Breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test use in the US territories of Guam, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands

A difference-in-differences analysis of Medicaid expansion and state paid sick leave laws on colorectal cancer screening

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening disparities persist among populations with limited health care access. Although Medicaid expansion and paid sick leave could address these barriers, there is limited data on the combined impact of these policies and CRC screening.

METHODS

The authors conducted a difference-in-differences analysis using 2012-2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. The study population included adults 50-75 years of age meeting preventive cancer screening guidelines during the study period. States were categorized into three groups: those with Medicaid expansion and paid sick leave (ME + SL), Medicaid expansion without paid sick leave (MEnoSL), and neither policy (NoME/NoSL). The pre-policy period was 2012-2014 and the post-policy period was 2015-2018. The outcome was the percent up-to-date with CRC screening. Survey-weighted logistic regression models accounted for individual- and state-level covariates and state-clustered standard errors.

RESULTS

Post-policy implementation, CRC up-to-date screening was 2.9 percentage points greater in ME + SL states compared to MEnoSL states (p < .001) and 4.2 percentage points greater compared to NoME/NoSL states (p = .018). These changes correspond to an estimated 352,343 and 1,087,140 fewer missed screenings between ME + SL and MEnoSL and NoME/NoSL states, respectively. The increased percent of up-to-date CRC screenings was associated with a reduction in colorectal cancer deaths: 8456 from ME + SL versus MEnoSL and 26,091 from ME + SL versus NoME/NoSL.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion combined with paid sick leave was associated with a greater likelihood of being up-to-date with CRC screening compared to Medicaid expansion alone or neither policy.

Evaluating the impact of hurricanes and the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer incidence in Puerto Rico: An interrupted time-series analysis

BACKGROUND

Major events, such as Hurricanes Irma and Maria and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted Puerto Rico's health system. Lack of access to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening services may have impeded timely diagnosis. The authors examined the impact of these events on CRC incidence in Puerto Rico.

METHODS

The Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry database allowed the authors to obtain CRC cases from 2012 to 2021. An interrupted time-series analysis was performed to examine changes in CRC incidence immediately after and during the periods after the hurricanes and the pandemic. Analysis periods included: pre-hurricanes, post-hurricanes, and post-COVID-19 lockdown restrictions.

RESULTS

We observed a level change of -8.3 CRC cases was observed in the month the hurricanes struck Puerto Rico, corresponding to an immediate decrease of 17.5%. After a slight upward trend, a second decline of 39.4 CRC cases was estimated after the COVID-19 lockdown restrictions, representing an immediate change of -24.2%. By the end of the study, the estimated numbers of patients with early stage CRC patients and those aged 50-75 years did not reach the expected numbers. In addition, CRC cases in patients with late-stage disease and in those aged younger than 50 years and aged 76 years and older exceeded the expected numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

Hurricanes Irma and Maria and the COVID-19 pandemic caused a decrease in CRC incidence in Puerto Rico. This analysis suggests that limited access to CRC screening services during these events likely hindered CRC diagnoses. To fully understand the long-term effects, monitoring of CRC trends will be necessary in the coming years.

Estimating the Impact of Asthma and COPD on Lung Cancer Screening in the USA

OBJECTIVES

Examine the association of asthma, COPD, and Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) on rates of lung cancer screening.

METHODS

2022 Behavior and Risk Factors Surveillance Survey was used for cross-sectional analysis of self-reported lung cancer screening prevalence in those with COPD, asthma, and ACO, with stratification by smoking status. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between asthma, COPD, ACO and lung cancer screening status.

RESULTS

17.9% of eligible adults were up-to-date on lung cancer screening. Those with COPD and ACO had higher rates of ever undergoing lung cancer screening (50.8% and 47.5%) than those with asthma (26.4%) or neither condition (23%). Adults with COPD (adjusted odds ratios (aOR): 2.86, 95% CI 2.49-3.28) and ACO (aOR: 2.85, 95% CI 2.49-3.28) had increased odds of ever having lung cancer screening compared with those without either condition. Stratification by smoking status shows that individuals who formerly smoked had slightly higher odds of ever undergoing screening than individuals currently smoking.

CONCLUSION

Lung cancer screening rates have increased; however, it remains low. Adults with COPD and ACO are more likely to undergo lung cancer screening.

Breast cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis in the six US-Affiliated Pacific Islands

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed among women globally and in the United States (US); however, its incidence in the six US-Affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) remains less characterized.

METHODS

We analyzed data from a population-based cancer registry using different population estimates to calculate incidence rates for breast cancer among women aged >20 years in the USAPI. Rate ratios and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare incidence rates between the USAPI and the US (50 states and the District of Columbia).

RESULTS

From 2007-2020, 1118 new cases of breast cancer were diagnosed in the USAPI, with 66.3 % (n = 741) of cases reported in Guam. Age-standardized incidence rates ranged from 66.4 to 68.7 per 100,000 women in USAPI and 101.1-110.5 per 100,000 women in Guam. Compared to the US, incidence rates were lower in USAPI, with rate ratios ranging from 0.38 (95 % CI: 0.36, 0.40) to 0.39 (95 % CI: 0.37, 0.42). The proportion of late-stage cancer was significantly higher in the USAPI (48.7 %) than in the US (34.0 %), particularly in the Federated States of Micronesia (78.7 %) and Palau (73.1 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer incidence rates were lower in the USAPI than in the US; however, late-stage diagnoses were disproportionately higher. Low incidence and late-stage cancers may signal challenges in screening, cancer surveillance, and health care access and resources. Expanding access to timely breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment could reduce the proportion of late-stage cancers and improve survival in the USAPI.

Recent cervical cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mortality trends in Puerto Rico, 2001-2019

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer incidence is rising in Puerto Rico (PR). Whether the increase is real or reflective of increased diagnostic scrutiny remains unclear.

METHODS

Using data from the PR Central Cancer Registry for 2001-2019, we estimated trends of hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates, overall, and by stage at diagnosis and age.

RESULTS

Overall, cervical cancer incidence (per 100,000) increased 1.6%/year (95% CI, -0.5% to 3.8%) from 12.5 to 15.3, with a prominent increase in distant-stage disease (4.5%/year [95% CI, 1.6% to 8.0%]), particularly among screening age eligible (25-64-year-old) women (5.8%/year [95% CI, 2.1% to 10.6%]). Mortality rates in this age-group remained stable during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased occurrence of distant-stage disease among screening-eligible women is troubling and may reflect a real increase. Future research is needed to elucidate the factors underlying these trends. Improved prevention is also an urgent priority to reverse the rising cervical cancer incidence in PR.

Cervical Pap screening among women living with HIV in Puerto Rico and the United States - Medical Monitoring Project, 2018-2021

Our objective was to determine the prevalence of cervical Pap screening among women living with HIV (WLWH) in Puerto Rico (P.R.) and other selected United States (U.S.) jurisdictions. Additionally, we sought to compare selected characteristics of WLWH who underwent cervical Pap screening between P.R. and the other U.S. jurisdictions. We analyzed data from the 2018-2021 cycles of CDC's Medical Monitoring Project (MMP), a national surveillance system among adults with HIV residing in P.R. (n = 218) and 22 other MMP jurisdictions (n = 3,653). Weighted percentages and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for selected characteristics were estimated. Prevalence ratios with predicted marginal means were calculated. An estimated 91.6 % and 84.6 % of WLWH underwent cervical Pap screening in P.R. and the other 22 MMP jurisdictions, respectively (Prevalence Ratio = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03-1.13). Among WLWH who underwent cervical Pap screening, those in P.R. were more likely to be 50+ years of age, have a household annual income below $20,000, engage in binge drinking, never smoke, and have Medicaid/other public insurance than those in the other 22 MMP jurisdictions (p < 0.05). No differences were found between P.R. and the other 22 MMP jurisdictions in the percentage reporting higher than the median HIV-stigma score, experiencing HIV health care discrimination, and having ≥ 1 sexual partner in the past 12 months. Although cervical Pap screening rates among WLWH were higher in P.R. than in the other 22 MMP jurisdictions, both surpass the Healthy People 2030 target. Future research should assess adherence and compliance with updated cervical cancer screening guidelines.

Building Capacity for Cervical Cancer Prevention in U.S.-Affiliated Pacific Islands: The Pacific Against Cervical Cancer Project

The U.S.-affiliated Pacific Islands (USAPI) have higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates and lower screening coverage compared with the United States. This is likely because of economic, geographical, health care delivery, and cultural barriers for women living in these resource-constrained, isolated regions. The most recent U.S. and World Health Organization cervical cancer screening guidelines recommended primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as one screening option or the preferred screening modality. Primary HPV screening-based strategies offer several advantages over current screening methods in the USAPI. However, adoption of this newer screening modality has been slow in the United States and not yet incorporated into USAPI screening programs. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and partners initiated the Pacific Against Cervical Cancer (PACe) project in 2019 to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and cost-effectiveness of primary HPV testing-based strategies in Guam and in Yap, Federated States of Micronesia. This report provides an overview of the PACe project and outlines the approaches we took in implementing primary HPV testing as a new cervical cancer screening strategy (including the option of self-sampling in Yap), encompassing four core components: (1) community engagement and education, (2) medical and laboratory capacity building, (3) health information and system improvement, and (4) modeling and cost-effectiveness analysis. The PACe project provides examples of systematic implementation and resource appropriate technologies to the USAPI, with broader implications for never screened and under-screened populations in the United States and Pacific as they face similar barriers to accessing cervical cancer screening services.

Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Incidence among Asian and Pacific Islander Populations in Guam, Hawai'i, and the United States

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the three most common cancers in Guam (GU), Hawai'i (HI), and the mainland United States (US). CRC prevalence in these areas is high among Filipinos, and indigenous CHamorus and Native Hawaiians; however, data on these populations are frequently aggregated in epidemiological studies, which can mask true CRC disparities. We examined CRC cumulative incidence rates (CIRs) among CHamorus in GU, Filipinos in GU, HI, and the US, and Native Hawaiians in HI and the US. CRC CIRs were calculated for two age groups (20-49 years; early onset, and 50-79 years; senior) and four time periods (2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019), stratified by ethnicity, sex, and location. Data analyzed included all invasive CRC cases reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 9-Registry (n = 166,666), the Hawai'i Tumor Registry (n = 10,760), and the Guam Cancer Registry (n = 698) between 2000 and 2019. Senior CIRs were highest in HI and lowest in GU throughout all time periods, with a downward trend observed for senior CIRs in the US and HI, but not GU. This downward trend held true for all ethnic groups, except for CHamorus in GU, females in GU, and females of CHamoru ethnicity in GU. In contrast, early onset CIRs increased across all locations, sexes, and ethnic groups, except for Filipinos in HI and males of Filipino ethnicity in HI. Our findings provide crucial insights for future research and policy development aimed at reducing the burden of CRC among indigenous populations.