Advances for achieving a pathological complete response for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy

Signet ring cell component predicts the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. Long interim results of a single institution experience

There are limited studies evaluating the correlation between the presence of signet ring carcinoma and tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy in the rectum. Hereby, we aimed to report for the first time our experience from Upper Egypt through assessing the predictive role of signet ring cell component (SRCC) in the response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) and the impact of histological types (SRCC versus other types) on survival. This retrospective study analysed the medical records of 195 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated from 2011, to 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to histological types: SRCC group and non SRCC group. All patients received PCRT followed by surgery. SRCC group was associated with significant higher rate of complete clinical response (cCR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) (83.3% and 88.9% respectively) as compared to non SRCC group (9.0% and 10.2% respectively); P<0.0001. Fifteen cases (93.8%) who were diagnosed by magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) as cCR after PCRT, also achieved pCR, in contrast to 88.9% of cases without SRCC. Signet ring histology was the only predictor of pCR in multivariate analysis (P=0.027). There was no statistically significant difference between both histological groups as regard to survival. SRCC is an important predictor of pCR and assessing their response to PCRT using mrTRG and DWI showed high sensitivity for the detection of cCR, making them good candidates for watch-and-wait approach. Histological types did not significantly affect the survival outcome.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer with peritumoral abscesses and fistulas

PURPOSE

Rectal cancer patients who present with peritumoral abscesses and fistulas at the time of diagnosis may be denied chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as the safety is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety of preoperative CRT in this patient group.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective nested case-control study to compare outcomes between patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with peritumoral abscesses and fistulas (study group) and patients with T4 locally advanced rectal cancer with no evidence of abscesses and fistulas (control group). These groups were matched by treatment center and radiotherapy delivery method. All patients received 50-54 Gy of conventionally fractionated RT with concurrent chemotherapy. Primary endpoint was grade 3-5 toxicity (by National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE). Secondary endpoints included postoperative morbidity, pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) at 2 years.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were included in each group. Grade 3 toxicity was observed in 2 (6.1%) patients in the study group and 4 (12.1%) patients in the control group (p = 0.672). No patients developed grade 4-5 toxicity. Grade 3-4 Clavien-Dindo complications were observed in 5 (15.2%) patients in the study group and in 6 (18.2%) patients in the control group (p = 1.0). Pathologic CR was achieved in 3 (9.1%) and 5 (15.2%) patients, respectively (p = 0.708). Two-year OS was 78.3% vs. 81.8% (p = 0.944), 2‑year DFS was 62.8% vs. 69.7% (p = 0.693), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The presence of peritumoral abscesses and fistulas in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is not associated with increased toxicity or inferior clinical outcomes after preoperative CRT.

Organ Sparing for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer after Neoadjuvant Treatment Followed by Electrochemotherapy

Simple Summary

This is a Phase II randomized controlled trial conducted with the aim of investigating whether the use of Electrochemotherapy after neoadjuvant therapy (ECT) and before surgery in patients with major clinical response allows for a more conservative surgical approach in patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC) in comparison with the control group that will not receive ECT. The treatment response, in both the control arm and in the treatment arm, will be assessed using the histopathological tumor regression grade on tissue specimens after local excision.

Abstract

Background: Currently, 45–55% of rectal cancer patients receive preoperative chemo- radio-therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (LARC). The idea of our study is to use Electrochemotherapy (ECT) before surgery, in patients with major clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy, to allow for a more conservative surgical approach. Objective: To evaluate the increase of the complete response rate after neoadjuvant treatment in LARC and to spare organ function due to total mesorectal excision (TME). Patients and Methods: This is a Phase II randomized controlled trial enrolling 70 patients that will be developed in two stages. In the first step, 28 patients will be enrolled: 14 of these will receive ECT for four weeks after neo-adjuvant treatment and then local excision (treatment group) and 14 patients will receive neo-adjuvant treatment and then local excision (control group). If an increase of response rate is observed in the first stage, and/or feasibility/safety is demonstrated, the second stage of the trial will be performed, enrolling an additional 42 patients. The treatment response. in both the control arm and the treatment arm, will be assessed using the histopathological tumor regression grade on tissue specimens after local excision.

Effect of mistletoe extract on tumor response in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a cohort study

Background

Mistletoe extract, used as a complementary chemotherapeutic agent for cancer patients, has anticancer effects against various malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of mistletoe extract (Abnoba Viscum Q®) on tumor responses to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods

This study included patients with rectal cancer who underwent NCRT between January 2018 and July 2020. In the mistletoe group (MG), the patients were administered Abnoba Viscum Q® subcutaneously during chemoradiotherapy—maintained just before surgery. Patient demographics, clinical outcomes, histopathological outcomes, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay results were compared between the MG and non-mistletoe group (NMG). Two rectal cancer cell lines (SNU-503 and SNU-503R80Gy) were treated with Abnoba Viscum Q® to assess its mechanistic effects in vivo.

Results

Overall, the study included 52 patients (MG: n = 15; NMG: n = 37). Baseline demographics between the two groups were similar, except carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels and tumor location from the anal verge. There was no difference in the clinical stage between the two groups. A better tumor response in the MG, relative to the NMG, was observed with respect to tumor regression grade (TRG), T stage, and overall tumor–node–metastasis stage. Tumor response was significantly better in the MG than in the NMG in terms of pathologic complete response rate (53.3% vs. 21.6%, P = 0.044), good TRG response (66.7% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.024), T downstaging (86.7% vs. 43.2%, P = 0.004), and overall downstaging (86.7% vs. 56.8%, P = 0.040). The toxicities during NCRT were minimal in both groups. More apoptotic cells were noted in MG samples than in the NMG samples on TUNEL staining. Cleaved caspase-3 level following treatment with Abnoba Viscum Q® was higher in SNU-503R80Gy cells than in SNU-503 cells.

Conclusion

Patients treated with chemoradiation combined with mistletoe extract showed better outcomes than patients not treated with mistletoe extract in terms of tumor responses. This diversity in treatment may improve the efficacy of NCRT, leading to better oncologic outcomes. Prospective and randomized studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to confirm and extend these results.

Timing to achieve the best recurrence-free survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: experience in a large-volume center in China

AIM

To identify the optimal interval from the end of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to surgery (CRT-surgery interval) based on long-term oncological outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).

METHODS

Retrospective data analysis is reported from patients diagnosed with cT3 or T4 or TxN+ rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant treatment and curative-intent surgery between January 2010 and December 2018. With a priority focus on the effect of interval on oncological prognosis, we used recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint to determine the best cutoff point of time intervals. Then, the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients from longer and shorter interval groups were compared.

RESULTS

Data from 910 patients were analyzed, with 185 patients who achieved pCR (20.3%). The trend for increased rates of pCR for groups with a prolonged time interval was not observed (P = 0.808). X-tile determined a cutoff value of 10.5 weeks, and the population was divided into longer (> 10 weeks) and shorter (≤ 10 weeks) interval groups. The shorter interval was associated with a higher wound infection rate (4.7% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.031), but other postoperative complications did not differ between the groups. The 5-year RFS rate was significantly higher in patients in a longer group than those in the shorter weeks group (86.8% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.016). The 5-year OS rates between groups were similar (84.1% vs. 82.5%, P = 0.257). Local recurrence and lung metastases rates were higher in shorter interval group than those of longer group (local recurrence rate: 1.7% vs. 5.1%, P = 0.049; lung metastases rate: 5.7% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.047). Cox multivariate regression analysis confirmed the CRT-surgery interval (HR = 0.599, P = 0.045) to be an independent prognostic factor of RFS.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first, to the best of our knowledge, to define the optimal CRT-surgery interval based on RFS as the primary endpoint. Prolonging the waiting period to 10 weeks after the completion of CRT with additional chemotherapy cycles during the interval period might be a promising option to improve oncological survival in LARC patients treated with CRT and TME without compromising the surgical safety. Further randomized controlled trials investigating this are warranted to prove a clearly causality.

Predictive factors of complete pathological response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy have better long-term outcomes and could be spared from the perioperative and long-term morbidity of rectal resection. The aim of this study was to identify factors that predict the ability to achieve pCR at completion of conventional neoadjuvant therapy, therefore determining their suitability for non-surgical management.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on data obtained from a prospectively maintained colorectal neoplasia database. Patients treated for biopsy-proven primary rectal adenocarcinoma between January 1, 2010, and February 28, 2018, who received neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and had undergone surgical resection, were included in this study. Five-year oncologic outcome data was also obtained for 144 patients. Clinicopathological tumour characteristics and treatment regimens were analysed for correlation to clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Three hundred fifty-four patients met inclusion criteria for this study. We identified significant differences between patients achieving a pCR and those that did not for tumour type (adenocarcinoma vs. mucinous/signet ring; p = 0.008), pre-treatment serum CEA level (</≥ 2.5 μg/L; p = 0.003), neoadjuvant therapy type (short-course radiotherapy and long-course chemoradiotherapy; p = 0.008) and preoperative lymph node status (node-negative versus node-positive disease; p = 0.031). Additionally, this is the first report to our knowledge to identify a significant correlation with pCR and the degree of tumour fixity (mobile vs. fixed/tethered; p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis identified factors that significantly impact a patients' ability to achieve a pCR, which may prove useful for prospectively selecting patients suitable for non-surgical management of disease.