A biochip-based combined immunoassay for detection of serological status of Borrelia burgdorferi in Lyme borreliosis

A simplified direct on-chip forward or reverse immunoassay for evaluating protein-protein interactions in the serum

BACKGROUND

The identification of protein-protein interactions is a great challenge. In this study, we fabricated a gold surface-modified biochip with activated sophorolipids (SLs) in combination with 16-amino-1-hexadecanethiol hydrochloride to detect serum proteins.

MAIN METHODS AND MAJOR RESULTS

The on-chip immunoassay reported here included a forward assay, in which a ligand is immobilized on the biochip surface and allowed to interact with its free specific receptor in liquid phase, and a reverse assay, in which a receptor is loaded on the biochip surface and combined with its free specific ligand in solution. The specificity of the molecular interactions on the biochip was evaluated using immunological blocking assays and chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIA). Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) serum was used to test the potential utilization of the biochip. Reverse receptor CD25-based interleukin (IL)-2 and forward ligand IL-2-based CD25 assays revealed that the limit of detection of the target proteins was as low as 156 and 78 pg/ml, respectively. Using receptor- or ligand-based platforms, we found that the positive rates of free IL-2 and soluble CD25 (sCD25) monomers in the sera of HLH patients were 14.3% and 71.4%, respectively. In addition, the biochip showed good compatibility with CLIA for the measurement of sCD25 (r = 0.77, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Biochip platforms, such as on-chip immunoprecipitation (IP), can be used to evaluate the interactions between proteins, ligands, and receptors, or enzymes and substrates in serum.

Global seroprevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in human populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bb) infection, the most frequent tick-transmitted disease, is distributed worldwide. This study aimed to describe the global seroprevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of Bb in human populations.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and other sources for relevant studies of all study designs through 30 December 2021 with the following keywords: ‘Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato’ AND ‘infection rate’; and observational studies were included if the results of human Bb antibody seroprevalence surveys were reported, the laboratory serological detection method reported and be published in a peer-reviewed journal. We screened titles/abstracts and full texts of papers and appraised the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration-endorsed Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Data were synthesised narratively, stratified by different types of outcomes. We also conducted random effects meta-analysis where we had a minimum of two studies with 95% CIs reported. The study protocol has been registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021261362).

Results

Of 4196 studies, 137 were eligible for full-text screening, and 89 (158 287 individuals) were included in meta-analyses. The reported estimated global Bb seroprevalence was 14.5% (95% CI 12.8% to 16.3%), and the top three regions of Bb seroprevalence were Central Europe (20.7%, 95% CI 13.8% to 28.6%), Eastern Asia (15.9%, 95% CI 6.6% to 28.3%) and Western Europe (13.5%, 95% CI 9.5% to 18.0%). Meta-regression analysis showed that after eliminating confounding risk factors, the methods lacked western blotting (WB) confirmation and increased the risk of false-positive Bb antibody detection compared with the methods using WB confirmation (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.2). Other factors associated with Bb seropositivity include age ≥50 years (12.6%, 95% CI 8.0% to 18.1%), men (7.8%, 95% CI 4.6% to 11.9%), residence of rural area (8.4%, 95% CI 5.0% to 12.6%) and suffering tick bites (18.8%, 95% CI 10.1% to 29.4%).

Conclusion

The reported estimated global Bb seropositivity is relatively high, with the top three regions as Central Europe, Western Europe and Eastern Asia. Using the WB to confirm Bb serological results could significantly improve the accuracy. More studies are needed to improve the accuracy of global Lyme borreliosis burden estimates.

PROSPERO registration number

CRD42021261362.

Optimizing use of multi-antibody assays for Lyme disease diagnosis: A bioinformatic approach

Multiple different recombinant and peptide antigens are now available for serodiagnosis of Lyme disease (LD), but optimizing test utilization remains challenging. Since 1995 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended a 2-tiered serologic approach consisting of a first-tier whole-cell enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for polyvalent antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi followed by confirmation of positive or equivocal results by IgG and IgM immunoblots [standard 2-tiered (STT) approach]. Newer modified 2-tiered (MTT) approaches employ a second-tier EIA to detect antibodies to B. burgdorferi rather than immunoblotting. We applied modern bioinformatic techniques to a large public database of recombinant and peptide antigen-based immunoassays to improve testing strategy. A retrospective CDC collection of 280 LD samples and 559 controls had been tested using the STT approach as well as kinetic-EIAs for VlsE1-IgG, C6-IgG, VlsE1-IgM, and pepC10-IgM antibodies. When used individually, the cutoff for each kinetic-EIA was set to generate 99% specificity. Utilizing logistic-likelihood regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) techniques we determined that VlsE1-IgG, C6-IgG, and pepC10-IgM antibodies each contributed significant diagnostic information; a single-tier diagnostic score (DS) was generated for each sample using a weighted linear combination of antibody levels to these 3 antigens. DS performance was then compared to the STT and to MTT models employing different combinations of kinetic-EIAs. After setting the DS cutoff to match STT specificity (99%), the DS was 22.5% more sensitive than the STT for early-acute-phase disease (95% CI: 11.8% to 32.2%), 16.0% more sensitive for early-convalescent-phase disease (95% CI: 7.2% to 24.7%), and equivalent for detection of disseminated infection. The DS was also significantly more sensitive for early-acute-phase LD than MTT models whose specificity met or exceeded 99%. Prospective validation of this single-tier diagnostic score for Lyme disease will require larger studies using a broader range of potential cross-reacting conditions.

Lyme Disease Biosensors: A Potential Solution to a Diagnostic Dilemma

Over the past four decades, Lyme disease has remained a virulent and pervasive illness, persisting throughout North America and many other regions of the world. Recent increases in illness in many countries has sparked a renewed interest in improved Lyme diagnostics. While current standards of diagnosis are acceptable for the late stages of the disease, it remains difficult to accurately diagnose early forms of the illness. In addition, current diagnostic methods tend to be relatively expensive and require a large degree of laboratory-based analysis. Biosensors represent the fusion of biological materials with chemical techniques to provide simple, inexpensive alternatives to traditional diagnostic methods. Lyme disease biosensors have the potential to better diagnose early stages of the illness and provide possible patients with an inexpensive, commercially available test. This review examines the current state of Lyme disease biosensing, with a focus on previous biosensor development and essential future considerations.

S-S-PEG-COOH Self-Assembled Monolayer on Gold Surface Enabled a Combined Assay for Serological EBV Antibody Isotypes

PURPOSE

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a ubiquitous human gamma herpes virus that infects human epithelial cells and B lymphocytes. It would be potentially valuable to develop novel combined assays to benefit screening for large panels of samples of EBV infectious diseases.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A simple antigen-probed biochip that is modified with S-S-PEG-COOH and is used as a label-free high-throughput screening method for a combined detection of EBV capsid antigen IgM antibody, capsid antigen IgG antibody, and nuclear antigen IgG antibody.

RESULTS

This protein biochip has similar feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity in comparison with Liaison chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). Detection limit of the EBV antibodies by the biochip is almost identical to that by CLIA-L (2.91 U mL^-1 vs 3.00 U mL^-1 for EBNA-1 IgG, 8 U mL^-1 vs10 U mL^-1 for EBV-VCA IgG, and 3.5 U mL^-1 vs 10 U mL^-1 for EBV-VCA IgM). Tests of the three serological antibodies against EBV by the biochip are consistent with the CLIA-L method in 274 clinical sera, respectively. Finally, the combined biochip is successfully utilized for diagnostic identification of EBV infection in 14 patients with infectious mononucleosis (IM) and 25 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus SLE, as well as additional 10 known real-time PCR positive patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This biochip format will enable concurrent detection of antibodies against EBV infection and confirm infection status of EBV. It will be a versatile tool for large-scale epidemiological screening in view of its miniaturization and high throughput.

Establishment of a protein biochip to detect serum IgG antibodies against IL-2 and soluble CD25 in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis

BACKGROUND

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and soluble CD25 (sCD25) are among the most important cytokines and diagnostic biomarkers in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Detecting serum level of IL-2 and sCD25 is valuable for making clinical diagnosis and treatment decision in HLH.

METHODS

Since tests showing serum IgG antibody against IL-2 or sCD25 have never been carried out, a new protein biochip, which was modified with cysteine and activated sophorolipid (Cys-SL), was developed.

RESULTS

Limits of detection on the biochip were 78 pg/ml for IL-2 and 39 pg/ml for sCD25, respectively. The data showed that on-chip seroimmunological responses to IL-2 and sCD25 proteins were 20.8% and 83.1% and the seroprevalence of IL-2 and sCD25 IgG antibodies were 45.5% and 57.2%, respectively. Data collection for the seroprevalence of serum antigen-antibody complex of sCD25 was 68.8%. The new biochip model shared similar sensitivity and specificity to chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) in its measuring capacity of serum sCD25.

CONCLUSIONS

We addressed and confirmed the involvement of serum IgG antibodies against IL-2 and sCD25 as well as Ag-Ab complex of sCD25 in HLH patients. Therefore, this biochip platform would offer a new technological substitution for clinical serological diagnosis of HLH.

Recent strategies for the diagnosis of early Lyme disease

Lyme disease (LD) is the most common tick-borne disease in the Northern Hemisphere. As the most prevalent vector-borne disease in the USA, LD affects 300,000 human cases each year. LD is caused by inoculation of the bacterial spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, from an infected tick. If not treated quickly and completely, the bacteria disseminate from the tick's biting site into multiple organs including the joints, heart, and brain. Thus, the best outcome from medical intervention can be expected with early detection and treatment with antibiotics, prior to multi-organ dissemination. In the absence of a characteristic rash, LD is diagnosed using serological testing involving enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) followed by western blotting, which is collectively known as the two-tier algorithm. These assays detect host antibodies against the bacteria, but are hampered by low sensitivity, which can miss early LD cases. This review discusses the application of some current assays for diagnosing LD clinically, thus providing a foundation for exploring newer techniques being developed in the laboratory for more sensitive detection of early LD.