1
|
Murchan P, Ó Broin P, Baird AM, Sheils O, P Finn S. Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology. J Pathol Inform 2024; 15:100396. [PMID: 39398947 PMCID: PMC11470259 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2024.100396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2024] [Revised: 09/02/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Developing artificial intelligence (AI) models for digital pathology requires large datasets from multiple sources. However, without careful implementation, AI models risk learning confounding site-specific features in datasets instead of clinically relevant information, leading to overestimated performance, poor generalizability to real-world data, and potential misdiagnosis. Methods Whole-slide images (WSIs) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon (COAD), and stomach adenocarcinoma datasets were selected for inclusion in this study. Patch embeddings were obtained using three feature extraction models, followed by ComBat harmonization. Attention-based multiple instance learning models were trained to predict tissue-source site (TSS), as well as clinical and genetic attributes, using raw, Macenko normalized, and Combat-harmonized patch embeddings. Results TSS prediction achieved high accuracy (AUROC > 0.95) with all three feature extraction models. ComBat harmonization significantly reduced the AUROC for TSS prediction, with mean AUROCs dropping to approximately 0.5 for most models, indicating successful mitigation of batch effects (e.g., CCL-ResNet50 in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.960, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.506, p < 0.001). Clinical attributes associated with TSS, such as race and treatment response, showed decreased predictability post-harmonization. Notably, the prediction of genetic features like MSI status remained robust after harmonization (e.g., MSI in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.667, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.669, p=0.952), indicating the preservation of true histological signals. Conclusion ComBat harmonization of deep learning-derived histology features effectively reduces the risk of AI models learning confounding features in WSIs, ensuring more reliable performance estimates. This approach is promising for the integration of large-scale digital pathology datasets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Murchan
- Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D08 W9RT, Ireland
- The SFI Centre for Research Training in Genomics Data Science, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Pilib Ó Broin
- The SFI Centre for Research Training in Genomics Data Science, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Mathematical & Statistical Sciences, University of Galway, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Anne-Marie Baird
- School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 A440, Ireland
| | - Orla Sheils
- School of Medicine, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 A440, Ireland
| | - Stephen P Finn
- Department of Histopathology and Morbid Anatomy, Trinity Translational Medicine Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D08 W9RT, Ireland
- Department of Histopathology, St. James's Hospital, James's Street, Dublin D08 X4RX, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Howard FM, Hieromnimon HM, Ramesh S, Dolezal J, Kochanny S, Zhang Q, Feiger B, Peterson J, Fan C, Perou CM, Vickery J, Sullivan M, Cole K, Khramtsova G, Pearson AT. Generative adversarial networks accurately reconstruct pan-cancer histology from pathologic, genomic, and radiographic latent features. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2024; 10:eadq0856. [PMID: 39546597 PMCID: PMC11567005 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq0856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence models have been increasingly used in the analysis of tumor histology to perform tasks ranging from routine classification to identification of molecular features. These approaches distill cancer histologic images into high-level features, which are used in predictions, but understanding the biologic meaning of such features remains challenging. We present and validate a custom generative adversarial network-HistoXGAN-capable of reconstructing representative histology using feature vectors produced by common feature extractors. We evaluate HistoXGAN across 29 cancer subtypes and demonstrate that reconstructed images retain information regarding tumor grade, histologic subtype, and gene expression patterns. We leverage HistoXGAN to illustrate the underlying histologic features for deep learning models for actionable mutations, identify model reliance on histologic batch effect in predictions, and demonstrate accurate reconstruction of tumor histology from radiographic imaging for a "virtual biopsy."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Siddhi Ramesh
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Sara Kochanny
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Qianchen Zhang
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Cheng Fan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Charles M. Perou
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jasmine Vickery
- Department of Pathology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Megan Sullivan
- Department of Pathology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Kimberly Cole
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marcus E, Teuwen J. Artificial intelligence and explanation: How, why, and when to explain black boxes. Eur J Radiol 2024; 173:111393. [PMID: 38417186 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is infiltrating nearly all fields of science by storm. One notorious property that AI algorithms bring is their so-called black box character. In particular, they are said to be inherently unexplainable algorithms. Of course, such characteristics would pose a problem for the medical world, including radiology. The patient journey is filled with explanations along the way, from diagnoses to treatment, follow-up, and more. If we were to replace part of these steps with non-explanatory algorithms, we could lose grip on vital aspects such as finding mistakes, patient trust, and even the creation of new knowledge. In this article, we argue that, even for the darkest of black boxes, there is hope of understanding them. In particular, we compare the situation of understanding black box models to that of understanding the laws of nature in physics. In the case of physics, we are given a 'black box' law of nature, about which there is no upfront explanation. However, as current physical theories show, we can learn plenty about them. During this discussion, we present the process by which we make such explanations and the human role therein, keeping a solid focus on radiological AI situations. We will outline the AI developers' roles in this process, but also the critical role fulfilled by the practitioners, the radiologists, in providing a healthy system of continuous improvement of AI models. Furthermore, we explore the role of the explainable AI (XAI) research program in the broader context we describe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Marcus
- AI for Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jonas Teuwen
- AI for Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Unger M, Kather JN. Deep learning in cancer genomics and histopathology. Genome Med 2024; 16:44. [PMID: 38539231 PMCID: PMC10976780 DOI: 10.1186/s13073-024-01315-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Histopathology and genomic profiling are cornerstones of precision oncology and are routinely obtained for patients with cancer. Traditionally, histopathology slides are manually reviewed by highly trained pathologists. Genomic data, on the other hand, is evaluated by engineered computational pipelines. In both applications, the advent of modern artificial intelligence methods, specifically machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have opened up a fundamentally new way of extracting actionable insights from raw data, which could augment and potentially replace some aspects of traditional evaluation workflows. In this review, we summarize current and emerging applications of DL in histopathology and genomics, including basic diagnostic as well as advanced prognostic tasks. Based on a growing body of evidence, we suggest that DL could be the groundwork for a new kind of workflow in oncology and cancer research. However, we also point out that DL models can have biases and other flaws that users in healthcare and research need to know about, and we propose ways to address them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaela Unger
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany.
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Howard FM, Hieromnimon HM, Ramesh S, Dolezal J, Kochanny S, Zhang Q, Feiger B, Peterson J, Fan C, Perou CM, Vickery J, Sullivan M, Cole K, Khramtsova G, Pearson AT. Generative Adversarial Networks Accurately Reconstruct Pan-Cancer Histology from Pathologic, Genomic, and Radiographic Latent Features. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.03.22.586306. [PMID: 38585926 PMCID: PMC10996476 DOI: 10.1101/2024.03.22.586306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Artificial intelligence models have been increasingly used in the analysis of tumor histology to perform tasks ranging from routine classification to identification of novel molecular features. These approaches distill cancer histologic images into high-level features which are used in predictions, but understanding the biologic meaning of such features remains challenging. We present and validate a custom generative adversarial network - HistoXGAN - capable of reconstructing representative histology using feature vectors produced by common feature extractors. We evaluate HistoXGAN across 29 cancer subtypes and demonstrate that reconstructed images retain information regarding tumor grade, histologic subtype, and gene expression patterns. We leverage HistoXGAN to illustrate the underlying histologic features for deep learning models for actionable mutations, identify model reliance on histologic batch effect in predictions, and demonstrate accurate reconstruction of tumor histology from radiographic imaging for a 'virtual biopsy'.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kriegsmann M, Kriegsmann K, Steinbuss G, Zgorzelski C, Albrecht T, Heinrich S, Farkas S, Roth W, Dang H, Hausen A, Gaida MM. Implementation of deep learning in liver pathology optimizes diagnosis of benign lesions and adenocarcinoma metastasis. Clin Transl Med 2023; 13:e1299. [PMID: 37415390 PMCID: PMC10326372 DOI: 10.1002/ctm2.1299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Differentiation of histologically similar structures in the liver, including anatomical structures, benign bile duct lesions, or common types of liver metastases, can be challenging with conventional histological tissue sections alone. Accurate histopathological classification is paramount for the diagnosis and adequate treatment of the disease. Deep learning algorithms have been proposed for objective and consistent assessment of digital histopathological images. MATERIALS AND METHODS In the present study, we trained and evaluated deep learning algorithms based on the EfficientNetV2 and ResNetRS architectures to discriminate between different histopathological classes. For the required dataset, specialized surgical pathologists annotated seven different histological classes, including different non-neoplastic anatomical structures, benign bile duct lesions, and liver metastases from colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a large patient cohort. Annotation resulted in a total of 204.159 image patches, followed by discrimination analysis using our deep learning models. Model performance was evaluated on validation and test data using confusion matrices. RESULTS Evaluation of the test set based on tiles and cases revealed overall highly satisfactory prediction capability of our algorithm for the different histological classes, resulting in a tile accuracy of 89% (38 413/43 059) and case accuracy of 94% (198/211). Importantly, the separation of metastasis versus benign lesions was certainly confident on case level, confirming the classification model performed with high diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, the whole curated raw data set is made publically available. CONCLUSIONS Deep learning is a promising approach in surgical liver pathology supporting decision making in personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Kriegsmann
- Institute of PathologyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
- Pathology WiesbadenWiesbadenGermany
| | - Katharina Kriegsmann
- Department of HematologyOncology and RheumatologyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
- Laborarztpraxis Rhein‐Main MVZ GbRFrankfurt am MainFrankfurtGermany
| | - Georg Steinbuss
- Department of HematologyOncology and RheumatologyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
| | | | - Thomas Albrecht
- Institute of PathologyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
| | - Stefan Heinrich
- Department of SurgeryJGU‐MainzUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Stefan Farkas
- Department of SurgerySt. Josefs‐ HospitalWiesbadenGermany
| | - Wilfried Roth
- Institute of PathologyJGU‐MainzUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Hien Dang
- Department of SurgeryDepartment of Surgical ResearchThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Anne Hausen
- Institute of PathologyJGU‐MainzUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| | - Matthias M. Gaida
- Institute of PathologyJGU‐MainzUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
- TRONJGU‐MainzTranslational Oncology at the University Medical CenterMainzGermany
- Research Center for ImmunotherapyJGU‐MainzUniversity Medical Center MainzMainzGermany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seraphin TP, Luedde M, Roderburg C, van Treeck M, Scheider P, Buelow RD, Boor P, Loosen SH, Provaznik Z, Mendelsohn D, Berisha F, Magnussen C, Westermann D, Luedde T, Brochhausen C, Sossalla S, Kather JN. Prediction of heart transplant rejection from routine pathology slides with self-supervised deep learning. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. DIGITAL HEALTH 2023; 4:265-274. [PMID: 37265858 PMCID: PMC10232288 DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Aims One of the most important complications of heart transplantation is organ rejection, which is diagnosed on endomyocardial biopsies by pathologists. Computer-based systems could assist in the diagnostic process and potentially improve reproducibility. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of using deep learning in predicting the degree of cellular rejection from pathology slides as defined by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grading system. Methods and results We collected 1079 histopathology slides from 325 patients from three transplant centres in Germany. We trained an attention-based deep neural network to predict rejection in the primary cohort and evaluated its performance using cross-validation and by deploying it to three cohorts. For binary prediction (rejection yes/no), the mean area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) was 0.849 in the cross-validated experiment and 0.734, 0.729, and 0.716 in external validation cohorts. For a prediction of the ISHLT grade (0R, 1R, 2/3R), AUROCs were 0.835, 0.633, and 0.905 in the cross-validated experiment and 0.764, 0.597, and 0.913; 0.631, 0.633, and 0.682; and 0.722, 0.601, and 0.805 in the validation cohorts, respectively. The predictions of the artificial intelligence model were interpretable by human experts and highlighted plausible morphological patterns. Conclusion We conclude that artificial intelligence can detect patterns of cellular transplant rejection in routine pathology, even when trained on small cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Paul Seraphin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty at Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Mark Luedde
- Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Christoph Roderburg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty at Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Marko van Treeck
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Pascal Scheider
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Roman D Buelow
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Peter Boor
- Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Sven H Loosen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty at Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Zdenek Provaznik
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Mendelsohn
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Filip Berisha
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Potsdamer Str. 58, 10785 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christina Magnussen
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Potsdamer Str. 58, 10785 Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Hospital Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Potsdamer Str. 58, 10785 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tom Luedde
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty at Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Christoph Brochhausen
- Institute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Samuel Sossalla
- Clinic for Cardiology and Pneumology, Georg-August University Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany
- German Center of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Potsdamer Str. 58, 10785 Berlin, Germany
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany
- Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Niehues JM, Quirke P, West NP, Grabsch HI, van Treeck M, Schirris Y, Veldhuizen GP, Hutchins GGA, Richman SD, Foersch S, Brinker TJ, Fukuoka J, Bychkov A, Uegami W, Truhn D, Brenner H, Brobeil A, Hoffmeister M, Kather JN. Generalizable biomarker prediction from cancer pathology slides with self-supervised deep learning: A retrospective multi-centric study. Cell Rep Med 2023; 4:100980. [PMID: 36958327 PMCID: PMC10140458 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.100980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) can predict microsatellite instability (MSI) from routine histopathology slides of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, it is unclear whether DL can also predict other biomarkers with high performance and whether DL predictions generalize to external patient populations. Here, we acquire CRC tissue samples from two large multi-centric studies. We systematically compare six different state-of-the-art DL architectures to predict biomarkers from pathology slides, including MSI and mutations in BRAF, KRAS, NRAS, and PIK3CA. Using a large external validation cohort to provide a realistic evaluation setting, we show that models using self-supervised, attention-based multiple-instance learning consistently outperform previous approaches while offering explainable visualizations of the indicative regions and morphologies. While the prediction of MSI and BRAF mutations reaches a clinical-grade performance, mutation prediction of PIK3CA, KRAS, and NRAS was clinically insufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Moritz Niehues
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Philip Quirke
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Heike I Grabsch
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Department of Pathology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Marko van Treeck
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Yoni Schirris
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; University of Amsterdam, 1012 WP Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gregory P Veldhuizen
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Gordon G A Hutchins
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Susan D Richman
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Sebastian Foersch
- Institute of Pathology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Titus J Brinker
- Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Junya Fukuoka
- Department of Pathology Informatics, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan; Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| | - Andrey Bychkov
- Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| | - Wataru Uegami
- Department of Pathology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa 296-8602, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daniel Truhn
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Brobeil
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Tissue Bank, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany; Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK; Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany; Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Saldanha OL, Loeffler CML, Niehues JM, van Treeck M, Seraphin TP, Hewitt KJ, Cifci D, Veldhuizen GP, Ramesh S, Pearson AT, Kather JN. Self-supervised attention-based deep learning for pan-cancer mutation prediction from histopathology. NPJ Precis Oncol 2023; 7:35. [PMID: 36977919 PMCID: PMC10050159 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-023-00365-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
The histopathological phenotype of tumors reflects the underlying genetic makeup. Deep learning can predict genetic alterations from pathology slides, but it is unclear how well these predictions generalize to external datasets. We performed a systematic study on Deep-Learning-based prediction of genetic alterations from histology, using two large datasets of multiple tumor types. We show that an analysis pipeline that integrates self-supervised feature extraction and attention-based multiple instance learning achieves a robust predictability and generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Lester Saldanha
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Chiara M L Loeffler
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Moritz Niehues
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marko van Treeck
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Tobias P Seraphin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Medical Faculty at Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Katherine Jane Hewitt
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Didem Cifci
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Gregory Patrick Veldhuizen
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Siddhi Ramesh
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alexander T Pearson
- Biological Sciences Division, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jakob Nikolas Kather
- Else Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
- Pathology & Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
- Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|