Manipulation of epithelial cell architecture by the bacterial pathogens Listeria and Shigella

A Ralstonia solanacearum type III effector alters the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton to promote bacterial virulence in plants

Cellular responses to biotic stress frequently involve signaling pathways that are conserved across eukaryotes. These pathways include the cytoskeleton, a proteinaceous network that senses external cues at the cell surface and signals to interior cellular components. During biotic stress, dynamic cytoskeletal rearrangements serve as a platform from which early immune-associated processes are organized and activated. Bacterial pathogens of plants and animals use proteins called type III effectors (T3Es) to interfere with host immune signaling, thereby promoting virulence. We previously found that RipU, a T3E from the soilborne phytobacterial pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum, co-localizes with the plant cytoskeleton. Here, we show that RipU from R. solanacearum K60 (RipUK60) associated with and altered the organization of both the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton. We found that pharmacological disruption of the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) cytoskeleton promoted R. solanacearum K60 colonization. Importantly, tomato plants inoculated with R. solanacearum K60 lacking RipUK60 (ΔripUK60) had reduced wilting symptoms and significantly reduced root colonization when compared to plants inoculated with wild-type R. solanacearum K60. Collectively, our data suggest that R. solanacearum K60 uses the type III effector RipUK60 to remodel cytoskeletal organization, thereby promoting pathogen virulence.

Why put yourself on a pedestal? The pathogenic role of the A/E pedestal

Certain Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains are attaching and effacing (A/E) lesion pathogens that primarily infect intestinal epithelial cells. They cause actin restructuring and polymerization within the host cell to create an actin-rich protrusion below the site of adherence, termed the pedestal. Although there is clarity on the pathways initiating pedestal formation, the underlying purpose(s) of the pedestal remains ambiguous. The conservation of pedestal-forming activity across multiple pathogens and redundancy in formation pathways indicate a pathogenic advantage. However, few decisive conclusions have been drawn, given that the results vary between model systems. Some research argues that the pedestal increases the colonization capability of the bacterium. These studies utilize A/E pathogens specifically deficient in pedestal formation to evaluate adhesion and intestinal colonization following infection. There have been many proposed mechanisms for the colonization benefit conferred by the pedestal. One suggested benefit is that the pedestal allows for direct cytosolic anchoring through incorporation of the established host cortical actin, causing a stable link between the pathogen and cell structure. The pedestal may confer enhanced motility, as enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are better able to migrate on the surface of host cells and infect neighboring cells in the presence of the pedestal. Additionally, some research suggests that the pedestal improves effector delivery. This review will investigate the purpose of pedestal formation using evidence from recent literature and will critically evaluate the methodology and model systems. Most importantly, we will contextualize the proposed functions to reconcile potential synergistic effects.

Direct targeting of host microtubule and actin cytoskeletons by a chlamydial pathogenic effector protein

To propagate within a eukaryotic cell, pathogenic bacteria hijack and remodulate host cell functions. The Gram-negative obligate intracellular Chlamydiaceae, which pose a serious threat to human and animal health, attach to host cells and inject effector proteins that reprogram host cell machineries. Members of the conserved chlamydial TarP family have been characterized as major early effectors that bind to and remodel the host actin cytoskeleton. We now describe a new function for the Chlamydia pneumoniae TarP member CPn0572, namely the ability to bind and alter the microtubule cytoskeleton. Thus, CPn0572 is unique in being the only prokaryotic protein that directly modulates both dynamic cytoskeletons of a eukaryotic cell. Ectopically expressed GFP-CPn0572 associates in a dose-independent manner with either cytoskeleton singly or simultaneously. In vitro, CPn0572 binds directly to microtubules. Expression of a microtubule-only CPn0572 variant resulted in the formation of an aberrantly thick, stabilized microtubule network. Intriguingly, during infection, secreted CPn0572 also colocalized with altered microtubules, suggesting that this protein also affects microtubule dynamics during infection. Our analysis points to a crosstalk between actin and microtubule cytoskeletons via chlamydial CPn0572.

The Host Cytoskeleton Functions as a Pleiotropic Scaffold: Orchestrating Regulation of the Viral Life Cycle and Mediating Host Antiviral Innate Immune Responses

Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites that critically depend on their hosts to initiate infection, complete replication cycles, and generate new progeny virions. To achieve these goals, viruses have evolved numerous elegant strategies to subvert and utilize different cellular machinery. The cytoskeleton is often one of the first components to be hijacked as it provides a convenient transport system for viruses to enter the cell and reach the site of replication. The cytoskeleton is an intricate network involved in controlling the cell shape, cargo transport, signal transduction, and cell division. The host cytoskeleton has complex interactions with viruses during the viral life cycle, as well as cell-to-cell transmission once the life cycle is completed. Additionally, the host also develops unique, cytoskeleton-mediated antiviral innate immune responses. These processes are also involved in pathological damages, although the comprehensive mechanisms remain elusive. In this review, we briefly summarize the functions of some prominent viruses in inducing or hijacking cytoskeletal structures and the related antiviral responses in order to provide new insights into the crosstalk between the cytoskeleton and viruses, which may contribute to the design of novel antivirals targeting the cytoskeleton.

Engineering tools for quantifying and manipulating forces in epithelia

The integrity of epithelia is maintained within dynamic mechanical environments during tissue development and homeostasis. Understanding how epithelial cells mechanosignal and respond collectively or individually is critical to providing insight into developmental and (patho)physiological processes. Yet, inferring or mimicking mechanical forces and downstream mechanical signaling as they occur in epithelia presents unique challenges. A variety of in vitro approaches have been used to dissect the role of mechanics in regulating epithelia organization. Here, we review approaches and results from research into how epithelial cells communicate through mechanical cues to maintain tissue organization and integrity. We summarize the unique advantages and disadvantages of various reduced-order model systems to guide researchers in choosing appropriate experimental systems. These model systems include 3D, 2D, and 1D micromanipulation methods, single cell studies, and noninvasive force inference and measurement techniques. We also highlight a number of in silico biophysical models that are informed by in vitro and in vivo observations. Together, a combination of theoretical and experimental models will aid future experiment designs and provide predictive insight into mechanically driven behaviors of epithelial dynamics.