Somatosensory input in the context of transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography: An evidence-based overview

Investigating cortical excitability and inhibition in patients with schizophrenia: A TMS-EEG study

BACKGROUND

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electromyography (EMG) has widely been used as a non-invasive brain stimulation tool to assess excitation/inhibition (E/I) balance. E/I imbalance is a putative mechanism underlying symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. Combined TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) provides a detailed examination of cortical excitability to assess the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. This study aimed to investigate differences in TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), TMS-related spectral perturbations (TRSP) and intertrial coherence (ITC) between patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TMS was applied over the motor cortex during EEG recording. Differences in TEPs, TRSP and ITC between the patient and healthy subjects were analysed for all electrodes at each time point, by applying multiple independent sample t-tests with a cluster-based permutation analysis to correct for multiple comparisons.

RESULTS

Patients demonstrated significantly reduced amplitudes of early and late TEP components compared to healthy controls. Patients also showed a significant reduction of early delta (50-160 ms) and theta TRSP (30-250ms),followed by a reduction in alpha and beta suppression (220-560 ms; 190-420 ms). Patients showed a reduction of both early (50-110 ms) gamma increase and later (180-230 ms) gamma suppression. Finally, the ITC was significantly lower in patients in the alpha band, from 30 to 260 ms.

CONCLUSION

Our findings support the putative role of impaired GABA-receptor mediated inhibition in schizophrenia impacting excitatory neurotransmission. Further studies can usefully elucidate mechanisms underlying specific symptoms clusters using TMS-EEG biometrics.

Changes in Cortical Activation by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Due to Coil Rotation Are Not Attributable to Cranial Muscle Activation

Transcranial magnetic stimulation coupled with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) allows for the study of brain dynamics in health and disease. Cranial muscle activation can decrease the interpretability of TMS-EEG signals by masking genuine EEG responses and increasing the reliance on preprocessing methods but can be at least partly prevented by coil rotation coupled with the online monitoring of signals; however, the extent to which changing coil rotation may affect TMS-EEG signals is not fully understood. Our objective was to compare TMS-EEG data obtained with an optimal coil rotation to induce motor evoked potentials (M1standard) while rotating the coil to minimize cranial muscle activation (M1emg). TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP), and intertrial phase clustering (ITPC) were calculated in both conditions using two different preprocessing pipelines based on independent component analysis (ICA) or signal-space projection with source-informed reconstruction (SSP-SIR). Comparisons were performed with cluster-based correction. The concordance correlation coefficient was computed to measure the similarity between M1standard and M1emg TMS-EEG signals. TEPs, TRSP, and ITPC were significantly larger in M1standard than in M1emg conditions; a lower CCC than expected was also found. These results were similar across the preprocessing pipelines. While rotating the coil may be advantageous to reduce cranial muscle activation, it may result in changes in TMS-EEG signals; therefore, this solution should be tailored to the specific experimental context.

High-frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation matching individual frequency of somatosensory evoked high-frequency oscillations can modulate the somatosensory system through thalamocortical pathway

tACS (transcranial alternating current stimulation) is a technique for modulating brain activity through electrical current. Its effects depend on cortical entrainment, which is most effective when transcranial alternating current stimulation matches the brain's natural rhythm. High-frequency oscillations produced by external stimuli are useful for studying the somatosensory pathway. Our study aims to explore transcranial alternating current stimulation's impact on the somatosensory system when synchronized with individual high-frequency oscillation frequencies. We conducted a randomized, sham-controlled study with 14 healthy participants. The study had three phases: Individualized transcranial alternating current stimulation (matching the individual's high-frequency oscillation rhythm), Standard transcranial alternating current stimulation (600 Hz), and sham stimulation. We measured early and late HFO components after median nerve electrical stimulation at three time points: before (T0), immediately after (T1), and 10 min after transcranial alternating current stimulation (T2). Compared to Sham and Standard stimulation Individualized transcranial alternating current stimulation significantly enhanced high-frequency oscillations, especially the early component, immediately after stimulation and for at least 15 min. No other effects were observed for other high-frequency oscillation measures. In summary, our study provides initial evidence that transcranial alternating current stimulation synchronized with an individual's high-frequency oscillation frequency can precisely and time-specifically modulate thalamocortical activity. These insights may pave the way for innovative, personalized neuromodulation methods for the somatosensory system.