Modifying angiographic syntax score according to PCI strategy: lessons learnt from ERACI IV Study

Prognostic significance of the SYNTAX score and SYNTAX score II in patients with myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the SYNTAX score (SS) and SYNTAX score II (SS-II) in a contemporary real-world cohort of myocardial infarction (MI) patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

BACKGROUND

The role of SS and SS-II in the prognostic stratification of patients presenting with MI and undergoing PCI has been poorly investigated.

METHODS

This study included MI patients treated with PCI from January 2015 to April 2020 at the University Hospital of Salerno. Patients were divided into tertiles according to the baseline SS and SS-II values. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up; secondary outcome measures were cardiovascular (CV) death and MI.

RESULTS

Overall, 915 patients were included in this study. Mean SS and SS-II were 16.1 ± 10.0 and 31.6 ± 11.5, respectively. At propensity weighting adjusted Cox regression analysis, both SS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.06; p = 0.017) and SS-II (HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.07-1.10; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up; both SS (HR 1.04; CI 1.01-1.06; p < 0.001) and SS-II (HR 1.08; CI 1.06-1.10; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the risk of CV death, but only SS-II showed a significant association with the risk of recurrent MI (HR 1.03; CI 1.01-1.05; p < 0.001). At 5 years, SS-II showed a significantly higher discriminative ability for all-cause mortality than SS (area under the curve: 0.82 vs. 0.64; p < 0.001). SS-II was able to reclassify the risk of long-term mortality beyond the SS (net reclassification index 0.88; 95% CI: 0.38-1.54; p = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world cohort of MI patients treated with PCI, SS-II was a stronger prognostic predictor of long-term mortality than SS.

Inflammation-based different association between anatomical severity of coronary artery disease and lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with cancer. The role of inflammation in the association of CAD with cancer remains unclear. The study investigated whether inflammation could impact the relationship between CAD and lung cancer.

METHODS

The study involved 96 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients without receiving anti-cancer therapy and 288 matched non-cancer patients. All the patients underwent coronary angiography and were free from previous percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting. SYNTAX score (SXscore) were used to assess severity of CAD. High SXscore (SXhigh) grade was defined as SXscore > 16 (highest quartile). Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) served as an inflammatory biomarker. NLR-high grade referred to NLR > 2.221 (median).

RESULTS

Among 384 study patients, 380 patients (98.96%) had NLR value (median: 2.221, interquartile range: 1.637-3.040). Compared to non-cancer patients, lung cancer patients had higher rate of SXhigh among total study patients (P = 0.014) and among patients with NLR-high (P = 0.006), but had not significantly higher rate of SXhigh among patients with NLR-low (P = 0.839). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SXhigh was associated with lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 1.834, 95% CI: 1.063-3.162, P = 0.029]. Subgroup analysis showed that SXhigh was associated with lung cancer among patients with NLR-high (OR = 2.801, 95% CI: 1.355-5.794, P = 0.005), however, the association between SXhigh and lung cancer was not significant among patients with NLR-low (OR = 0.897, 95% CI: 0.346-2.232, P = 0.823).

CONCLUSIONS

Inflammation could lead different association between anatomical severity of CAD and lung cancer. Severity of CAD was significantly associated with increased risk of lung cancer among patients with high inflammation rather than among patients with low inflammation.

Using machine learning to aid treatment decision and risk assessment for severe three-vessel coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND

Three-vessel disease (TVD) with a SYNergy between PCI with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) score of ≥ 23 is one of the most severe types of coronary artery disease. We aimed to take advantage of machine learning to help in decision-making and prognostic evaluation in such patients.

METHODS

We analyzed 3786 patients who had TVD with a SYNTAX score of ≥ 23, had no history of previous revascularization, and underwent either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after enrollment. The patients were randomly assigned to a training group and testing group. The C4.5 decision tree algorithm was applied in the training group, and all-cause death after a median follow-up of 6.6 years was regarded as the class label.

RESULTS

The decision tree algorithm selected age and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) as splitting features and divided the patients into three subgroups: subgroup 1 (age of ≤ 67 years and LVEDD of ≤ 53 mm), subgroup 2 (age of ≤ 67 years and LVEDD of > 53 mm), and subgroup 3 (age of > 67 years). PCI conferred a patient survival benefit over CABG in subgroup 2. There was no significant difference in the risk of all-cause death between PCI and CABG in subgroup 1 and subgroup 3 in both the training data and testing data. Among the total study population, the multivariable analysis revealed significant differences in the risk of all-cause death among patients in three subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of age and LVEDD identified by machine learning can contribute to decision-making and risk assessment of death in patients with severe TVD. The present results suggest that PCI is a better choice for young patients with severe TVD characterized by left ventricular dilation.

Increased incidence of serious late adverse events with drug-eluting stents when compared with coronary artery bypass surgery: a cause of concern

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in pre-drug-eluting stents (DESs) era, randomized trials and meta-analysis showed that the extension of coronary artery disease was not associated with a better survival with CABG, and only diabetic patients had an inferior survival with PCI. After the introduction of DES, we would expect a substantial improvement in PCI results compared with CABG, narrowing the gap between both revascularization strategies, However, on the contrary, most randomized studies between DES and CABG showed that rate of recurrences remained and there is an unexpected increased of late serious adverse events including spontaneous myocardial infarction and death. In this review, we try to described each of these problems and find out explanations for these new findings searching for potential solutions.

One-Year Follow-Up Results From the Observational, Multicenter, Prospective, and Controlled Registry: The WALTZ All-Comers Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate 1-year follow-up results in an all “comers” population treated with a new cobalt chromium bare-metal stent (BMS) design. Since August 2016 to March 2017, 201 (9.7% of screening population) consecutive patients undergoing coronary stent implantation in 11 centers in Argentina were prospectively included in our registry. The inclusion criteria were multiple-vessel disease and/or unprotected left main disease, acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with at least one severe (⩾70%) stenosis in any of major epicardial vessel. In-stent restenosis, protected left main stenosis, or impossibility to receive dual-antiplatelet therapy was an exclusion criterion. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were the primary endpoint and included cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion revascularization (TLR); also, all components of the primary endpoint were separately analyzed. Completeness of revascularization was analyzed as post hoc data using residual SYNTAX or ERACI risk scores. Demographic characteristics showed that 6.5% of patients were very elderly, 22.5% have diabetes, 47% have multiple-vessel disease, 67% have ACS, and 32% have ST elevation MI. At a mean of 376 ± 18.1 days of follow-up, MACE was observed in 10.4% of patients: death + MI + cardiovascular accident (CVA) in 3% (6 of 201) and cardiac death + MI + CVA in 1.5% (3 of 201). Residual ERACI score ⩽5 was associated with 98% of event-free survival (P < .04). In conclusion, this prospective, multicenter, and observational all-comers registry with this novel BMS design showed a low incidence of adverse events at 1 year mainly due to coronary restenosis.

SYNTAX score II predicts long-term mortality in patients with one- or two-vessel disease

Objective

SYNTAX score II (SSII) is a long-term mortality prediction model to guide the decision making of the heart-team between coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease. This study aims to investigate the long-term predictive value of SSII for all-cause mortality in patients with one- or two-vessel disease undergoing PCI.

Methods

A total of 628 patients (76% men, mean age: 61±10 years) undergoing PCI due to stable angina pectoris (43%) or acute coronary syndrome (57%), included between January 2008 and June 2013, were eligible for the current study. SSII was calculated using the original SYNTAX score website (www.syntaxscore.com). Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between continuous SSII and long-term all-cause mortality. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to assess the performance of SSII.

Results

SSII ranged from 6.6 to 58.2 (median: 20.4, interquartile range: 16.1–26.8). In multivariable analysis, SSII proved to be an independent significant predictor for 4.5-year mortality (hazard ratio per point increase: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 1.07–1.13; p<0.001). In terms of discrimination, SSII had a concordance index of 0.77.

Conclusion

In addition to its established value in patients with left main and three-vessel disease, SSII may also predict long-term mortality in PCI-treated patients with one- or two-vessel disease.

Risk factors for three-vessel coronary artery disease in patients of Northwest Mexico

INTRODUCTION

Three-vessel coronary artery disease is an advanced manifestation of atherosclerosis, with high prevalence in Mexico.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe coronary risk factors in a group of patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease in Northwest Mexico.

METHODS

A cross sectional study was conducted on a population with three-vessel coronary artery disease from May 2015 to February 2016. The disease was defined when ≥70% stenosis was present in each major epicardial coronary artery. Anthropometric and biochemical parameters were measured in each patient. Ankle-Brachial Index was measured with vascular ultrasound, and Syntax score calculation with an on-line application. Statistical analysis for qualitative differences was performed using Pearson X² test, with p<0.05 being considered as significant.

RESULTS

The study included 100 patients, of whom 75 were male (mean age 63±9 years) and 25 female (mean age 69±9 years). The coronary risk factors observed were diabetes (58%), hypertension (86%), smoking (68%), dyslipidaemia (100%), metabolic syndrome (71%), and obesity/overweight (75%). Diabetes and metabolic syndrome prevalence was higher in women (p=0.03), but smoking was higher in men (76%, p=0.003). Ankle-Brachial Index was abnormal in 58% of patients, the mean Syntax score was in 36.9±11.5, and the prevalence of left main coronary heart disease was 36%.

CONCLUSIONS

This group of patients with complex coronary lesions has a high prevalence of coronary risk factors, which could represent a worse prognosis.

Can We Improve the Outcomes of Multivessel Disease Using Modified SYNTAX and Residual SYNTAX Scores?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In spite of the benefits of drug eluting (DES), these advantages were not translated to better outcome when percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) were compared with coronary artery bypass surgery. PCI strategy allowing stent deployment in all intermediate lesions including small vessels together with DES design may be the reasons of these findings.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently randomized and observational studies demonstrated using functional flow reserve analysis, residual Syntax score risk, or residual ERACI score after PCI that a reasonably incomplete revascularization was associated with good long-term outcome and low events rate at follow-up. In the ERACI IV study, which included patients with multiple vessel disease and left main, all intermediate lesions and severe lesions in small vessels were excluded from the revascularization strategy, and the 3-year follow-up results showed a remarkable low incidence of death/MI and stroke. Intermediate stenosis or severe lesions in small vessels should not be incorporated in the PCI strategy in order to define patient clinical cardiac prognosis or completeness of revascularization.

Understanding the Outcome of Randomized Trials with Drug-Eluting Stents and Coronary Artery Bypass Graft in Patients with Multivessel Disease: A Review of a 25-Year Journey

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with first- and second-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) confirmed the superiority of coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) in patients with multiple vessel disease. In spite of different DES designs, investigators in these trials used similar percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategies hoping to achieve complete revascularization, meaning that all intermediate lesions would be stented. One of these studies also included small vessels in the revascularization policy. On this revision, authors searched for a potential explanation of these intriguing findings and also for solutions to this problem, not seen years ago when other RCTs compared CABG with PCI in the previous DES era. After they revised old and new scientific data, they concluded that improved DES design is not itself enough to narrow the gap between PCI and CABG and that in the future RCTs we should institute more conservative strategies avoiding unnecessary multiple DES implantation.

The value of the Clinical SYNTAX Score in predicting long-term prognosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who have undergone primary percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The Clinical SYNTAX Score (CSS) combines anatomical and clinical risk assessment.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate CSS as a predictor of prognosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (p-PCI).

METHODS

We evaluated 433 patients who were diagnosed with STEMI and underwent p-PCI. CSS was calculated by multiplying the anatomically derived SYNTAX score (Sx) by the modified age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score. Patients were divided into tertiles according to the CSS: CSS(Low)≤14 (n=141), 14<CSS(Mid)≤26 (n=144), and CSS(High)>26 (n=148). The primary endpoints were defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events over 15 months' follow-up.

RESULTS

Primary endpoints were achieved in 9.2% of patients with CSS≤14, 12.5% of those with 14<CSS≤26, and 28.4% of those with CSS>26 (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the CSS>26 group had a significantly higher incidence of primary endpoints [P (log-rank)<0.001]. CSS>26 was identified as an independent predictor for all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 3.58, 95% confidence interval 1.68-7.60, P=0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis found areas under the curve of 0.66, 0.59, and 0.64 for CSS, Sx score, and age, creatinine, and ejection fraction score (P<0.001, P=0.01, P<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CSS may be better than the Sx score for predicting long-term prognosis in patients with STEMI undergoing p-PCI.

Second vs. First generation drug eluting stents in multiple vessel disease and left main stenosis: Two-year follow-up of the observational, prospective, controlled, and multicenter ERACI IV registry

OBJECTIVE

To compare second generation drug eluting stents (2DES) with first generation (1DES) for the treatment of patients (pts) with multiple coronary vessel disease (MVD).

BACKGROUND

Although 2DES improved safety and efficacy compared to 1DES, MVD remains a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions.

METHODS

ERACI IV was a prospective, observational, and controlled study in pts with MVD including left main and treated with 2DES (Firebird 2, Microport). We included 225 pts in 15 sites from Argentina. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and unplanned revascularization; and to compare with 225 pts from ERACI III study (1DES). PCI strategy was planned to treat lesions ≥70% in vessels ≥ 2.00 mm, introducing a modified Syntax score (SS) where severe lesions in vessels < 2.0 mm and intermediate lesions were not scored.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics showed that compared to ERACI III, ERACI IV pts had higher number of diabetics (P = 0.02), previous revascularization (P = 0.007), unstable angina IIb/IIIc (P < 0.001) and three vessels/left main disease (P = 0.003). Modified SS was 22.2 ± 11. At 2 years of follow-up ERACI IV group had significantly lower incidence of death+ MI + CVA, (P = 0.01) and MACCE (P = 0.001). MACCE rate was similar in diabetics, (5.8%) and nondiabetics (7.0%). After performing a matched propensity score, MACCE remain significantly lower in ERACI IV (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

This registry showed that 2DES in MVD has a remarkable low incidence of MACCE in unadjusted and adjusted analysis. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.