of dystonic features in our sample seems to exclude mechanisms with long time constants from the pathophysiology of dystonia. Thus, it is likely that, in these patients, an aberrant pattern of neural activity representing an inappropriate set point value for the position of the head is responsible for dystonia.