Section 12: Evaluation and Management of Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Transient heart rate reduction improves acute decompensated heart failure-induced left ventricular and coronary dysfunction

AIMS

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), a live-threatening complication of heart failure (HF), associates a further decrease of the already by HF-impaired cardiac function with an increase in heart rate. We evaluated, using a new model of ADHF, whether heart rate reduction (HRR) opposes the acute decompensation-related aggravation of cardiovascular dysfunction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Cardiac output (echocardiography), cardiac tissue perfusion (magnetic resonance imaging), pulmonary wet weight, and in vitro coronary artery relaxation (Mulvany) were assessed 1 and 14 days after acute decompensation induced by salt-loading (1.8 g/kg, PO) in rats with well-established HF due to coronary ligation. HRR was induced by administration of the If current inhibitor S38844, 12 mg/kg PO twice daily for 2.5 days initiated 12 h or 6 days after salt-loading (early or delayed treatment, respectively). After 24 h, salt-loading resulted in acute decompensation, characterized by a reduction in cardiac output (HF: 130 ± 5 mL/min, ADHF: 105 ±  8 mL/min; P < 0.01), associated with a decreased myocardial perfusion (HF: 6.41 ± 0.53 mL/min/g, ADHF: 4.20 ± 0.11 mL/min/g; P < 0.01), a slight increase in pulmonary weight (HF: 1.68 ± 0.09 g, ADHF: 1.81 ± 0.15 g), and impaired coronary relaxation (HF: 55 ± 1% of pre-contraction at acetylcholine 4.5 10-5  M, ADHF: 27 ± 7 %; P < 0.01). Fourteen days after salt-loading, cardiac output only partially recovered (117 ± 5 mL/min; P < 0.05), while myocardial tissue perfusion (4.51 ± 0.44 mL/min; P < 0.01) and coronary relaxation (28 ± 4%; P < 0.01) remained impaired, but pulmonary weight further increased (2.06 ± 0.15 g, P < 0.05). Compared with untreated ADHF, HRR induced by S38844 improved cardiac output (125 ± 1 mL/min; P < 0.05), myocardial tissue perfusion (6.46 ± 0.42 mL/min/g; P < 0.01), and coronary relaxation (79 ± 2%; P < 0.01) as soon as 12 h after S38844 administration. These effects persisted beyond S38844 administration, illustrated by the improvements in cardiac output (130 ± 6 mL/min; P < 0.05), myocardial tissue perfusion (6.38 ± 0.48 mL/min/g; P < 0.01), and coronary relaxation (71 ± 4%; P < 0.01) at Day 14. S38844 did not modify pulmonary weight at Day 1 (1.78 ± 0.04 g) but tended to decrease pulmonary weight at Day 14 (1.80 ± 0.18 g). While delayed HRR induced by S38844 never improved cardiac function, early HRR rendered less prone to a second acute decompensation.

CONCLUSIONS

In a model mimicking human ADHF, early, but not delayed, transient HRR induced by the If current inhibitor S38844 opposes acute decompensation by preventing the decompensated-related aggravation of cardiovascular dysfunction as well as the development of pulmonary congestion, and these protective effects persist beyond the transient treatment. Whether early transient HRR induced by If current inhibitors or other bradycardic agents, i.e. beta-blockers, exerts beneficial effects in human ADHF warrants further investigation.

Novel Neuromodulation Approach to Improve Left Ventricular Contractility in Heart Failure: A First-in-Human Proof-of-Concept Study

BACKGROUND

Morbidity and mortality outcomes for patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure are poor and have not significantly changed in decades. Current therapies are focused on symptom relief by addressing signs and symptoms of congestion. The objective of this study was to test a novel neuromodulation therapy of stimulation of epicardial cardiac nerves passing along the posterior surface of the right pulmonary artery.

METHODS

Fifteen subjects admitted for defibrillator implantation and ejection fraction ≤35% on standard heart failure medications were enrolled. Through femoral arterial access, high fidelity pressure catheters were placed in the left ventricle and aortic root. After electro anatomic rendering of the pulmonary artery and branches, either a circular or basket electrophysiology catheter was placed in the right pulmonary artery to allow electrical intravascular stimulation at 20 Hz, 4 ms pulse width, and ≤20 mA. Changes in maximum positive dP/dt (dP/dt_Max) indicated changes in ventricular contractility.

RESULTS

Of 15 enrolled subjects, 5 were not studied due to equipment failure or abnormal pulmonary arterial anatomy. In the remaining subjects, dP/dt_Max increased significantly by 22.6%. There was also a significant increase in maximum negative dP/dt (dP/dt_Min), mean arterial pressure, systolic pressure, diastolic pressure, and left ventricular systolic pressure. There was no significant change in heart rate or left ventricular diastolic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

In this first-in-human study, we demonstrated that in humans with stable heart failure, left ventricular contractility could be accentuated without an increase in heart rate or left ventricular filling pressures. This benign increase in contractility may benefit patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure.

Rationale and study design of intravenous loop diuretic administration in acute heart failure: DIUR-AHF

AIMS

Although loop diuretics are the most commonly used drugs in acute heart failure (AHF) treatment, their short-term and long-term effects are relatively unknown. The significance of worsening renal function occurrence during intravenous treatment is not clear enough. This trial aims to clarify all these features and contemplate whether continuous infusion is better than an intermittent strategy in terms of decongestion efficacy, diuretic efficiency, renal function, and long-term prognosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a prospective, multicentre, randomized study that compares continuous infusion to intermittent infusion and a low vs. high diuretic dose of furosemide in patients with a diagnosis of acute heart failure, BNP ≥ 100 pg/mL, and specific chest X-ray signs. Randomization criteria have been established at a 1:1 ratio using a computer-generated scheme of either twice-daily bolus injection or continuous infusion for a time period ranging from 72 to 120 h. The initial dose will be 80 mg/day of intravenous furosemide and, in the case of poor response, will be doubled using an escalation algorithm. A high diuretic dose is defined as a furosemide daily amount >120 mg/day respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous and high dose groups could reveal a more intensive diuresis and a greater decongestion with respect to intermittent and low dose groups; high dose and poor loop diuretic efficiency should be related to increased diuretic resistance, renal dysfunction occurrence, and greater congestion status. Poor diuretic response will be associated with less decongestion and an adverse prognosis.

Hospital Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) is one of the leading causes of hospitalizations for elderly adults in the United States. One in 5 Americans will be >65 years of age by 2050. Because of the high prevalence of HF in this group, the number of Americans requiring hospitalization for this disorder is expected to rise significantly. We reviewed the most recent and ongoing studies and recommendations for the management of patients hospitalized due to decompensated HF. The Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry, together with the 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association heart failure guidelines, earlier retrospective and prospective studies including the Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE), the Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in the Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF), the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (OPTIMIZE-HF), the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT) and the Comparison of Medical, Pacing and Defibrillation Therapies in Heart Failure (COMPANION) trial were reviewed for current practices pertaining to these patients. Gaps in our knowledge of optimal use of patient-specific information (biomarkers and comorbid conditions) still exist.

Short and long-term effects of continuous versus intermittent loop diuretics treatment in acute heart failure with renal dysfunction

Intravenous loop diuretics are still the cornerstone of therapy in acute decompensated heart failure, however, the optimal dosage and administration strategies remain poorly defined particularly in patients with an associated renal dysfunction. This is a single-center, pilot, randomized trial involving patients with acute HF and renal dysfunction. Patients were assigned to receive continuous furosemide infusion (cIV) or bolus injections of furosemide (iIV). Primary end points were the evaluation of urine output volumes, renal function, and b-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels during treatment time. Secondary end point included: weight loss, length of hospitalization, differences in plasma electrolytes, need for additional treatment, and evaluation of cardiac events during follow-up period. 57 patients were included in the study. The cIV group showed an increase in urine output (2,505 ± 796 vs 2140 ± 468 ml/day, p < 0.04) and a more significant decrease of BNP levels in respect to the iIV group (679.6 ± 397 vs 949 ± 548 pg/ml, p < 0.04). We observed a significant increase in creatinine levels (1.78 ± 0.5 vs 1.41 ± 0.3 mg/dl, p < 0.01), and a reduction of the estimated glomerular filtration rate in cIV (44.8 ± 6.1 vs 46.7 ± 6.1 ml/min, p < 0.05). We observed a significant difference in eGFR (p = 0.01), creatinine (p = 0.02) and BNP levels (p = 0.03) from baseline to the end of treatment in both groups. A significant increase of in-hospital additional treatment as well as length of hospitalization was observed in cIV. Finally, cIV revealed a higher rate of adverse events during the follow-up period (p < 0.03). cIV appears to provide a more efficient diuresis and BNP level reduction during hospitalization, however, it was associated with increased rate of worsening renal function during hospitalization. cIV also appears related to a longer hospitalization and an increased number of adverse events during follow-up. For all of these reasons, a larger multi-center study is required to determine whether high-dose diuretics are responsible for worsening renal function and to define the best modality of administration.

Continuous versus bolus intermittent loop diuretic infusion in acutely decompensated heart failure: a prospective randomized trial

Introduction

Intravenous loop diuretics are a cornerstone of therapy in acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We sought to determine if there are any differences in clinical outcomes between intravenous bolus and continuous infusion of loop diuretics.

Methods

Subjects with ADHF within 12 hours of hospital admission were randomly assigned to continuous infusion or twice daily bolus therapy with furosemide. There were three co-primary endpoints assessed from admission to discharge: the mean paired changes in serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and reduction in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Secondary endpoints included the rate of acute kidney injury (AKI), change in body weight and six months follow-up evaluation after discharge.

Results

A total of 43 received a continuous infusion and 39 were assigned to bolus treatment. At discharge, the mean change in serum creatinine was higher (+0.8 ± 0.4 versus -0.8 ± 0.3 mg/dl P <0.01), and eGFR was lower (-9 ± 7 versus +5 ± 6 ml/min/1.73 m²P <0.05) in the continuous arm. There was no significant difference in the degree of weight loss (-4.1 ± 1.9 versus -3.5 ± 2.4 kg P = 0.23). The continuous infusion arm had a greater reduction in BNP over the hospital course, (-576 ± 655 versus -181 ± 527 pg/ml P = 0.02). The rates of AKI were comparable (22% and 15% P = 0.3) between the two groups. There was more frequent use of hypertonic saline solutions for hyponatremia (33% versus 18% P <0.01), intravenous dopamine infusions (35% versus 23% P = 0.02), and the hospital length of stay was longer in the continuous infusion group (14. 3 ± 5 versus 11.5 ± 4 days, P <0.03). At 6 months there were higher rates of re-admission or death in the continuous infusion group, 58% versus 23%, (P = 0.001) and this mode of treatment independently associated with this outcome after adjusting for baseline and intermediate variables (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.57, 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 6.58 P = 0.04).

Conclusions

In the setting of ADHF, continuous infusion of loop diuretics resulted in greater reductions in BNP from admission to discharge. However, this appeared to occur at the consequence of worsened renal filtration function, use of additional treatment, and higher rates of rehospitalization or death at six months.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01441245. Registered 23 September 2011.

Management of acute heart failure and the effect of systolic blood pressure on the use of intravenous therapies

AIMS

To examine the use of the treatments for acute heart failure (AHF) recommended by ESC guidelines in different clinical presentations and blood pressure groups.

METHODS

The use of intravenous diuretics, nitrates, opioids, inotropes, and vasopressors as well as non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was analysed in 620 patients hospitalized due to AHF. The relation between AHF therapies and clinical presentation, especially systolic blood pressure (SBP) on admission, was also assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 76% of patients received i.v. furosemide, 42% nitrates, 29% opioids, 5% inotropes and 7% vasopressors, and 24% of patients were treated with NIV. Furosemide was the most common treatment in all clinical classes and irrespective of SBP on admission. Nitrates were given most often in pulmonary oedema and hypertensive AHF. Overall, only SBP differed significantly between patients with and without the studied treatments. SBP was higher in patients treated with nitrates than in those who were not (156 vs. 141 mmHg, p<0.001). Still, only one-third of patients presenting acute decompensated heart failure and SBP over 120 mmHg were given nitrates. Inotropes and vasopressors were given most frequently in cardiogenic shock and pulmonary oedema, and their use was inversely related to initial SBP (p<0.001). NIV was used only in half of the cardiogenic shock and pulmonary oedema patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The management of AHF differs between ESC clinical classes and the use of i.v. vasoactive therapies is related to the initial SBP. However, there seems to be room for improvement in administration of vasodilators and NIV.

Impact of peripheral arterial disease on functional limitation in congestive heart failure: results from the national health and nutrition examination survey (1999-2004)

Background. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) often coexists with congestive heart failure (CHF) and can be masked by symptoms of CHF such as functional limitation (FL), a common manifestation for both. Therefore, we sought to estimate the prevalence of PAD and its independent association with FL in CHF. Methods. We conducted a cross-sectional study on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 1999 to 2004 to quantify weighted prevalence of CHF and PAD. Study cohort consisted of 7513, with ankle brachial index (ABI) measurements at baseline. Independent association of PAD (ABI ≤ 0.9) with FL in CHF was determined with multivariate logistic regression (MVLR). Results. Overall weighted PAD prevalence was 5.2%. CHF was present in 305 participants, and the weighted prevalence of PAD in this subgroup was 19.2%. When compared, participants with CHF and PAD were more likely to be older (P < 0.001), hypertensive (P = 0.005) and hypercholesterolemic (P = 0.013) than participants with CHF alone. MVLR showed that PAD (adjusted OR = 5.15; 95% CI: 2.2, 12.05: P < 0.05) and arthritis (adjusted OR = 2.36; 95% CI: 1.10, 5.06: P < 0.05) were independently associated with FL in CHF. Conclusion. Independent association of PAD with FL suggests the need for reinforced screening for PAD in individuals with CHF.

Modifiable factors associated with sleep dysfunction in adults with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Sleep dysfunction contributes to poor quality of life in adults with heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with sleep dysfunction that may be modifiable.

METHODS

Data were collected from 266 subjects enrolled from three sites in the U.S. Sleep dysfunction was measured over the past month with the Pittsburgh sleep quality index, using a score > 10 to indicate sleep dysfunction. Potentially modifiable clinical, behavioral, and psychological factors thought to be associated with sleep dysfunction were analyzed with hierarchical logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

When covariates of age, gender, race, data collection site, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were entered on the first step, only NYHA was a significant correlate of sleep dysfunction. When the clinical, behavioral, and psychological factors were entered, correlates of sleep dysfunction were the number of drugs known to cause daytime somnolence (OR = 2.08), depression (OR = 1.83), worse overall perceived health (OR = 1.64), and better sleep hygiene (OR = 1.40). Although most (54%) subjects had sleep disordered breathing (SDB), SDB was not a significant predictor of sleep dysfunction.

DISCUSSION

Factors associated with sleep dysfunction in HF include medications with sleepiness as a side-effect, depression, poorer health perceptions, and better sleep hygiene. Sleep dysfunction may motivate HF patients to address sleep hygiene. Eliminating medications with sleepiness as a side-effect, treating depression and perceptions of poor health may improve sleep quality in HF patients.

Decongestive treatment of acute decompensated heart failure: cardiorenal implications of ultrafiltration and diuretics

In patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), treatment aimed at adequate decongestion of the volume overloaded state is essential. Despite diuretic therapy, many patients remain volume overloaded and symptomatic. In addition, adverse effects related to diuretic treatment are common, including worsening kidney function and electrolyte disturbances. The development of decreased kidney function during treatment affects the response to diuretic therapy and is associated with important clinical outcomes, including mortality. The occurrence of diuretic resistance and the morbidity and mortality associated with diuretic therapy has stimulated interest to develop effective and safe treatment strategies that maximize decongestion and minimize decreased kidney function. During the last few decades, extracorporeal ultrafiltration has been used to remove fluid from diuretic-refractory hypervolemic patients. Recent clinical studies using user-friendly machines have suggested that ultrafiltration may be highly effective for decongesting patients with ADHF. Many questions remain regarding the comparative impact of diuretics and ultrafiltration on important clinical outcomes and adverse effects, including decreased kidney function. This article serves as a summary of key clinical studies addressing these points. The overall goal is to assist practicing clinicians who are contemplating the use of ultrafiltration for a patient with ADHF.

Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

Nesiritide is approved in the United States for early relief of dyspnea in patients with acute heart failure. Previous meta-analyses have raised questions regarding renal toxicity and the mortality associated with this agent.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 7141 patients who were hospitalized with acute heart failure to receive either nesiritide or placebo for 24 to 168 hours in addition to standard care. Coprimary end points were the change in dyspnea at 6 and 24 hours, as measured on a 7-point Likert scale, and the composite end point of rehospitalization for heart failure or death within 30 days.

RESULTS

Patients randomly assigned to nesiritide, as compared with those assigned to placebo, more frequently reported markedly or moderately improved dyspnea at 6 hours (44.5% vs. 42.1%, P=0.03) and 24 hours (68.2% vs. 66.1%, P=0.007), but the prespecified level for significance (P≤0.005 for both assessments or P≤0.0025 for either) was not met. The rate of rehospitalization for heart failure or death from any cause within 30 days was 9.4% in the nesiritide group versus 10.1% in the placebo group (absolute difference, -0.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.1 to 0.7; P=0.31). There were no significant differences in rates of death from any cause at 30 days (3.6% with nesiritide vs. 4.0% with placebo; absolute difference, -0.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -1.3 to 0.5) or rates of worsening renal function, defined by more than a 25% decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (31.4% vs. 29.5%; odds ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.21; P=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Nesiritide was not associated with an increase or a decrease in the rate of death and rehospitalization and had a small, nonsignificant effect on dyspnea when used in combination with other therapies. It was not associated with a worsening of renal function, but it was associated with an increase in rates of hypotension. On the basis of these results, nesiritide cannot be recommended for routine use in the broad population of patients with acute heart failure. (Funded by Scios; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00475852.).

Mechanical support in childhood heart failure

Despite optimization of standard medical therapy, some patients with chronic heart failure will deteriorate to the point that they require hospitalization for intravenous therapies and inpatient monitoring. Once the condition is recognized, the therapeutic goals are to reverse hemodynamic derangements, correct metabolic abnormalities, and provide symptomatic relief. Achievement of these goals requires individualized care and a familiarity with the risks and benefits of particular therapies.

Effect of adding nitroglycerin to early diuretic therapy on the morbidity and mortality of patients with chronic kidney disease presenting with acute decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

Loop diuretics are considered first-line therapy for patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Adding nitroglycerin (NTG) to diuretic therapy for alleviation of acute shortness of breath has been advocated in our institution. We evaluated the benefits of adding NTG to diuretics in the emergency department for patients with ADHF and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

430 consecutive patients with ADHF who were admitted with a chief complaint of dyspnea were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group A patients were treated with neither diuretics nor NTG; Group B patients were treated with diuretics only; and Group C patients were treated with both diuretics and NTG. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula. Follow-up was 36 ± 9 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) months. Primary endpoints were readmission rate at 30 days and mortality at 24 months.

RESULTS

430 patients were included in this study (42% men; age, 69 ± 14 [mean ± SD] years); mean New York Heart Association class was 2.4 ± 0.7 (mean ± SD) and mean ejection fraction was 28% ± 17% (mean ± SD). Group A included 257 (59%) patients, Group B had 127 (29%) patients, and Group C had 46 (11%) patients. Group C patients were older (mean age, 72 ± 13 years) with lower body mass index (26 ± 7 kg/m2), lower estimated GFR (55.8 ± 38 mL/min per 1.73 m2), higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels (1112 ± 876 pg/mL; P = nonsignificant [NS]), and higher systolic and diastolic blood pressures on admission (P = 0.001). The primary endpoint was assessed as a composite of all-cause mortality and ADHF readmission seen in 143 (56%) Group A patients, 68 (53%) Group B patients, and 22 (48%) Group C patients (P = NS). At 30 days there were 53 (12%) readmissions--26 in Group A, 20 in Group B, and 7 in Group C (P = NS). However, survival at 24 months was higher in Group C (87%) compared with Groups A (79%) and B (82%) (P = 0.002). Using the Cox proportional-hazards regression module, early administration of NTG and Lasix (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.62; P = 0.01) followed by CKD stage (95% CI, 1.00-1.35; P = 0.04) were the only predictors for survival.

CONCLUSION

There is a role for early administration of NTG in addition to diuretic therapy in patients admitted to the emergency department with ADHF, with resultant decreased length of stay and a trend toward a decrease in the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality and ADHF readmission. The mortality benefit at 2 years reported in our study is thought-provoking and raises a premise to be proven in randomized clinical trials.

Evaluation and management of shock States: hypovolemic, distributive, and cardiogenic shock

Shock states have multiple etiologies, but all result in hypoperfusion to vital organs, which can lead to organ failure and death if not quickly and appropriately managed. Pharmacists should be familiar with cardiogenic, distributive, and hypovolemic shock and should be involved in providing safe and effective medical therapies. An accurate diagnosis is necessary to initiate appropriate lifesaving interventions and target therapeutic goals specific to the type of shock. Clinical signs and symptoms, as well as hemodynamic data, help with initial assessment and continued monitoring to provide adequate support for the patient. It is necessary to understand these hemodynamic parameters, medication mechanisms of action, and available mechanical support when developing a patient-specific treatment plan. Rapid therapeutic intervention has been proven to decrease morbidity and mortality and is crucial to providing the best patient outcomes. Pharmacists can provide their expertise in medication selection, titration, monitoring, and dose adjustment in these critically ill patients. This review will focus on parameters used to assess hemodynamic status, the major causes of shock, pathophysiologic factors that cause shock, and therapeutic interventions that should be employed to improve patient outcomes.

Loop diuretic therapy in heart failure: the need for solid evidence on a fluid issue

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is a common condition associated with substantial cost, morbidity, and mortality. Because results of clinical trials in the acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) setting have been mostly neutral, loop diuretics remain the mainstay of treatment.

HYPOTHESIS

Loop diuretic use may be associated with unfavorable outcomes.

METHODS

A MEDLINE literature search was performed to identify articles relating to heart failure and loop diuretics. The current evidence on the risks and benefits of loop diuretics for the treatment of ADHF is reviewed.

RESULTS

Loop diuretics are associated with symptomatic improvements in congestion, urine output, and body weight, but have shown no long-term mortality benefit. Loop diuretics, especially at high doses, are associated with worsened renal function and other poor outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Loop diuretics still prove useful in HF treatment, but risk-benefit analysis of these agents in the treatment of ADHF requires a well-designed prospective study.

Hospitalization as an opportunity to integrate palliative care in heart failure management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Hospitalization for heart failure is a critical event associated with high rates of readmissions, morbidity, and mortality. This review examines the role of hospitalization for heart failure as an opportunity to assess comprehensive patient needs including palliative care needs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent evidence demonstrates that institution of a comprehensive care plan at discharge reduces the high rates of readmissions and death seen in patients with heart failure. The chronic progressive nature of heart failure, with its concomitant limitations in functioning, significant psychosocial distress, and risk of death at all stages of illness creates a need for palliative care services that span the disease trajectory. These services include symptom management, psychosocial care, advance care planning, assistance in defining goals of care, and family/caregiver support and should be provided simultaneously with optimal medical management. Hospice is also underutilized.

SUMMARY

Hospitalization for heart failure should serve as an opportunity to assess, introduce, and provide comprehensive care that includes palliative care alongside optimal medical management. Palliative care services have the potential to positively impact the health and quality of life of patients with heart failure and should be integrated as an ongoing key component of their care.

Continuous versus intermittent infusion of furosemide in acute decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in the treatment of chronic ambulatory heart failure, hospitalization rates for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remain high. Although loop diuretics are used in nearly all patients with ADHF to relieve congestive symptoms, optimal dosing strategies remain poorly defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group study comparing the effectiveness of continuous intravenous (cIV) with intermittent intravenous (iIV) infusion of furosemide in 56 patients with ADHF. The dose and duration of furosemide as well as concomitant medications to treat ADHF were determined by physician preference. The primary end point of the study was net urine output (nUOP)/24 hours. Safety measures including electrolyte loss and hemodynamic instability were also assessed. Twenty-six patients received cIV and 30 patients received iIV dosing. The mean nUOP/24 hours was 2098+/-1132 mL in patients receiving cIV versus 1575+/-1100 mL in the iIV group (P=.086). The cIV group had significantly greater total urine output (tUOP) with 3726+/-1121 mL/24 hours versus 2955+/-1267 mL/24 hours in the iIV group (P=.019) and tUOP/mg furosemide with 38.0+/-31.0 mL/mg versus 22.2+/-12.5 mL/mg (P=.021). Mean weight loss was not significantly different between the groups. The cIV group experienced a shorter length of hospital stay (6.9+/-3.7 versus 10.9+/-8.3 days, P=.006). There were no differences in safety measures between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The cIV of furosemide was well tolerated and significantly more effective than iIV for tUOP. In addition, continuous infusion appears to provide more efficient diuresis.

End points for clinical trials in acute heart failure syndromes

Acute heart failure syndromes (AHFS) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality, in part because the development of new therapies for these disorders has been marked by frequent failure and little success. The heterogeneity of current approaches to AHFS drug development, particularly with regard to end points, remains a major potential barrier to progress in the field. End points involving hemodynamic status, biomarkers, symptoms, hospital stay, end organ function, and mortality have all been employed either alone or in combination in recent randomized clinical trials in AHFS. In this review, we will discuss the various end point domains from both a clinical and a statistical perspective, summarize the wide variety of end points used in completed and ongoing AHFS studies, and suggest steps for greater standardization of end points across AHFS trials.

Rolofylline: a selective adenosine 1 receptor antagonist for the treatment of heart failure

BACKGROUND

Co-existent cardiac and renal dysfunction is increasingly recognized as both a predictor and mediator of poor outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure. Novel therapies, including adenosine receptor antagonists, are currently under development for the treatment of 'cardiorenal syndrome'.

OBJECTIVES

To review the pathophysiologic rationale for using rolofylline, a selective adenosine 1 receptor antagonist, in patients with cardiorenal syndrome; and to provide a critical overview of safety and efficacy data from clinical studies.

METHODS

We reviewed published data on the pharmacology of rolofylline, and used this to inform a comprehensive summary of preclinical and clinical trials. Cardiac and renal effects, and safety data with a particular reference to seizures, are highlighted.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Rolofylline facilitates diuresis and preserves renal function in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and renal dysfunction. Pilot data also suggest beneficial effects on symptoms and short-term outcomes. The risk of seizures may be minimized by excluding high-risk patients.

Relaxin for the treatment of patients with acute heart failure (Pre-RELAX-AHF): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-finding phase IIb study

BACKGROUND

Most patients admitted for acute heart failure have normal or increase blood pressure. Relaxin is a natural human peptide that affects multiple vascular control pathways, suggesting potential mechanisms of benefit for such patients. We assessed the dose response of relaxin's effect on symptom relief, other clinical outcomes, and safety.

METHODS

In a placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging study, 234 patients with acute heart failure, dyspnoea, congestion on chest radiograph, and increased brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal prohormone of BNP, mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency, and systolic blood pressure greater than 125 mm Hg were recruited from 54 sites in eight countries and enrolled within 16 h of presentation. Patients were randomly assigned, in a double-blind manner via a telephone-based interactive voice response system, to standard care plus 48-h intravenous infusion of placebo (n=62) or relaxin 10 microg/kg (n=40), 30 microg/kg (n=43), 100 microg/kg (n=39), or 250 microg/kg (n=50) per day. Several clinical endpoints were explored to assess whether intravenous relaxin should be pursued in larger studies of acute heart failure, to identify an optimum dose, and to help to assess endpoint selection and power calculations. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00520806.

FINDINGS

In the modified intention-to-treat population, 61 patients were assessed in the placebo group, 40 in the relaxin 10 microg/kg per day group, 42 in the relaxin 30 microg/kg per day group, 37 in the relaxin 100 microg/kg per day group, and 49 in the relaxin 250 microg/kg per day group. Dyspnoea improved with relaxin 30 microg/kg compared with placebo, as assessed by Likert scale (17 of 42 patients [40%] moderately or markedly improved at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h vs 14 of 61 [23%]; p=0.044) and visual analogue scale through day 14 (8214 mm x h [SD 8712] vs 4622 mm x h [9003]; p=0.053). Length of stay was 10.2 days (SD 6.1) for relaxin-treated patients versus 12.0 days (7.3) for those given placebo, and days alive out of hospital were 47.9 (10.1) versus 44.2 (14.2). Cardiovascular death or readmission due to heart or renal failure at day 60 was reduced with relaxin (2.6% [95% CI 0.4-16.8] vs 17.2% [9.6-29.6]; p=0.053). The number of serious adverse events was similar between groups.

INTERPRETATION

When given to patients with acute heart failure and normal-to-increased blood pressure, relaxin was associated with favourable relief of dyspnoea and other clinical outcomes, with acceptable safety.

Prednisone adding to usual care treatment for refractory decompensated congestive heart failure

The aim of the present study was to determine if prednisone, a glucocorticoid, added to conventional treatment for patients with decompensated congestive heart failure (DCHF) refractory to the conventional care, results in significant relief of congestive symptoms and improvement of clinical status. Diuretic-based strategies, as the mainstay in DCHF management, are not always effective in eliciting diuresis. However, the addition of prednisone to standard care may induce potent diuresis in this clinical setting. Thirty-five patients with DCHF were enrolled in the study, and prednisone (1 mg/kg/day with maximum dosage of 60 mg/day) was added to the standard treatment. Primary endpoints were the effects on daily urine volume, patient and physician assessed dyspnea and global clinical status, and changes in renal function. The addition of prednisone induced potent diuresis with time. As a result of the diuresis, congestive symptoms improved markedly in 80% and global clinical status improved markedly in 68.6% of the DCHF patients at the end of the study (P < 0.001). The change in serum creatinine from baseline was -12.21 micromol/L (P < 0.05). Adding prednisone to conventional care in the patients with refractory DCHF induced potent diuresis accompanied by a dramatic relief of congestive symptoms and improvements in clinical status and renal function.

Inpatient management of patients with volume overload and high filling pressures

The majority of patients with acute decompensated heart failure are admitted with symptoms of congestion. The classic symptoms of "congestive" heart failure reflect fluid overload, that is, orthopnea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, and peripheral edema; these symptoms can be so dramatic that it is not surprising that patients seek hospitalization. Activation of the renin angiotensin system coupled with sympathetic hyperactivity results in marked sodium retention and high filling pressures that ultimately bring about these congestive symptoms. The treatment goal of patients hospitalized with volume overload and high filling pressures is to improve symptoms by normalizing the filling pressure and volume status without worsening renal function. The current use of diuretics, vasodilators, and ultrafiltration, as well as potential future use of investigational agents such as oral vasopressin antagonists and adenosine A1-receptor antagonists, is surrounded by the important issues of when to stop intravenous therapy in hospitalized patients and the exact mechanism by which the filling pressures are normalized. New data from evidence-based clinical trials and optimal strategies for monitoring fluid overload will help define this issue and ultimately reduce mortality in these patients.

Improvements in signs and symptoms during hospitalization for acute heart failure follow different patterns and depend on the measurement scales used: an international, prospective registry to evaluate the evolution of measures of disease severity in acute heart failure (MEASURE-AHF)

BACKGROUND

The natural evolution of signs and symptoms during acute heart failure (AHF) is poorly characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We followed a prospective international cohort of 182 patients hospitalized with AHF. Patient-reported dyspnea and general well-being (GWB) were measured daily using 7-tier Likert (-3 to +3) and visual analog scales (VAS, 0-100). Physician assessments were also recorded daily. Mean age was 69 years and 68% had ejection fraction <40%. Likert measures of dyspnea initially improved rapidly (day 1, 0.22; day 2, 1.31; P <.001) with no significant improvement thereafter (day 7, 1.51; day 2 versus 7 P = .16). In contrast, VAS measure of dyspnea improved throughout hospitalization (day 1, 50.1; day 2, 64.7; day 7, 83.2; day 1 versus 2 P < .001, day 2 versus 7 P < .001). Symptoms of dyspnea and GWB tracked closely (correlation r = .813, P < .001). Physical signs resolved more completely than did symptoms (eg, from day 1 to discharge/day 7, absence of edema increased from 33% to 72% of patients, whereas significant improvements in dyspnea increased from 27% to 52% of patients; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in patient-reported symptoms and physician-assessed signs followed different patterns during an AHF episode and are influenced by the measurement scales used. Multiple clinical measures should be considered in discharge decisions and evaluation of AHF therapies.

Amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide testing for inpatient monitoring and treatment guidance of acute destabilized heart failure

Although typically elevated at presentation in the context of destabilized heart failure (HF), amino-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values typically decrease rapidly among patients who have a favorable response to therapy. Given this, it is natural to examine the relation between NT-proBNP and therapeutic interventions for acute HF. Both presentation and posttreatment NT-proBNP concentrations have some value for prognostication of recurrent HF hospitalization or death. However, the percent change in NT-proBNP after treatment for acute HF may be a more powerful method for risk stratification. Although prospective studies on the effect of NT-proBNP measurement in guiding therapy in acute destabilized HF are lacking, observational data suggest that a 30% decrease in NT-proBNP values during hospitalization is a reasonable goal. If a baseline measure of NT-proBNP is not available, an NT-proBNP level <4,000 ng/L after acute treatment is an alternative goal. Because the criteria for determining restabilization from destabilized HF prominently include clinical and routine laboratory testing rather than NP measures, the frequency of NT-proBNP measurement should not be excessive in patients with acute HF, with measures at baseline/presentation and after perceived recompensation to evaluate for the desired decrease in NT-proBNP concentrations. A remeasurement of NT-proBNP may also be useful for evaluation of new or worsened symptoms. In those patients without a decrease in NT-proBNP despite perceived recompensation from HF, a review of adequacy of treatment, goals of therapy, and consideration of prognosis is recommended.

Natriuretic peptides and therapeutic applications

Since the discovery of atrial natriuretic factor by de Bold et al., there has been tremendous progress in our understanding of the physiologic, diagnostic and therapeutic roles of the natriuretic peptides (NPs) in health and disease. Natriuretic peptides are endogenous hormones that are released by the heart in response to myocardial stretch and overload. Three mammalian NPs have been identified and characterized, including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP or atrial natriuretic factor), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP). In addition, Dendroaspis natriuretic peptide (DNP) has been isolated from the venom of Dendroaspis angusticeps (the green mamba snake), and urodilatin from human urine. These peptides are structurally similar and they consist of a 17-amino-acid core ring and a cysteine bridge. Both ANP and BNP bind to natriuretic peptide receptor A (NPR-A) that are expressed in the heart and other organs. Activation of NPR-A generates an increase in cyclic guanosine monophosphate, which mediates natriuresis, inhibition of renin and aldosterone, as well as vasorelaxant, anti-fibrotic, anti-hypertrophic, and lusitropic effects. The NP system thus serves as an important compensatory mechanism against neurohumoral activation in heart failure. This provides a strong rationale for the use of exogenous NPs in the management of acutely decompensated heart failure. In this article, the therapeutic applications of NPs in the acute heart failure syndromes are reviewed. Emerging therapeutic agents and areas for future research are discussed.

Management of acute decompensated heart failure

Acute decompensated heart failure represents a heterogeneous group of disorders that typically present as dyspnea, edema and fatigue. Despite the high prevalence of this condition and its associated major morbidity and mortality, diagnosis can be difficult, and optimal treatment remains poorly defined. Identification of the acute triggers for the decompensation as well as noninvasive characterization of cardiac filling pressures and output is central to management. Diuretics, vasodilators, continuous positive airway pressure and inotropes can be used to alleviate symptoms. However, few agents currently available for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure have been definitively shown in large prospective randomized clinical trials to provide meaningful improvements in intermediate-term clinical outcomes. Multiple novel therapies are being developed, but previous treatment failures indicate that progress in the management of acute decompensated heart failure is likely to be slow.

Advances in the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure in the elderly

Acute decompensated heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in older adults, and more than half of all patients admitted with this condition are over 75 years of age. In addition, hospital mortality is threefold higher in patients over 75 years of age compared with younger patients. This article reviews the pathophysiology, clinical features and management of acute heart failure in older adults, highlighting recent advances in the field. It is anticipated that over the next 5–10 years, new approaches to the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure will become available. Nonetheless, additional research is required to develop more effective strategies for the prevention and management of both acute and chronic heart failure in our rapidly growing elderly population.

Nesiritide: a reappraisal of efficacy and safety

The treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) remains a therapeutic challenge. Nesiritide was approved by the FDA in 2001 for the treatment of patients with ADHF who have dyspnea at rest or with minimal exertion. Although widely adopted for the treatment of ADHF due to its ability to decrease ventricular filling pressures and to provide mild symptomatic benefit, recent analyses have suggested that nesiritide worsens renal function and increases mortality. Although some discount these analyses that demonstrate the potential dangers of nesiritide, others have stated that its use at the present time must be weighed against the possibility of worse outcomes. A large outcomes trial in patients with ADHF would help clarify the role of nesiritide.