[Clinical safety plan in a university hospital complex. Initial diagnosis: study of adverse events]

Assessment of the predictive ability of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese Version) in inpatient settings

AIMS

This study was to assess the predictive ability of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese Version) in inpatient settings.

DESIGN

A case-control study.

METHODS

This study was conducted in a tertiary hospital based on 2019 data. With a case-control design in a 1:2 ratio, the predictive ability of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese Version) was determined by ROC curve. The best cut point was identified based on sensitivity, specificity, positive predict value and negative predict value. Conditional logistical regression analysis was conducted to test the predictive ability of each indicator.

RESULTS

The study included 309 patients, with 103 in the case group and 206 in the control groups. Generally, the predictive ability was acceptable with the area under ROC curve value at 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.79). Positive predict value and negative predict value performed best at the cut point of 13. Sensitivity at cut point 6 was much higher than that at cut point 13, though specificity was lower. Except for age, all indicators in the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese Version) demonstrated significant predictive ability as to occurrence of fall.

CONCLUSION

The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese Version) is a reliable assessment instrument in the inpatient settings.

IMPACT

This is the first study that evaluated the predictive ability of the Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese version) in the inpatient settings, and proved that the instrument is reliable for assessing inpatient fall risks. Further studies could be carried out to assess the predict ability of Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool (Chinese version) among specific populations.

Incidence and preventability of adverse events in adult patients admitted to a Brazilian teaching hospital

Objective

To analyze the incidence and preventability of adverse events related to health care in adult patients admitted to a Brazilian teaching hospital.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study, in which the incidence and preventability of adverse events related to health care were based on a two-stage retrospective review of 368 medical records (nurses and pharmacist review of medical records, followed by physicians review of triggered medical records) of adult patients whose hospitalizations occurred during 2015 in a high-complexity public teaching hospital located in Brazil. Data were collected from February 2018 to February 2019.

Results

A total of 266 adverse events were observed in 124 patients. The incidence of adverse events related to health care was 33.7% (95% CI 0.29–0.39), and the incidence density was 4.97 adverse events per 100 patient-days. Adverse events were responsible for 701 additional days of hospitalization, and the estimated length of additional hospital stay attributable to them was, on average, 6.8 days per event. The most common types of events were related to general care (60; 22.6%), medications (50; 18.8%), nosocomial infection (35; 13.2%), any other type (11; 4.1%), and diagnoses (2; 0.8%). Regarding the severity of adverse events, it was found that 168 (63.2%) were mild, 55 (20.7%) were moderate, and 43 (16.2%) were severe. In addition, it was estimated that 155 (58.3%) events were preventable. The length of a patient’s hospital stay was identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of adverse events (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.04–1.39).

Conclusions

Through knowledge of the incidence, nature, severity, preventability, and risk factors for the occurrence of adverse events, it is possible to create the opportunities to prioritize the implementation of strategies for mitigating specific events based on reliable data and concrete information.

Assessment of the incidence and preventability of adverse events in hospitals: an integrative review

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the scientific production related to the use of the retrospective chart review methods to assess the incidence and preventability of adverse events in hospitals.

METHOD

An integrative review in the MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, Web of Science and EMBASE databases conducted in May 2019 with the following guiding question: What is known about the retrospective chart review methods to assess the incidence and preventability of adverse events in hospitals? Subsequently, the categorization, synthesis, and classification of the evidence levels of the included publications were performed.

RESULTS

In the 13 selected studies, the instruments adopted to assess the occurrence of adverse events were the Harvard Medical Practice Study, the Canadian Adverse Event Study, the Quality in Australian Health Care Study, and the Global Trigger Tool. Incidence ranged from 5.7 to 14.2%, while preventability ranged from 31 to 83%.

CONCLUSION

Differences in incidence and preventability were found, showing different results in the quality of care provided, the information registered in medical records, the screening criteria used, and the assessments of the reviewers.