Tranexamic acid in burn surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Effects of intravenous tranexamic acid on bleeding during burn surgery: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial

Blood loss during burn surgery significantly contributes to morbidity and mortality. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, is hypothesized to reduce intraoperative bleeding. This double-blinded, randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the efficacy of systemic TXA in severe burn patients (total body surface area [TBSA] > 20 %) undergoing surgery. The study evaluated the impact of TXA on surgical bleeding, operating room (OR) time, intravenous (IV) fluid requirements, length of hospital stay (LOS), and overall patient outcomes. A total of 94 patients, with equal distribution in age, sex, and TBSA, were randomly assigned into two groups (47 each). We administered TXA as a 10 mg/kg loading dose followed by a 1 mg/kg/h infusion during surgery. Results demonstrated significant reductions in blood loss (P = 0.043), total IV fluid volume (P = 0.021), OR time (P = 0.002), LOS (P = 0.0001), and transfusions (P = 0.024) in the TXA group. Notably, women and patients without inhalation injuries exhibited better responses to TXA treatment, and graft survival was lower in the TXA group. The study concludes that IV TXA administration during burn surgery can reduce bleeding, minimize IV fluid and blood transfusion needs, and shorten surgery duration, enhancing overall surgical outcomes.

Rosuvastatin accelerates the healing process of partial-thickness burn wounds in rats by reducing TNF-α levels

Introduction

Burn wound healing is a complex, dynamic process that involves a coordinated cascade of cellular responses and phases. Inflammation, proliferation and remodeling are the main phases of tissue repair, while tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and procalcitonin (PCT) seem to be important mediators affecting the inflammatory state. Our aim was to assess the effect of rosuvastatin on tissue repair after partial thickness burn injury in healthy animals.

Material and methods

In this randomized prospective experimental study, 36 male rats were randomly divided into two groups: placebo-treated (PG) and topical rosuvastatin-treated (SG). Under anesthesia, a partial-thickness burn trauma was induced in the dorsal region of the rats using an iron seal. Tissue samples were collected for histopathological examination as well.

Results

Variables of TNF-α, procalcitonin and macroscopic assessment were normally distributed between the two groups on all studied days. The expression of TNF-α was found to be lower in burn injuries treated with topical rosuvastatin in comparison with placebo-treated animals on days 3, 6 and 9. PCT values in rosuvastatin-treated subgroups were statistically significantly lower than in placebo subgroups. Upon macroscopic examination, a significantly smaller burnt area in the statin-treated group was detected compared to the non-statin group on all days, except for day 3. Histopathological examination demonstrated higher levels of mean neutrophil infiltration in the placebo group (day 3). Finally, fibroblast proliferation, angiogenesis and re-epithelization levels were noted to be higher after the topical application of rosuvastatin.

Conclusions

Rosuvastatin accelerated wound healing and down-regulated TNF-α and PCT levels.

Barriers and prospects for skin grafting in burn treatment across African countries

INTRODUCTION

The current standard management of full-thickness or deep dermal burns is early tangential excision and skin grafting. A conservative approach to deep burns without the option of skin grafting results in delayed wound healing, possibly leading to wound infection and is associated with hypertrophic scarring and increased morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to improve the understanding of the management and availability to perform skin grafting for burns on the African continent. It also sought to identify challenges and perceived improvements.

METHODS

A web-based, structured, closed-formatted, multinational survey was designed to gather information on the current state and availability of skin grafting of burn wounds on the African continent. The questionnaire consisted of 27 questions, available in English and French. It was reviewed within the GAP-Burn collaboration network and sent to 271 health care professionals who had participated in a previous study and had initially been recruited by means of the snowball system.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was completed 84 times (response rate: 31.0%), of which 3 were excluded. Responses originated from 22 African countries. The majority 71 (87.7%) resulted from countries with a low Human Development Index (HDI), 7 (8.6%) from medium HDI countries. Split thickness skin grafting (STSG) is performed in 51 (63.0%) centers. The majority considers STSG to reduce length of stay (72.8%) and improve scarring (54.3%), yet some indicated that STSG is associated with increased risk of donor site infection (8.6%) and severe bleeding (7.4%). Factors preventing increased grafting included lack of equipment and training.

CONCLUSION

Skin grafting is not performed in a significant number of hospitals treating burns. The majority of the staff believe that more skin grafting would lead to a better outcome. Advocacy and improved infrastructure, human resources coupled with introduction to well-structured health coverage for all in African countries could help to better access and affordability in burn care.

Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Rhinoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Rhinoplasty is one of the most popular aesthetic plastic surgeries worldwide. The effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients undergoing rhinoplasty are still being studied to guide a better management.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) analyzing the effects of TXA in patients undergoing rhinoplasty. The outcomes evaluated were blood loss, postoperative edema, postoperative ecchymosis, surgery duration and surgeon satisfaction.

RESULTS

Eleven studies comprising 841 patients were included. Overall, TXA reduced total blood loss regardless of dose and administration route (MD = - 39.37 mL; 95% CI = - 62.70 to - 16.05 mL; p = 0.0009; I2 = 92%), using intravenous 10 mg/kg of TXA preoperatively (MD = - 16.30 mL; 95% CI = - 29.49 to - 2.57 mL; p = 0.02; I2 = 61%) and using 1 g of oral TXA preoperatively (MD = - 61.70 mL; 95% CI = - 83.02 to - 40.39 mL; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). TXA also decreased edema (MD = - 0.78; 95% CI = - 1.28 to - 0.27 points; p = 0.003; I2 = 80%) and ecchymosis (MD = - 1.13; 95% CI = - 1.99 to -0.28; p = 0.01; I2 = 93%) on postoperative day one (POD 1). Surgeon satisfaction was increased (SMD = 1.55; 95% CI = 0.33 to 2.77; p = 0.01; I2 = 95%). However, there was no difference in surgery duration (SMD = - 0.26; 95% CI = - 0.56 to 0.04; p = 0.09; I2 = 36%).

CONCLUSION

This study found a significant reduction in blood loss, periorbital edema and periorbital ecchymosis, along with an improvement in surgeon satisfaction. These results hold the potential to optimize the rhinoplasty management by plastic surgeons.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Effectiveness of tranexamic acid in burn patients undergoing surgery - a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Reducing blood loss during excisional surgery in burn patients remains a challenge. Tranexamic acid during surgery can potentially reduce blood loss. The use of tranexamic acid during excisional surgery in burn patients has recently been described in a review and meta-analysis. However, quality assessment on studies included was not performed and this review did not apply independent reviewers. Quality assessment of studies investigating the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in burn patients is crucial before concusions can be drawn. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature investigating the effectiveness of tranexamic acid in burn patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted. The study was pre-registered in PROSPERO database (CRD42023396183).

RESULTS

Five studies including two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 303 patients were included. Risk of bias of the included studies was moderate to high. Individual results of the studies were heterogeneous. In three studies of moderate quality the administration of tranexamic acid resulted in a reduction of blood loss per unit excised area, accounting as moderate level of evidence. In two low-quality studies and one moderate quality study the administration of tranexamic acid resulted in a reduction of transfused packed Red Blood Cells (pRBC's), accounting for moderate level of evidence. Postoperative haemoglobin levels were higher after tranexamic acid administration in one study, accounting for insufficient evidence. Meta-analysis pooling overall blood loss from two separate RCTs failed to detect a statistically significant reduction. Substantial heterogeneity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate level of evidence indicates that tranexamic acid reduces blood loss per unit of excised area and transfusion of packed Red Blood Cells. Results indicate that tranexamic acid can be beneficial in burn patients undergoing surgery. More high-quality research is needed to confirm these results. Future studies should focus on the dosing of tranexamic acid, the administration approaches, and even consider combining these approaches.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42023396183.