False-positive serum chromogranin A assay due to heterophile antibody interference

[Troponin elevation in the absence of acute coronary syndrome]

Cardiac troponins are the most sensitive and specific markers of myocardial injury. Cardiac troponin elevation are common in many diseases and do not necessarily indicate the presence of a thrombotic acute coronary syndrome. In clinical practice, interpretation of dynamic changes of troponin may be challenging. Troponin evaluation should be performed only if clinically indicated and must be interpreted in the context of clinical presentation, ECG changes, troponin level and kinetic. In the absence of thrombotic acute coronary syndrom, troponin retains a prognostic value. Its practical interest as a risk criteria is limited to a few situations like pulmonary embolism, pericarditis an myocarditis.

Chromogranin A assay in clinical practice

Chromogranins belong to the family of secretory chromogranin and secretogranin proteins. They are found in secretory vesicles throughout the neuroendocrine system. Chromogranin A (CgA) is the main component. CgA acts as a prohormone submitted to processes of degradation through which active peptides are generated. CgA has auto, para and endocrine functions. It is widely used as an immunohistochemical marker. Despite the lack of international standardization, and the lack of an accurate definition of the diagnostic cut-off levels, some CgA assays are reliable. Numerous studies have suggested that CgA determination may be of interest for the diagnosis and the follow-up of various endocrine tumors. Plasma levels of this general marker are proportional to tumor mass. The localization of the primitive tumor, the presence of associated hormonal secretions and possible renal failure and/or hypergastrinemia must be taken into consideration for proper interpretation of CgA levels. New clinical indications are emerging for the evaluation of stress in intensive care units and the assessment of cardiovascular risk. New assays estimating the concentration of active peptides are under development.

The fundamental flaws of immunoassays and potential solutions using tandem mass spectrometry

Immunoassays have made it possible to measure dozens of individual proteins and other analytes in human samples for help in establishing the diagnosis and prognosis of disease. In too many cases the results of those measurements are misleading and can lead to unnecessary treatment or missed opportunities for therapeutic interventions. These cases stem from problems inherent to immunoassays performed with human samples, which include a lack of concordance across platforms, autoantibodies, anti-reagent antibodies, and the high-dose hook effect. Tandem mass spectrometry may represent a detection method capable of alleviating many of the flaws inherent to immunoassays. We review our understanding of the problems associated with immunoassays on human specimens and describe methodologies using tandem mass spectrometry that could solve some of those problems. We also provide a critical discussion of the potential pitfalls of novel mass spectrometric approaches in the clinical laboratory.