Colistin monotherapy versus colistin-based combination therapy for treatment of bacteremia in burn patients due to carbapenem-resistant gram negative bacteria

Efficiency of combination therapy versus monotherapy for the treatment of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For resistant Gram-positive bacteria, evidence suggests that combination therapy is more effective. However, for resistant Gram-negative bacteria, no consensus has been reached. This study aims to comprehensively summarize the evidence and evaluate the impact of combination versus monotherapy on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and Embase up to June 15, 2024, to identify relevant studies. This study included comparisons of monotherapy and combination therapy for treating infections caused by CRGNB. Topical antibiotics (i.e., inhalational or intratracheal administration) and monotherapy with sulbactam/relebactam was excluded. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were clinical success and microbiological eradication. Pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated in order to systematically assess effect of treatment on mortality, clinical success and microbiological eradication. Subgroup analyses, publication bias tests, and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 62 studies, including 8342 participants, were analyzed, comprising 7 randomized controlled trials and 55 non-randomized studies. Monotherapy was associated with higher mortality (OR = 1.29, 95%CI: 1.11-1.51), lower clinical success (OR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.56-0.98), and lower microbiological eradication (OR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.55-0.91) compared to combination therapy for CRGNB infections. Specifically, patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections receiving monotherapy had higher mortality (OR = 1.50, 95%CI: 1.15-1.95), comparable clinical success (OR = 0.57,95%CI: 0.28-1.16), and lower microbiological eradication (OR = 0.48,95%CI:0.25-0.91) than those receiving combination therapy. For carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections, no significant differences were observed in mortality (OR = 1.15.95%CI: 0.90-1.47), clinical success (OR = 0.95,95%CI: 0.74-1.24) and microbiological eradication (OR = 0.78,95%CI: 0.54-1.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy or combination therapy is controversial. The systematic review and meta-analysis suggested that monotherapy is associated with higher mortality, lower clinical success, and lower microbiological eradication for treating infection caused by CRGNB. The available evidence suggests that treatment should be selected based on the specific bacteria and antibiotic used. Monotherapy for CRE infections may lead to adverse outcomes. For CRAB infections, no significant differences were found between combination therapy and monotherapy.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022331861.

The Use of CHROMID® Colistin R for the Detection of Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Positive Blood Cultures

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of CHROMID® Colistin R for direct detection of colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures. A total of 390 blood cultures from hospitalised patients containing Gram-negative bacteria were included in this study. These blood cultures were referred to clinical laboratories in the United Kingdom and Türkiye. A further 16 simulated positive blood culture bottles were included that contained a range of colistin-resistant strains as well as susceptible control strains. Fluid from each positive blood culture was diluted 1/200 in saline and 10 µL aliquots cultured onto cystine-lactose-electrolyte-deficient agar and CHROMID® Colistin R. All recovered bacteria were identified, and for Gram-negative bacteria, their minimum inhibitory concentration of colistin was measured using the broth microdilution method. From a total of 443 Gram-negative isolates, 57 colistin-resistant isolates were recovered, of which 53 (93%) grew on CHROMID® Colistin R within 18 h. Of the 377 isolates determined to be colistin-susceptible, only 9 isolates were able to grow, including 6 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For positive blood cultures that are shown to contain Gram-negative bacteria, culture on CHROMID® Colistin R is a useful diagnostic tool to detect susceptibility or resistance to colistin within 18 h.

Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign

INTRODUCTION

The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was developed to improve outcomes for all patients with sepsis. Despite sepsis being the primary cause of death after thermal injury, burns have always been excluded from the Surviving Sepsis efforts. To improve sepsis outcomes in burn patients, an international group of burn experts developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign (SSABC) as a testable guideline to improve burn sepsis outcomes.

METHODS

The International Society for Burn Injuries (ISBI) reached out to regional or national burn organizations to recommend members to participate in the program. Two members of the ISBI developed specific "patient/population, intervention, comparison and outcome" (PICO) questions that paralleled the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1]. SSABC participants were asked to search the current literature and rate its quality for each topic. At the Congress of the ISBI, in Guadalajara, Mexico, August 28, 2022, a majority of the participants met to create "statements" based on the literature. The "summary statements" were then sent to all members for comment with the hope of developing an 80% consensus. After four reviews, a consensus statement for each topic was created or "no consensus" was reported.

RESULTS

The committee developed sixty statements within fourteen topics that provide guidance for the early treatment of sepsis in burn patients. These statements should be used to improve the care of sepsis in burn patients. The statements should not be considered as "static" comments but should rather be used as guidelines for future testing of the best treatments for sepsis in burn patients. They should be updated on a regular basis.

CONCLUSION

Members of the burn community from the around the world have developed the Surviving Sepsis After Burn Campaign guidelines with the goal of improving the outcome of sepsis in burn patients.

Optimal dosing interval of intravenous Colistin monotherapy versus combination therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to maximize the clinical response and effectiveness of colistin antibiotics in patients with multi-drug (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria, there is an increasing interest in colistin combination therapy with other antibiotics and extended interval dosing regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim is to evaluate if the combination therapy is superior to monotherapy with colistin regarding increased survival and also which dose interval is the most effective to utilize. English language, peer-reviewed journal publications from the first date available to 25 January 2022 were identified by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Forest plots for overall and subgroups and funnel plots were graphed. 42 studies were included in the study. Among them, 38 studies were on combination therapy, and four on dose interval. The overall pooled odds ratio is 0.77 (CI: 0.62; 0.95) (p value < 0.017). The I^2 value was 43% (p value < 0.01). The Begg correlation test of funnel plot asymmetry showed no significant publication bias (0.064). The overall pooled odds ratio for Carbapenem is 0.74 (CI: 0.48; 1.13). A prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) on 40 adults intensive care unit (ICU) patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), comparing the mortality and ICU length of stay of 8- or 24- hour intervals regimens, showed that the ICU length of stay and ICU mortality were; 31.31, 35.3 days, and 32.06, 22.2% in groups 24-h interval and 8- hour interval (p value: 0.39, 0.87), respectively. It seems that combination therapy is associated with drug synergism and increased survival. The extended interval colistin administration may result in higher peak concentration and bacterial eradication. In both cases, we face a dearth of literature.