The association of the DNA repair gene XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism with susceptibility to colorectal cancer in a Chinese population

Genetic Polymorphisms of DNA Repair Pathways in Sporadic Colorectal Carcinogenesis

DNA repair systems play a critical role in maintaining the integrity and stability of the genome, which mainly include base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR) and double-strand break repair (DSBR). The polymorphisms in different DNA repair genes that are mainly represented by single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can potentially modulate the individual DNA repair capacity and therefore exert an impact on individual genetic susceptibility to cancer. Sporadic colorectal cancer arises from the colorectum without known contribution from germline causes or significant family history of cancer or inflammatory bowel disease. In recent years, emerging studies have investigated the association between polymorphisms of DNA repair system genes and sporadic CRC. Here, we review recent insights into the polymorphisms of DNA repair pathway genes, not only individual gene polymorphism but also gene-gene and gene-environment interactions, in sporadic colorectal carcinogenesis.

The Association of Low-Penetrance Variants in DNA Repair Genes with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objectives:

Approximately 35% of colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is attributable to heritable factors known hereditary syndromes, accounting for 6%. The remainder may be due to lower penetrance polymorphisms particularly of DNA repair genes. DNA repair pathways, including base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), direct reversal repair (DRR), and double-strand break repair are complex, evolutionarily conserved, and critical in carcinogenesis. Germline mutations in these genes are associated with high-penetrance CRC syndromes such as Lynch syndrome. However, the association of low-penetrance polymorphisms of DNA repair genes with CRC risk remains unclear.

Methods:

A systematic literature review of PubMed, Embase, and HuGENet databases was conducted. Pre-specified criteria determined study inclusion/exclusion. Per-allele, pooled odds ratios disclosed the risk attributed to each variant. Heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup analyses for ethnicity and tumor location; funnel plots and Egger’s test assessed publication bias.

Results:

Sixty-one polymorphisms in 26 different DNA repair genes were identified. Meta-analyses for 22 polymorphisms in 17 genes revealed that six polymorphisms were significantly associated with CRC risk within BER (APE1, PARP1), NER (ERCC5, XPC), double-strand break (RAD18), and DRR (MGMT), but none within MMR. Subgroup analyses revealed significant association of OGG1 rs1052133 with rectal cancer risk. Egger’s test revealed no publication bias.

Conclusions:

Low-penetrance polymorphisms in DNA repair genes alter susceptibility to CRC. Future studies should therefore analyze whole-genome polymorphisms and any synergistic effects on CRC risk.

Translational impact:

This knowledge may enhance CRC risk assessment and facilitate a more personalized approach to cancer prevention.

Association between x-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) genetic polymorphisms and papillary thyroid cancer susceptibility in a Chinese Han population

Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is a predominant type of thyroid cancer. Ionizing radiation is the only well-established risk factor and may result in double-strand breaks. The x-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) gene plays a vital role in DNA repair through homologous recombination. We aimed at investigating the association between XRCC3 genetic polymorphisms and PTC susceptibility. Eighty-three PTC patients and 367 controls in a Chinese population were enrolled in the study. Tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified by HaploView 4.2 software. Genomic DNAs were isolated from peripheral blood samples by using TaqMan Blood DNA kits. The genotyping of XRCC3 SNPs was performed by TaqMan SNPs genotyping assay. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the association between XRCC3 SNPs and PTC susceptibility. The statistical analyses were conducted by using SPSS 13.0 software. Four tag-SNPs were initially identified by HaploView 4.2 software. Only one SNP (rs861539) was shown to be significantly associated with increased risk of PTC. There was a significant difference in smoking and drinking status between PTC cases and controls. And the stratified analysis suggested that the polymorphisms of rs861539 in XRCC3 were correlated with PTC risk in the four subgroups of smokers (ex-smokers included), non-smokers, drinkers (ex-drinkers included), and non-drinkers. The meta-analysis showed that only two studies reported a significant association between XRCC3 polymorphisms and PTC risk. In this study, we find a significant association between rs861539 polymorphisms and PTC susceptibility. However, there were inconsistent results in previous published studies. Therefore, further studies in a large population are required to gain insights into the PTC risk conferred by XRCC3 SNPs.

Association between the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta analysis of 5,193 cases and 6,645 controls

BACKGROUND

Many studies have reported associations of the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) Thr241Met polymorphism with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but the results remained controversial. Hence, we performed the present meta-analysis with different inheritance models.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the PubMed and Google scholar databases for studies relating to associations between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and risk of CRC. 16 studies with 5,193 cases and 6,645 controls were finally included into the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We found that the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism was associated with increased CRC risk only under a dominant genetic model (CC+CT vs. TT: OR 0.575, 95%CI 0.498-1.665, p<0.001, Pheterogeneity=0.00, I2=83%). There was a significant association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and CRC risk in Caucasian in the overall 8 studies under only in the heterozygote genetic model (CT vs. TT: OR=0.929, 95%CI=0.806-1.070, P=0.308, Pheterogeneity=0.002, I2=57%). Four studies evaluated the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and CRC risk in Asians. Two genetic models of the XRCC3 polymorphism were significantly correlated with increasing risk in Asians (dominant model: CC+CT vs. TT: OR= 0.609, 95%CI=411-0.902, P=0.013, Pheterogeneity=0.54, I2=0.00%; Allele model: C vs. T: OR=0.708, 95 %=CI 0.605-0.829, p=0.000, Pheterogeneity=0.000, I2=92%). The sensitivity analysis suggested stability of this meta-analysis and no publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates that XRCC3 Thr241Met shows an increased CRC risk, particularly in Asians rather than Caucasians.

XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and melanoma skin cancer risk: A meta-analysis

Although the T241M polymorphism in the X-ray cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) gene has been implicated in the pathogenesis of melanoma, the results have been inconsistent. In this study, a meta-analysis was performed to assess the association of XRCC3 T241M polymorphism with melanoma. Published literature from PubMed and Embase databases was retrieved. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using fixed- or random-effects models. A total of six case-control studies containing 2,133 patients and 3,141 controls were enrolled into this meta-analysis. In a combined analysis, the results revealed no significant association between XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and melanoma risk in the overall population. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant associations between the XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and melanoma risk were identified in Caucasians. However, when the analyses were restricted to three larger studies (n>500 cases), a significant association was noted with melanoma (TT vs. MT: OR=1.20, 95% CI=1.04-1.38; dominant model: OR=0.86, 95% CI=0.75-0.98). In conclusion, the meta-analysis results suggest that the XRCC3 T241M polymorphism was associated with risk of melanoma. Further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm this conclusion.

Genes and SNPs associated with non-hereditary and hereditary colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in both men and women in the world and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths. The incidence of colorectal cancer has increased in Iran in the past three decades and is now considered as a serious problem for our society. This cancer has two types hereditary and non-hereditary, 80% of cases being the latter. Considering that the relationship between SNPs with diseases is a concern, many researchers believed that they offer valuable markers for identifying genes responsible for susceptibility to common diseases. In some cases, they are direct causes of human disease. One SNP can increase risk of cancer, but when considering the rate of overlap and frequency of DNA repair pathways, it might be expected that SNP alone cannot affect the final result of cancer, although several SNPs together can exert a significant influence. Therefore identification of these SNPs is very important. The most important loci which include mutations are: MLH1, MSH2, PMS2, APC, MUTYH, SMAD7, STK11, XRCC3, DNMT1, MTHFR, Exo1, XRCC1 and VDR. Presence of SNPs in these genes decreases or increases risk of colorectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this article we reviewed the Genes and SNPs associated with non-hereditary and hereditary of colorectal cancer that recently were reported from candidate gene y, meta-analysis and GWAS studies.

RESULTS

As with other cancers, colorectal cancer is associated with SNPs in gene loci. Generally, by exploring SNPs, it is feasible to predict the risk of developing colorectal cancer and thus establishing proper preventive measures.

CONCLUSIONS

SNPs of genes associated with colorectal cancer can be used as a marker SNP panel as a potential tool for improving cancer diagnosis and treatment planning.

Association between the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and lung cancer risk in the Asian population

X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) plays a vital role in maintaining the stability of genome by homologous recombination repair for DNA double-strand breaks. The genetic polymorphism of XRCC3 C241T has been implicated in lung cancer risk, but the findings across published studies in Asians are inconsistent and inconclusive. To estimate the precise association of XRCC3 C241T polymorphism with lung cancer risk, a meta-analysis of all currently available studies in Asians was performed. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases was conducted for eligible studies based on the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the association. Besides, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were also performed for further estimation. Seven available studies with a total of 7,398 subjects were finally included into this meta-analysis. The overall ORs indicated that the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism was not associated with a lung cancer risk among Asians in all genetic contrast modes (ORT allele vs. C allele = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.95-1.24, P OR = 0.252; ORTT vs. CC = 1.30, 95 % CI 0.69-2.45, P OR = 0.426; ORCT vs. CC = 1.07, 95 % CI 0.93-1.24, P OR = 0.363; ORTT + CT vs. CC = 1.08, 95 % CI 0.94-1.24, P OR = 0.300; ORTT vs. CC + CT = 1.29, 95 % CI 0.68-2.43, P OR = 0.439). We failed to identify significant association between the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism and risk of lung cancer in Chinese and population-based studies. Interestingly, the pooled ORs in hospital-based studies indicated that the XRCC3 C241T variant carriers were more susceptible to lung cancer (ORT allele vs. C allele = 1.27, 95 % CI 1.04-1.56, P OR = 0.019; ORCT vs. CC = 1.26, 95 % CI 1.01-1.57, P OR = 0.045; ORTT + CT vs. CC = 1.28, 95 % CI 1.03-1.59, P OR = 0.027). Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability and liability of all results. This meta-analysis suggests that the XRCC3 C241T polymorphism may not exert a risk effect on the lung cancer risk in Asians, although a statistically significant association was observed among the hospital-based studies. Thus, the precise relationship between the XRCC3 C241T variant and lung cancer risk needs further confirmation in future studies with large available data.

Association between the XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and risk of cancer: evidence from 157 case-control studies

The T241M polymorphism in the X-ray cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) had been implicated in cancer susceptibility. The previous published data on the association between XRCC3 T241M polymorphism and cancer risk remained controversial. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the association between cancer susceptibility and XRCC3 T241M (61,861 cases and 84,584 controls from 157 studies) polymorphism in different inheritance models. We used odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals to assess the strength of the association. Overall, significantly increased cancer risk was observed in any genetic model (dominant model: odds ration [OR]=1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.00-1.13; recessive model: OR=1.15, 95% CI=1.08-1.23; additive model: OR=1.17, 95% CI=1.08-1.28) when all eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. In further stratified and sensitivity analyses, the elevated risk remained for subgroups of bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians. In addition, significantly decreased lung cancer risk was also observed. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests the participation of XRCC3 T241M in the susceptibility for bladder cancer and breast cancer, especially in Caucasians, and XRCC3 T241M polymorphism is associated with decreased lung cancer risk. Moreover, our work also points out the importance of new studies for T241M association in some cancer types, such as gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and melanoma skin cancer, where at least some of the covariates responsible for heterogeneity could be controlled, to obtain a more conclusive understanding about the function of the XRCC3 polymorphism in cancer development.

Association between XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 23 case-control studies

Several potential functional polymorphisms in the DNA repair gene X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln (rs25487), Arg194Trp (rs1799782), Arg280His (rs25489) and X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) T241M (rs861539) have been implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, but the results are conflicting. Here, we performed a meta-analysis of 23 published case control datasets and assessed genetic heterogeneity between those datasets. All the case-control studies published from January 2000 to June 2012 on the association between those polymorphisms and CRC risk were identified by searching the electronic literature Medline. Statistical analysis was performed with the software programs Review Manager (version 4.2). For overall CRC, no significant association was observed, the pooled odds ratios for XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp, Arg280His, and XRCC3 T241M were 1.02 (95 % CI: 0.93, 1.12), 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.94, 1.14), 0.98 (95 % CI: 0.85, 1.13) and 1.03 (95 % CI: 0.85, 1.26), respectively. Furthermore, no significant association was observed in subgroup analyses based on ethnicity. The results suggested that these four SNPs evaluated are not associated with risk of CRC.

Association between DNA repair gene XRCC3 Thr241 Met single nucleotide polymorphisms and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

AIM: To evaluate the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms of the X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) gene and colorectal cancer susceptibility.

METHODS: By searching EMBSE (1974-2010.11), Pubmed (1966-2010.11), CNKI (1994-2010.11) and CBM (1978-2010.11), We collected studies evaluating the association between XRCC3 gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer susceptibility. The effect size was odds ratios (OR) of variant allele of XRCC3Thr241Met in the case and control groups. Random or fixed effect model was selected according to the results of heterogeneity test. The OR and publication bias were calculated using Review Manager 5.0 and STATA11.0 software.

RESULTS: Nine case-control studies involving 3 294 cases and 3 947 controls were included. In the Met/Met versus Thr/Thr group, the odds ratio was 1.30 (95%CI: 0.86-1.98, P = 0.22). For the dominant genetic model, the OR in the Met/Met+Met/Thr versus Thr/Thr group was 1.05 (95%CI: 0.67-1.66 P = 0.83). For the recessive genetic model, the OR in the Met/Met versus Thr/Thr+Thr/Met group was 1.45 (95%CI: 0.94-2.25, P = 0.09).

CONCLUSION: There was no close association between XRCC3 Thr241 Met single nucleotide polymorphisms and colorectal cancer susceptibility.

Smoking and selected DNA repair gene polymorphisms in controls: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

When the case-only study design is used to estimate statistical interaction between genetic (G) and environmental (E) exposures, G and E must be independent in the underlying population, or the case-only estimate of interaction (COR) will be biased. Few studies have examined the occurrence of G-E association in published control group data.

METHODS

To examine the assumption of G-E independence in empirical data, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of G-E associations in controls for frequently investigated DNA repair genes (XRCC1 Arg399Gln, Arg194Trp, or Arg280His, XPD Lys751Gln, and Asp312Asn, and XRCC3 Thr241Met), and smoking (ever/never smoking, current/not current smoker, smoking duration, smoking intensity, and pack-years).

RESULTS

Across the 55 included studies, single nucleotide polymorphisms SNP-smoking associations in controls (OR(z)) were not reliably at the null value of 1.0 for any SNP-smoking combinations. Two G-E combinations were too heterogeneous for summary estimates: XRCC1 399 and ever-never smoking (N = 21), and XPD 751 and pack-years (N = 12). OR(z) ranges for these combinations were: [OR(z) (95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.7 (0.4, 1.2)-1.9 (1.2, 2.8) and 0.8 (0.5, 1.3)-2.3 (0.8, 6.1), respectively). Estimates for studies considered homogeneous (Cochran's Q P-value <0.10) varied 2- to 5-fold. No study characteristics were identified that could explain heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend the independence assumption be evaluated in the population underlying any potential case-only study, rather than in a proxy control group(s) or pooled controls.

IMPACT

These results suggest that G-E association in controls may be population-specific. Increased access to control data would improve evaluation of the independence assumption.

MGMT -535G>T polymorphism is associated with prognosis for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The present study analyzed the polymorphisms of DNA repair genes and their impact on the response to chemotherapy and survival of patients with colorectal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 94 patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based combination chemotherapy were enrolled in the present study. The single nucleotide polymorphisms of 16 DNA repair genes were determined using a PCR-RFLP assay.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up duration of 15.9 (2.1-53.0) months, 67 (71.3%) progressions and 29 (30.9%) deaths were observed. Among the 60 patients assessable for response, response to the oxaliplatin-based regimens was found in 27 (45%) patients (9 CR and 18 PR). In a logistic regression analysis adjusted to age, sex, primary site, disease status, and regimen, the POLR2C rs4937 and MSH2 rs3732183 polymorphisms were statistically associated with the response to the oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. A multivariate survival analysis showed that the TT genotype of the MGMT (rs1625649) -535G>T polymorphism was found to correlate with a worse progression-free survival (PFS) than the combined GG + GT genotypes (HR = 3.137; 95% CI = 1.423-6.914; P = 0.005), which was also observed among the 60 evaluable patients (HR = 2.653; 95% CI = 1.101-6.392; P = 0.030) For the clinical parameters, curative resection was the most significant prognostic factor in a Cox model for PFS and overall survival (HR = 0.229 and 0.205; P < 0.001 and 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The MGMT -535G>T polymorphism (rs1625649) was found to be correlated with PFS in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

A meta-analysis on XRCC1 and XRCC3 polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk

PURPOSE

Studies on polymorphism of X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1), group 3 (XRCC3), and colorectal cancer risk are inconclusive. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of XRCC1 R399Q, R194W, and XRCC3 T241M genotypes in colorectal cancer susceptibility.

METHODS

We performed a meta-analysis on all available studies that provided 3,514/4,686 cases/controls for R399Q, 2,767/3,907 cases/controls for R194W and 3,183/3,926 cases/controls for T241M.

RESULTS

Overall, no apparent effects of 194 W allele compared to 194R on colorectal cancer risk were found in all subjects and subgroups (Asians and Caucasians). Insignificant effects were also found under other genetic contrasts (homologous contrast, dominant model, and recessive model). The same pattern of results was produced in T241M polymorphism. The 399Q allele compared to 399R showed no significant association with colorectal cancer risk in all subjects and subgroups. However, protective effects of 399QQ genotype were observed under recessive model (QQ/QR + RR) [P = 0.02, OR = 0.84, 95% CI (0.72, 0.97)] and homozygote contrast (QQ/RR) [P = 0.01, OR = 0.81; 95% CI (0.69, 0.95)] in all subjects.

CONCLUSION

Results suggested that 399Q allele might act as a recessive allele in its association with colorectal cancer.

TGFB1 509 C/T polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) is a cytokine. The TGF-β signaling pathway plays an important role in controlling cell proliferation and differentiation involved in colorectal carcinogenesis. In mammalian cells, TGFB1 is the most abundant subtype of TGF-β. The 509 C/T polymorphism in TGFB1 has been implicated in colorectal cancer risk. However, published data remain conflicting. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis of 994 cases and 2,335 controls from five published case-control studies was performed. Overall, significantly increased colorectal cancer risks were found for CC versus TT (OR=1.62; 95% CI: 1.30-2.02; Pheterogeneity=0.118), TC+CC versus TT (OR=1.30; 95% CI: 1.08-1.58; Pheterogeneity=0.259) and CC versus TC+TT (OR=1.48; 95% CI: 1.26-1.75; Pheterogeneity=0.244). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significantly increased risks were also found among Asians for CC versus TT (OR=1.77; 95% CI: 1.40-2.24; Pheterogeneity=0.519), TC+CC versus TT (OR=1.38; 95% CI: 1.13-1.68; Pheterogeneity=0.679) and CC versus TC+TT (OR=1.58; 95% CI: 1.31-1.89; Pheterogeneity=0.340). However, no significant associations were found among Europeans for all genetic models. This meta-analysis showed that TGFB1 509 C allele is a risk factor for developing colorectal cancer in Asians.

Common single-nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA double-strand break repair genes and breast cancer risk

The proteins involved in homologous recombination are instrumental in the error-free repair of dsDNA breakages, and common germ-line variations in these genes are, therefore, potential candidates for involvement in breast cancer development and progression. We carried out a search for common, low-penetrance susceptibility alleles by tagging the common variation in 13 genes in this pathway in a two-stage case-control study. We genotyped 100 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), tagging the 655 common SNPs in these genes, in up to 4,470 cases and 4,560 controls from the SEARCH study. None of these tagging SNPs was associated with breast cancer risk, with the exception of XRCC2 rs3218536, R188H, which showed some evidence of a protective association for the rare allele [per allele odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), 0.80-0.99; P trend = 0.03]. Further analyses showed that this effect was confined to a risk of progesterone receptor positive tumors (per rare allele odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.91; P trend = 0.002). Several other SNPs also showed receptor status-specific susceptibility and evidence of roles in long-term survival, with the rare allele of BRIP1 rs2191249 showing evidence of association with a poorer prognosis (hazard ratio per minor allele, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.36; P trend = 0.002). In summary, there was little evidence of breast cancer susceptibility with any of the SNPs studied, but larger studies would be needed to confirm subgroup effects.

TheXRCC3Thr241Met polymorphism and breast cancer risk: a case–control study in a Thai population

The X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 gene (XRCC3) belongs to a family of genes responsible for repairing DNA double-strand breaks caused by normal metabolic processes and exposure to ionizing radiation. Polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may alter an individual's capacity to repair damaged DNA and may lead to genetic instability and contribute to malignant transformation. We examined the role of a polymorphism in the XRCC3 gene (rs861529; codon 241: threonine to methionine change) in determining breast cancer risk in Thai women. The study population consisted of 507 breast cancer cases and 425 healthy women. The polymorphism was analysed by fluorescence-based melting curve analysis. The XRCC3 241Met allele was found to be uncommon in the Thai population (frequency 0.07 among cases and 0.05 among controls). Odds ratios (OR) adjusted for age, body mass index, age at menarche, family history of breast cancer, menopausal status, reproduction parameters, use of contraceptives, tobacco smoking, involuntary tobacco smoking, alcohol drinking, and education were calculated for the entire population as well as for pre- and postmenopausal women. There was a significant association between 241Met carrier status and breast cancer risk (OR 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.44). Among postmenopausal women, a slightly higher OR (1.82, 95% CI 0.95-3.51) was found than among premenopausal women (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.82-2.69). Our findings suggest that the XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism is likely to play a modifying role in the individual susceptibility to breast cancer among Thai women as already shown for women of European ancestry.

DNA repair genetic polymorphisms and risk of colorectal cancer in the Czech Republic

Colorectal cancer represents a complex disease where susceptibility may be influenced by genetic polymorphisms in the DNA repair system. In the present study we investigated the role of nine single nucleotide polymorphisms in eight DNA repair genes on the risk of colorectal cancer in a hospital-based case-control population (532 cases and 532 sex- and age-matched controls). Data analysis showed that the variant allele homozygotes for the Asn148Glu polymorphism in the APE1 gene were at a statistically non-significant increased risk of colorectal cancer. The risk was more pronounced for colon cancer (odds ratio, OR: 1.50; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01-2.22; p=0.05). The data stratification showed increased risk of colorectal cancer in the age group 64-86 years in both individuals heterozygous (OR: 1.79; 95% CI: 1.04-3.07; p=0.04) and homozygous (OR: 2.57; 95% CI: 1.30-5.06; p=0.007) for the variant allele of the APE1 Asn148Glu polymorphism. Smokers homozygous for the variant allele of the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism showed increased risk of colorectal cancer (OR: 4.17; 95% CI: 1.17-15.54; p=0.03). The analysis of binary genotype combinations showed increased colorectal cancer risk in individuals simultaneously homozygous for the variant alleles of APE1 Asn148Glu and hOGG1 Ser326Cys (OR: 6.37; 95% CI: 1.40-29.02; p=0.02). Considering the subtle effect of the DNA repair polymorphisms on the risk of colorectal cancer, exploration of gene-gene and gene-environmental interactions with a large sample size with sufficient statistical power are recommended.

Sporadic colorectal cancer and individual susceptibility: a review of the association studies investigating the role of DNA repair genetic polymorphisms

Mutations in one of the DNA repair genes are one of the most common reasons for cancer, and it may be assumed that the individual genetic background modulating the DNA repair capacity may affect the susceptibility to cancer. Numerous polymorphisms (mainly SNPs) have been identified for DNA repair genes, although their functional outcome and phenotypic effect is often unknown. The aim of the present review is to evaluate the studies investigating a possible influence of DNA repair polymorphisms in the risk of sporadic colorectal cancer and/or adenoma. Overall, no relevant common findings emerge among the studies, except for some statistically significant associations between polymorphisms in the XRCC1 and XPD genes, mainly for colorectal adenoma risk. Other individual associations remain to be confirmed. This inconclusive data may suggest that the modulation of cancer risk depends not only on a single gene/SNP, but also on a joint effect of multiple polymorphisms (or haplotypes) within different genes or pathways, in close interaction with environmental factors. The relevance of many low-penetrance genes in cancer susceptibility is supposed to be very subtle. Several reviewed association studies revealed weaknesses in their design. However, there has been a progressive improvement over the years in aspects such as simultaneous genotyping and combined analyses of different polymorphisms in larger numbers of patients and controls, as well as stratification of results by ethnicity, gender, and tumor localization. This gained experience shows that only carefully designed studies of a sufficient statistical power may resolve the relationships between polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk.

Genetic polymorphism of XRCC3 Thr241Met and breast cancer risk: case-control study in Korean women and meta-analysis of 12 studies

To evaluate the relationship of genetic polymorphism in XRCC3 Thr(241)Met and the risk of breast cancer, a hospital-based case-control study was conducted in Korea. Histologically confirmed breast cancer cases (n = 574) and controls (n = 502) with no present or previous history of cancer were recruited from several teaching hospitals in Seoul during 1995-2001. Information on demographic characteristics and other information were collected by interviewed questionnaire. Genetic polymorphisms of XRCC3 Thr(241)Met (C > T) was determined by single base extention assay. The frequency of Thr/Thr, Thr/Met, and Met/Met genotype were 89.4, 10.4, 0.2% in cases and 92.3, 7.7, 0.0% in controls, respectively. Genotype distribution in controls fit well to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P = 0.74). XRCC3 codon 241 Thr/Met or Met/Met genotype moderately increased the risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.87-2.33), but not significant in this study. In the results of meta-analysis using twelve reports, however, Thr/Met or Met/Met genotype increased the risk of breast cancer (OR = 1.08, 95%CI: 1.00-1.17). In conclusion, although the genetic polymorphism of XRCC3 Thr(241)Met was unlikely to have a substantial overall association in Korean women, the meta-analysis of studies, including ours, provided that Thr/Met and Met/Met was weakly increased the risk of breast cancer compare to Thr/Thr genotype.

DNA repair gene XRCC3 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 48 case-control studies

The X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3) is a highly suspected candidate gene for cancer susceptibility. However, association studies on the XRCC3 polymorphisms (4541A>G, Thr(241)Met, 17893A>G) in cancer have shown conflicting results. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to better assess the purported associations. Forty eight eligible case-control studies including 24,975 cancer patients and 34, 209 controls were selected for our meta-analysis. Overall, individuals carrying the XRCC3 Met/Met genotype showed a small cancer risk under a recessive genetic model. The subgroup and meta-regression analysis demonstrated different scenarios concerning the XRCC3 Met/Met genotype's role in cancer susceptibility for different subgroups. Specially, there was a significantly increased risk of breast cancer (OR, 1.14; P=0.0004; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23; P=0.37 for heterogeneity), elevated but not significant risk of cancer for head and neck, bladder, surprisingly, a significantly decreased risk of non-melanoma skin cancer (OR, 0.76; P=0.007; 95% CI, 0.62-0.93; P=0.61 for heterogeneity). A significantly elevated risk of cancer was observed in population-based case-control studies but not in nested or hospital based studies. Similarly, we found a significantly increased risk of cancer for A4541G and a decreased risk for A17893G under dominant genetic models. Our meta-analysis results support that the XRCC3 might represent a low-penetrance susceptible gene especially for cancer of breast, bladder, head and neck, and non-melanoma skin cancer. A single larger study should be required to further evaluate gene-gene and gene-environment interactions on XRCC3 polymorphisms and tissue-specific cancer risk in an ethnicity specific population.

Polymorphisms of the XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD genes and risk of colorectal adenoma and carcinoma, in a Norwegian cohort: a case control study

Background

Genetic polymorphisms in DNA repair genes may influence individual variation in DNA repair capacity, which may be associated with risk of developing cancer. For colorectal cancer the importance of mutations in mismatch repair genes has been extensively documented. Less is known about other DNA repair pathways in colorectal carcinogenesis. In this study we have focused on the XRCC1, XRCC3 and XPD genes, involved in base excision repair, homologous recombinational repair and nucleotide excision repair, respectively.

Methods

We used a case-control study design (157 carcinomas, 983 adenomas and 399 controls) to test the association between five polymorphisms in these DNA repair genes (XRCC1 Arg¹⁹⁴Trp, Arg²⁸⁰His, Arg³⁹⁹Gln, XRCC3 Thr²⁴¹Met and XPD Lys⁷⁵¹Gln), and risk of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas in a Norwegian cohort. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were estimated by binary logistic regression model adjusting for age, gender, cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption.

Results

The XRCC1 280His allele was associated with an increased risk of adenomas (OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.19–4.46). The XRCC1 399Gln allele was associated with a reduction of risk of high-risk adenomas (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41–0.96). Carriers of the variant XPD 751Gln allele had an increased risk of low-risk adenomas (OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.03–1.89), while no association was found with risk of carcinomas.

Conclusion

Our results suggest an increased risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia in individuals with the XRCC1 Arg²⁸⁰His polymorphism and a reduced risk associated with the XRCC1 Arg³⁹⁹Gln polymorphism. Interestingly, individuals with the XPD Lys⁷⁵¹Gln polymorphism had an increased risk of low-risk adenomas. This may suggest a role in regression of adenomas.