Reducing pain through distraction therapy in small acute paediatric burns

Trends and hotspots in burns-related pain research: A bibliometric analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this investigation was to conduct a thorough synthesis of the extant scholarly discourse and to delineate the prevailing global trends in the domain of burn pain, employing a bibliometric analysis.

METHODS

A bibliometric analysis was performed utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection database. Articles were selected based on titles or abstracts containing keywords associated with burns and pain. Both quantitative and qualitative methodologies were applied to examine the retrieved data, encompassing an analysis of publication trends, research themes, and collaboration networks.

RESULTS

The number of articles on this topic has been increasing, averaging an annual growth rate of 6.9 % from 1997 to 2023. Contributions have come from 645 institutions across 53 countries, resulting in 446 papers that span areas such as nursing, anesthesia, and immunology. Key journals include Burns, Journal of Burn Care & Research, and Pain. The United States has demonstrated a significant research output in this field, with active international collaboration, notably with Washington University leading in contributions. Patterson DR was the most prolific author in terms of published papers, while Choiniere M was the most frequently co-cited author. The focus of research has shifted from symptom management to exploring pain mechanisms. Current research priorities in burn pain include "quality of life," "music therapy," and "psychological state." Recent analysis has highlighted key areas in neuropathic pain mechanisms, novel analgesic therapies, and specific groups such as pediatric burn patients. Influential studies have advanced our understanding of pathophysiology, while psychological interventions and inflammation are increasingly receiving attention. Emerging topics include non-pharmacological interventions, psychological support, technology in pain assessment and management, quality of life, and personalized pain management.

CONCLUSION

Research on burn pain is advancing rapidly; however, collaboration among countries and institutions remains limited. Increased cooperation and communication across these entities could significantly advance the field in the future. Future research should prioritize placebo-controlled trials of targeted therapeutic drugs and innovative pain management approaches, with a strong emphasis on patient outcomes and quality of life.

Acceptability and Usability of Smileyscope Virtual Reality for Paediatric Pain Management During Burn Procedures: Perspectives of Patients, Carers and Clinicians

AIM

To explore clinician, child and parent acceptability and usability of the Smileyscope VR device in the context of addressing the unique pain and distress needs of young burn patients.

DESIGN

A survey comprising closed and open-ended questions.

METHOD

Descriptive statistics analysed participant characteristics, pain and analgesia. Qualitative content was collected from April 2022-August 2022 and analysed to identify barriers and enablers. Categories were then mapped onto the Capabilities, Opportunities and Motivation-Behaviour Wheel (COM-B) framework.

RESULTS

Smileyscope was found to be effective for reducing pain and anxiety during dressing changes by both patients (n = 39) and parents (n = 37). Clinicians (n = 35) reported high self-efficacy and willingness to reuse the device. However, concerns arose regarding the device's fit and the need for age-appropriate programmes.

CONCLUSION

Smileyscope demonstrated promise in reducing procedural pain and distress. The device is well accepted by all participants implying ease of implementation. Feedback suggests further program development and fitting optimisation is required.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Improved procedural pain has proven to decrease wound healing times, decreasing possible need for further scar management and long-term consequences after sustaining a burn injury. Smileyscope use in rural hospitals presents valuable opportunities for optimising early paediatric burn pain.

IMPACT

Increased burn pain can delay wound healing and have long term physical and psychological impact on patients. Smileyscope was well received within this cohort; however, improvements in device design and programmes were suggested. This study shows the potential for use of Smileyscope as a non-pharmacological approach to improving paediatric burn pain and distress.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

While our study included patients, parents and clinicians as research participants, there was no patient or public contribution in the design or conduct of the study, analysis or interpretation of the data.

The Effect of Using Virtual Reality During Burn Dressing on Pain, Anxiety and Fear Felt in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study was conducted to determine the effect of using virtual reality (VR) during burn dressing on the level of fear, anxiety, and pain that children would experience. This randomized controlled trial was conducted in a pretest-posttest design. Randomization of the participants (n = 65) was performed with the block randomization method. Then, 33 children were included in the intervention and 32 children in the control group with simple sequential randomization. The study data were collected using the "Family and Child Personal Information Form," "Physiological Parameters Registration Form," "Wong-Baker Faces Pain Scale," "Children's Fear Scale," and "Children's Anxiety Meter-State." The chi-square test, t-test, Shapiro-Wilk, mean, and percentile distributions were used for the data analysis. After dressing, the physiological parameters of the children who used VR were found to be within normal limits (HR: 108.48 ± 12.43, O2: 98.39 ± 1.14) compared to the children who did not use (HR: 117.38 ± 15.25, O2: 97.81 ± 1.35) (P < .05). After the dressing, children using VR (0.85 ± 1.23) were determined to have less fear than those who did not use them (3.03 ± 1.06), and similarly, children who used VR (2.64 ± 2.73) experienced less anxiety than those who did not use them (5.84 ± 2.26). When the pain levels were evaluated, the VR group (1.79 ± 2.04) was reported to feel less pain compared to the control group (5.50 ± 2.36). The VR used by children aged 5-10 years during burn dressing has been found to affect their physiological parameters and is effective in reducing fear, anxiety, and pain levels.

Pain Assessment in the Outpatient Pediatric Burn Patient: An Integrative Review

BACKGROUND

There is no standardized practice in pediatric pain assessment with burn injuries in the outpatient clinic setting.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to identify reliable, validated tools to measure pain in the pediatric burn clinic population.

METHODS

The literature search for this integrative review was conducted using the databases of PubMed, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane, and Embase from 2011 to 2023. Quality and relevance were appraised using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Model. Reporting was done according to a Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklist.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles and two clinical practice guidelines met inclusion criteria and were included in this review.

CONCLUSION

The Pain Observation Scale for Young Children and the COMFORT Behavior Scale tools have shown good reliability and construct validity and can be safely used to measure background and procedural pain in daily burn practice. Further research on reliable, validated pain assessment techniques in the pediatric burn population is needed.

Comparing Auditory and Visual Distractions for Reducing Pain Severity and Pain Anxiety in Older Outpatients with Burn: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Pain and anxiety are major issues among older patients with burn injuries. Complementary medicine and non-pharmacological methods can relieve pain and anxiety in older people, but comparison of the effects of these methods needs further research. This study aimed to compare the effects of auditory and visual distractions on pain severity and pain anxiety in older outpatients referred to a burn clinic for dressing change. In this randomized controlled clinical trial, older men were randomly assigned to three groups as auditory distraction, visual distraction, and control (n = 45 in each group). The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Burn Specific Pain Anxiety Scale (BSPAS) were used to asses pain severity and pain anxiety before and immediately after the interventions, and after wound dressing. Reduction in pain severity and pain anxiety after visual distraction was reported. Auditory distraction only reduced pain anxiety. Therefore, visual distraction had a better effect on alleviating pain anxiety compared with auditory distraction. Visual distraction is suggested to be used during dressing changes for older outpatients with burn injuries in outpatient clinics in order to reduce their burn-related suffering and improve their collaboration with the therapeutic regimen.