1
|
Santoro V, Hou MD, Premoli I, Belardinelli P, Biondi A, Carobin A, Puledda F, Michalopoulou PG, Richardson MP, Rocchi L, Shergill SS. Investigating cortical excitability and inhibition in patients with schizophrenia: A TMS-EEG study. Brain Res Bull 2024; 212:110972. [PMID: 38710310 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2024.110972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electromyography (EMG) has widely been used as a non-invasive brain stimulation tool to assess excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance. E/I imbalance is a putative mechanism underlying symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Combined TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) provides a detailed examination of cortical excitability to assess the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. This study aimed to investigate differences in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), TMS-related spectral perturbations (TRSP) and intertrial coherence (ITC) between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS TMS was applied over the motor cortex during EEG recording. Differences in TEPs, TRSP and ITC between the patient and healthy subjects were analysed for all electrodes at each time point, by applying multiple independent sample t-tests with a cluster-based permutation analysis to correct for multiple comparisons. RESULTS Patients demonstrated significantly reduced amplitudes of early and late TEP components compared to healthy controls. Patients also showed a significant reduction of early delta (50-160 ms) and theta TRSP (30-250ms),followed by a reduction in alpha and beta suppression (220-560 ms; 190-420 ms). Patients showed a reduction of both early (50-110 ms) gamma increase and later (180-230 ms) gamma suppression. Finally, the ITC was significantly lower in patients in the alpha band, from 30 to 260 ms. CONCLUSION Our findings support the putative role of impaired GABA-receptor mediated inhibition in schizophrenia impacting excitatory neurotransmission. Further studies can usefully elucidate mechanisms underlying specific symptoms clusters using TMS-EEG biometrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Santoro
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRC, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - M D Hou
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - I Premoli
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Belardinelli
- Cimec, Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - A Biondi
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Carobin
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - F Puledda
- Headache Group, Wolfson SPaRC, Institute of Psychiatry Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - P G Michalopoulou
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - M P Richardson
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - L Rocchi
- Department of Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - S S Shergill
- Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience (IoPPN), King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Kent and Medway Medical School, Canterbury CT2 7FS, United Kingdom; Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Maidstone, ME7 4JL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harquel S, Cadic-Melchior A, Morishita T, Fleury L, Witon A, Ceroni M, Brügger J, Meyer NH, Evangelista GG, Egger P, Beanato E, Menoud P, Van de Ville D, Micera S, Blanke O, Léger B, Adolphsen J, Jagella C, Constantin C, Alvarez V, Vuadens P, Turlan JL, Mühl A, Bonvin C, Koch PJ, Wessel MJ, Hummel FC. Stroke Recovery-Related Changes in Cortical Reactivity Based on Modulation of Intracortical Inhibition. Stroke 2024; 55:1629-1640. [PMID: 38639087 DOI: 10.1161/strokeaha.123.045174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cortical excitation/inhibition dynamics have been suggested as a key mechanism occurring after stroke. Their supportive or maladaptive role in the course of recovery is still not completely understood. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-electroencephalography coupling to study cortical reactivity and intracortical GABAergic inhibition, as well as their relationship to residual motor function and recovery longitudinally in patients with stroke. METHODS Electroencephalography responses evoked by TMS applied to the ipsilesional motor cortex were acquired in patients with stroke with upper limb motor deficit in the acute (1 week), early (3 weeks), and late subacute (3 months) stages. Readouts of cortical reactivity, intracortical inhibition, and complexity of the evoked dynamics were drawn from TMS-evoked potentials induced by single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS (short-interval intracortical inhibition). Residual motor function was quantified through a detailed motor evaluation. RESULTS From 76 patients enrolled, 66 were included (68.2±13.2 years old, 18 females), with a Fugl-Meyer score of the upper extremity of 46.8±19. The comparison with TMS-evoked potentials of healthy older revealed that most affected patients exhibited larger and simpler brain reactivity patterns (Pcluster<0.05). Bayesian ANCOVA statistical evidence for a link between abnormally high motor cortical excitability and impairment level. A decrease in excitability in the following months was significantly correlated with better motor recovery in the whole cohort and the subgroup of recovering patients. Investigation of the intracortical GABAergic inhibitory system revealed the presence of beneficial disinhibition in the acute stage, followed by a normalization of inhibitory activity. This was supported by significant correlations between motor scores and the contrast of local mean field power and readouts of signal dynamics. CONCLUSIONS The present results revealed an abnormal motor cortical reactivity in patients with stroke, which was driven by perturbations and longitudinal changes within the intracortical inhibition system. They support the view that disinhibition in the ipsilesional motor cortex during the first-week poststroke is beneficial and promotes neuronal plasticity and recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvain Harquel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Andéol Cadic-Melchior
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Takuya Morishita
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Lisa Fleury
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Adrien Witon
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Health-IT, Centre de Service, Hôpital du Valais, Switzerland (A.W.)
| | - Martino Ceroni
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Julia Brügger
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Nathalie H Meyer
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, INX and BMI, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland (N.H.M., O.B.)
| | - Giorgia G Evangelista
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Philip Egger
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Elena Beanato
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Pauline Menoud
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
| | - Dimitri Van de Ville
- Medical Image Processing Laboratory, INX, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland (D.V.V.)
- Department of Radiology and Medical Informatics, University of Geneva (UNIGE), Switzerland (D.V.d.V.)
| | - Silvestro Micera
- The Biorobotics Institute and Department of Excellence in Robotics and AI, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy (S.M.)
- Bertarelli Foundation Chair in Translational Neuroengineering, INX and Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (S.M.)
| | - Olaf Blanke
- Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience, INX and BMI, EPFL, Geneva, Switzerland (N.H.M., O.B.)
- Department of Neurology, Geneva University Hospital (HUG), Switzerland (O.B.)
| | - Bertrand Léger
- Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (B.L., P.V., J.-L.T., A.M.)
| | | | | | | | - Vincent Alvarez
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital du Valais, Sion, Switzerland (C.C., V.A., C.B.)
| | - Philippes Vuadens
- Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (B.L., P.V., J.-L.T., A.M.)
| | - Jean-Luc Turlan
- Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (B.L., P.V., J.-L.T., A.M.)
| | - Andreas Mühl
- Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (B.L., P.V., J.-L.T., A.M.)
| | - Christophe Bonvin
- Department of Neurology, Hôpital du Valais, Sion, Switzerland (C.C., V.A., C.B.)
| | - Philipp J Koch
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Germany (P.J.K.)
| | - Maximilian J Wessel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Department of Neurology, Julius-Maximilians-University Würzburg, Germany (M.J.W.)
| | - Friedhelm C Hummel
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, Neuro-X Institute (INX), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Geneva, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Defitech Chair of Clinical Neuroengineering, INX, EPFL Valais, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland (S.H., A.C.-M., T.M., L.F., A.W., M.C., J.B., G.G.E., P.E., E.B., P.M., P.J.K., M.J.W., F.C.H.)
- Clinical Neuroscience, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland (F.C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xia AWL, Jin M, Qin PPI, Kan RLD, Zhang BBB, Giron CG, Lin TTZ, Li ASM, Kranz GS. Instantaneous effects of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on brain oxygenation: A systematic review. Neuroimage 2024; 293:120618. [PMID: 38636640 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
This systematic review investigates how prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) immediately influences neuronal excitability based on oxygenation changes measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). A thorough understanding of TMS-induced excitability changes may enable clinicians to adjust TMS parameters and optimize treatment plans proactively. Five databases were searched for human studies evaluating brain excitability using concurrent TMS/fMRI or TMS/fNIRS. Thirty-seven studies (13 concurrent TMS/fNIRS studies, 24 concurrent TMS/fMRI studies) were included in a qualitative synthesis. Despite methodological inconsistencies, a distinct pattern of activated nodes in the frontoparietal central executive network, the cingulo-opercular salience network, and the default-mode network emerged. The activated nodes included the prefrontal cortex (particularly dorsolateral prefrontal cortex), insula cortex, striatal regions (especially caudate, putamen), anterior cingulate cortex, and thalamus. High-frequency repetitive TMS most consistently induced expected facilitatory effects in these brain regions. However, varied stimulation parameters (e.g., intensity, coil orientation, target sites) and the inter- and intra-individual variability of brain state contribute to the observed heterogeneity of target excitability and co-activated regions. Given the considerable methodological and individual variability across the limited evidence, conclusions should be drawn with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam W L Xia
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Minxia Jin
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China; Shanghai YangZhi Rehabilitation Hospital (Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center), School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
| | - Penny P I Qin
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Rebecca L D Kan
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bella B B Zhang
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cristian G Giron
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tim T Z Lin
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Ami S M Li
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Georg S Kranz
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China; Mental Health Research Center (MHRC), The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Solomon EA, Wang JB, Oya H, Howard MA, Trapp NT, Uitermarkt BD, Boes AD, Keller CJ. TMS provokes target-dependent intracranial rhythms across human cortical and subcortical sites. Brain Stimul 2024:S1935-861X(24)00096-2. [PMID: 38821396 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is believed to alter ongoing neural activity and cause circuit-level changes in brain function. While the electrophysiological effects of TMS have been extensively studied with scalp electroencephalography (EEG), this approach generally evaluates low-frequency neural activity at the cortical surface. However, TMS can be safely used in patients with intracranial electrodes (iEEG), allowing for direct assessment of deeper and more localized oscillatory responses across the frequency spectrum. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS Our study used iEEG to understand the effects of TMS on human neural activity in the spectral domain. We asked (1) which brain regions respond to cortically-targeted TMS, and in what frequency bands, (2) whether deeper brain structures exhibit oscillatory responses, and (3) whether the neural responses to TMS reflect evoked versus induced oscillations. METHODS We recruited 17 neurosurgical patients with indwelling electrodes and recorded neural activity while patients underwent repeated trials of single-pulse TMS at either the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) or parietal cortex. iEEG signals were analyzed using spectral methods to understand the oscillatory responses to TMS. RESULTS Stimulation to DLPFC drove widespread low-frequency increases (3-8Hz) in frontolimbic cortices and high-frequency decreases (30-110Hz) in frontotemporal areas, including the hippocampus. Stimulation to parietal cortex specifically provoked low-frequency responses in the medial temporal lobe. While most low-frequency activity was consistent with phase-locked evoked responses, anterior frontal regions exhibited induced theta oscillations following DLPFC stimulation. CONCLUSIONS By combining TMS with intracranial EEG recordings, our results suggest that TMS is an effective means to perturb oscillatory neural activity in brain-wide networks, including deeper structures not directly accessed by stimulation itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan A Solomon
- Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto CA 94305.
| | - Jeffrey B Wang
- Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto CA 94305; Biophysics Graduate Program, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA 94305
| | - Hiroyuki Oya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242
| | - Matthew A Howard
- Department of Neurosurgery, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242
| | - Nicholas T Trapp
- Department of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242; Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242
| | - Brandt D Uitermarkt
- Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242
| | - Aaron D Boes
- Department of Neurology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242; Department of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242; Department of Pediatrics, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 52242
| | - Corey J Keller
- Dept. of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto CA 94305; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, CA, 94305
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mutanen TP, Ilmoniemi I, Atti I, Metsomaa J, Ilmoniemi RJ. A simulation study: comparing independent component analysis and signal-space projection - source-informed reconstruction for rejecting muscle artifacts evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1324958. [PMID: 38784523 PMCID: PMC11112076 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1324958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) allows researchers to explore cortico-cortical connections. To study effective connections, the first few tens of milliseconds of the TMS-evoked potentials are the most critical. Yet, TMS-evoked artifacts complicate the interpretation of early-latency data. Data-processing strategies like independent component analysis (ICA) and the combined signal-space projection-source-informed reconstruction approach (SSP-SIR) are designed to mitigate artifacts, but their objective assessment is challenging because the true neuronal EEG responses under large-amplitude artifacts are generally unknown. Through simulations, we quantified how the spatiotemporal properties of the artifacts affect the cleaning performances of ICA and SSP-SIR. Methods We simulated TMS-induced muscle artifacts and superposed them on pre-processed TMS-EEG data, serving as the ground truth. The simulated muscle artifacts were varied both in terms of their topography and temporal profiles. The signals were then cleaned using ICA and SSP-SIR, and subsequent comparisons were made with the ground truth data. Results ICA performed better when the artifact time courses were highly variable across the trials, whereas the effectiveness of SSP-SIR depended on the congruence between the artifact and neuronal topographies, with the performance of SSP-SIR being better when difference between topographies was larger. Overall, SSP-SIR performed better than ICA across the tested conditions. Based on these simulations, SSP-SIR appears to be more effective in suppressing TMS-evoked muscle artifacts. These artifacts are shown to be highly time-locked to the TMS pulse and manifest in topographies that differ substantially from the patterns of neuronal potentials. Discussion Selecting between ICA and SSP-SIR should be guided by the characteristics of the artifacts. SSP-SIR might be better equipped for suppressing time-locked artifacts, provided that their topographies are sufficiently different from the neuronal potential patterns of interest, and that the SSP-SIR algorithm can successfully find those artifact topographies from the high-pass-filtered data. ICA remains a powerful tool for rejecting artifacts that are not strongly time locked to the TMS pulse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuomas Petteri Mutanen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Trapp NT, Tsang EW, Bruss J, Russo S, Gander PE, Berger JI, Nourski KV, Rosanova M, Keller CJ, Oya H, Howard MA, Boes AD. TMS-associated auditory evoked potentials can be effectively masked: Evidence from intracranial EEG. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:616-618. [PMID: 38729299 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas T Trapp
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Eric W Tsang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Joel Bruss
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Simone Russo
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20157, Italy; Wallace H Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Phillip E Gander
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Joel I Berger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kirill V Nourski
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Mario Rosanova
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, 20157, Italy
| | - Corey J Keller
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Wu Tsai Neuroscience Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA; Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Healthcare System, and the Sierra Pacific Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), Palo Alto, CA, 94394, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Oya
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Matthew A Howard
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Aaron D Boes
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Iowa Neuroscience Institute, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fong PY, Rothwell JC, Rocchi L. The Past, Current and Future Research in Cerebellar TMS Evoked Responses-A Narrative Review. Brain Sci 2024; 14:432. [PMID: 38790411 PMCID: PMC11118133 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 04/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is a novel technique to investigate cortical physiology in health and disease. The cerebellum has recently gained attention as a possible new hotspot in the field of TMS-EEG, with several reports published recently. However, EEG responses obtained by cerebellar stimulation vary considerably across the literature, possibly due to different experimental methods. Compared to conventional TMS-EEG, which involves stimulation of the cortex, cerebellar TMS-EEG presents some technical difficulties, including strong muscle twitches in the neck area and a loud TMS click when double-cone coils are used, resulting in contamination of responses by electromyographic activity and sensory potentials. Understanding technical difficulties and limitations is essential for the development of cerebellar TMS-EEG research. In this review, we summarize findings of cerebellar TMS-EEG studies, highlighting limitations in experimental design and potential issues that can result in discrepancies between experimental outcomes. Lastly, we propose a possible direction for academic and clinical research with cerebellar TMS-EEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Yu Fong
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (J.C.R.)
- Division of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
- Medical School, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - John C. Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (J.C.R.)
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK; (J.C.R.)
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Reddy PV, Basavaraju R, Sanjay TN, Ramesh A, Chowdhury P, Mehta UM, Venkatasubramanian G, Thirthalli J, Kesavan M. Investigational applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in Mood Disorders: Studies from a tertiary care center in India. Asian J Psychiatr 2024; 97:104054. [PMID: 38728813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
The investigational potential of TMS in psychiatry is largely underutilized. In the current article, we present the results of five studies with similar TMS protocols that looked at the investigative applications of TMS via measuring cortical reactivity as potential biomarkers in mood disorders. The first two studies, evaluate potential of TMS parameters and Motor neuron system (MNS) as state or trait markers of BD. Third and fourth studies evaluate these as endophenotypic markers of BD. The fifth study which is an RCT evaluating add-on yoga in UD, evaluates if markers of CI can index the therapeutic response of yoga. In study one MT1 was significantly greater in the SM (symptomatic-mania) group compared to HC (healthy-control) (P=0.032). The cortical inhibition measures SICI was reduced in SM(P=0.021) and BD (remitted Bipolar) (P=0.023) groups compared to HC. LICI was increased in the SM(0.021) and BD(P=0.06) groups compared to HC. In study two, a significant group x time interaction effect was observed indicating higher putative MNS-activity mediation in patients compared to HC on SlCl(P=0.024), LlCl(P=0.033). There were no significant group differences noted in the endophenotype studies. The fifth study showed a significant time X group interaction for CSP, favoring improvement in YG (yoga-group) (p<0.01).No significant change was observed for LICI(p=0.2), SICI(p=0.5). Limitations of these studies notwithstanding, we conclude that cortical reactivity measured using TMS is a potential biomarker across the course of mood disorders, starting from state and trait markers to understanding the therapeutic mechanism of a particular treatment modality in these disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preethi V Reddy
- Department of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560029, India
| | | | - Tarasingh N Sanjay
- Department of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560029, India; Psychiatry Registrar, North West Area Mental Health (NWAMH), Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Abhishek Ramesh
- Department of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560029, India
| | - Praerna Chowdhury
- Center for Consciousness Studies, Department of Neurophysiology, Hosur Road NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, India
| | - Urvakhsh M Mehta
- Department of Psychiatry, NIMHANS, Hosur Road, Bengaluru 560029, India
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
She X, Nix KC, Cline CC, Qi W, Tugin S, He Z, Baumer FM. Stability of transcranial magnetic stimulation electroencephalogram evoked potentials in pediatric epilepsy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9045. [PMID: 38641629 PMCID: PMC11031596 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59468-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation paired with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) can measure local excitability and functional connectivity. To address trial-to-trial variability, responses to multiple TMS pulses are recorded to obtain an average TMS evoked potential (TEP). Balancing adequate data acquisition to establish stable TEPs with feasible experimental duration is critical when applying TMS-EEG to clinical populations. Here we aim to investigate the minimum number of pulses (MNP) required to achieve stable TEPs in children with epilepsy. Eighteen children with Self-Limited Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes, a common epilepsy arising from the motor cortices, underwent multiple 100-pulse blocks of TMS to both motor cortices over two days. TMS was applied at 120% of resting motor threshold (rMT) up to a maximum of 100% maximum stimulator output. The average of all 100 pulses was used as a "gold-standard" TEP to which we compared "candidate" TEPs obtained by averaging subsets of pulses. We defined TEP stability as the MNP needed to achieve a concordance correlation coefficient of 80% between the candidate and "gold-standard" TEP. We additionally assessed whether experimental or clinical factors affected TEP stability. Results show that stable TEPs can be derived from fewer than 100 pulses, a number typically used for designing TMS-EEG experiments. The early segment (15-80 ms) of the TEP was less stable than the later segment (80-350 ms). Global mean field amplitude derived from all channels was less stable than local TEP derived from channels overlying the stimulated site. TEP stability did not differ depending on stimulated hemisphere, block order, or antiseizure medication use, but was greater in older children. Stimulation administered with an intensity above the rMT yielded more stable local TEPs. Studies of TMS-EEG in pediatrics have been limited by the complexity of experimental set-up and time course. This study serves as a critical starting point, demonstrating the feasibility of designing efficient TMS-EEG studies that use a relatively small number of pulses to study pediatric epilepsy and potentially other pediatric groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiwei She
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kerry C Nix
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Christopher C Cline
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Wendy Qi
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Sergei Tugin
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Zihuai He
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Fiona M Baumer
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Metsomaa J, Song Y, Mutanen TP, Gordon PC, Ziemann U, Zrenner C, Hernandez-Pavon JC. Adapted Beamforming: A Robust and Flexible Approach for Removing Various Types of Artifacts from TMS-EEG Data. Brain Topogr 2024:10.1007/s10548-024-01044-4. [PMID: 38598019 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01044-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
Electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded as response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be highly informative of cortical reactivity and connectivity. Reliable EEG interpretation requires artifact removal as the TMS-evoked EEG can contain high-amplitude artifacts. Several methods have been proposed to uncover clean neuronal EEG responses. In practice, determining which method to select for different types of artifacts is often difficult. Here, we used a unified data cleaning framework based on beamforming to improve the algorithm selection and adaptation to the recorded signals. Beamforming properties are well understood, so they can be used to yield customized methods for EEG cleaning based on prior knowledge of the artifacts and the data. The beamforming implementations also cover, but are not limited to, the popular TMS-EEG cleaning methods: independent component analysis (ICA), signal-space projection (SSP), signal-space-projection-source-informed-reconstruction method (SSP-SIR), the source-estimate-utilizing noise-discarding algorithm (SOUND), data-driven Wiener filter (DDWiener), and the multiple-source approach. In addition to these established methods, beamforming provides a flexible way to derive novel artifact suppression algorithms by considering the properties of the recorded data. With simulated and measured TMS-EEG data, we show how to adapt the beamforming-based cleaning to different data and artifact types, namely TMS-evoked muscle artifacts, ocular artifacts, TMS-related peripheral responses, and channel noise. Importantly, beamforming implementations are fast to execute: We demonstrate how the SOUND algorithm becomes orders of magnitudes faster via beamforming. Overall, the beamforming-based spatial filtering framework can greatly enhance the selection, adaptability, and speed of EEG artifact removal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Metsomaa
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. Box 12200, FI-00076 AALTO, Espoo, Finland.
- Hertie-Insitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Yufei Song
- Hertie-Insitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tuomas P Mutanen
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. Box 12200, FI-00076 AALTO, Espoo, Finland
| | - Pedro C Gordon
- Hertie-Insitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Hertie-Insitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Zrenner
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Osnabruegge M, Kanig C, Schoisswohl S, Litschel K, Mack W, Schecklmann M, Langguth B, Schwitzgebel F. Variability of pulse width in transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:026035. [PMID: 38513287 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad367a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Objective.There is a high variability in the physiological effects of transcranial magnetic brain stimulation, resulting in limited generalizability of measurements. The cause of the variability is assumed to be primarily based on differences in brain function and structure of the stimulated individuals, while the variability of the physical properties of the magnetic stimulus has so far been largely neglected. Thus, this study is dedicated to the systematic investigation of variability in the pulse width of different TMS pulse sources at different stimulation intensities.Approach.The pulse widths of seven MagVenture® pulse sources were measured at the output of 10%-100% stimulation intensity in 10% increments via Near Field Probe and oscilloscope. The same C-B60 coil was used to deliver biphasic pulses. Pulse widths were compared between pulse sources and stimulation intensities.Main results.The mean sample pulse width was 288.11 ± 0.37µs, which deviates from the value of 280µs specified by the manufacturer. The pulse sources and stimulation intensities differ in their average pulse width (p's< .001). However, the coefficient of variation within the groups (pulse source; stimulation intensity) were moderately low (CV = 0.13%-0.67%).Significance.The technical parameter of pulse width shows deviations from the proposed manufacturer value. According to our data, within a pulse source of the same manufacturer, the pulse width variability is minimal, but varies between pulse sources of the same and other pulse source models. Whether the observed variability in pulse width has potential physiological relevance was tested in a pilot experiment on a single healthy subject, showing no significant difference in motor evoked potential amplitude and significant difference in latencies. Future research should systematically investigate the physiological effects of different pulse lengths. Furthermore, potential hardware ageing effects and pulse amplitude should be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirja Osnabruegge
- Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Carolina Kanig
- Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Schoisswohl
- Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Karsten Litschel
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Mack
- Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schecklmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Berthold Langguth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schwitzgebel
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schoisswohl S, Kanig C, Osnabruegge M, Agboada D, Langguth B, Rethwilm R, Hebel T, Abdelnaim MA, Mack W, Seiberl W, Kuder M, Schecklmann M. Monitoring Changes in TMS-Evoked EEG and EMG Activity During 1 Hz rTMS of the Healthy Motor Cortex. eNeuro 2024; 11:ENEURO.0309-23.2024. [PMID: 38565296 PMCID: PMC11015949 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0309-23.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique capable of inducing neuroplasticity as measured by changes in peripheral muscle electromyography (EMG) or electroencephalography (EEG) from pre-to-post stimulation. However, temporal courses of neuromodulation during ongoing rTMS are unclear. Monitoring cortical dynamics via TMS-evoked responses using EMG (motor-evoked potentials; MEPs) and EEG (transcranial-evoked potentials; TEPs) during rTMS might provide further essential insights into its mode of action - temporal course of potential modulations. The objective of this study was to first evaluate the validity of online rTMS-EEG and rTMS-EMG analyses, and second to scrutinize the temporal changes of TEPs and MEPs during rTMS. As rTMS is subject to high inter-individual effect variability, we aimed for single-subject analyses of EEG changes during rTMS. Ten healthy human participants were stimulated with 1,000 pulses of 1 Hz rTMS over the motor cortex, while EEG and EMG were recorded continuously. Validity of MEPs and TEPs measured during rTMS was assessed in sensor and source space. Electrophysiological changes during rTMS were evaluated with model fitting approaches on a group- and single-subject level. TEPs and MEPs appearance during rTMS was consistent with past findings of single pulse experiments. Heterogeneous temporal progressions, fluctuations or saturation effects of brain activity were observed during rTMS depending on the TEP component. Overall, global brain activity increased over the course of stimulation. Single-subject analysis revealed inter-individual temporal courses of global brain activity. The present findings are in favor of dose-response considerations and attempts in personalization of rTMS protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Schoisswohl
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Carolina Kanig
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Mirja Osnabruegge
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
- Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Desmond Agboada
- Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Berthold Langguth
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Roman Rethwilm
- Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Sport Science, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Hebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mohamed A Abdelnaim
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Mack
- Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Seiberl
- Department of Human Sciences, Institute of Sport Science, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Manuel Kuder
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schecklmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mancuso M, Cruciani A, Sveva V, Casula E, Brown KE, Di Lazzaro V, Rothwell JC, Rocchi L. Changes in Cortical Activation by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Due to Coil Rotation Are Not Attributable to Cranial Muscle Activation. Brain Sci 2024; 14:332. [PMID: 38671984 PMCID: PMC11048461 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14040332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) allows for the study of brain dynamics in health and disease. Cranial muscle activation can decrease the interpretability of TMS-EEG signals by masking genuine EEG responses and increasing the reliance on preprocessing methods but can be at least partly prevented by coil rotation coupled with the online monitoring of signals; however, the extent to which changing coil rotation may affect TMS-EEG signals is not fully understood. Our objective was to compare TMS-EEG data obtained with an optimal coil rotation to induce motor evoked potentials (M1standard) while rotating the coil to minimize cranial muscle activation (M1emg). TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP), and intertrial phase clustering (ITPC) were calculated in both conditions using two different preprocessing pipelines based on independent component analysis (ICA) or signal-space projection with source-informed reconstruction (SSP-SIR). Comparisons were performed with cluster-based correction. The concordance correlation coefficient was computed to measure the similarity between M1standard and M1emg TMS-EEG signals. TEPs, TRSP, and ITPC were significantly larger in M1standard than in M1emg conditions; a lower CCC than expected was also found. These results were similar across the preprocessing pipelines. While rotating the coil may be advantageous to reduce cranial muscle activation, it may result in changes in TMS-EEG signals; therefore, this solution should be tailored to the specific experimental context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Mancuso
- Department of Human Neuroscience, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Viale dell’Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Cruciani
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (V.D.L.)
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Sveva
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Elias Casula
- Department of System Medicine, “Tor Vergata” University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Katlyn E. Brown
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G5, Canada;
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 21, 00128 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (V.D.L.)
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - John C. Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK;
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK;
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, Blocco I S.S. 554 bivio per Sestu, Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jia J, Guo J, Yao L, Zhang D. Editorial: Novel technologies targeting the rehabilitation of neurological disorders. Front Neurosci 2024; 18:1367286. [PMID: 38595971 PMCID: PMC11002261 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1367286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Jia
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- National Center for Neurological Disorders, Shanghai, China
| | - Jingchun Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology, MOE Frontier Center for Brain Science, Department of Translational Neuroscience of Shanghai Jing'an District Centre Hospital, Institutes of Brain Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Yao
- College of Computer Science, College of Biomedical Engineering and Instrument Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dingguo Zhang
- Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Farzan F. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Electroencephalography for Biomarker Discovery in Psychiatry. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 95:564-580. [PMID: 38142721 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Current diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illnesses are still based on behavioral observations and self-reports, commonly leading to prolonged untreated illness. Biological markers (biomarkers) may offer an opportunity to revolutionize clinical psychiatry practice by helping provide faster and potentially more effective therapies. Transcranial magnetic stimulation concurrent with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) is a noninvasive brain mapping methodology that can assess the functions and dynamics of specific brain circuitries in awake humans and aid in biomarker discovery. This article provides an overview of TMS-EEG-based biomarkers that may hold potential in psychiatry. The methodological readiness of the TMS-EEG approach and steps in the validation of TMS-EEG biomarkers for clinical utility are discussed. Biomarker discovery with TMS-EEG is in the early stages, and several validation steps are still required before clinical implementations are realized. Thus far, TMS-EEG predictors of response to magnetic brain stimulation treatments in particular have shown promise for translation to clinical practice. Larger-scale studies can confirm validation followed by biomarker-informed trials to assess added value compared to existing practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faranak Farzan
- eBrain Lab, School of Mechatronic Systems Engineering, Simon Fraser University, Surrey, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zrenner C, Ziemann U. Closed-Loop Brain Stimulation. Biol Psychiatry 2024; 95:545-552. [PMID: 37743002 PMCID: PMC10881194 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
In the same way that beauty lies in the eye of the beholder, what a stimulus does to the brain is determined not simply by the nature of the stimulus but by the nature of the brain that is receiving the stimulus at that instant in time. Over the past decades, therapeutic brain stimulation has typically applied open-loop fixed protocols and has largely ignored this principle. Only recent neurotechnological advancements have enabled us to predict the nature of the brain (i.e., the electrophysiological brain state in the next instance in time) with sufficient temporal precision in the range of milliseconds using feedforward algorithms applied to electroencephalography time-series data. This allows stimulation exclusively whenever the targeted brain area is in a prespecified excitability or connectivity state. Preclinical studies have shown that repetitive stimulation during a particular brain state (e.g., high-excitability state), but not during other states, results in lasting modification (e.g., long-term potentiation) of the stimulated circuits. Here, we survey the evidence that this is also possible at the systems level of the human cortex using electroencephalography-informed transcranial magnetic stimulation. We critically discuss opportunities and difficulties in developing brain state-dependent stimulation for more effective long-term modification of pathological brain networks (e.g., in major depressive disorder) than is achievable with conventional fixed protocols. The same real-time electroencephalography-informed transcranial magnetic stimulation technology will allow closing of the loop by recording the effects of stimulation. This information may enable stimulation protocol adaptation that maximizes treatment response. This way, brain states control brain stimulation, thereby introducing a paradigm shift from open-loop to closed-loop stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christoph Zrenner
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hamel R, Waltzing BM, Hinder MR, McAllister CJ, Jenkinson N, Galea JM. Bilateral intracortical inhibition during unilateral motor preparation and sequence learning. Brain Stimul 2024; 17:349-361. [PMID: 38479713 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Motor sequence learning gradually quickens reaction time, suggesting that sequence learning alters motor preparation processes. Interestingly, evidence has shown that preparing sequence movements decreases short intracortical inhibition (SICI) in the contralateral motor cortex (M1), but also that sequence learning alters motor preparation processes in both the contralateral and ipsilateral M1s. Therefore, one possibility is that sequence learning alters the SICI decreases occurring during motor preparation in bilateral M1s. To examine this, two novel hypotheses were tested: unilateral sequence preparation would decrease SICI in bilateral M1s, and sequence learning would alter such bilateral SICI responses. Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered over the contralateral and ipsilateral M1s to assess SICI in an index finger muscle during the preparation of sequences initiated by either the right index or little finger. In the absence of sequence learning, SICI decreased in both the contralateral and ipsilateral M1s during the preparation of sequences initiated by the right index finger, suggesting that SICI decreases in bilateral M1s during unilateral motor preparation. As sequence learning progressed, SICI decreased in the contralateral M1 whilst it increased in the ipsilateral M1. Moreover, these bilateral SICI responses were observed at the onset of motor preparation, suggesting that sequence learning altered baseline SICI levels rather than the SICI decreases occurring during motor preparation per se. Altogether, these results suggest that SICI responses in bilateral M1s reflect two motor processes: an acute decrease of inhibition during motor preparation, and a cooperative but bidirectional shift of baseline inhibition levels as sequence learning progresses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hamel
- School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom; School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - B M Waltzing
- School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom; Institute of Neurosciences, UC Louvain, Belgium Avenue Mounier 54, 1200, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - M R Hinder
- School of Psychological Sciences, College of Health and Medicine After School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - C J McAllister
- School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - N Jenkinson
- School of Sports, Exercise, and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - J M Galea
- School of Psychology and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rösch J, Emanuel Vetter D, Baldassarre A, Souza VH, Lioumis P, Roine T, Jooß A, Baur D, Kozák G, Blair Jovellar D, Vaalto S, Romani GL, Ilmoniemi RJ, Ziemann U. Individualized treatment of motor stroke: A perspective on open-loop, closed-loop and adaptive closed-loop brain state-dependent TMS. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 158:204-211. [PMID: 37945452 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Rösch
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Emanuel Vetter
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Antonello Baldassarre
- Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Victor H Souza
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, Aalto University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pantelis Lioumis
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, Aalto University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Timo Roine
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, Aalto University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andreas Jooß
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - David Baur
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gábor Kozák
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - D Blair Jovellar
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Selja Vaalto
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; HUS Diagnostic Center, Clinical Neurophysiology, Clinical Neurosciences, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Gian Luca Romani
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, Aalto University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Humaidan D, Xu J, Kirchhoff M, Romani GL, Ilmoniemi RJ, Ziemann U. Towards real-time EEG-TMS modulation of brain state in a closed-loop approach. Clin Neurophysiol 2024; 158:212-217. [PMID: 38160069 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Dania Humaidan
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jiahua Xu
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Miriam Kirchhoff
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gian Luca Romani
- Institute for Advanced Biomedical Technologies, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| | - Risto J Ilmoniemi
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland; BioMag Laboratory, HUS Medical Imaging Center, University of Helsinki, Aalto University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology & Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang Z, Fort JM, Giménez Mateu L. Mini review: Challenges in EEG emotion recognition. Front Psychol 2024; 14:1289816. [PMID: 38239464 PMCID: PMC10794660 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1289816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) stands as a pioneering tool at the intersection of neuroscience and technology, offering unprecedented insights into human emotions. Through this comprehensive review, we explore the challenges and opportunities associated with EEG-based emotion recognition. While recent literature suggests promising high accuracy rates, these claims necessitate critical scrutiny for their authenticity and applicability. The article highlights the significant challenges in generalizing findings from a multitude of EEG devices and data sources, as well as the difficulties in data collection. Furthermore, the disparity between controlled laboratory settings and genuine emotional experiences presents a paradox within the paradigm of emotion research. We advocate for a balanced approach, emphasizing the importance of critical evaluation, methodological standardization, and acknowledging the dynamism of emotions for a more holistic understanding of the human emotional landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhihui Zhang
- Escola Tècnica Superior d'Arquitectura de Barcelona, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Song Y, Gordon PC, Metsomaa J, Rostami M, Belardinelli P, Ziemann U. Evoked EEG Responses to TMS Targeting Regions Outside the Primary Motor Cortex and Their Test-Retest Reliability. Brain Topogr 2024; 37:19-36. [PMID: 37996562 PMCID: PMC10771591 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-023-01018-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked electroencephalography (EEG) potentials (TEPs) provide unique insights into cortical excitability and connectivity. However, confounding EEG signals from auditory and somatosensory co-stimulation complicate TEP interpretation. Our optimized sham procedure established with TMS of primary motor cortex (Gordon in JAMA 245:118708, 2021) differentiates direct cortical EEG responses to TMS from those caused by peripheral sensory inputs. Using this approach, this study aimed to investigate TEPs and their test-retest reliability when targeting regions outside the primary motor cortex, specifically the left angular gyrus, supplementary motor area, and medial prefrontal cortex. We conducted three identical TMS-EEG sessions one week apart involving 24 healthy participants. In each session, we targeted the three areas separately using a figure-of-eight TMS coil for active TMS, while a second coil away from the head produced auditory input for sham TMS. Masking noise and electric scalp stimulation were applied in both conditions to achieve matched EEG responses to peripheral sensory inputs. High test-retest reliability was observed in both conditions. However, reliability declined for the 'cleaned' TEPs, resulting from the subtraction of evoked EEG response to the sham TMS from those to the active, particularly for latencies > 100 ms following the TMS pulse. Significant EEG differences were found between active and sham TMS at latencies < 90 ms for all targeted areas, exhibiting distinct spatiotemporal characteristics specific to each target. In conclusion, our optimized sham procedure effectively reveals EEG responses to direct cortical activation by TMS in brain areas outside primary motor cortex. Moreover, we demonstrate the impact of peripheral sensory inputs on test-retest reliability of TMS-EEG responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufei Song
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Pedro C Gordon
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Johanna Metsomaa
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland
| | - Maryam Rostami
- Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
| | - Paolo Belardinelli
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
- Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, CIMeC, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Ulf Ziemann
- Department of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Straße 3, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
- Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mancuso M, Cruciani A, Sveva V, Casula EP, Brown K, Rothwell JC, Di Lazzaro V, Koch G, Rocchi L. Somatosensory input in the context of transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography: An evidence-based overview. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2023; 155:105434. [PMID: 37890602 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
The transcranial evoked potential (TEP) is a powerful technique to investigate brain dynamics, but some methodological issues limit its interpretation. A possible contamination of the TEP by electroencephalographic (EEG) responses evoked by the somatosensory input generated by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been postulated; nonetheless, a characterization of these responses is lacking. The aim of this work was to review current evidence about possible somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) induced by sources of somatosensory input in the craniofacial region. Among these, only contraction of craniofacial muscle and stimulation of free cutaneous nerve endings may be able to induce EEG responses, but direct evidence is lacking due to experimental difficulties in isolating these inputs. Notably, EEG evoked activity in this context is represented by a N100/P200 complex, reflecting a saliency-related multimodal response, rather than specific activation of the primary somatosensory cortex. Strategies to minimize or remove these responses by EEG processing still yield uncertain results; therefore, data inspection is of paramount importance to judge a possible contamination of the TEP by multimodal potentials caused by somatosensory input.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Mancuso
- Department of Human Neurosciences, University of Rome "Sapienza", Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - A Cruciani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - V Sveva
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, University of Rome "Sapienza", Piazzale Aldo Moro, 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - E P Casula
- Department of System Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - K Brown
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave W, N2L 3G5 Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - J C Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, WC1N 3BG London, United Kingdom
| | - V Di Lazzaro
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 21, 00128 Rome, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128 Rome, Italy
| | - G Koch
- Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina, 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy
| | - L Rocchi
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato Blocco I S.S, 554 bivio per Sestu 09042, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chowdhury NS, Chiang AKI, Millard SK, Skippen P, Chang WJ, Seminowicz DA, Schabrun SM. Combined transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography reveals alterations in cortical excitability during pain. eLife 2023; 12:RP88567. [PMID: 37966464 PMCID: PMC10651174 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88567] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been used to examine inhibitory and facilitatory circuits during experimental pain and in chronic pain populations. However, current applications of TMS to pain have been restricted to measurements of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from peripheral muscles. Here, TMS was combined with electroencephalography (EEG) to determine whether experimental pain could induce alterations in cortical inhibitory/facilitatory activity observed in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs). In Experiment 1 (n=29), multiple sustained thermal stimuli were administered to the forearm, with the first, second, and third block of thermal stimuli consisting of warm but non-painful (pre-pain block), painful (pain block) and warm but non-painful (post-pain block) temperatures, respectively. During each stimulus, TMS pulses were delivered while EEG (64 channels) was simultaneously recorded. Verbal pain ratings were collected between TMS pulses. Relative to pre-pain warm stimuli, painful stimuli led to an increase in the amplitude of the frontocentral negative peak ~45 ms post-TMS (N45), with a larger increase associated with higher pain ratings. Experiments 2 and 3 (n=10 in each) showed that the increase in the N45 in response to pain was not due to changes in sensory potentials associated with TMS, or a result of stronger reafferent muscle feedback during pain. This is the first study to use combined TMS-EEG to examine alterations in cortical excitability in response to pain. These results suggest that the N45 TEP peak, which indexes GABAergic neurotransmission, is implicated in pain perception and is a potential marker of individual differences in pain sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nahian Shahmat Chowdhury
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Alan KI Chiang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Samantha K Millard
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
| | - Patrick Skippen
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
| | - Wei-Ju Chang
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- School of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
| | - David A Seminowicz
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
| | - Siobhan M Schabrun
- Center for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research AustraliaSydneyAustralia
- The Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, University of Western OntarioLondonCanada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fong PY, Spampinato D, Michell K, Mancuso M, Brown K, Ibáñez J, Di Santo A, Latorre A, Bhatia K, Rothwell JC, Rocchi L. Reply to: "Reflecting the causes of variability of EEG responses elicited by cerebellar TMS". Neuroimage 2023; 281:120392. [PMID: 37769927 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In their commentary on our recently published paper about electroencephalographic responses induced by cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (Fong et al., 2023), Gassmann and colleagues (Gassmann et al., 2023b) try to explain the differences between our results and their own previous work on the same topic. We agree with them that many of the differences arise from our use of a different magnetic stimulation coil. However, two unresolved questions remain. (1) Which method is most likely to achieve optimal activation of cerebellar output? (2) To what extent are the evoked cerebellar responses contaminated by concomitant sensory input? We highlight the role of careful experimental design and of combining electrophysiological and behavioural data to obtain reliable TMS-EEG data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Yu Fong
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Division of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Medical School, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Danny Spampinato
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, Rome 00142, Italy
| | - Kevin Michell
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marco Mancuso
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Katlyn Brown
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jaime Ibáñez
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; BSICoS Group, I3A Institute, University of Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Di Santo
- NEuroMuscular Omnicentre (NEMO), Serena Onlus, AOS Monaldi, Naples, Italy; Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Latorre
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kailash Bhatia
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - John C Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Al E, Stephani T, Engelhardt M, Haegens S, Villringer A, Nikulin VV. Cardiac activity impacts cortical motor excitability. PLoS Biol 2023; 21:e3002393. [PMID: 38015826 PMCID: PMC10684011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Human cognition and action can be influenced by internal bodily processes such as heartbeats. For instance, somatosensory perception is impaired both during the systolic phase of the cardiac cycle and when heartbeats evoke stronger cortical responses. Here, we test whether these cardiac effects originate from overall changes in cortical excitability. Cortical and corticospinal excitability were assessed using electroencephalographic and electromyographic responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation while concurrently monitoring cardiac activity with electrocardiography. Cortical and corticospinal excitability were found to be highest during systole and following stronger neural responses to heartbeats. Furthermore, in a motor task, hand-muscle activity and the associated desynchronization of sensorimotor oscillations were stronger during systole. These results suggest that systolic cardiac signals have a facilitatory effect on motor excitability-in contrast to sensory attenuation that was previously reported for somatosensory perception. Thus, it is possible that distinct time windows exist across the cardiac cycle, optimizing either perception or action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esra Al
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- MindBrainBody Institute, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Division of Systems Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Tilman Stephani
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- International Max Planck Research School NeuroCom, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Melina Engelhardt
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Berlin, Germany
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Einstein Center for Neurosciences, Berlin, Germany
| | - Saskia Haegens
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Division of Systems Neuroscience, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, United States of America
- Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Arno Villringer
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
- MindBrainBody Institute, Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research Berlin (CSB), Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Vadim V. Nikulin
- Department of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Siviero I, Bonfanti D, Menegaz G, Savazzi S, Mazzi C, Storti SF. Graph Analysis of TMS-EEG Connectivity Reveals Hemispheric Differences following Occipital Stimulation. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 23:8833. [PMID: 37960532 PMCID: PMC10650175 DOI: 10.3390/s23218833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
(1) Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) provides a unique opportunity to investigate brain connectivity. However, possible hemispheric asymmetries in signal propagation dynamics following occipital TMS have not been investigated. (2) Methods: Eighteen healthy participants underwent occipital single-pulse TMS at two different EEG sites, corresponding to early visual areas. We used a state-of-the-art Bayesian estimation approach to accurately estimate TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) from EEG data, which has not been previously used in this context. To capture the rapid dynamics of information flow patterns, we implemented a self-tuning optimized Kalman (STOK) filter in conjunction with the information partial directed coherence (iPDC) measure, enabling us to derive time-varying connectivity matrices. Subsequently, graph analysis was conducted to assess key network properties, providing insight into the overall network organization of the brain network. (3) Results: Our findings revealed distinct lateralized effects on effective brain connectivity and graph networks after TMS stimulation, with left stimulation facilitating enhanced communication between contralateral frontal regions and right stimulation promoting increased intra-hemispheric ipsilateral connectivity, as evidenced by statistical test (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The identified hemispheric differences in terms of connectivity provide novel insights into brain networks involved in visual information processing, revealing the hemispheric specificity of neural responses to occipital stimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilaria Siviero
- Department of Computer Science, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Davide Bonfanti
- Perception and Awareness (PandA) Lab., Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124 Verona, Italy; (D.B.); (S.S.); (C.M.)
| | - Gloria Menegaz
- Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| | - Silvia Savazzi
- Perception and Awareness (PandA) Lab., Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124 Verona, Italy; (D.B.); (S.S.); (C.M.)
| | - Chiara Mazzi
- Perception and Awareness (PandA) Lab., Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Science, University of Verona, Piazzale Ludovico Antonio Scuro 10, 37124 Verona, Italy; (D.B.); (S.S.); (C.M.)
| | - Silvia Francesca Storti
- Department of Engineering for Innovation Medicine, University of Verona, Strada Le Grazie 15, 37134 Verona, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hernandez-Pavon JC, San Agustín A, Wang MC, Veniero D, Pons JL. Can we manipulate brain connectivity? A systematic review of cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation effects. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 154:169-193. [PMID: 37634335 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation (ccPAS) is a form of dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) entailing a series of single-TMS pulses paired at specific interstimulus intervals (ISI) delivered to distant cortical areas. The goal of this article is to systematically review its efficacy in inducing plasticity in humans focusing on stimulation parameters and hypotheses of underlying neurophysiology. METHODS A systematic review of the literature from 2009-2023 was undertaken to identify all articles utilizing ccPAS to study brain plasticity and connectivity. Six electronic databases were searched and included. RESULTS 32 studies were identified. The studies targeted connections within the same hemisphere or between hemispheres. 28 ccPAS studies were in healthy participants, 1 study in schizophrenia, and 1 in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. 2 additional studies used cortico-cortical repetitive paired associative stimulation (cc-rPAS) in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) patients. Outcome measures include electromyography (EMG), behavioral measures, electroencephalography (EEG), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). ccPAS seems to be able to modulate brain connectivity depending on the ISI. CONCLUSIONS ccPAS can be used to modulate corticospinal excitability, brain activity, and behavior. Although the stimulation parameters used across studies reviewed in this paper are varied, ccPAS is a promising approach for basic research and potential clinical applications. SIGNIFICANCE Recent advances in neuroscience have caused a shift of interest from the study of single areas to a more complex approach focusing on networks of areas that orchestrate brain activity. Consequently, the TMS community is also witnessing a change, with a growing interest in targeting multiple brain areas rather than a single locus, as evidenced by an increasing number of papers using ccPAS. In light of this new enthusiasm for brain connectivity, this review summarizes existing literature and stimulation parameters that have proven effective in changing electrophysiological, behavioral, or neuroimaging-derived measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio C Hernandez-Pavon
- Legs + Walking Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (Formerly, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago), Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Brain Stimulation, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.
| | - Arantzazu San Agustín
- Legs + Walking Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (Formerly, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago), Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Brain Stimulation, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Neural Rehabilitation Group, Cajal Institute, CSIC, Madrid, Spain; PhD Program in Neuroscience, Autonoma de Madrid University-Cajal Institute, Madrid 28029, Spain
| | - Max C Wang
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jose L Pons
- Legs + Walking Lab, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (Formerly, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago), Chicago, IL, USA; Center for Brain Stimulation, Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Guidali G, Zazio A, Lucarelli D, Marcantoni E, Stango A, Barchiesi G, Bortoletto M. Effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) current direction and pulse waveform on cortico-cortical connectivity: A registered report TMS-EEG study. Eur J Neurosci 2023; 58:3785-3809. [PMID: 37649453 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) are a promising proxy for measuring effective connectivity, that is, the directed transmission of physiological signals along cortico-cortical tracts, and for developing connectivity-based biomarkers. A crucial point is how stimulation parameters may affect TEPs, as they may contribute to the general variability of findings across studies. Here, we manipulated two TMS parameters (i.e. current direction and pulse waveform) while measuring (a) an early TEP component reflecting contralateral inhibition of motor areas, namely, M1-P15, as an operative model of interhemispheric cortico-cortical connectivity, and (b) motor-evoked potentials (MEP) for the corticospinal pathway. Our results showed that these two TMS parameters are crucial to evoke the M1-P15, influencing its amplitude, latency, and replicability. Specifically, (a) M1-P15 amplitude was strongly affected by current direction in monophasic stimulation; (b) M1-P15 latency was significantly modulated by current direction for monophasic and biphasic pulses. The replicability of M1-P15 was substantial for the same stimulation condition. At the same time, it was poor when stimulation parameters were changed, suggesting that these factors must be controlled to obtain stable single-subject measures. Finally, MEP latency was modulated by current direction, whereas non-statistically significant changes were evident for amplitude. Overall, our study highlights the importance of TMS parameters for early TEP responses recording and suggests controlling their impact in developing connectivity biomarkers from TEPs. Moreover, these results point out that the excitability of the corticospinal tract, which is commonly used as a reference to set TMS intensity, may not correspond to the excitability of cortico-cortical pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Guidali
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Agnese Zazio
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Delia Lucarelli
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Marcantoni
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Antonietta Stango
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| | - Guido Barchiesi
- Department of Philosophy, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Bortoletto
- Neurophysiology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Swami P, Gramann K, Vonstad EK, Vereijken B, Holt A, Holt T, Sandstrak G, Nilsen JH, Su X. CLET: Computation of Latencies in Event-related potential Triggers using photodiode on virtual reality apparatuses. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1223774. [PMID: 37795210 PMCID: PMC10546026 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1223774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
To investigate event-related activity in human brain dynamics as measured with EEG, triggers must be incorporated to indicate the onset of events in the experimental protocol. Such triggers allow for the extraction of ERP, i.e., systematic electrophysiological responses to internal or external stimuli that must be extracted from the ongoing oscillatory activity by averaging several trials containing similar events. Due to the technical setup with separate hardware sending and recording triggers, the recorded data commonly involves latency differences between the transmitted and received triggers. The computation of these latencies is critical for shifting the epochs with respect to the triggers sent. Otherwise, timing differences can lead to a misinterpretation of the resulting ERPs. This study presents a methodical approach for the CLET using a photodiode on a non-immersive VR (i.e., LED screen) and an immersive VR (i.e., HMD). Two sets of algorithms are proposed to analyze the photodiode data. The experiment designed for this study involved the synchronization of EEG, EMG, PPG, photodiode sensors, and ten 3D MoCap cameras with a VR presentation platform (Unity). The average latency computed for LED screen data for a set of white and black stimuli was 121.98 ± 8.71 ms and 121.66 ± 8.80 ms, respectively. In contrast, the average latency computed for HMD data for the white and black stimuli sets was 82.80 ± 7.63 ms and 69.82 ± 5.52 ms. The codes for CLET and analysis, along with datasets, tables, and a tutorial video for using the codes, have been made publicly available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piyush Swami
- Motion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
- Section for Visual Computing, Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
- Biomedical Engineering Techies, Broendby, Denmark
| | - Klaus Gramann
- Biological Psychology and Neuroergonomics, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elise Klæbo Vonstad
- Motion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Beatrix Vereijken
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Alexander Holt
- Motion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tomas Holt
- Motion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Grethe Sandstrak
- Motion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Jan Harald Nilsen
- Motion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Xiaomeng Su
- Motion Capture and Visualization Laboratory, Applied Information Technology Group, Department of Computer Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hamel R, Pearson J, Sifi L, Patel D, Hinder MR, Jenkinson N, Galea JM. The intracortical excitability changes underlying the enhancing effects of rewards and punishments on motor performance. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1462-1475. [PMID: 37777109 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Monetary rewards and punishments enhance motor performance and are associated with corticospinal excitability (CSE) increases within the motor cortex (M1) during movement preparation. However, such CSE changes have unclear origins. Based on converging evidence, one possibility is that they stem from increased glutamatergic (GLUTergic) facilitation and/or decreased type A gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABAA)-mediated inhibition within M1. To investigate this, paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used over the left M1 to evaluate intracortical facilitation (ICF) and short intracortical inhibition (SICI), indirect assays of GLUTergic activity and GABAA-mediated inhibition, in an index finger muscle during the preparation of sequences initiated by either the right index or little finger. Behaviourally, rewards and punishments enhanced both reaction and movement time. During movement preparation, regardless of rewards or punishments, ICF increased when the index finger initiated sequences, whereas SICI decreased when both the index and little fingers initiated sequences. This finding suggests that GLUTergic activity increases in a finger-specific manner whilst GABAA-mediated inhibition decreases in a finger-unspecific manner during preparation. In parallel, both rewards and punishments non-specifically increased ICF, but only rewards non-specifically decreased SICI as compared to neutral. This suggests that to enhance performance rewards both increase GLUTergic activity and decrease GABAA-mediated inhibition, whereas punishments selectively increase GLUTergic activity. A control experiment revealed that such changes were not observed post-movement as participants processed reward and punishment feedback, indicating they were selective to movement preparation. Collectively, these results map the intracortical excitability changes in M1 by which incentives enhance motor performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Hamel
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom; School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
| | - J Pearson
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - L Sifi
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - D Patel
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - M R Hinder
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - N Jenkinson
- School of Sport, Exercise, and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| | - J M Galea
- School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zrenner B, Zrenner C, Balderston N, Blumberger DM, Kloiber S, Laposa JM, Tadayonnejad R, Trevizol AP, Zai G, Feusner JD. Toward personalized circuit-based closed-loop brain-interventions in psychiatry: using symptom provocation to extract EEG-markers of brain circuit activity. Front Neural Circuits 2023; 17:1208930. [PMID: 37671039 PMCID: PMC10475600 DOI: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1208930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Symptom provocation is a well-established component of psychiatric research and therapy. It is hypothesized that specific activation of those brain circuits involved in the symptomatic expression of a brain pathology makes the relevant neural substrate accessible as a target for therapeutic interventions. For example, in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), symptom provocation is an important part of psychotherapy and is also performed prior to therapeutic brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Here, we discuss the potential of symptom provocation to isolate neurophysiological biomarkers reflecting the fluctuating activity of relevant brain networks with the goal of subsequently using these markers as targets to guide therapy. We put forward a general experimental framework based on the rapid switching between psychiatric symptom states. This enable neurophysiological measures to be derived from EEG and/or TMS-evoked EEG measures of brain activity during both states. By subtracting the data recorded during the baseline state from that recorded during the provoked state, the resulting contrast would ideally isolate the specific neural circuits differentially activated during the expression of symptoms. A similar approach enables the design of effective classifiers of brain activity from EEG data in Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI). To obtain reliable contrast data, psychiatric state switching needs to be achieved multiple times during a continuous recording so that slow changes of brain activity affect both conditions equally. This is achieved easily for conditions that can be controlled intentionally, such as motor imagery, attention, or memory retention. With regard to psychiatric symptoms, an increase can often be provoked effectively relatively easily, however, it can be difficult to reliably and rapidly return to a baseline state. Here, we review different approaches to return from a provoked state to a baseline state and how these may be applied to different symptoms occurring in different psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitte Zrenner
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Psychiatry Hospital, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christoph Zrenner
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Neurology Hospital, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicholas Balderston
- Center for Neuromodulation in Depression and Stress (CNDS), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Daniel M. Blumberger
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stefan Kloiber
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Judith M. Laposa
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Reza Tadayonnejad
- TMS Clinical and Research Service, Neuromodulation Division, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
| | - Alisson Paulino Trevizol
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gwyneth Zai
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jamie D. Feusner
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
- Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, United States
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Vergallito A, Varoli E, Pisoni A, Mattavelli G, Del Mauro L, Feroldi S, Vallar G, Romero Lauro LJ. State-dependent effectiveness of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on cortical excitability. Neuroimage 2023; 277:120242. [PMID: 37348625 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Revised: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The extensive use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in experimental and clinical settings does not correspond to an in-depth understanding of its underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. In previous studies, we employed an integrated system of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) to track the effect of tDCS on cortical excitability. At rest, anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) over the right Posterior Parietal Cortex (rPPC) elicits a widespread increase in cortical excitability. In contrast, cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) fails to modulate cortical excitability, being indistinguishable from sham stimulation. Here we investigated whether an endogenous task-induced activation during stimulation might change this pattern, improving c-tDCS effectiveness in modulating cortical excitability. In Experiment 1, we tested whether performance in a Visuospatial Working Memory Task (VWMT) and a modified Posner Cueing Task (mPCT), involving rPPC, could be modulated by c-tDCS. Thirty-eight participants were involved in a two-session experiment receiving either c-tDCS or sham during tasks execution. In Experiment 2, we recruited sixteen novel participants who performed the same paradigm but underwent TMS-EEG recordings pre- and 10 min post- sham stimulation and c-tDCS. Behavioral results showed that c-tDCS significantly modulated mPCT performance compared to sham. At a neurophysiological level, c-tDCS significantly reduced cortical excitability in a frontoparietal network likely involved in task execution. Taken together, our results provide evidence of the state dependence of c-tDCS in modulating cortical excitability effectively. The conceptual and applicative implications are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Vergallito
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy.
| | - Erica Varoli
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Alberto Pisoni
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy
| | - Giulia Mattavelli
- IUSS Cognitive Neuroscience (ICON) Center, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, Pavia, Italy; Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory of Pavia Institute, 27100, Italy
| | - Lilia Del Mauro
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
| | - Sarah Feroldi
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Vallar
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy; MiBTec - Mind and Behavior Technological Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonor J Romero Lauro
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy; NeuroMi, Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cruciani A, Mancuso M, Sveva V, Maccarrone D, Todisco A, Motolese F, Santoro F, Pilato F, Spampinato DA, Rocchi L, Di Lazzaro V, Capone F. Using TMS-EEG to assess the effects of neuromodulation techniques: a narrative review. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1247104. [PMID: 37645690 PMCID: PMC10461063 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1247104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past decades, among all the non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, those aiming for neuromodulatory protocols have gained special attention. The traditional neurophysiological outcome to estimate the neuromodulatory effect is the motor evoked potential (MEP), the impact of NIBS techniques is commonly estimated as the change in MEP amplitude. This approach has several limitations: first, the use of MEP limits the evaluation of stimulation to the motor cortex excluding all the other brain areas. Second, MEP is an indirect measure of brain activity and is influenced by several factors. To overcome these limitations several studies have used new outcomes to measure brain changes after neuromodulation techniques with the concurrent use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalogram (EEG). In the present review, we examine studies that use TMS-EEG before and after a single session of neuromodulatory TMS. Then, we focused our literature research on the description of the different metrics derived from TMS-EEG to measure the effect of neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Cruciani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Mancuso
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Sveva
- Department of Anatomical and Histological Sciences, Legal Medicine and Orthopedics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Davide Maccarrone
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Todisco
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Motolese
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Santoro
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Pilato
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Fioravante Capone
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology, Neurobiology, and Psychiatry, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Müller-Dahlhaus F, Bergmann TO. Network perturbation-based biomarkers of depression and treatment response. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:101086. [PMID: 37343513 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Using concurrent TMS-EEG, Han et al.1 identified temporal and spectral signatures of depression in a prefrontal-orbitofrontal-hippocampal network, which renormalized after rTMS. This highlights the relevance of causal network perturbation for the assessment of disease-related network states and their therapeutic modulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Müller-Dahlhaus
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Til Ole Bergmann
- Neuroimaging Center (NIC), Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Costanzo M, Leodori G, Cutrona C, Marchet F, De Bartolo MI, Mancuso M, Belvisi D, Conte A, Berardelli A, Fabbrini G. Motor Cortical Correlates of Paired Associative Stimulation Induced Plasticity: A TMS-EEG Study. Brain Sci 2023; 13:921. [PMID: 37371399 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13060921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Paired associative stimulation (PAS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that modulates synaptic plasticity in the human motor cortex (M1). Since previous studies have primarily used motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) as outcome measure, cortical correlates of PAS-induced plasticity remain unknown. Therefore, the aim of this observational study was to investigate cortical correlates of a standard PAS induced plasticity in the primary motor cortex by using a combined TMS-EEG approach in a cohort of eighteen healthy subjects. In addition to the expected long-lasting facilitatory modulation of MEPs amplitude, PAS intervention also induced a significant increase in transcranial magnetic stimulation-evoked potentials (TEPs) P30 and P60 amplitude. No significant correlation between the magnitude of PAS-induced changes in TEP components and MEP amplitude were observed. However, the linear regression analysis revealed that the combined changes in P30 and P60 component amplitudes significantly predicted the MEP facilitation after PAS. The findings of our study offer novel insight into the neurophysiological changes associated with PAS-induced plasticity at M1 cortical level and suggest a complex relationship between TEPs and MEPs changes following PAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giorgio Leodori
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Marchet
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Mancuso
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Belvisi
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Conte
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berardelli
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fabbrini
- IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale dell'Università 30, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cristofari A, De Santis M, Lucidi S, Rothwell J, Casula EP, Rocchi L. Machine Learning-Based Classification to Disentangle EEG Responses to TMS and Auditory Input. Brain Sci 2023; 13:866. [PMID: 37371346 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13060866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The combination of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and electroencephalography (EEG) offers an unparalleled opportunity to study cortical physiology by characterizing brain electrical responses to external perturbation, called transcranial-evoked potentials (TEPs). Although these reflect cortical post-synaptic potentials, they can be contaminated by auditory evoked potentials (AEPs) due to the TMS click, which partly show a similar spatial and temporal scalp distribution. Therefore, TEPs and AEPs can be difficult to disentangle by common statistical methods, especially in conditions of suboptimal AEP suppression. In this work, we explored the ability of machine learning algorithms to distinguish TEPs recorded with masking of the TMS click, AEPs and non-masked TEPs in a sample of healthy subjects. Overall, our classifier provided reliable results at the single-subject level, even for signals where differences were not shown in previous works. Classification accuracy (CA) was lower at the group level, when different subjects were used for training and test phases, and when three stimulation conditions instead of two were compared. Lastly, CA was higher when average, rather than single-trial TEPs, were used. In conclusion, this proof-of-concept study proposes machine learning as a promising tool to separate pure TEPs from those contaminated by sensory input.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Cristofari
- Department of Civil Engineering and Computer Science Engineering, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna De Santis
- Department of Computer, Automatic and Management Engineering, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Lucidi
- Department of Computer, Automatic and Management Engineering, "Sapienza" University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - John Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Elias P Casula
- Department of System Medicine, "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK
- Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Fong PY, Spampinato D, Michell K, Mancuso M, Brown K, Ibáñez J, Santo AD, Latorre A, Bhatia K, Rothwell JC, Rocchi L. EEG responses induced by cerebellar TMS at rest and during visuomotor adaptation. Neuroimage 2023; 275:120188. [PMID: 37230209 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Revised: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Connections between the cerebellum and the cortex play a critical role in learning and executing complex behaviours. Dual-coil transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be used non-invasively to probe connectivity changes between the lateral cerebellum and motor cortex (M1) using the motor evoked potential as an outcome measure (cerebellar-brain inhibition, CBI). However, it gives no information about cerebellar connections to other parts of cortex. OBJECTIVES We used electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate whether it was possible to detect activity evoked in any areas of cortex by single-pulse TMS of the cerebellum (cerebellar TMS evoked potentials, cbTEPs). A second experiment tested if these responses were influenced by the performance of a cerebellar-dependent motor learning paradigm. METHODS In the first series of experiments, TMS was applied over either the right or left cerebellar cortex, and scalp EEG was recorded simultaneously. Control conditions that mimicked auditory and somatosensory inputs associated with cerebellar TMS were included to identify responses due to non-cerebellar sensory stimulation. We conducted a follow-up experiment that evaluated whether cbTEPs are behaviourally sensitive by assessing individuals before and after learning a visuomotor reach adaptation task. RESULTS A TMS pulse over the lateral cerebellum evoked EEG responses that could be distinguished from those caused by auditory and sensory artefacts. Significant positive (P80) and negative peaks (N110) over the contralateral frontal cerebral area were identified with a mirrored scalp distribution after left vs. right cerebellar stimulation. The P80 and N110 peaks were replicated in the cerebellar motor learning experiment and changed amplitude at different stages of learning. The change in amplitude of the P80 peak was associated with the degree of learning that individuals retained following adaptation. Due to overlap with sensory responses, the N110 should be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS Cerebral potentials evoked by TMS of the lateral cerebellum provide a neurophysiological probe of cerebellar function that complements the existing CBI method. They may provide novel insight into mechanisms of visuomotor adaptation and other cognitive processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Po-Yu Fong
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Division of Movement Disorders, Department of Neurology and Neuroscience Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Medical School, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Danny Spampinato
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Unit, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00142, Rome, Italy
| | - Kevin Michell
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marco Mancuso
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Katlyn Brown
- Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
| | - Jaime Ibáñez
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; BSICoS group, I3A Institute, University of Zaragoza, IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain; Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - Alessandro Di Santo
- NEuroMuscular Omnicentre (NEMO), Serena Onlus, AOS Monaldi, Naples, Italy; Unit of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Latorre
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kailash Bhatia
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - John C Rothwell
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lorenzo Rocchi
- Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK; Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Donati FL, Mayeli A, Sharma K, Janssen SA, Lagoy AD, Casali AG, Ferrarelli F. Natural Oscillatory Frequency Slowing in the Premotor Cortex of Early-Course Schizophrenia Patients: A TMS-EEG Study. Brain Sci 2023; 13:brainsci13040534. [PMID: 37190501 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13040534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the heavy burden of schizophrenia, research on biomarkers associated with its early course is still ongoing. Single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation coupled with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) has revealed that the main oscillatory frequency (or "natural frequency") is reduced in several frontal brain areas, including the premotor cortex, of chronic patients with schizophrenia. However, no study has explored the natural frequency at the beginning of illness. Here, we used TMS-EEG to probe the intrinsic oscillatory properties of the left premotor cortex in early-course schizophrenia patients (<2 years from onset) and age/gender-matched healthy comparison subjects (HCs). State-of-the-art real-time monitoring of EEG responses to TMS and noise-masking procedures were employed to ensure data quality. We found that the natural frequency of the premotor cortex was significantly reduced in early-course schizophrenia compared to HCs. No correlation was found between the natural frequency and age, clinical symptom severity, or dose of antipsychotic medications at the time of TMS-EEG. This finding extends to early-course schizophrenia previous evidence in chronic patients and supports the hypothesis of a deficit in frontal cortical synchronization as a core mechanism underlying this disorder. Future work should further explore the putative role of frontal natural frequencies as early pathophysiological biomarkers for schizophrenia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco L Donati
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Forbes Avenue, Suite 456, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- Western Psychiatric Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Ahmad Mayeli
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Forbes Avenue, Suite 456, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- Western Psychiatric Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Kamakashi Sharma
- Western Psychiatric Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Sabine A Janssen
- Western Psychiatric Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Alice D Lagoy
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Forbes Avenue, Suite 456, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Adenauer G Casali
- Institute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos 12231-280, Brazil
| | - Fabio Ferrarelli
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Forbes Avenue, Suite 456, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
- Western Psychiatric Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|